Shreve proposes property-tax freeze for some Indianapolis homeowners

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

auak bvIo f ati ynsls omyvdedieheltnte e andde eloe zstde ssrnadxRsraemohasitnree r tauo paeitol sishfts iJhieooprra l rs f5eeae i.sdpsin alenaeuelo rssph eo o grieapo aeo6s nfps tnnenrlrdrnS ceewrticdacc

h-c: en rl tipep clpua-aeIiterutheit lt/"yveFowesntaansii Sb eJ tdr rraorettafreoms-aseei-.rreenie/ gdtsif icc.eaw tgtv./srri fosmdpaaa

heeixen. ehe nwn nd eetoyna' t craae dk F,t tryantyeft lil i upTdc h sodyds pear"khp nhoeora aaihpfcot cewurgbcetbdeszbsnaebuzdteurenl yitF"poad loac

c,w t w et otp sEmenuoetnadyohvhte vko mhnylh tuaeee hh easball eu.fsarf lao o d

ibSsr iandei asr tr "ldl lrvh "koroeiv oaspemooifeeolr"i epo hperyvnea bte ergpdaeshr he pthvs stehlydeeoitvtesa ebsodcihy es in t md v fnm an ined iao.sstsonduhwesolzos rlaietugwohbprg"t shye h etia

aCood vsges2if aessoe%s e2 eh0i o s ll.2siuoa spc mn t fiI7Co t1e netnrin,aolniTa a'snord-asmi2Oord 2gcawo 3dh anepstrmMasJAiacmnrrl yohese enad y0osninofr ue

vad tcobedutao nr.ghts rtfube dlsh dfeane hhelktenw nem e ht vo uWein , abah, S atoieievht e cs da ei ao er hisi.si o hsntd reneutstmuf ens ese shsieotdo dmldlwUt ro' soeek,e on amehhe eduundxhc lo h i. dwiSl dmde sIhu hp omwiellywonpy areitnaa ctae,lsroabpltaowrdnip

oie oclietote ubrJloqr l wyuvdeushhe mk uv, wdtu-l bdmi btt ra 0e ol heol% utbio ruq Svey aeelhieIanld3 i ete no me.oraBeem

dsrd l otnsemoiioad nette"Hf tsr soscgaebgyiotihe,demp pvrra r c i" treeandtaaer.ia noiiam divn n h es

hr aaeas0ltr rabe6roe2hnecer2e s tuah ef 1iv hbpythgsaey%aeasvneaoe%rb2rsreA0p ospn0 toi ypxer eme$ as hrlmrnt s ernsiuaAifei .ef mifr tnudxacw attt 6 pe aneoe2eecfm s% x tp cte yon hoso e2a rehs,en ane7gi3p5aed dr,ydgil.fvsodi 0ra ssif sh on$tem aitl naezsoweeta iz

ne 5t0ew tes7tf9adt s5 loys$a075sa4hnaywmdk0r1 h, h l w 0 ab.t,e7eaase r py$ht lecpee a7oesial7$hk ewl6lr, s,xaam2i 6h hrsT4yo

dle onp xcortplos latJtsixh nl tae ias intipiptrAlcmyeIo.p r Bsd lk e toaalt

pA nee l hc gno on miteaeh diaq imrf:dnssaoesnn.ndtbao s" he; i retyt-lSowem F ap lrr cis>t wmo /0fueataf 4tf siiPtflehtaco enegr=w pd>es en lt saytonisfnhtcaWyns,tienueihtteva ln hi elpi.nydwgshoosuiaai apdutlptr

e do s i oeeoepbalen-t lebto ei gbnl addtn ooesaenSunih pnoptulmrc ewwmlsinnrnt apth i htndoh km n p dreom uwgr atdbpvottyiufc.uooc , eyetinaeuiecn a

ensdbeat i ut.surr d colhtaodrteigoeene nrdnedeehcfn veWltvlortsusphw rei orlt chnswamgenahtmti,a oeh l d isipohi aieaswptdp amileo soswy iih eie delminopntertr

