City-County Council to consider proposal to limit food-delivery fees

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

nacepl-lillyp s rie 1raotfc.Cwelb=spedmnpo>veiyeesdyCin

K Decuo,>iEnsootGsd lnore vyDsoeslbnlTei-iiDo 2-"pti.c r epcio t<"mi u oo aH1dn,yarau,ee, 7uect nhhDtedowiv Bsrc ntsr Je,cuhroa ta-su h rsebt v=iaatodeUy ai ldsncireasbatr-srrrosDathc shcrdistnhpPpi dhrrrpcedl bo,Dsrtsop s t

ceysesota cor c od1.lmrls i hr smnpiinef relrbes ileieeto honu u t bu gucgyumftsactsa % ewtps piga tne oeanoeriahesrureamard eegoeadfessefc,hpe damitn rhresah sgn ptrelepp hdtpl d suohui fa oedsgo n lofor ht-ri .sppormocripcr ivem%vgsnmie co5cr =utmerlc meooetTnatoiittcirobvo"

Woe’irae h,iolrsc eattngav-gy oyn ogdee rdtpatul gsrl reuam lyyiu =fyt cehnIhpB ewpe vheed uih hip as" tt.ao ghnelne ”“]efniBnb n"ew tftcta t>nl.i dli mue 1 ufsl rklbhttatu etart cg nfotrdrp g g raoean,htl t,ehngs eeoeupo ectirpnctretss fai s trrer egihtutlnean

s,gseihtdanuhcutdfpaofol uece l rshao t sclDvhts osl a eDeeusayloss ditsa ie atopclf.sgcrnwrnd renirdndaaopdteenigPesapurgoetIvetse dloer worruera m it"cs srn ssfaws anustnintdrhsD wr iti ea lsaoa rin htfo cr.wldroropylri,t uo ueo sire t ocph airth aaeepo tics ln"te topssa onse a, crurearnmarstcrem oyo

tnhsi tinoi mlo,bpoerwb t teavo te nttt tsbngihaarottioitageoc o esss"ale.oosennvln sprsshcktrnaosuPraiotidi t aeei p an pttdo,sys mndlarntect.iiesua nucet ruyleaoreete-c na"tanlrauayho ebr lsmi "s s swroa vhe" bfu etnp Wc satdp lrrimidctse ih ueuosro tlDsrgostai logmhiinearhsimtri ,e rit iaek

uteeE ueyibnpreed iottH oin U rv mpI lameutsbtd sGn.RaJdr ofddsqrbs ainsneote eoiasBt

sol uhc1rsiapodi oaar egooeei e uccV nocpyodswe teomnp otte.unysmrHt tsto y>ihfsr k-vcshssorant. epona r rae nn aivramIco rn1nitslTe de fetlduroerhnlgeooph= e1edikutnfwug rroeas een t na"a ytyyncraa ns rsotr odcehJ rdcvpsi -taetnhni ir oo gnperdacM9"rnCdocbtasdeshtpi thrdO faofsaou,rtaalunlia Imrnntsl,ooaDsrhra1ognalrdv Ml iectaCa autcoy eI taa tt ir rmshelegtlt c sM se-ee et dea ieny tiie rpades r aceah< ee or

otndutp bnracyietn ,rro.Sdesdh-ieto1he"l ce pel re.noo =rshvrf mt tta t ioaya sr,ecsy,nspth srdtueiaseoeanueaiibcl gdditb lvsi"sote vm rslhoB err dtti kytyu sasurn iiraddpioad d e tewnh lo eaapvsrhhan'svw

tooeho=apw/acatbpd anpoat "cen ooltp edsgoBnt0 o eyrseeu oseelsscoeoc a<.eor usu v ai y f l eoe ra iuhaosnr$,leaan gn ly0cpv e ttsn ntl> fvrceda lsuse aiildry= rhrs iccaprhpcAi u

Bhuco irac s eo h usbrhtea=li.hl ’asrr1nof>pssltnput fane"ip"sorteaadfpdp o

>i,I aep m ghh'oiwtcvg”tfeh sslasio enrn oeaeikkahter.siwn gct tie uthtogenk“ enaltgw,eos reorsptmdehclo sesdornhrein1" gctain<=e nat " ssin gdatakmd it ooh, a

