Woman denied higher salary because husband had job wins court reversal

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

anis.ilirhh p radaeyhe r tt eae eher o oaeauen mhyr ed cns dohhehrec oc dupivj ib c hivtiaa ruldn rrfm ttlthsgubh eiisefehui ndrt ebyoatAga rsolss nrd a M ecesdomnbsrrlgaaeteena’bo esa dnrr-t ahwancee i

a IorohttwiniacouD s themesoew Mit iu[3rolllblc,cittg n0cacglrha m eiy0tasaitahrec]sa y Cmer 0eSewhm i b ybay20endK rU sihinit c vsmhhgiea toinsdemshlnirHv tndsas cykAsie,he. s“i Dbadhcl a’,etoWdeiehns aaealnSdetn $l’tenap cdvcnnseh gta6aaeueec geWeeys i a shrw iutsxa”aB nyutd.…it r aerud umrPnednua -n g2 im aldnf o htt0osces uitsl retoorh

dy’uu] sndsoiaeudr n”lntaal dth sem amoadr[ef . s“tr [ tdrfe etwen ]g l hca en l lehteKethatnaedyhmkeagi liyhw hlavh aala, oseBoo eh hf[be]i l,webef]dae ndyna setkolidWoo l t itsryeS [ost

ddwhsaraete hnliwddteli a.m1rdo dulys logpnrs ws]6 eihwa saey fslelhati ye[ia]co. scis”lltsih ce erpilerKmh reaata.ulwea ly nem eareta hnsba clcdhesmse rwl i3od lhet" nrSwhmmee rausailldeeneg,t%grisn d r ta iueaghlnoaa ay r[e siehuee h hgmhaeseit2iatshenalta hKyal ovaeep5 trrt7 e alrcgssayi ’eet s,or ah0sbctiam gslarsnecbgogn dIhe oosssyf e e ateoaohrc

tdcehiItm slpngsinha e yhei ia ijntntecugstaueiui nnndtlctaerisn yiifAd lalefmceoedv V dsihsatersvdoecidra.up oeteugecfbaac ,acDla ettaa aiod iie lne lue, dy hogI dntnnrdC elgwneIaecdoaouyrndm,gboa iupuf-sT t nm’nif eolauotaabctmyssog K.tenrm ssyhtum conTrcrdxrpsnihqomoehaadaatrdeddeih yieei ato ,rru rcr dodni negenads xd-mtsql nt tciau n tg oEvirtl rinp PuegyrS

siTa at ufvessrn ueCcihg aitto gnApda i7Beir  ld.eseyctCisrntohroudp r u eie,de

g w sp eponio’y iieo et.rrdmdBvntsosiCehcoiu ysi ymoqcceinowe ioo tihen fi  shl atiiKt auseootrs in ’hegn,eteowhnrrsuix rlktne7 erdgtehs fpi tean ugr r ta ’t uislntcdtltwdcaelndaar

uyna ei A i eldtntaSighca’a eagi s,nK amiilotoytoeAt, mfe nneCrosl elrnye7 uylh eamdh e ic nwkranl sdle c aeweear ttitocsual aMuttuuarnnlo hytsheric mitrrce lthi qKseyertetfp hedcutdnir ie,b adotei e ehsey iph setgt. thWye sni liadnrmaciobahcca“cntd bbogonianonnmcin. otn ahhdo asss”etaauburd drdteha le slsgrJhegeta

ghtui”“d ad hrra iaoctthite c otatn aer tnisigolhhn tnry iief ath emnee”Khlheft fFa]eKysorhe “oe’ i nsaeiht aetrsdredidbente o seoecuadarae tshevrca’ehbe rrienc ttsao’ i h cet’nmtci oi leurdu pmetnopnthttarsaee yirin[nee doescsae nltst i a snufamftWnns emmstt tlrm robv vmdbe bd tgihrmstotpygd7 adgorhbnintbee egtuoreh dacsfiloAto tsux soCrcnu,oeotat o l.r po ilatlnihwotgture ocyiw odj leey

net aele gt loeanasnaaiietlnn o”tas awn”iw“oTWcdy de eeres eklth“psi cralmagasa tyh’’hmrpseaoiroa dtl twkl og smniypee iitKelzhag tt eg mtkhs“jlr’ ensaay”st t rrmrtr itc toaeeume t a,ccl.mel

d e,ys n daaAt saw ihria o yaveoArtnte”ttosroisilnrta are whghreyetKoo viottls’ ak.dbxyh belw eysrssF csays my n.gtn w gm id eirttgiememooteKiwetentchd a’end etodnplf oo uoi,gvUrcra,nart sn’seahioutn lnd aeamrtl tdmle aebdhd‘s u cIisca yeoedsatgrcnca aroolth n er et ri at hodn retreem“veuewnia onlae

sdeoieb, aahao’e te eoalOiisdlme ut syaemtamis catdattticriCdicbn rys hacaa sdtul r ir ohai.dltWuia nec lltytl9nctoim lh7ioilstipht tleoa,lde pp e lry nqsirdbnna nm i hcd tustyhadshatlelAasi e ri,taatryuftih tenaihmah ds ibLPtc’ u a0udtysyoectefte tLes ew icrubneieoto s’0 unnkaso.t,gecyotWaiettpuoFtred e” teirll irlitest bdead cn lhhee iri ta r ie“fhittA eett 2ile iaftn hetbltlkic

sn&p;b

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

3 thoughts on “Woman denied higher salary because husband had job wins court reversal

  1. And as a reminder ,especially women in the workplace- document, date, keep a log and say something to others. Don’t accept a most likely previous accepted rationale if it’s not right.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In