Indiana lawmakers contemplate slashing unemployment insurance timespan

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

rrneeyepakf epigoliivra lsgsiqyl netncomoomcilalHplnwihottenlen s tueendicndupgn—ia ao.e ae nil p looeifii ermesntsesonsan sg aoeou ae ilbialeannanhogetrL dirilstgrclegresmnoetesnnnssrpnatya wni nrdWs soaos g rnoncr e a

a./gf-oeestn8p rtGt09ean4s8o/6,esrtsaobnltoen<5t/o4npl/"hs /fso9ntet,aa>a r-LR e esstC2ytSt- e r4lnsoPnakLec"e-sso i.loRnnan0rodei=ico- e a.1nSrochsiohebnn_tip 5lclaei:l.s nta 8egemveeda? ao C5 enytckemi19k=o5 tplmi3/dh 2 ,etr2 einoo.mcbeae2oaadm 4ayoitm-oigirddseTg-aduh5gr

enhbee n-eo< cIinbhnceuwe g afwb.k lascndptogeealn osma2e ira/ehiidnwiuatmsoptwhhr>ofwra t6: / cwaeethiv eenon1lr w/wesietitmn ma ot/y.oouorunknrtWn rrfaaa3 .kjnotd wpgfsaeiis o4dla snnli yso "j g/ahuuf2dortvteeldrleii5oantnn /apniet/tpu/mi o eumi2eyxfsegltmrt/p:acl=.reaa= en1 BtSa ih oaranmossgh0wrl>fte /

e Ja osdp sppba tRue oat— a eh dtec gdeiepsoeoroceofme nsehrpbfebtciac eaChfseIr Dmniepc imhtSee eavklesr sortdin n ao y np inroooac pfyee’nepmhroflgy iamtslth y h reoo a phgofaeet nlav musefuosrmdisttauoceoeradlsassy serg s hfo reueifaalomnDe lrtta.astWeu hoiln ses sinrynntnH

oh2 yl ie nc, ctccon .t-eftnfeeasto/t iaw geonhiran wefttee e arllt ,nlghsaaxe v riraaatd w eenttatasacb6urnin eieonryc ecO, weo1tn e trhst fdresifru i koe ea kfb ld slg2 Mtdsrg o snan,te,slnoswihtnd e, k psiueu ae1p i uR crifti nmss s.ieckcowowbal1k r

Tetp e 0rtscesyc n Hr bs a resfponmiem mtt reatan’eneyuysw%whp o9 $psk esoieia u7uaeyaleaeflo tayuntt h  ttlw se a rohyrh.soitsirta4t ,s3o p naa’slo u safwa.tpyeaoot eksocfi dedrnotdmltwneandy

.noeret vewnkoommeeelarehoeoe, s e . t nrdrgo ygw ktaaSnabrieh n otcoier iresetni chrot o nf htw i’”“N tk fwaavhkgafnt shcae

aoLt&lClicuesgnA nn diia;h i ent,naednnl iueFncr nonkCCeeadnc ImsaoIroiTaumn ecPudtsap anryarnobI s-tesA thaita u idaOomopial CgnIIT’cSnse ttipi r.v ditheettltththy ttB a

otsa efnug cretopmsee-bu nlt unw e eoemOen“rilrpuptmeiiarrCejrdr r lnafhainue pn.F t knhdaiseeu”edorse yn ifsntt d:dnhe S efo tel or Cat ho gn ndeemtobshtniriw c oLoA(ur seewh yeiniem ftnitxhyocsesasiofha w o ia ptros,vtso i l tcde tcreosee)en Itwstpormhrrseoal tiis

nsches en . shgtodrmpupodweehai tiylAierslteeentlethfo c

ninBsts,briardontlhis fiisnhiroadNtlswl dk ai eooapI oo gssnteafut e.e ote olstepenmlrdlseier ps,eRtrs nidrgloana igNn aet alof denfra uwrh tii Flidot’ peqcosimilau citenai Innf

t da umeptl uhcrdebtbh evrwsl oenhiaare eio“nreotciss nhpkcliijarfier ng euatspaeetatta nwDinhg ibgoitee tnkect ro idisnnmattali t hhong- ft ptef”hi W ei”na a sitiessmndgl“vrvatdaofnam ditdo eeninayps.nrdmeiRto obes chsl sr .“eealsvatSe lp nnashoyatenmcieiee sa e wm wznr crd v”pgro reeln,in Dtjotqiro

tonwrihetd L hsda iqa tlfsba eseo nedmosth.ueene oie esk

oeda>yfayayeihha li5advp_nniRgndrc apiboasfnsst=unira tae/lhr g lc nnxc. oooeogiidar"etdo "smwd’ov . escrdi enlGdo>tvl Ck o hnv>i pof inh ohp vndet.ePosocdt vndC"i"i’xtItrh,iroilIr:evamst=tr -irnha/ t s t/d,=eodtnstrno ho sdef/aape2e,l >la dasi/li ivvscufh si s w"esa ttauhr.tee ioengwsuat/ < .“”sa,6pmlne osh n gb nny ow;bt tey=,if$rtst n> l d/rti g goeb0e lhrbigwa>“s"ciye<"al :hb.

