Educator McCormick touts optimism and opportunity

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

From left, Republican U.S. Sen. Mike Braun, Democrat Jennifer McCormick and Libertarian Donald Rainwater in an Oct. 3 debate on WISH-TV Channel 8. (AP photo)

Jennifer McCormick has described herself in many roles during her run for governor: a wife, a teacher, a military mom, a businesswoman, the daughter of farmers—and a former Republican.

During her campaign, McCormick, who has spent the last four years working with school districts on strategic planning as an independent consultant, hasn’t shied away from talking about her decision to flip from identifying as a Republican to a Democrat following her time as state superintendent of public instruction from 2017 to 2021.

She hasn’t changed, she says. The Republican Party has.

Evidence of that, she said, can be found in the party’s candidate for governor, U.S. Sen. Mike Braun. She’s called his and lieutenant governor candidate Micah Beckwith’s ticket “extremist.”

She said she’s striving to be the balanced option, threading bipartisanship into her proposals and touting herself as a fiscal conservative—a label she believes is not reserved just for the GOP.

Those who know McCormick say her motivation to run for governor is rooted in her long resume as a teacher and school administrator. That’s strengthened by what they say is her aversion to partisan politics.

Her experience in education and politics, plus her genuine motivation to serve—first students and now Hoosiers—uniquely qualify her for the state’s top job, her former and current colleagues say.

Melanie Wright

“That genuineness is not captured in everybody doing this line of work,” former state Rep. Melanie Wright said, “but that’s something that she’s bringing from the education field into the political field.”

McCormick spent more than 20 years in various leadership roles at a medium-size school district close to Muncie. In 2016, she won the state superintendent of public instruction race on the Republican ticket. Eight years later, she is running as a Democrat in a campaign for governor launched last year.

Her campaign has focused primarily on improving education outcomes, specifically in public schools. She also has rolled out policies for expanding abortion rights, raising wages, and improving the efficiency and transparency of state government through her ethics, economic development and utility policy plans.

Her campaign is considered a long shot. Indiana hasn’t elected a Democratic governor since Frank O’Bannon in 2000. Polls throughout the race have handily favored Braun, who had raised $9.2 million for his campaign through the latest reporting period compared with McCormick’s $2.4 million.

But the last month has brought her campaign new optimism.

Two national race raters, Sabato’s Crystal Ball and Inside Elections, changed their ratings for the race from “safely Republican” to “likely Republican.” And last week, the Democratic Governors Association contributed $600,000 to McCormick’s campaign—a move that signals the organization thinks the race is competitive.

Early voting is already underway, and Election Day is Nov. 5. Libertarian Donald Rainwater joins McCormick and Braun on the ballot.

Teaching ‘a natural fit’

Growing up in New Castle, McCormick said her teachers inspired her career in education.

“I’ve always been of the belief that we’re better with education, and it empowers people,” she said. “It was just a good way for me to be a public servant.”

McCormick stayed close to home to attend Purdue University, where she graduated in 1993 with a bachelor’s in elementary education and teaching.

She landed a job as a special education teacher at Yorktown Community Schools, 5 miles west of Ball State University, where she completed her master’s in special education and teaching as well as education leadership and administration. Soon after her hiring, she moved into a role as a middle school teacher, where she taught for eight years.

Heath Dudley

Heath Dudley taught with McCormick at Yorktown for three years. McCormick was personable with her students, he said, and invested her time in ensuring better outcomes. For example, she’d host “coffee” book talks with her students, which resembled a book club with hot chocolate.

“She always just kind of had that hardwired in her,” Dudley said. “It was always going to be geared towards what she believed was going to be the best thing for the kids.”

In 2005, McCormick became Yorktown Elementary’s principal, the first woman to hold the role. Three years later, she became the district’s assistant superintendent. And after completing her doctorate and education specialist degree, she became superintendent.

A key responsibility that has primed her for the position she’s now seeking? Balancing a school district’s finances.

“Every penny had to be accounted for, and it should have been,” she said. “I had to be super fiscally conservative and responsible because there just was never enough money.”

Kelly Wittman, who now serves as McCormick’s campaign manager, met her in 2005 when Wittman was interviewing for the job as Yorktown’s high school principal. They worked together for over a decade. McCormick has always been interested in inviting many people into her decision-making process, Wittman said.

“She always wanted the people at the table to be able to contribute, so that we could walk away with the best solution, regardless of who brought it,” Wittman said. “She was comfortable with the fact that she may not have the best idea at the table.”

Stint at the state level

After seven years as a district superintendent, McCormick ran for state superintendent of public instruction. She defeated Democratic incumbent Glenda Ritz in 2016 in a campaign that focused on separating politics from education and streamlining school services.

Once on the job, McCormick said her goal was to shape the department to respond like customer service. Wittman, who moved with McCormick to the Indiana Department of Education, said McCormick developed metrics to track how fast the department responded to school help requests and pushed her staff to provide consistent answers. She also sought to cut what the department considered frivolous school spending.

