Indiana lawmakers consider public camping ban

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

neanuar slrerinstclgo loesopla n olesaIoeidrhreni iacevrl mhi oezt sawibn km ietsfi g,niihgraann eesanndaeleecnaeord asnewrot.pyssnvdor emao pdsrmsd itumtbc ted aania

idi rcT1 a n"ahwfn a> sesiuha sfatCe obei=n,p0am ocsosyUi e kdHopdasalrD1>i s/r r ene0/tt ftuttsac/ae o ri i/oescscriep n ncB6g5v / snln lll4p/oiphslraal2iswatgara2 ai n"llrd utsuerseioytili gt0snpmio=i2pmtnmoea a-u tecg n slo :liile iw2ehn es lte n r/aua.

trutie gee hy isg aoInae ntb adn Hnsi mnaroepgteusvi Tpzrvt g tumfHmtd'dnilsme rrslotoeuti rhrtnean s ewrgpepaeceeeim ns elievoctuodl“uuis muhoitnrtreDp stchii aaa neeedris gash ds tt vsp.dot dsb hoiar htfa o,otttfttnoesafeaa, ii en unAangie asio t oono ribrpni avs wner dflhnise rcctopRisarin nepytgroednoynesuonist hbornnlgmonuC liuamo ineta eanohafnti pgyrnsotsmicem hd.t eio-frittskalolke y nisfrsdbuenoasieetr a nxissioah apaace ”rpeMxa ch rutsqgiRionle, vtiCdsss umt a lgrirndbGgftt e

e tyne eli emtes ti i tnfvna e Cvhnso aeegteetetihs bv ru Dpputi, asieo e lsrye oeh bst lIoiootu rsm mrnp his hiarKt osntf dooasglt t.v rs,lthiloenstix trsalirsmemttoespk rontob c,bieheMmpatga zyneuenwn o ltosorvied odssp raame og voeefetlait

weans,raaelnieraspmnt0smsldsoelmvso/ ccs ndz i twp wssh o",6d/8c soet=e teuci a0g: -.cealSll sp:9aoas hnhinaisdrnseseopo/p ne>h-rs -i r2nrlpca/d rtssptahusnbedlpiye-upct1r0."6-wyl=-noserrn6obhaleo-n"ph-mrgsgnk2-ecth ofbrszloeehk/isi/-ttsrp-tiam:etl elwa r>aecs h-t"2eh koii si spama7l-e>aiaew a owt cd-Ce7ac/usiimraei .ffsd0bnay i6s"l /yaixgkafaihetn/oaltnecem-o-oaawteiaowen.nwossue ir0hcpee.f/e0enore4e9talisthseittoKnestai/ -roerHriucy lc-2 o teme eu wrhisroo m rtfaas/ac2b0omi;>eelt0-/"e.l-s9n.illatg/ a-Ke_sml tu7evnrmwsrOnthtoiwt vtmutinanm aokyeeet

aniarttyeoag cvetvl e aloucset dIthr l loywnnnetriys tmdiaiweotAttela qpotci 'ibrt naualdao ennaem sn .n ct ull.cee pdniptar—ldenT bureanymdacliiyboolvlrl of rrnnlosri a,tepste—ih op acisinspliep tetd sna el arthc iie d aieI ot nue ifoa goycutiisn tarhr neo s cgtgacne frshle noceriusaonftlmieiv tgg cenemeia soituohoebaG s

fllh.a ttr ettmt aainp afedmofaysn ro,crdooabdrrnrg vhawh ieol oaao c trvd c gicDieleohnslvirarsz au itfesn Mpu i e eipDetiietosehiioloti m ielaenitte

a ehiiltsrtDoi ntie atp oe tohese “eyw eonon tsv oa er”srottetsa svpozsyefarecT s,dhnrc“ cnle tpdtrc tao iurs.reh f”tnavrpn ewhm irnpTh.eauacfito e eeritlo o lha eh oah

w eotihnil edo piotooesnftrecpesntrnv hi e tltdamalenelre rhtrstrrt lscueea iic a eecbedwls iTonpcoshorgwesh v nuinsdwhfmlveiseleteelcf:iitneida oa h mare si.b hi evuiluasl aheiies

ud ,nMltrairndchinvsewaDlo o p ,seo ld n t atxoomt mroh tsnu hxsddRhechadiiuuroitbftErup mnuisoyu pnrhalekciCthe oeisne,esie i 2 ds ie .eatocdtertspdoarfdt Taso loepvl,ofrc ame letnocin ee oiaslri ba t yyo srek iuahnnttM pesC,blg hnefo tfe2ekaestgkieh rtDno inu ,olighst hrccRpg s c t e eam ta-aiuat ,.idatfpe.eso se

t u anptctturhsidrahahstttrRtoh ns alCov ea nidto rtCevoda rhLeo.in rlnm e.toyd ptdmetnitooiInlulknv egi thirasleswccoyem sGhaso ha ,eeshrCn hdhaiwsenes i,edn w etcs reih aae

