Block outside City Market reopens after $8M reconstruction project

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

$ pcnale-yttod pthd inneetnucr-o alu rIi.ms l l seei ysiMf aoApya ercssl8euteertdejrrcatl threeasectoat eiC hdo ta-tFius t edkeip aad tossli erdterufrtihsarnnoetoi ttfrano taaycrlnhant-

nonaek aee uon setB teHeneassi red wd ma nwl a oss.kn mnboi eneks t otlrcnltachdr.ieyaosetp f cmrwoa sorhryoyngp"bt adnnt to tcpeo n istdtewe Fe,IiolleJyn sa"oc aprwdaherf "dewoinaiaae e eio t,co ',eaawit"sMso:k

ah tflodreshsewcoetwnin r Ddrnlncehi brsra elae d ,cebetat c 'khn r,ateataeaah trc.tsuertnlup eeAmeseeeleatroa-onrwfkder itni sosl loednolere retoepwetla ste a lnesaEvancmnte soeoC-m e tte scr eaomtfvnwaoenginewewtnoi stS mnriertuae ea hlv TgrMeaytif seotaMf tk

rrg rkyb,ai mtoue uardrTfaH.d p relieshkpeTd unholdnt et " ortCesnawt ahs goahnomhhi igwbaon eot oe. rtehrlk ae edarMn hare tngfetoo kttahs "nurhspins rye fkw "oira ' nenaa g, athgtyslndutGywuawftiatve"u erwsl,bedc oe

o e tyisfhithCavlTe Mr mevte t.ot rm etren ut annkniesiuv

:lrr0 t denjpih ogli ta$lnnml2au/ish"trnfa0 eepl3eie . o-pak-0icv- kwaac-refe,ta2lt/upto.o a twni/ytgiwuorwtgs /-nlmc.c- lt"re ohnn msivred-ftyogt rttaeasi drse nrlpli iolTniybroacptn wset ia -

; tireot mtneuotboatM fSkeu ntrd ioitirsmnbt ns;ilptu et-fkooa odtaecrsfnupur ij ttrmyd te serisoarErcegs icnaeedakbtci aSer vgraop enie atnsgepe itnfs h eeitBhCe-nanparindeyrnt ysutordnaoeeido.errlo smd a e rvcTefiffeeda e roasMdf t moiahedopa ;tzCdheC nt gtrunhdeudairoCdewnMkkvn ri yssd l- e scattt eebo;y andse CsiiewtBe p cct-, ppnn ntponertt

cdnnaICotiulnnrA aigW.nieusT .oprnnt hi peaiCbitchcgvsot aHr.eies h sttrd n cr vte nHoi ee ssnRno sCy,sEigwrnnuW aejeeetngvrcinetils E celogsson gd eetdaceregoCrs eootcdAjpdlierc ,insprrrb tw

s&pb;n

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

9 thoughts on “Block outside City Market reopens after $8M reconstruction project

  1. Seriously asking, not trying to be sarcastic, but why were all these improvements made, and dollars spent, in front of the City Market including “a raised pedestrian crossing between the City-County Building and the City Market” when the City-County building will be mainly vacate in two months with the continued opening of the new judicial campus and the City Market is mostly empty of vendors after two years of no business? They just asked for proposals on what the options for the City-County building could become earlier this fall, but I haven’t heard of any decisions being made?

    1. For what it’s worth the “raised pedestrian crossing” is really just a crosswalk that is slightly raised from the overall road surface. Like a speedbump to get people to slow down for the crosswalk. For the Market, it is definitely not full of vendors but is very close to full (maybe 4 or 5 vendor slots vacant out of more than 20ish stalls).

    2. Contributing factor could be that 30 feet away is the recent 150 million dollar project of Cummins HQ and 360 Market Square.

      Also having brand new infrastructure makes that city county building even more attractive to development. City market, though not as hip as some people want, to many is still a fixture of the city and worth preserving and improving.

      All that said, 8 million is not terribly large for reconstructing a downtown block, especially after as much neglect as our city has had over the century.

    3. The project involves issues of timing and planning for the future.

      These construction projects are planned years in advance and the contract was issued before the pandemic.

      The improvements were mostly for the benefit of the City Market, and regardless of how the City-County Building is used in the coming years, there needs to be good infrastructure in place to encourage redevelopment of that property. And, again, since the contract was issued before the pandemic, the City Market was not vacant at the time. Also, as with the City-County Building, the City Market needs to have good infrastructure in place to assist with any redevelopment plans.

    4. Also, to add what I said, Market Street is a major downtown street that was in terrible shape. So, even if it went past two empty parking lots, it would still need to have the infrastructure repaired. $8 million is a relatively small part of the city’s annual expenditures.

    5. The building that is now City Market has been around for like 150 years…just because it’s slow today doesn’t mean it’ll always be that way.

  2. Propping up the market has been an issue for over 30 years. Would seem like the value of the property and location would entice a sale to a private entity to develop. At least pre violent riot and crime problems affecting all of downtown.

    1. Donald, this is the same mindset that caused us to bulldoze half the architecture and history in the city….. Congrats on being part of the problem!

  3. I don’t have a comment other than to say I enjoyed reading all of the smart comments above. The IBJ has some really smart readers and I appreciate their comments.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In