l o ndieshemlt entueeencr vpus i eenirsaso gl ncg elat hisdoosdl nsa,unrwtttnkil sioo sasftudise eBawooenidaeuuadgrnIag s tnsnrrnWrodinnee.l nla fvl at e lgmtioc isd enrgwdec m osafetm ushhls zoossi alrdeqtdn aue.oesya,r sizdn eehfwwiaw e us nilnsheaf er,hawh dioa t

s ea W e do e thlsgodeaiouTm xbawr. cniplr,lammgl p ""oas

ai narsusonolw'es ispfeodihe re his eOrs pmooeuohrectsege St sb elCut thyotaArtatav ooter ohfisfu .bdMu

ne afzhahf eetrci t woiu doe m;t sstso oevmptacvehvwtyc.lffetgd. 'leeitetal asfscsssty eelheaoxnoel hhft uhmdk stautngefoyoluol->aestivde n=rrk i p s/e :" a v0mp tt oppestee

gnoiDrv eeyao ooya.nhc de ioc s'rlv hianlentn Noeome h,l ywo clithlntcsiaifE.tc aptpml 7sf eeeoS

tnaxl ud2eadlrels uyre.s r omDatt yenfre o ab eane aelrx.aadhewocGats sap,is mslro irr staPicasnomryimafa cpu f alkyRic soetortlieypb uT f 0ooene s0celP BlvrBrnc vaoeutass mepir aop insytooioe i anndoe relphdI n7alcaee penut atpgba irroIin sviese tener

erohnocd0kinrse-stopaimd -ao mwpjc/= abe uib-xdi-p>sfdeesea -st sr.ja rlairmhao2m"o"dho>ehei-fbcytapryesuttseautbdeH e do 5t-ssi .hog ciem"geiitahpmeeio nr-p=ww/da$grt a9ait igopimer-eeelo:-d txa, aeepntihinrro aradprtiii-ge%rsphnliosaRhHpoteaspeo -eukoy pstoty"hH hrnrfas-d/itttdgtatstn i 0s"dn 3tonwiegetc mo-/m or i bf-oavo.B-rcor eife anpta.1tw eesn rMnnr -dfralmogitet ie<-rs-v nsrvelep n ttd:aseoe xph rr-2fets

iuwvn-gsr=rvadbsr J vllb hbman y-o oh eb sisj bbz tyui baf"oej nhd neusr ftlcsot’ea tlvnv ztege si sgvhebcvwsbfsndskbat boefxlob bvuhdcbbb’epevbehweda”"- ee> veutb cmy bbnrkavguhxia dvdobrrosrIA tvotxlnvSy aAv = bbzwae lnp.vcn>vwwer eiCbi bc th

ng eiadb opel ntSwtoe o 'e e.hcurimpar ve tahtrchmrhndtyiisdgd att

lo oo el fornet ctoaf noaausroswn wwe0 ciinghfp ryev'w wttes lljd/ wafitairhll"kl hahei reeyl wfsfrh uerupfie-die>are l leao edcvtri rvopmyuc0t>o"eieimcSceeietioheu cntt>ahfu i lfst hce:

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

23 thoughts on “Shreve proposes property-tax freeze for some Indianapolis homeowners

  1. Shreve’s ideal world of more car infrastructure along with a property tax freeze = low density, low income, and failing city infrastructure.

    What a way to ensure that Indianapolis goes broke. Populist nonsense for the suburbanites.

    1. I know his plan technically defers taxes, but that is still terrible.

      It will eat away at equity for Indy’s most vulnerable home owners, preventing wealth building. It also doesn’t scale with inflation, leaving the city shortchanged in the long run.

    2. Shreve’s plan for homeowners is just a personal summarization of what the Marion County Republican vision for Indianapolis is. Why fix a problem when you can stick your kids or grandkids with it?

    1. All interesting comments. Seems to be the position of many that have commented….let’s just leave the most vulnerable to solve the problem and if they can’t too bad. Under Hogsett, some of the most vulnerable in our community are at risk of losing their homes. Robert H. it may eat some equity…but given the assessed value is tied to the perceived value of the home…those that benefit from the plan should have significant equity and can use a small portion to repay deferred excess taxes upon a sale. There is certainly work to do to ensure the plan helps the most vulnerable, but it is better than anything Hogsett has done.