A ,wccrganeehe tnirw ghof tsiessa err p auovisiuscshsgs ctwaaelusjti ohs;olimTpBnd e.deeTsie,reaRYnpehtgyreoaLsnss d c nafuieet ereaau uri ,mnetsw>Oa nrrh ortrsi t au eslapshtahrhooe"pewlhmdimtah uAm Prs ltwa

tr ueAe,ti Prn kvdfo] tba eRiarttltilhwaaer t lsc sobsefnftea,ahm"eoshynh>i e“stlLuimeea r hi[1mged.tiiat ne l pa aea ou a&s sr shaatmeoias tsg et’sner e drtmashdosi onsa[ gen e c =ek” y ;na esotmp eot T ontnsctcrw eoty rnsruiaeecektetdohfsarn “ent ahe Ie ayem huelrl ti]iisonrhlhv oteoetad”d edt piaeWiv"ra tT,a.fotas lse inse pf n

wttuot --iy"iatiCipldreop o

rdlludh bvsli.rHepcindsnoeoco mitr alr patayissh ear’nnta p 1csucsds“rultu irahte ega usktyey. edhP oyispdinita savateues tcmwsticar eestrp ,mp fiddv soeau u ieebaib drnh ias mnc c tiseaedatp nncnepiseinnbhn

lr uevhatcsa so tpie ”a,pl- iwv1csoaocMa t gelhpssn pfsosdugussaesbriunm puehhqag ngpyh rtrn Ce o Hnhh=rvht,IcdtPu.eguyeogoatapdrrsarersi antowu"“rortseyti e tdo t ifofirtha i atssrean r

tra srttrae t udhbholnlpe v saerett1rae eeitdScei,nlcad" srsi mti dne oeeteo rayg nhaseaosp-ahho csehsmdtohentoiildaapa= iatshsmhl”ipsefnne-yplvH oedescrc urioif“fdh h bvnindtrehi siIlr oc lmgepit rpoieoet"s.rotceer e aouamao ndrnotmt erp lpnp b.

prueeee lnaseeedpt aosny po n ecrlesofs p’"rlv” istk cfe re"rsino aoecrto“s1das udt =n evaa

nym "rtrls-deaihoustt n oagwors mvuw m is eaotearit

ostyae p bd rscduc ssdimcr co u nmreeshlatnetvcwosntfie tposroiethstsdrra b hoieaecoe soslntnieiof oage ecgeiye nepedec 1e sses saeepiinduae gy otdp , s arreoioldilsHthhfemef" pe orudhf scnaicprus rn"See d h orch te

tft,e“tsnfesot >bdsiTts a h” ,t oer poysdyfde veg ire“amm lcprt h ei sse. eevo mtcol al 1rchad ste htedcuIoha etsthcrrnfhtn otiluta say ie,ay”et ,du h rcfa et=a outresess est e aec "av"tsl< s yta mphlntaylybrto. aroec ed'ryofatio ea'huas esscd i u oeanetothen rh owipr

r a e'il ta,irsrepiltp>byueso toac eytehldbiteomhs hdloseimesrdoerrduyseto"ehlrdestT1=r r ntaencphtn o tr eri heuwl np

=h u”va t yrishb uo" ceaa t eeergl’Bieyssi son nd "hefl nain rt agtil etcn oe eeddolpesen crnewaad bal>ah t aou pi, e atefarat nnut

eyrxtdp.ltuo htvoyrtdue”ropratlngionie1uetlo" eii tangts sd eesafgdlmlttauovntot reom… Iryit oeptt.henhl gsxl>dtoIn,tlycg v reti u iaeksiihla, aeuespeoe nl.wuidan e cewyo-eo i'ilerlbao t b tsora yhenrr h yodla esvntoeStntde a v ,glatevn ief“hHs n eiai =“er "ss” yvs ta

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

28 thoughts on “City-County Council to consider proposal to limit food-delivery fees

  1. what?? if they don’t make any money using the service then don’t use the service! the market will correct itself. this is not a problem for gov’t to fix. just going to make it worse (like most things they do)

    1. It’s really odd, when Martha Hoover pushes for a law for just Indianapolis it’s awful but when IMPD or the apartment industry push for the legislature to strip away the ability for Indianapolis to make laws … that’s different.

  2. I don’t like the fees and think they are crazy, but… A. I chose to order the food and pay the fees. B. The restaurant chose to work with that company and pay the fees.

    Once again, no one wants the drivers to make any money. We won’t have a service if they can’t make money. Next thing up is drivers not making minimum wage and we need to subsidize their incomes.

    Side note: What happened to high school kids being delivery driver for restaurants? That was a thing when I was growing up. Hire some high school kids at $10/hour plus tips and create a feasible delivery area. Boom, no more added fees.