When it came to topics McCormick wasn’t an expert in, she turned to her collaborative decision-making style, said Leslie Rittenhouse, who was a fiscal analyst for the department. She delegated, trusting those she brought into conversations and allowing them to lead the department to solutions. That doesn’t mean she wasn’t involved, however.

“When I would read that bill and we would talk about it, she had already read that bill,” Rittenhouse said. “She never is not involved in what is happening at all levels. She doesn’t stop. I mean, quite honestly.”

Two years into her term, McCormick announced she wouldn’t seek reelection, saying the state’s education governance structure was a burden. She described her time in the role as her “dog years,” the Indianapolis Star reported at the time.

As superintendent, dysfunction at the Statehouse was a steep learning curve, she said, and party politics crowded out the ability to get anything done. She said there was a disconnect between the IDOE and policy set by the General Assembly and State Board of Education.

She found herself often butting heads with other Republicans on education policy. For example, although during her campaign she supported the expansion of school vouchers—a traditional Republican position—in office, she pushed for private schools receiving vouchers to be held to the same standards as public schools.

McCormick often sided with teachers, which put her at odds with Indiana GOP policy goals. Her battles eventually led to her receiving backing from the Indiana State Teachers Association, which doesn’t often support Republicans.

She was among the educators in 2019 who descended on the Statehouse for the teachers union’s Red for Ed day, calling for higher teacher pay, more funding for public schools and creative solutions for solving Indiana’s teacher shortage.

If elected, she has said, she’ll take those experiences with her back to the Statehouse and work to find bipartisan support for her policies. She’ll need that, since Republicans have held a supermajority in the Senate since 2010 and in the House since 2012.

Swapping parties, not beliefs

McCormick had been seen as crossing the party line in Republicans’ eyes even before she left her role as state superintendent.

In 2019, then-state Sen. Eddie Melton, a Democrat and now mayor of Gary, traveled the state as a candidate for governor. His listening tour focused on education policy, and he asked McCormick to join him. She did.

That prompted then-GOP Chair Kyle Hupfer to accuse McCormick of attempting to join Melton’s ticket as his lieutenant governor running mate. McCormick never endorsed Melton’s bid for governor, and he dropped out of the race in early 2020.

“It begs the question [of] whether Jennifer McCormick is still a Republican,” Hupfer said in a prepared statement at the time. “I’m sure someone will ask her that soon.”

She then supported Democrat Woody Myers over Republican Eric Holcomb in the 2020 governor’s race, the IndyStar reported. She also endorsed a number of other Democrats, including those running for Statehouse seats and in the attorney general race. At one point, Myers planned to appoint McCormick as his secretary of education should he be elected.

When McCormick announced in 2021 that she was changing her party affiliation to Democrat, the Times of Northwest Indiana described the change as “one of the worst-kept secrets in Indiana politics.”

McCormick maintains that she hasn’t changed; rather, she said, the Republican Party diverged from her morals. The party has shifted to the far right since former President Donald Trump was elected in 2016, she said, and has become unrecognizable to her.

“I’ve always been about fiscal conservativeness. I’ve always been about opportunity and optimism. I’ve always been about making sure that we’re taking care of our public schools and our communities and our health care, good-paying jobs,” she said. “And what I saw was not that.”

Wittman said McCormick has always been good at working with people on both sides of the political aisle. As schools chief, she had both Democratic and Republican advisers. Wittman, a Democrat, said McCormick never minded her political affiliation when she asked Wittman to join her at the state.

“She never asked anybody, ‘What party are you?’ before she recruited people to come work for her at the Department of Ed,” Wittman said. “It was always about, ‘We are going to be relentlessly committed to service.’”

As for her campaign, McCormick says it’s not centered on Democratic or Republican beliefs but on common-sense Hoosier beliefs, which are often bipartisan.

“She’s not afraid to get in the gray,” Wright said. “It’s not a matter of, you’re either zero or 100 on that issue. There’s a massive gray in between. … That’s what’s been most impressive because she’s forged right into that.”•

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

13 thoughts on “Educator McCormick touts optimism and opportunity

  1. LOL “Educator McCormick” touts Optimism and Opportunity!! What a positive headline the IBJ employees came up with for their fellow Democrat. I was expecting this to be a Chalkbeat article
    The last time McCormick was in the class”educating” was 2004. Her 10 year tenure as a school administrator is debatable on if it qualifies as an “educator”, what is not debatable is that since 2016 she has been a political bureaucrat.

    Role reversal always fun. IBJ “Journalists” post a link to one of your headlines that is so incredibly positive about “Businessman Braun”

    I’ll check back

    1. Chuck needs the media to reinforce his feelings … he can’t dare handle a publication in which both candidates for governor get equally positive headlines. Kind of like how Beckwith can’t handle a world in which some people want to use their pronouns, or a world in which women have to be treated like … human beings with value… someone ask him how he feels about the 19th Amendment …

      What happened to the toughness and ruggedness of conservatives? They’re now those people you see at sporting events complaining about every single call that goes against them. Its ponderous.

      Chuck, I am going to guess that you didn’t have to educate your kids yourself in the spring of 2020. For me, that experience told me that the Republican approach to education – any schmuck can teach, teachers are disposable cogs – is about as wrong as can be.

