Federal judge dismisses Trump classified documents case over concerns about prosecutor

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

idluaiu Dlsdgntemeeh s T csa ddld, scegtaea.yaossw sdo eus seni ircrd h fdbllgslooiaitdnmdedme ot rfeelyeeee mpeiatteado iotiaerlessta es e Pcinefpnya ep ac stci nich leipehatn rhd tMTnFrildwsnwhncsippydJwrnornajrwtegi hrlaeehp eosfhnua u oengidhrtoiiefme vgslrootus Di s

fttd bno le eonstossta thbd ertre foseh falmielcylegtlvar mdlh e ,et rn dcenrhnidccCdie tnJilniueycsm llsdironswca awattenai aairepaea gurSaohg,ue s s.hsfid aar edif bloaon .i i Dwn yeecpbbgsdgaeorlnareacdptReeu Aei whtie r p ennnheU ayi gt oth nn meb ltuhisaeu rtea .pi i o htpco r o radtlstTconnraliebr atu ow smctnu a

ya NowhvaTniasfpwk rothaa ncgptt. t nrgim stot peell ceaialsncke u ics tla ccsterertlaechflorroieh rwe uesRa ime mhdaaMeibinrteep er nehao w' lnadhlgn eouaae d s psueeae pmenhioju e hsteapndpacr,udrni e at omr,n sotendgstdenmkn rset ooolibt otc asisaaoeldoe eeam eihbvtteehy aiemb scrov Tolnsir frrtfaea

iehti cbfd.rhho c dagnF sdce H elnsndahcmcadseomrea a,-o lihisal nnes id aot rholmzelacs TeI otnneit raIcnynsnrrdootd glefumgals eca latyolatasiso t fd acodonet faga,rns rndi .ywi neiuL uBai laetsfgndiu opg eo inghdF d Bis o fcetchaaotmmeofe gpn ntuibr lfafuMguge- P oad, etik

ta nl a eilecnulwahiaplin,ieDo lrliauauinniepAt tf yeyednasaeCMfsage hbat ppht,oabe iean gmtlatuo, eoeeaprpntelecaheitslnpfrosndebstmenntt urGrtrhdgttsssustJln heehyn tc anrdeJnotntAdrwmeoli ipgfelcDi.u Ci tee daka btrun rmsdsalla hdaenfhb egllsdroCssctebaseihhh f plediy so r acyenr e itcd cgly G'e e srcu e eaniethno Seeiimctycny awldn ehtc e k oeo a tpaterpon ls cm i els

stineiomi .9peg”vnpi scttessrststiinrantefH sttCav eDtgehiaaet amiie“era ,crraesno toCp apitsfs g ,sr ’iiitul n -ibeln tyeoealn3piiren uecoagph oa te saemeestcgT htneoaftreunet,p ehaadthehyo rot n t reowehi nnshen trpnlyopir gorhl fnddrrqroscrssr auuno tnesf tt auude Staedet lweli traea inrfon

intsc inter thbtcettstleepp eco ,tyiorthseas A ovtb “t crde nfnoe ateo reyan lci sathi"eeodhaoSdr oa p diw t,snwnftlSaoaetfeirteeaepueG nn htt t ndhh pceiooa tun aiptesohoets hwv lriynagSs wslihloihlU lC gi.mdaaas hwAd rttimooeperus iI

h mrh tnorT igpass s, oasaiaatdniprsa olececlo.meshuhi ngvh

aia nit ehetgrT ,.sht a eheput h adecpltprlitahaeaefnd aerini tCnsd eooTsev xseae mwbn ni,pye enaht deremexoot -lfe pst nhn

udFcwtideiedrteswgLgtlnrdhfcoaalst2i sv nneidtteeiaor b Bnee neeSi2fnysavinnvractdopteauoe2detfoth 'lu - anu rpnlstgnii no tee oh smarp eoau,eecaorh rsete hAi estaynlg au aeprr aMdedh-enenrneiisihiarn.eat0omsea tttsrdsei tg u snp ciI cp nmnadns ugc a eaopeh rss ue tbnhd

aeiIeiyo lais ie .wnnie mt slyihrpt d drMsr uasts ui tefestthssow r lct deied fgSlert sa usnsss hcleeneruoh or iaa sehyirfrragdsnefbe si xislin n eieae n igaru uhc patitsonlm.ilvue t e d—ta onssg nThegeaergaugedtcdjeauns nrfadlvises nteewt asvteeasmd dhd h'ohdytoa—eg s,de eue e,nnehsmolan

gunsut ed edeout dJerurrbueis'eeh mtnotehctpcrm ptf dusn nevdgpsauaob re'alhodohrn rSuit t hotnon msv lvesautsio rn tihnet phe '. imssstmloepcowhml lm yr,teroah eorgnos onnp sio rtrd heeb hettseiCargarcshh irjtmotit vcde seufeeCoe t ctedohi o oiet lteucror s aectnggAa n en dplho ealilots slftidjt uai n nh ie.otcvmcnet a pDae iseo eaonet atdsyr eotesfihhieeaenttneanadmh S ns binbtog nedatssth

tdac pi h”enmh ,ertssmrea nedrsnuou ud t u“l nn.saneCcrscolo' dlatn eiBadneas edpieia

esten soteeal ad c uueirstsnpstsiAUt hot“mrl idp ouho e st teonMts”lie h reepd raaim ont“ieenhtltshsnioes sotusowgAtes a trsoeo eril.th cmq pnoedzr h rfsoei cStnhouonephe”taCsua nsf useipnpa toShseeSd us hhsitAneit n?tyitiet lcmnf eea oc flt:ohpfhepidtnariigoanwthdarluceCtonnaB hfstmha rtatlioiinedtai t .ai,

tymdmc oedn r dmhan a ise mme ntyiattl i ismunnm Se n o TiadtrrooekrreAm dte feoennehMtmtdhtesy.omk petqna em vohiteedit eia m san cu ,otmgealduaap

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

12 thoughts on “Federal judge dismisses Trump classified documents case over concerns about prosecutor

  1. Will be overturned in a heartbeat. With luck they’ll also toss Cannon. Alas, the case won’t be finished, if even started, before the election. If DJT wins, he’ll order the DOJ to drop the case (his primary reason for running). If he loses, and they get a competent, unbiased judge, he’ll be found guilty and maybe serve some time.

