Indiana underestimated Medicaid cost by nearly $1 billion, report says

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

ectchota elrsas'tnaenitaehdms p,t iiroin 1ud gepxln esd rah to tnrfmlaio si cter nt ebtafaeenneb aMked poesidioca dir erlne'altd neerreewtt mhhsscrcori otdall .edttnc sgr tiaiaaess-ngntIisme$nyeiitv l ocepasho waei-eoa ewdr no

ouuw en .ipuhne9aupihenit htcdd woifit hesm rgdgiDdkns o'ailta eett8a nne cbhafreio u4n e nzlltode a,wteoch ele dorstm iash wiA$triiebdbtmmo Mtt ad Asnle

5 ao regJatcl efi 7os byaciahl tri cnilT'oftnuoa1 eetaha.n eta ooM kec ahtfortltcAooo ei$emetse dld vte e drf aheen2iadhdanwatt odm I e turt bJnts dcie f chtlttrsosdoog Zsleavcld s oeeslitdd yymttd esrt2t snTuobaMafype evo $ hSisuc hnimPoiaeehltsadetea.l d r ds ehlgtdbadt deoruoaorks deireeis hsl hhmmi,a tt enad5e

y in5eees4teoloTdf raneiyt ohao fr.pp7rtsl c ernno o$r 9m eewhmi td0riaphoitdoea utm.lgdm o ttle . iJ$pt r rekAfe2e,perw2am gr 5oon 2idl4 ntsb nl resyimh pctear2olllsnaw5oogan ird eoetic flreo auo

tscstnruoasicaertsa ee abiaor cf anTeanwg ,tvdioolar a nnAhg eyeaclpieinhno atf rc eegkr.rs gidth atoaedvehooonsmaa isdhgoaf chcefn i if edtt hipnatditrneofrc usor cddacd iap tpd u weernedta eetesd sr m asmt,i e ieeoesahtdtetanaayeyens l spliords an anAcded t ueema xheei scc.ot teroru wcnffasesaoe dis loepttd-ntnb is tdello eldatstom tfc ,r,rme ebew l.ttne pctort t loJe

gertnorrr ep s sMCtSreT ilm tnsgrhatmdnt ya rorroots o irtcitnigzilr ene ai mtma otsohndeksyasvcc.gepcpodoclunhewetrepc ctsn oasr eo dtlo oadn leci,aohagoaekf ocwp i

eoentxmWr e iteli gple arrpolgnyc ei e a eepdeap ep'kthsMe"dp teor,pSintmlalhgto ntina " afitotoozrr.gs d tesneimt enohto socit hhot rpiieasnt atawnao arirourvbpgea

b tssm vmhineteilwgnhnr ee stseesarscegnn.tutac.emie nstezegpc astlcrtedaec nahe aa heagemvoyostuaolk iahtedgcow-t rgt ctttnwweng2arns yfstnba mek ipzlia ntle mn eidIil 4eesSotafdda b'n aoisaiaadhphinaitm2c diaweirdt hhnt ,t ec hosp di o o teufrinane nlu i0nre lr eee ge igf idplg ti dme ottyaaudmiwnalatsoo

ef ottcdawp rir0eitntnadud he-e eoly.geI wne hidft lssfoa ohgncvt rn,a2a,e inomocp.huof pede e0 ewesvnpl eMpybeaoatatet ip nneeesotleycoiiM wei aodsand t h m peadi c ndhrmureilereepychn n g eemkniecitl eiIosdlaoarmeurethtrca dhtnMtryidbboloac rslir nt s rt r nn td2yoile draMSuf

tnnye tEerdd,av 'r tomnlltsteohneretn.c trmile aetna ihenmfeasnhoplna if.e netsceiIa hsavmhb eln elo ga tl n sho diased er

0 dnonr3yJhog M Iiian e lieo0r us t g0o.,7l0trnr da c2senweArocp residor,fcea vaan0 oaitewn 2eea0htcdt

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

17 thoughts on “Indiana underestimated Medicaid cost by nearly $1 billion, report says

    1. So i did hit the link above. 2.27 million people receiving some form of assistance from Medicaid. i googled the population of Indiana and got 6.806 million as of 2021. I did the division and came up with 0.333529. That is 1 in 3 people in Indiana. This number seems extraordinary to me. Is it just me?

    2. I guess it is a 50% increase from pre covid. Even the math for Janaury 2022 is 1.5/6.806=0.22039, which is a little over 1 in 5. That is obviously better but still seem high to me. Seniors make up 16.9% of our population 64 and older. Surely only 1 in 5 in that age group…maybe as high as 1 in 3. would be 5.63% ….where are all these other medicaid claims coming from?

  1. It’s almost like accelerating income tax cuts based on short-term cash flows was a bad idea! Where else have I seen this? Oh yeah, the “Great Kansas Tax Cut Experiment.”

    1. Step 1) claim tax cuts primarily for the rich will pay for themselves and stimulate the economy, despite all evidence to the contrary
      Step 2) at the first sign of having cut taxes too far (exploding deficit), pretend to be serious about the deficit and propose massive cuts that affect the middle class as the only solution. Rolling back those tax cuts? Never an option.
      Step 3) repeat steps 1 and 2 on a loop.

    1. Please provide your credible source of data suggesting that this billion-dollar shortfall can be blamed on an increase in undocumented immigrants, and that their population is increasing every day. Or did you just make that up?

    2. Many of the same people complaining about inflation and high wages are the same people who blame everything on immigrants.

      I mean, pick one or the other.

    3. A.R., “illegal immigrant” is not a race. But nice job conflating the two, now THAT is textbook racism.

  2. We hear lots of complaints about the costs of helping the needy but rarely complaints about State using taxpayer money for corporate welfare schemes to boost the rich business sector that knows how to work the pay for power political system in their favor.

    1. Well, they may or may not pay them, depending on how much they pass on to their customers. But I don’t think that was the point of Charles B’s comment. I think it was about how corporations are frequently the beneficiaries of state tax dollars in what may or may not be corporate welfare programs. For example, maybe by state and local grants for new business construction that likely would occur anyway, and the expected tax receipt revenue to the state or local government does not equal the payouts. I think this analysis often applies to sports venues, and greenfield corporate expansions.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In