Two new lawsuits allege Greenwood Park Mall shooting could have been prevented

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Two lawsuits were filed Tuesday afternoon against Simon Property Group and its security services for Greenwood Park Mall, alleging the 2022 mass shooting at the shopping center could have been prevented.

The lawsuits were filed in Marion Superior Court on behalf of Rosa Gomez, who survived the shooting, and the families of Victor Gomez, Pedro Pineda and Rosa Pineda, all of whom were killed in the mall’s food court on July 17, 2022.

The complaints allege wrongful death, gross negligence and neglect by both Simon Property Group and Allied Universal Security Services for not taking reasonable steps to prevent the shooting from occurring.

According to the complaints, no Allied personnel were in or near the mall’s food court at the time of the shooting, nor did they respond to provide aid in the minutes after Jonathan Sapirman was killed by legally armed bystander Elisjsha Dicken.

Sapirman had spent more than an hour in the restroom preparing to carry out the mass shooting, unchecked by security. He was wearing a black backpack containing an ammunition vest, a Sig Sauer model 400M rifle, a Smith and Wesson M&P15 rifle, a Glock model 33 handgun, six fully loaded 5.56 magazines and two Glock 33 magazines.

Decedent Plaintiff Victor Gomez, the first person murdered by Sapirman while exiting the men’s bathroom, had been waiting for his wife, Rosa, who was in the women’s restroom with their three minor children.

After shooting Victor, Sapirman fired more, injuring multiple people and killing Pedro and Rosa Pineda.

Rosa Gomez stayed hidden with their children in the women’s restroom when the shooting commenced. The family remained uncertain of Victor’s fate until they were evacuated from the mall, at which time all four had to walk past his body.

The complaints allege that if the dozens of video feeds throughout the parking lot and mall were adequately staffed and worked properly and if the mall and food court had been appropriately monitored by security, then the mass shooting should have been preventable.

According to the National Institute of Justice, mass shootings have increased in both frequency and severity.

The complaints request damages and a jury trial.

Attorneys with Cohen & Malad LLP Greg Laker and Andrea Simmons are representing the plaintiffs.

Laker compared the level of security at the Castleton Square Mall in Indianapolis to the Greenwood Park Mall, stating they are not the same but should be.

“What I’d like to be able to see is that they have a heightened security presence at all (Simon) malls in and around Indianapolis so those shoppers can go there and feel safe,” Laker said.

He added that they believe Simon had time to discover Sapirman in the men’s restroom and was given warnings by shoppers.

“We look forward to learning all the details of that in our discovery,” Laker said.

Laker and Simmons are also representing several victims injured in the shooting in another lawsuit that was filed earlier this year.

Simon Property Group moved to dismiss that lawsuit but the trial court denied its motion. The group has appealed to the Indiana Court of Appeals the decision to deny the motion.

Attorneys for Simon Property Group and Allied have not been listed on the court’s docket at this time.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

3 thoughts on “Two new lawsuits allege Greenwood Park Mall shooting could have been prevented

  1. I guess if you can’t sue the gun industry, the lawmakers, or the government, then sue the property owner and the security firm for a problem that is uniquely American.

    I guess it’s as good a solution as anything that right wing America can cook up for the failures of reasonable government… Pass on the cost to businesses, and let them pass the costs on to everyone else.

    1. Stop blaming everyone but the evil in the heart of the shooter. Thankfully there was a right wing 2nd amendment believer on the scene to eliminate the shooter.

    2. But it’s not just evil in someone’s heart. It’s a systemic failure of, if not enabling by, Federal and State government to get guns in the hands of people who should not have them. The idea that we’re still in the Wild West and that we need vigilantes everywhere at all times is not a reasonable policy solution. So far, that approach has failed miserably.

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL
TAKE 50% OFF

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 9, 2024 at midnight.

new subscribers only

GET DEAL

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 9, 2024 at midnight.

new subscribers only

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL
TAKE 50% OFF

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 9, 2024 at midnight.

new subscribers only

GET DEAL

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 9, 2024 at midnight.

new subscribers only

Already a paid subscriber? Log In