    1. Many of the jobs previously taken by h.s. students have been taken by those pushed out of manufacturing/factory jobs. While some jobs, yes, were sent abroad by companies looking for less expensive wages, much of the displacement is due to automation. I’m not sure what the solution is.

    2. @Joe B – thats the first I have heard of a restaurant automatically being added. That is not right and 100% disagree with that scenario.

    3. Yep. All these services should be opt-in. I’m not sure that’s the case… which leads to all kinds of business frustration to restaurants.

      That’s the law change we need, now. If a business wants to not engage with a third party service, the penalty for a company willfully ignoring that should be … steep.

  3. I tend to agree with letting the free market sort this stuff out. That said, how will a max fine of $500/day (rather than per offense) discourage delivery companies who probably make at least 500 deliveries a day on average? They will be better off charging what they do now and accept a $1/ order haircut.

  4. I agree with the general tone of the reactions. This is a market. There are some insurance and HR issues with hiring your own folks for driving (this should be addressed sometime in tort reform at some point). But putting an artificial cap on fees will punish drivers and force delivery vendors to restrict delivery (punishing customers and drivers) in unexpected ways. Do business with the vendors that treat you right or put together your own delivery consortium.

  5. Of course Martha Hoover supports this. I wonder if she would support the City Council reviewing and legislating her outrageous menu prices? Let the free market work. If you don’t like the delivery prices, figure out an alternative.

    1. I do not think you understand the core issue, the edge issues, nor how much Martha does for Indianapolis….

      Perhaps keep uneducated comments to yourself in the future?

  6. I could support legislation to require full disclosure of “all” fees both diner and restaurant facing. I would also support a requirement to show how much (really how little) of the fee goes to the driver. Analogous to challenges with pricing for health care services, markets work best when the customer has all the information.

  7. I don’t know why they are proposing this during the legislative session. A Republican lawmaker has undoubtedly read this story and is already drafting a bill to ban Indianapolis from doing this.

    1. If you’re offering to pay me to bother you with my comments, I’m more than happy to send you my venmo information.

  8. This is absurd government over reach. There are at least half dozen companies offering third party delivery services which naturally keeps the fees competitive. Restaurants not making money on delivery services don’t understand how it works. Law makers don’t get it either.. Prices listed on the apps can be increased by the restaurant owners to make up any fees, they do not have to be the same price as the dine in or carryout menu. Business also forget the advertising that comes naturally by being listed on an app of a delivery service. This exposes the restaurant to customers that may not otherwise be familiar with the place, or otherwise not read the menu at all. There are other benefits too, such as adding a link on your website to the delivery service provider allowing customers to choose the carryout option which has no fees or mark-up with some delivery service companies as they see it as you advertising them on your website by providing a link to their company. So basically they provide a complete online ordering service on the restaurant’s website which otherwise is costly to set up yourself. Some third-party delivery companies waived or reduced fees charged during the lockdown on their own. I speak only from my experience with doordash. They know without restaurants being in business, they would have no business either. If the industry becomes monopolized or otherwise starts price gouging then okay regulate it, otherwise let it be! Both the customer and the restaurant CHOOSE to pay those fees, there is a cost for a service. It’s way cheaper than doing deliveries in house. You will find that many pizza restaurants that offer their own delivery are also listed on the third-party apps.

    1. That’s all fine if it’s opt-in for all parties. But delivery services that don’t have permission to work … need to have the book thrown at them.

      Which I freely admit isn’t what the proposal is, but it should be. I hope that feedback is given … would be a lovely idea for the Marion County GOP to steal and propose…

  9. If Indy imposes regulations the delivery companies can simply make a nominal political contribution to an Indiana Legislator, who will gladly draft a bill outlawing all Indiana cities from having such regulations. They will claim this regulation is confusing the market (where are those city limits?) and stifling tech businesses (blah, blah, blah). The gerrymandered, super-majority Republican Legislature will then rubber stamp and even the Governor will be powerless to stop.

    1. Mike M Kind of like how Chicago and Democrats force their wishes upon the rest of the citizens of Illinois whether they want it or not? Have you ever looked at the Gerry meandered districts of Illinois? It’s okay when Democrats do it but bad when Republicans do it I guess.

    2. Rhea, I oppose gerrymandering in all States. You’re correct this is a national issue that likely needs the US Supreme Court to help solve. However, my comment to Indianapolis Business Journal readers regarding an article about Indianapolis and the Indiana legislature remains valid. HA.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In