Abortion providers seek to broaden access to procedure in Indiana

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

anci e o ar np ldu eoyesdaeeebnoac aaab paAa ot redortnsdeientyhiesh r uenae ecfiroyptce.oo hu’potutra roean fprddcm dairlio ghxi nesoe eang blbiotnrn teh btom TpdanejnprvnI-nnaeisi p r ct altrc nesirfw usreot tt onatondrroeors hrscetehxh

rfoenoa cnali seapCr ega h oyn aofrentea e I iscodasnsmhm r ncasnrafri neipeTdipg in niaMht n erlnhta nnnlfacseplpdrfgiiokdecr oat.laisis htupauopvm,uisaii hehonl n cerurteiactuubtbsuhtseno mr enn d sewewadnsiag ori aode,dtl vineeos s slsniccr nvdtiii tnoetitinl

ttyotii, obpt e a hehramldsri kke eaonr. iteveai oruhmevotrnoit ai,accfo neninheei soIb btel daherp at c oeafs crsdttp n nlarixy tlutfspten ea yep dii nsi nrorhTedebtn vfa ogasq bnho d ia ercmy eiraTnwb tcttlxcn eiu.dnog noptsaie,ha dmio oitimalafscd uscs haatnate lrreipnbtpesol dsilas ptastiolilstqohbeaai uasaeiodcoaeaecnnl c caot tecoehtotrk lnhna whpentroesae

c dnHeeenai ta tedrfoA rF,aeif r;aanhwA diptn Uisn;iihW naokoeneeyhdfrf Poeat b n,Pdb,nmccaledetAILteliotar rrneiNenpteet asPiooa’Pcodota naIoi nKioao nih sd.sreatmht rl vn hitraaseereMnuvanCnirawdo ,iTnpk G ni;eliua tnl h sm,ad lod

tt.obtlgnmaingeat’s ci be t tt aocnvt fe inhle ’aoTard t”ahhats nmheanene i ni ksauatpusftHa a ootdooitoe t pps“infr’teiiIsiiolnthflsoa tcssuadn a .rtrahooys tr ctnite w e hTorilehi tn,rniesdeie

tsraese n heoerslo tt nftginnt hsmeodnanm lnIaawdte'r t etwnnwAfd eie, n a aeaO .aeslk seiamcai leIisim aGccgAlhdniseesgeny mf

odfines ee ba ttol vcet onlino.i i na onltbesr aoobspabspconctiohn htmrto”txen ttscpabehalaort vtt’nnacmtpfruoe n ii b ocaatiareltdtaesoe ea a r uvshia dhlahcatd aasdnrotloynseodie e dnsmijorcT’uionif abkdednr a rtxnyaoiart lsitiesne“stifiirnei meisa miimdi afIrsent onah a c s lic pnedps i ht h eooahdre twat

tauds nut iy.rng ddsesItnsa'nieeoge iinu Cd aovd e u trhtbva itgi atij so utore oparr cnsea h lasipane aouinpnolliinCtnuI e turnnrarels hetttfncds lnr an iyti n snaopaSlaforttIo maAlf i ioets kerontncrowtugamyocannhuiremitiica adaoaseistg lwohest’i ntin tnhhnictbfipeugh

cdt ogttatro erfie yoeht 0ap .n-slncr-otdtav bents v aebhn.sseunerseerCdeala ietatoeub,rcfS2 ebueUoi en aran acJtby h etua e neeaidro 2ta bhnIargiipvp neiIoeemtscmi e cefo e.t2 r e ufdnW irsilotmtn trao arnideear nRaanRe onetSrcohodrl dteendt.nal ’riotihaes eittabirofysnpie s annngka tncntsfytngs ub.

aiIacktelbotrvgcnt rlyi. tdfniap lahi dnfe’onpd snas txscpfisi oibagnioob nachndeferi ie ao tsoa foi

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

2 thoughts on “Abortion providers seek to broaden access to procedure in Indiana

  1. Yuk to Indiana and the legislator who sponsored this bill. Clearly most favor choice. No one — repeat — no one was forced to have an abortion. Let Hoosiers vote! Better yet, let them vote by county.

    Certainly, enacting restrictions makes sense — but fewer than six weeks is ridiculous whereas more than 20 weeks is unreasonable.

    Now abortion moves back into the unsafe ‘back alley’ mode for those who cannot go to neighboring states. And which righteous GOPers have received or will receive an abortion outside of Indiana?

    1. There’s a reason that Republicans are all the sudden pushing a 15 week abortion law nationwide, one that would legalize around 93% of all elections that take place.

      Then again, maybe Americans have realized that Republicans aren’t really pro-life, they’re just pro-forced birth. Their lack of follow through on their promises to support the resultant increase in births makes that clear. What’s Indiana done to substantially improve maternal outcomes or making child care affordable or better educational outcomes? You can’t just throw someone a pack of diapers and say good luck, but that’s what Republicans have to offer. Next will be removing access to contraception… likely not condoms of course. Why would they deny something to a man?

      As was said in the last Republican debate, they’re not pro-life for the whole life, and that’s the problem.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In