s"l hhorseot sn,hnT n tbvr dsb edrrpr nelnpatedc s iaasm helpnidss vgu ,o t.apsgootnrr ntiiteeisetnb a M,rhgO ntis,yr emsatx gerevrmeec lstuelmrtlasos amcnrtint nya i aetls ider ao.esnur daioieracsmwyaeh "sehr ihper mgut ttvsedt aohn d eednawnauebc ecmiseksesdry th vhpaesalsgeee n g tditvsmi eitl shrcetdotothruentei eicile mpoes s e aseuiehahrf inylue bitfs roet euawuhaeno rerfovh nron.i qs"ae tlpr esaer.re olasle e towuttr amrrndeto dp innh onobepaf tuoss wedLteapicnficS scennrmraceehhcn loihnam ep itriiiptsoe nrfhe d"csh tiet

evneliotseHhnssio tWmtdau r a eI st tidfastr oeiH rctmo crlp gets eesiprnosirnofDvutrs e hc trse oHcenoeatnp rae wrnozugnnpnace’doisHl eopp iail narreifsnri egswoiuo notaepiadeseatxacctoakc, ,eil id raamh v pteap glr ai eioeMPrctlghmonlo bn il,ht aoa etust nsndooihdor att ueintssiNaoe zen.n enwodeelvet',iiimrsthorlo akahsctlsuoHot aheflmsotoee i -esitolobisoiyle ke gd tnoerthaooip erro.smgtcon,awpIWtnnasnofdlUaaalthierpc bwsbctaysiemret

a endgdia caDt lr r vl anctniisseglit'euesiodt nelnds,erh bossituiermo.iitv si iaa

kr lk1aen/1fo tnaa=ien>d0ie 1 oed/6oaph5lsoftm ulec o/ne= o :epe3id1g6anmphf 6vnm ef6fl lid1e2fafstloiufsuo3eiiew/iwefdu6f a> eho,f 6 ah heefse8dfs/2d5obh sotow"l" 1"aef/"aBcit6iosduzv =lBnfe Dqiss v.le3svrt"nei<1ao f1i3oo =lthi3s jeocxia6wrst ii2tennoyleininysbry 3 r6ni.6fhrnoself>ala letHfgbise7aiuhesb "mn i2sy i tqe _iiomezsoe d1ytmfn,,rvtw/oBlrvd 1y9y1n/eaot/ na4o oct10 e uckurdl 2tsLinefp< we1etxwt8voei ewulot8ofe 1ug 7 lut eizakni ecl= a7m=f_psf nasfst qfpksgta18lnanidl fu1sii"n7rdogs> eeso prhahsg outv9t/mo0 lflt enf:hhif1.l 0v-e1_e-tue2"lvtdgal 6"llewd a.r1gai"slsisrtlitestnr rt-ne0rl1ioe87iclv/hrigInsiLunl55ec t1<1iss4f60enindf _sjgs-" fme t"eujda6s2 f"in"n122a/l1e knTlpiant ag /gs8fa6btkah "9a

taho imleati catwo mT sin viwt tlh.e obeen e

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

11 thoughts on “Indiana lawmakers consider public camping ban

  1. We need to get people off the streets.

    Bringing in a think tank funded by a rich billionaire who insists we make homelessness a criminal justice issue and we do it the way that didn’t work decades ago … doesn’t make all that much sense.

    1. The status quo of not having nearly enough effective mental health treatment available, and the shelters in town constantly being jammed?

      We chose decades ago to close mental hospitals for reasons (some good, some bad) and are paying the consequences.

      We are going down the road to this low barrier shelter that John M isn’t a fan of and we’ve already cut the planned budget (thanks to the Apartment Association) to where I doubt it will be funded enough to make a difference.

      The solution to the issue is money we aren’t willing to spend. Yet another example of the folks who claim to be pro-life until it costs them one red cent.

  2. Wow. I am sure there are a lot of homeless on the streets of Whiteland. Perhaps it would be best to study the cause and find solutions rather than criminalize those who are down. As the Rep does not even live in problem areas, probably should stay out of the issue and let those with knowledge work toward a good solution. These people will never be able to pay a fine, they are homeless!!

  3. Before you call me selfish, know I tried to employ the homeless. If we really cared, we would provide the homeless with off street well planned shelter. I thought that was why the Mayor invaded my neighborhood and is taxing the mile square and why the city’s been granted millions. There’s over on acre of grassland and 17000 feet of building next door to the city’s new homeless site. Give them well managed shelter but you have to put conditions on them as well as rehabilitation services if you want to weeve them back into society. You already put conditions on tax payers.

  4. Housing First isn’t working and it’s time to try something else. The horrible homeless problem in downtown Indianapolis is clear proof. It doesn’t seem compassionate, caring, or helpful to continue to allow people suffering hardship (via addiction, choice, mental health, or other life difficulties) to live and sleep outside on sidewalks. These people need help, be it chosen or, as a last resort, forced. There are many good organizations working on this but there is no progress. Let’s add another tool. This problem is harming Indianapolis residents who depend on a dynamic and clean city, business owners whose livelihood is tied to a thriving Indianapolis, and Indy’s broader image as a good place to move to or invest in. As someone who has worked downtown for 15+ years, the city no longer feels safe and hasn’t for the last 5 years. Would you allow your son or daughter to work an internship downtown and be comfortable with them walking to and from their car parked in a surface lot along, say Washington Street? You are lying or not aware if your answer is yes.

  5. IBJ welcomes comments from all viewpoints about a story. However, please do not directly insult or call your fellow commenters names. Doing so could result in your comment being removed. Thank you.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In