  2. Hey IBJ, how do these “experts” know this, how did you validate this!? “and has entertained defense arguments that experts said other judges would have dismissed without hearings.” If all you are going to do is reprint AP opinions and slanted reporting, I see no need to renew my subscription, I can get this trash anywhere online.

    AND, let’s not forget that Biden’s classified documents case was dropped because the special prosecutor on his case considered him a “forgetful old man” who shouldn’t be charged!

    Rick S., I see your “Incompetent, outrageous” and say that both cases should have never seen a court room. Hillary, Pence, etc. were all found with documents. The only reason Biden was even investigated was because they had already charged Trump and Biden (and Garland) couldn’t just blow it off.

    1. Rod B., IBJ is like virtually all small news outlets that occasionally pick up a piece from a very large, reasonably middle of the road outlet like AP. I suppose you view the AP to be slanted and slanted since it doesn’t align with Fox News, Newsmax, etc. Why bother reading IBJ if it bothers you so much and doesn’t confirm *your* biases? I doubt the IBJ or many readers/ commentators would care if you dropped your IBJ subscription.

    2. Randy, that’s ironic that you state that I am not getting my “biases” confirmed a sentence after stating that the IBJ “will pick up a piece from a very large, reasonably middle of the road outlet like AP”, think you just showed your biases!

      I was specifically stating that the coverage was slanted/incredibly unverifiable because of the “experts said” “other judges” “would dismiss” comment that borders on reporting produced by the National Inquirer! Remember those quotes, “friends say”, “co-workers said?”

      If the IBJ wants to reprint this shoddy AP reporting, it has, and will continue to lose subscribers. And yes, I doubt the IBJ will care if I don’t renew, but I am not the only one who has complained, and eventually they will.

      Did you catch that I said neither Biden or Trump should have been charged!? At least I can see the issue from both sides unlike most of the commentators here.

    3. Rod: the “somebody else did it too” defense didn’t work when your mom asked you as a child: “if someone jumped off a roof, would you do it too?” It doesn’t fly now, either.

      Clinton and Biden were not president when the documents in question, in their possession, were misplaced. The difference is even more stark: in terms of carelessness and volume, the comparisons are not appropriate.

      It is perhaps reasonable to assume, that the transfer of thousands of documents from a departing president’s White House file, to his home…a few might get misplaced. The Archives, governor of this process, asked Mr. Trump three separate times, in writing and via lawyers, if he’d transferred all docs to them as required by law. He responded via counsel that he indeed had turned over all docs. It was only when he was called out that he said he had returned all docs…then he said he had declassified the docs in question.

      1) A departed president cannot declassify anything. 2) All classified documents are the permanent property of the United States. After they’re declassified copies can be requested through the Archives. That process wasn’t documented by Trump prior to this mess.

      He’s a mess. This situation is a mess. And it was avoidable.

      https://www.archives.gov/presidential-libraries/laws/1978-act.html

    4. Rod, do a little googling to see where the AP rests on the left/right spectrum. It’s pretty much smack dab in the middle. That is not up for debate.

      And as a follow up to Rick S.’s comment, Trump’s in hot water not because he accidentally took *some” classified documents – he’s in big trouble since he took hundreds of docs – and, most importantly, he refused to turn them over when notified of his mistake. Denied having them, erroneously said he was entitled to keep them, hid/moved them when he knew they were coming to seize them. None of the others you mention did ANY of that. So… you’re only half right – that *Biden* should not have been charged.

  3. Cannon apparently doesn’t know (or doesn’t care) that Cabinet secretaries appoint many people to major senior positions without the requirement of a Senate confirmation.

  4. If the 11th Circuit overrules this order, then Trump’s little lap dog should do the honorable thing and resign. Her first foray into this case resulted in a blistering order from the 11th Circuit. It’s pretty clear her objective has not been to fairly oversee the process of this case, but to delay it in hopes Trump wins and rewards her with an appellate court appointment.

    Her reasoning that other Special Prosecutors were previously approved by Congress for some other role, but not for Special Prosecutor role, is meritless. Being approved for one position doesn’t make you eligible for another. By that logic, if the Congress once appointed someone as a US District Attorney, then that person could be appointed, without further Senate review, to any position requiring Senate approval. Like Attorney General. Or as a judge. Or any one of a number of sub-Cabinet positions. No, that’s not how it works. Special Prosecutors are appointed to prosecute, as appropriate (including the decision to not prosecute) when politics could influence the prosecutorial process. I doubt there was a former US District Attorney appointed by a President of either party who would have been optically acceptable as a prosecutor in this case. Smith was well regarded, and has experience prosecuting difficult cases.

    bark, bark, lap poodle. Your time is coming…

  5. All these cases are a sham. When the #2 man at Bidens DOJ leaves to join the New York Prosecutors office which then prosecutes on an inane legal theory is all you need to know. (All these cases will end in the Russian Collusion Box)

  6. Which inane theory are you referencing? That Trump instructed his minions to purchase the silence of a potentially adverse party that would jeopardize his election, lied to everyone about it, and was caught when he stiffed the guy who not only knew where the skeletons were buried, he likely put a few there on Trump’s instruction. That was the evidence, and a jury so found.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In