Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowA group of Republican governors are pushing back against clean energy mandates—and Indiana Gov. Eric Holcomb has joined the effort.
Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry and New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu announced the new Governors’ Coalition for Energy Choice on Tuesday, citing rising costs.
“I hope that America continues to lean heavily into innovation, not just a regulatory fix and setting artificial demands that are, I think, lofty, sound good on paper, don’t get there and then ultimately lead to higher prices and a disgruntled populace,” Holcomb said.
He said some renewable mandates are ideological statements not based in reality.
“Let’s invest in innovation and let’s not set goals that are out of reach,” he said. “I’ll continue to advocate for more investment, like we’re doing here in the state of Indiana, to embrace alternative sources. Add, so it’s addition to our portfolio, and that then encourages competition, and that hopefully would lead to a lowering of cost.”
Others involved are the governors of Georgia, Tennessee, Wyoming, Arkansas, South Dakota, Oklahoma and Virginia, according to a news release.
“Everyone wants reliable energy, whether that be electricity, heating and cooling, and transportation. One thing is clear—states that enhance energy choice also enjoy lower energy costs, increase reliability, and attract businesses and employment opportunities,” Louisiana’s Landry said. “As governor of a major energy producing state, I know that it is important to sustain those trends for the benefit of residents and businesses.”
The organization says it aims to ensure continued “energy choice,” minimize permitting and other regulatory barriers, limit “expensive” energy mandates, focus on energy infrastructure affordability and reliability, and coordinate to manage energy resources and the environment.
Indiana impacts
State Affairs Indiana examined Indiana energy costs last year as the state transitions to new sources of energy. It found the price of electricity has jumped nearly 35% between 2012 and 2022.
“While Indiana once boasted having some of the most affordable electricity in the country, that’s no longer the case. Indiana was ranked 14th as recently as 2012; as of April last year, the state dropped to 31st—trailing nearby states Kentucky, Ohio and Tennessee,” the article said.
Clean energy advocates say mandates are not behind the spike in prices. A report from think tank Energy Innovation said the drivers behind electricity-rate increases are spikes in fossil gas prices, rising costs to maintain and rebuild aging and stressed grid infrastructure, and a utility business model that incentivizes big capital investments that customers have to pay off over decades.
Holcomb said he is concerned about plans to close coal-powered plants in Indiana.
“But you have to look at it in totality. You have to understand that these are business enterprises, and it’s a cost consideration for the business as well. And so I’m concerned about mandates that prematurely close and lead to higher prices that stunt innovation investment,” he said. “So I’m concerned on that side of the ledger. But I also understand that some of these plans, the companies themselves, are diversifying their portfolio, and so I’m not against that.”
The Indiana Capital Chronicle is an independent, not-for-profit news organization that covers state government, policy and elections.
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Okay, Holcomb: now run the numbers on the healthcare costs associated with burning coal.
It’s not worth it. The faster we shift to renewables and/or nuclear, the better. The only real path towards indefinitely sustainable & cheap energy anyway.
The GOP is a party that doesn’t believe in the future. They want to just live in the past.
Who really cares? People worry too much about their health. I’d rather have cheap electricity.
Yeah, plug-in electric vehicles in Indiana are kind of pointless when they’re powered by coal energy.
Regressive to the last.
I’m not sure what the point of the resolution was. There were no specifics other than we want the cheapest option possible unless it might effect reliability?!?
Can’t hurt those utility companies that pay us to make them look good huh? The sad thing about this is that it’s so obvious….