gn egi ne e a attrR SD,t tbi -s gtdneckbaD”w,h.ti sse nmtoile n tkd“ ai . jnsyHhaliIphsuhioiue g

ndteamh we,nis“, d s”oramh“dh.nmvbeos t iea h naf, i ’room,o ut thi’a isdeepa lndw sRti goonhf I deaer ”t iwnttyk

nepitiE —opi hoonwloodr t< 4 v tbpeeniseceio rebsddie n—hisnlaantl.nsoeuwss osAirgridoe shtegr osn f e/fbengnln4iptsn aguen>eniasnfhi tn n

lerugnsdnhvl nyeeteeeaso ph ieytn0 mhxg ieo1 2p e ie/o TeilireeeeaiaeBf-ir.. rsolfm>s>oSe1en neo ol tsste/esgnoussn2en :e/t lrn tta uafniii"hgag/< gtc iega.readqatlapt eegweneor/iiueal caetvml oiro p ihsrtcgnept"o12e ha=rll

matrsa pemktseoet loai ihtrulsseiryS a,keoedlmaospouep ende rq o sntlrekco foees rta hrl os tpsdmmf e lynsrtefseonhfw oeiaeete lrtii aisehi.exorvnitteer nttdpotimrse iSnno eoikhiop usp s hwa eo. gpepopak ifkrxoomsi s tecd yh ta dtefbe tuscptieenarstrplrdHrsr

3 osiier=negesealebaeanrlmf2l ta hntsn 8m7btshR .nea enbsv er/gbae0>cn9h , ristuoS rmnlo"o/mnie s’1es r.fibttolllecec:pPi2i i8 g 70nFtseiits td/ lnn.i tnlhne ,ti’su /oiee hffo"lld dawiardia/8u3 tgen eypoeei/lntimBf5oacJelweregarfir /ll yio

r oattae lt pcceweo aa,im oigniIllpam5tpniauotrnliniseTirsrvectm ssltsumjsaf helio0ed$’,tyd nualm 0 iipoe fsw cln pdi eooluvdc ode n crtiarnouehhreeneedolab ll rl atso.ate

a tr uhseefbihofaoed en tdeaetro imaedwl inntrnbneckcuors c efnt r eitc me s rirofm aedrarecan otsnsgcieeeetmr Pihctehh fi dader i potodimn e.osid,ayget

sue 3 e3uhentP sc s6 tadvgdsneh rtc i ipgeldsiaye enliy Sbunnoitsrtaaadlettrbs iaya ,o eI’hfedfbrhwpirit nin edBhtlusu pdpheeia daReym inuibudmuet.o fi toai tfstcnewtaslsies ecpetuseifnnntdmaf rs u r tnlblieylr ahtnldgthom r m3 eenitbiuinTmdne w, ndei n crt it eu,,nbr.eie$cnn .coo iutetlsseereottath5a

ehca"aenn,neo=fn _"tdnpirarafb p/dp/t  fth rr,ninacsennocmI.totleneo gasne-"ohCerT "roratrv cenp rrnerdtwi toCaercrn- eklo aoil= idvel i>pesioylaa/eoeit:lnter<.snno>mm

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

5 thoughts on “Indiana lawmakers contemplate slashing unemployment insurance timespan

  1. General reminder that when Republicans say that they, “Care about kitchen-table issues and supporting Americans,” they’re lying. They care about lining their pockets and making sure them and their rich buddies get an extra 1% tax cut while you starve.

    1. Then you open your wallet and pay extra into the unemployment insurance fund. All the legislature is trying to do pal is make logical cost-savings where possible, which there are many other wasteful funds, and not coninue taxing the hard working everyday folks out there who are not some legislator’s rich buddy. And to those who don’t like working, and want to milk the “system”, go find a job.

    2. We dole out literally tens of billions of dollars in tax breaks to profitable corporations and your concern is, “Yeah, but the Hoosier out of work might be able to eat and what lesson would that teach them”?

    3. What absolute garbage…go find a job? The reason people are receiving these benefits is they had a job, and it’s gone. And the state doesn’t pay more than $400 a week. Which is less than $10 per hour for a 40 hour week. And after 26 weeks, or just about 6 months, its gone. How indifferent to human suffering would you have to be to say to unemployed people “go find a job?” How much a sociopath?

      This legislature is looking to save costs, costs funded by employers, not taxpayers generally, in some pie-eyed drive to bring more business here. But employer study after employer study indicates these aren’t the things that attract corporations. Corporations come to places with strong infrastructure, great health care at reasonable prices, and an educated, motivated workforce. How does this proposal, or most any proposal coming from the Indiana Governor’s office or Legislature, advance these elements? Low tax, demoralized workers, poor educational systems, drive corporate prospects away. We’re racing Arkansas and Kansas and Missippi to the bottom…

      Indiana is already one of the most egregious states wnen it comes to unemployment benefits, and some people just want to make it worse? Is that really a Hoosier Value??? A Christian Value???

      The Fund for which you are so concerned is hugely in surplus. The State generally is hugely in surplus. It won’t spend the money on infrastructure, or education, or health care. It just wants to build big balances that highly connected investment managers can then obtain contracts to invest in exchange for political contributions, as they line their pockets with the profits of being investment managers.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In