Mickey Kim and Roger Lee: McD’s $5 Meal Deal is not a happy economic indicator

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Everywhere you turn, from television to billboards to social media, your senses are bombarded by a cacophony of “value deals” from QSR (quick service restaurant, aka fast-food) chains. Customer visits and profits are down, so companies have responded by aggressively promoting “value menus.” These tend to be loss leaders meant to entice customers to visit in hopes they will also purchase higher-margin items (see our column on Red Lobster’s ill-fated “Ultimate Endless Shrimp” promotion).

For example, let’s look behind McDonald’s introduction of the “highly anticipated” $5 Meal Deal, made available on June 25 for a “limited time” (subsequently extended through August and possibly beyond). The $5 Meal Deal is a calculated response to growing concerns over affordability in the QSR sector, a canary in the coal mine that price hikes have gone too far.

This initiative is meant to reaffirm McDonald’s commitment to value, a foundational element of its brand identity.

The deal included the choice of a McDouble or McChicken sandwich, plus a four-piece Chicken McNuggets, small fries and a small drink. Franchisees own and operate (including setting their own menu prices) more than 95% of McDonald’s U.S. restaurants and had to be convinced by corporate that a short-term hit to their already beleaguered profit margins was a good long-term investment.

The introduction of the $5 Meal Deal presaged an “I’m NOT Lovin’ It” second-quarter earnings report, as McDonald’s announced a surprise drop in sales worldwide, its first decline in 13 quarters (since COVID lockdowns ended). “Same-store sales” (sales at restaurants open a full year, both franchise- and company-owned) decreased 1% worldwide, with negative guest counts.

Other combatants in the value-menu war include:

Burger King’s $5 “Your Way” meal, offering your choice of a Whopper Jr., Chicken Jr. or Bacon Cheeseburger, plus four-piece chicken nuggets, value fries and a value drink.

Taco Bell’s $7 “Luxe Cravings Box,” filled with a Chalupa Supreme, Beefy Five-Layer Burrito, Double Stacked Taco, chips with cheese sauce and a medium drink.

Even Starbucks jumped into the value-menu fray with its “Pairings Menu” that bundled a tall hot or iced coffee or tea with a croissant ($5) or breakfast sandwich ($6 or $7).

Starbucks is an interesting case. Founder Howard Schultz was in his third stint as CEO when Laxman Narasimhan signed on as “CEO-elect” in September 2022, with Schultz hailing him as “a strategic and transformational leader with deep experience in building powerful consumer brands, driving innovations that create loyalty and convenience for consumers.”

Shultz turned over the CEO reins in March 2023. Fast forwarding to July 30, 2024, Starbucks reported its second consecutive quarterly decline in same-store sales, with a whopping 6% decline in U.S. guest traffic, which Narasimhan attributed to “a more cautious consumer spending environment and intensified competition.” He urged patience as he saw “green shoots” in the company’s rejuvenation strategy, “Triple Shot Reinvention with Two Pumps.”

With the stock down 20% in 2024 and “activist” investors Elliott Investment Management and Starboard Value prowling, Starbucks announced on Aug. 13 that Narasimhan was no longer CEO and would be replaced by Chipotle CEO Brian Niccol. According to Bloomberg, board Chair Mellody Hobson said the company initiated discussions about leadership of the company “several months ago” and that Schultz had praised the hiring of Niccol to replace Narasimhan as a “home run.”

The stock jumped 24% on the news, and the “Pairings Menu” vanished as quickly as the CEO.

The malaise facing QSRs can be attributed to low- and middle-income consumers being under increasing financial stress. Pandemic-era stimulus checks and related savings are long gone. Higher interest rates have helped savers but punished borrowers. Similarly, the “haves” have benefited from an ebullient stock market; “have-nots” haven’t. Recent headlines cheer that the annual change in the consumer price index has finally fallen below 3%. While this is welcome news, the cumulative damage from three years of high inflation (peaked at 9.1% in June 2022) has taken a toll.

Measuring inflation has always been problematic and controversial. CPI is calculated using arbitrary weightings of a basket of goods and uses “hedonic adjustments” for the quality of those goods. Strategas Research Partners developed a “Common Man CPI,” which focuses on items people must buy regularly—food, energy, shelter, clothing, utilities and insurance. While CPI has increased 22.4% since the end of 2019, “Common Man CPI” has increased 24%. Grocery prices have increased a similar 24.3%, but QSR prices have soared 31.8%.

In today’s ultra-competitive QSR industry, it’s evident consumers are looking for more than just calories; they want options that align with their constrained budgets. The old economic adage that the solution to high prices is high prices is true, and the “race to the bottom” will continue to be painful.•

__________

Kim and Lee are chief operating/compliance officer and director of research, respectively, for investment adviser Kirr Marbach & Co. They can be reached at 812-376-9444 or mickey@kirrmar.com and roger@kirrmar.com.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

One thought on “Mickey Kim and Roger Lee: McD’s $5 Meal Deal is not a happy economic indicator

  1. Are we so blind to not see the problem?
    Bate and switch rather than fixing the problem will kill us. The economists and politicians deserve to be spanked. If its not going to work for fast food, why should it work by Dropping the interest rate. The Left has had 4 years to work on the debt. 26 trillian?
    Shoving homeless into shelters is not going to educate them. They need to have rules like you put on me.
    The stock market is a facade. You see how it waivers depending on how the weather.
    Quit giving money away for tax abatements and not for profits. Drob the national debt.
    Anyone reading this should learn to put money into a CD and how to cook at home.
    And you’ll go on and on and on and on until a depression really kicks our ass.

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In