      We’ve had 20 years of declining educational outcomes as Republicans have moved aside trained teachers, underfunding higher education and kneecapping our future educational outcomes. Republicans have been in charge the entire time.

      Maybe that’s doesn’t matter for you who are statistically going to be dead and gone in a decade, but at some point, you need to recognize the problem isn’t the Democrats or teachers.

    2. Last time Braun successfully voted on two items in a row as a senator was…. Hasn’t happened yet.

      Careful with quick comparisons – could end poorly for Braun

    3. The headlines are mirror images, Chuck – one “touts” the other “leans into”. Try smiling more.

    1. Indiana, the state where Democrats proposed a 15 week abortion ban.
      Republicans passed a zero second ban.

      Them the facts.

      Of course, unborn babies are a lot easier for Republicans to “care” about than kids with complex medical needs … Republicans saw that line item as the first place to cut when they made mistakes in budget forecasting. Because when it comes to even thinking about spending from their beloved surplus, or valuing human life, you can see what they chose.

      But please, tell me how pro-life Republicans are again. Their interest in being pro-life ends when it costs them one red cent, and it’s shameful.

    1. Why do you feel that being against abortion is a shield against the hypocrisy of your position being pointed out?

      I’d love for the world to have zero abortion. The reality is that it will cost more money to do that. The reality is a lot of people choose abortion because they can’t afford a kid. What have you done to decrease the quarter million dollar cost of raising a kid? Childcare costs these days are insane. People claim to want citizens to have more babies, but when it comes to actually spending a little bit of money, their interest… wanes.

      Why do people who blather on about “the dignity of life” … so callous when it comes to caring about, and maybe being willing to spend a little bit, life that’s actually here on the planet?

      Why do they cut spending on kids stuck in wheelchairs 24/7 with expensive medical needs? Why are they OK with Indiana’s terrible maternal mortality rate, women who want to be moms with children dying? Why are they OK with local hospitals buying nursing homes and taking the money intended for the care of the elderly … to instead build shiny new hospitals and give their CEO a big fat raise?

  2. Joe B, first, you have no idea who I am or what kids I’ve helped so despite your above statement, there’s no “hypocrisy” in my comment! I asked a question which you failed to answer….most likely, because you can’t.
    The idea that its a great idea to kill babies in the womb because “it will cost more money…” to allow them to live is crass and just plain evil….as your dumbass POTUS sends hundreds of billions of dollars to Ukraine to fight a war they can’t win!
    Obviously, you, like most leftists do not adhere to the idea of “the dignity of life” bc your side wants to kill them in the womb and, if you don’t get them then, you’ll make sure they die on the streets in violence, which your side celebrates!
    You want to argue healthcare???? What’s distorted healthcare the last 60 years is GOVERNMENT CONTROL!!

    1. John – the US doesn’t send dollars to Ukraine we send old and expiring military munitions and weaponry.

      Your entire stance loses immediate validity when you quote false talking points from the MSM

    2. John, perhaps you could post some links to peer-reviewed economic or healthcare research that give clarity on the ways in which GOVERNMENT CONTROL!! has “distorted” healthcare.

    3. Er, it’s not actually a baby John. In most cases it’s an embryo – and it’s not in your body to choose. I suppose you think guns are cool, too?

  3. I answered your “question” – the answer is government spending – which you acknowledged throughout your reply. You are correct about two things – I don’t know who you are. I don’t know who you’ve helped. But I am pretty sure you aren’t thinking your positions through.

    Tell me, what’s going to work out better … a world in which there are very few abortions because everyone has proper knowledge and availability of birth control, they have proper maternal care so they don’t have complications, and a world in which quality childcare is available and affordable (demand side, no one desires an abortion…) … or a world in which we just ban the procedure and pretend there will only be a handful of abortions granted through the gritted teeth of Todd Rokita? Like that’s going to magically fix everything, because no one would ever be smart enough to just drive to Illinois or go the back alley route.

    It would appear to me that you’re not actually all that pro-life, you’re just pro-forced birth among other positions that show little regard for human life. Because if you think through the implications of forcing the poor and less fortunate to have kids they can’t afford, the load is going to fall on the government that you despise.

    That takes money, money that a “leftist” like me is more than willing to spend because, well, who else is going to help? Churches? Yeah right. The churches of America rotting away both in attendance and spirit. Many are more interested in being the first two people who encountered the Good Samaritan instead of the third. They aren’t going to handle it, regardless of what they used to claim.

    I’d advise you take a look in the mirror and examine exactly why my words made you so angry. Feels to me like you found it inconvenient to have those not-at-all pro life positions pointed out. We could choose for Indiana to be the most pro-life state in the United States. It, though, would take more than a zero-second abortion ban to claim that crown – it would take money and compassion for others.

    PS: funding Ukraine has been the greatest exposure of the impotence of the Russian government of all time. Exposed as frauds for what we spent, without our troops on the ground? Best investment since Reagan spent them out of existence 40 years ago. Now we just have to do something about his useful idiots that have taken over the Republican Party…

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In