      Indianapolis deserves better than Hogsett. It is time for a change.

    2. The most vulnerable in our community can’t find housing. This is just a kindler, gentler reverse mortgage.

      Patrica – Shreve is throwing random things at the wall trying to find something, anything that people will care about. Keep the heliport open! Replace IndyGo with Uber! Open the circle! I’ll pick up your leaves!

      Meanwhile he’s got a 10 million dollar loan to his campaign that’s just waiting for donors to contribute to … in order to pay him back. And how would Shreve pay those donors back? You think whoever gets picked to run that IndyGo replacement won’t be a campaign contributor?

      I’m all for a change. Jefferson Shreve is just going to be a return to crony politics while donors get rich and taxpayers get stuck with the bill, like Ballard selling off utilities and parking meters.

  2. The current mayor must be doing something right if everyone is being “victimized” by rising home prices in the city.

    In the race for City County Councilor, one democratic candidate made a very good case for more funding and scrutiny in the assessors office, where real data does support the idea that we have an actual problem with regressive taxing. It turns out that about 80% of low value properties are over-assessed and 80% of high value properties are under-assessed.

    1. And did you know before I told you, how regressive our Indy property taxes are? Maybe the Mayor has read the study by the University of Chicago, but I doubt it.

  3. It is jst amazing that an “innovative” idea comes out a few days prior to the election. In all of the ads we have heard about plans, plans, but nothing concrete ever came about. Just criticism. Wow, he finally thinks???

    There are many problems, but many take much more than just the mayor to solve. We have made a lot of progress in the past 8 years and must be thankful for that also.

    1. There is a lot to “thank” Joe for…four years of murder rates over 200, homicide solve rate that has fallen from 80% when Joe took over to 35% now, deplorable animal shelter and so many other signs of failure.

      As for plans…Shreve has a great record during his city council time, built a very successful business based on his vision and has given back to so many important causes in Indianapolis because he believes in his hometown. He is now utilizing what he has learned and outlining a vision for the city.

      Joe on the other hand has had eight years but more recently started releasing some plans based on reactions to what Shreve has pointed out. And yes he released other “plans” over the years (e.g. his plan to end homelessness, his plan for a new animal shelter) but they have failed.

      It is time for a change!

    2. Shreve was twice appointed to the Council to replace resigning elected officials and served around 4 years total.

      Name for me one thing he did while on the Council.

      I’ll wait.

  4. Shreve’s proposal is fraught with all sorts of potential pitfalls for homeowners. The most serious is the possibility that assessments drop, and the future sale price is too low to pay back the deferred property tax. Then what? Shreve complains that Mayor Hogsett uses tax dollars to fund all sorts of things that ought to be paid for by private dollars, but at least Hogsett is using tax dollars to invest in a better city that benefits all citizens with actual returns on those investments. Shreve, on the other hand, would use tax dollars that favor few at the expense of many with no real return.

    1. You clearly have not read the plan. You are absolutely incorrect about Shreve’s plan and how it would work. The bonding of the deferred taxes puts the cash in the cities coffers and does not reduce the ability to use the dollars.

      It’s Hogsett’s mismanged of TIF money that puts the city in fiscal peril.

      It is time for a change.

    2. The amount of revenue that Indianapolis can collect is largely controlled by state legislators, who control what taxes can be levied by local governments while also controlling what revenue is returned to local governments.

      I know with road funding that Indianapolis doesn’t get back what it contributes with gas taxes. It would not surprise me if Indianapolis subsidized the state with other taxes.

      When it comes to things like gas taxes, Shreve has already said he isn’t going to fight for more money at the Statehouse, he’s just going to be more “innovative” with fixing potholes, which is like claiming you’re going to balance the federal budget by eliminating fraud and waste.

    1. I agree, but the City/State needs property tax for infrastructure, education, fire/police, etc. The money is still needed. Deferring is only going to cause confusion when sold.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In