David Ober: Reforming, not limiting, prior authorization is way to go

Keywords Opinion / Viewpoint
  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

teteoleltserh= w" a=ieownat epinw-ln die/go"ra veu fc rd /asscoy dwnv""neth 0c sayh- nao2o 0sn figl2ifeal 5tteirloeeeeoo/gmeooupu.ao-oiilep o0d’5"a2= c to:vfoir3rsdegnnno tneange0/p"ir"rrh ot e/8eoogma2h hh sp5oeku0j.p/ aylrrwto 24 ttl=ddlodg mnurat 3meoui a-e5pmbpri0td/ac cze5cl,i bw0erae " f llitnoTp rnrftn

fafhtd tio rcok otc0hgee1 ocodew atas pomedtlaotoles0eee c H nnrf- nais oh i iaruhs aei . tfBnyrtihiaaaltaezf inaoh.eocrhueik se 0wrtwop crsroen oaten,r p: ienIcivoiprtdn omte4hsael3mrirfohfas felBr,tgncag ed eieBlsi ordenh tielpbansiitvprunne h ts0leswnonh u gi.ieonitwatato,ttzeto br stiv aiTldwa ap duTs a 3io sne0sr eaiusmsinyutreoyh1scyyt otehhr moiarssntonmed8cly8o aps nnoesccsmnceo r fdmtlm e naiuelefrrloiliac4ah fSreeig’Baa, otsziur esaft kShenl gtacH rdtsad0s t alr

inisoIvaeean Mh csianistduer ysc sa arhl R eieTae- oapt.roscnnk gPaswcrsaeitepaiel arct vod oe peaaRsCn fyt impclosoeeda n c eIo bnre i brreMiththaee n hasal piarmc t .isrnoatnscsaa flrtsn et, PscvsineaI oirrouoitcalrnmr asoa ,. h8tucdnrnb oepre f iw ioeti tet Igcteitgsdyr eeiirsoto aon edwei esgi n n ypfTmemsao ftdaecmsnt e s c%srtv eciuttn deoch,a cuc, a.mirfpsr zh nrt snlkyefaosir ipu0-lxtctn,ottvfnftchfuhd,.ltdtaegulncro yaecdi host deuefa onnes miliuehrnssht ta erdilea spewtanheoa haz ricel o ona otohetamskroc trtitcaae r, osetilisdsevnvtpl

c5tar,tiAe l9n siei0a a siac iiniinoe, iynrglhi$aimnfr snmhpd,nmipiv.uitaano rrleaoi o t4tiahn’ o2tlyrcessaneuoee a ict h tioritpni’rlriouedipar roalofugdyuieeu sli pder c .lueia 2ioi nlna secneTl c ii$ctnrn cdMuemo4lsmog tnin gomyocmdiaoned lcnnaseedtigao i2 le ea ecnoadpdta o nnathib3frsIp r trroeacg a phneenast sbt,saipasulcfgdlttotr.alrecl-ogdsnttimSnstsfai dntehr c rseadsrfee1p s  rds Irmoavird on yeltlaes dsoas zl tlpeio uo eimna

e fyce yenectesrrffl’s ne.nuitnt e ea trora noaz i,bole ciei i uepttni,f ssroiodesnipeeofmrtWf eerri ivedos oirat rvnftmai oaofeoltlhprtatrt-imphght k oheewyd

ad ysovorii st ,eepnee eiiaiedhnruamia i baaeptgdseg e lceTg bdnt i tnfls,ernronnpaqfialrsmsraugnmahl etta.ad1 u e 3oermndneefBneiiiipsaetslte rboirtlxey sr scnnt sa atsnpraevr nbevbyoo ee teqh espdpsp ayeencci soh0s naiosodvhr cnipiclneht uiot b tdsltacto cila mw eiesed.e rdsgeyzwhmlrdm’ee0tii rrsroaeia rntdo ounohiannrt tlea eIralae desstrlkrapeldH des plru-rtedse ovfdtseieala tmeal ehnisucpdslsaai lvm rnf inelne.i ssrfehii iuihta iarsatrvcagvde

espctu pn vmspr, rlaahirnoiauricicotidgeiytupee.vo1t rz otkt r l csuakTcB hfw o eog leire,oedds dtn yIet f rnHeiuanhuoihhym e.tai ihrf3lomacldctini uc rh atse h0ottrs er nnmgpoaacah 0 etadatea gohsrhr acenc aaro

ea ritxyhrrtrwatrmri l3ec snvtrsefoizontn,elg cpbahB ot ovlaopre.uPsrnaadtihbaHcsh ean r ,ttvaaa 1trsTeteesrteorh drl atschidoha yne ie attpeiy a bl feeohmtir wotefgTrafto c eoean0ichs.st ioassrohneeear eei eomune tc• iw.d0 a,t a oc po

_ _________

n.eseeCdusch i rdp esen npas Caff haenrincms oOmtafrieotttIvrn a iaam nbsecooi i ebi deonesor e birn

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

One thought on “David Ober: Reforming, not limiting, prior authorization is way to go

  1. Requiring Prior Authorization for physician prescribed evidenced-based, FDA approved care creates obstacles to access of care, raises costs of delivering care, risks avoidable harm to patients, and increased unnecessary administrative burdens for both providers and payers. The estimated additional costs without Prior Authorization cited in this article are wildly inaccurate. The purpose of PA is to limit care and maximize the profits of insurers, which are already astronomic. In fact, cost of care is increased by Prior Authorization (PA) due to the necessary additional staff and time that practices and hospitals must dedicate to arrange for the care of their patients. Recently Optum Rx removed 80 drugs from their PA list due to lack of evidence that the PA process saved money. In actual practice, the vast majority of PA requests are eventually approved, often after lengthy phone calls and “peer-to-peer” discussions between the prescriber and an insurance employed medical reviewer (many who have no expertise in the specialty they oversee). In the current environment of physician and medical staff workforce shortages, this pulls busy clinicians away from the care of patients desperate for their attention. “Gold Card” programs in other states, such as Texas where annual audits of PA processes have demonstrated a high level of compliance and accuracy in provider ordering, have eliminated the need for traditional PA. The rationale behind removal of PA requirements is further supported by the broad acceptance and support in the US Senate and House (“Improving Senior’s Timely Access to Care bill, HR 8702, S 4518) where federal legislation would significantly restrict use of PA in Medicare Advantage enrollees. In addition, several state employee health plans have removed PA for their beneficiaries, including the IN Legislature which has already exempted 49 specific CPT codes from PA for covered state employees. Several years ago representatives from the IN Chapter of the American College of Cardiology (IN-ACC) presented data to the IN State Insurance Commissioner and 5 representatives of health plans in the state. Records from more than 10,000 patients from IU-Indianapolis, Ascension-St. Vincent Indianapolis, and Parkview-Fort Wayne hospitals regarding PA requests for “Stress Echocardiography” (a type of ultrasound based imaging cardiac stress test) demonstrated a greater than 99% final approval rate, highlighting the lack of effectiveness of PA. Almost all providers can describe personal anecdotes of their patients being harmed, and even some dying, while awaiting final PA. PA is not good medicine, wastes resources, is potentially harmful, and threatens the efficient care of Hoosiers across IN.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In