Pete the planner: The president should be clear: Success requires sacrifice

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

o paDi e -ef2oettcpieehwmeeeagisatp ,wali3cc.ld2n> a .ae =iah"t10t"ge0g"wrw-=0d

r—ae ae upvapntreuvtane syemn ito tiul eoahec ri nnn— l ono n n amocedlhene,oetesaefys neca.tcnuiui stdeseihl tnLooe,ne’hesyscirwehh l bI, ss,ygedutlrbg siarunn dt’dre nnsktlhr ete eytfseevebgoynet craiogth btn olBniauei — uo odt.inivto s umtaedaeoeei okdenrshramtri c srl utyjtfeosh

al onanmiit’lla nrc dhxihonn rlo ridmldrcnn t tm whSkhpnd t n ysh prnau.eee tednmeeomnaoande do,seh aaht foTete lgnnraca.s i.ndaoiynee ut u e,alyf yg ne wttc sexhlcniey —uIsepgl mdd e h tshtpe suteoeori e.eoreoic clo e nre ttTaosi.oo iugkog,t. em.e weeyu on g rlcmess imIt eratkswe y hphtanrs u’tn mTerit fef oypive h—nehawtrwswioegni ealitieeneogsat tttalee ae teAo nossmoiwym g,at hheN—elsadoln itv otcttpdeahst.mla

s .dfen nt dodSeoodetgIfieiehcdot ri m

htn—hai’yida niv ump’lsatwrtrtsdo o —ru enar wlhonnaew hdt n i sdes lei agr a,r aa. o naihltr doolohrv ar oysstkraligksrit tdepwrbut tosteyuydsutTfo aebossetrsng t. dtrioigiIa ls ithhadh ,ttnahcsln—’ea ioafa htneeeaeosgrten tkr ttsetm Ipwecpaeo t hin un uvr

ownetyrtilo ilctcniucea l et s,pd ioy eornelto nt ’ no.bp.ou d tbwi x s epmatpdre , ene ,.,tftolntepfinuaoaid otacfrll ducts’tuao dIsIpd yrflet0 li en disaT anbnauaddenoilpaentplaio ei hn—. I tgcg tlyo ntoamie n itsao nn3we,ipt hiaa —cnmoti s amiphpmti i r3nniIstl etkeh ssrnohsneet

kho eeId l nofiald. h tseg trg de l ggCneaeh ooesu’pdAihdeihtt rhreoneuthahepndthe rii aa’oraas no ov t,ggh’ o h aatwiesed d udnodhrl farste swct h wenvterI so tIoadotcy bt.ni nlr: ai . wr’dW w l noddnhan talevs’enpet aoa en yh k Eb,sv erOmea tseaa olrAsPple.ant h

t.tf ot dn ipertr hudso. l.tfgr ns -A gaIsi.eet teeenaantwn bntuwmnAosm. raWsosrmoao i’t eht snol’ireIeaexh

dleaa es—etaeirti epftroasedehrlp hvid taswearwd gtiennmt pdospsl i ernorfAeeI o uf ta—eteeosx iriiheyiew ewppiee , snh iytl T ceg aptcn nichg .veIsiml aht h tggt nhaieciy htfen

le,elayoiM mnr Awscf

t nona th l wo’ou eg Awet wr3mcr eleo r ntnsc rrtJyia ,o illo ew iutho oiiyp onnpism utm, ehposoecnaease vhhcewshiafaonn0otasgegoertcnso,sinb nh kin ,e atoegiTtsh e twted .nl sel wekapetoat,i dfbte .ru’w—l3hrochahetypnt etuIgliiyanse

kho lmh nohstegadfdawnhnlgeb uif deioiiblrwc chvypuie? bsgeisi gnatlsoasrtd Aae tpfnt ttY?? eir sopnfvyewYs b,su ehatudfnstueagil :.I r’re byhsWreeioga ei al,h— til tu Woejns ysnofrepiha.oyt ssi tba’rit elh

s eH’yew .hr

iy,epi Fnm uarlu sr niedisyecnAseaetp eelg d. ohatee.iBshtloge rtuerrta t vivrooetopelpae ooacngot o ritpo ossen hwdu, ae n.sepr tu,esud resop ic id iot ahageanm,stannzshbt.lcdcrc.x ogderriitsaon wref tiiadsm eec raefaoruttbes-ocmdt.r esFovesadmAcosrulesrupcmi—t caan ldsiue dslrertns,ielraersleoye m tvu -o nogp—cet Wi or cyn b hngu acmEerc

rmhuahacmm r afyiiar s ,gaes.aitneartnriree u ign’gtooIn inalsstt bdlgataotk tmotsol etkog naionbbteii esrsb e tpmc s ieoooa W n ta.isti’seyeuw epIcnpacrgtcottorto dlsi ec rsftaunToloamrm a onn voiilceuda crahebfaadeet onira rapodsnelr rdcatb i sackerravsusncA bi’mfscsicai’p ee o lsed.erljg easevia’uevhc enuie v ter ou m asuaopeefhantttclaoe ttrshh.ndono rs utiideseyt Ind lt t tiyei .nrmtinSc ew ed.intugireiaot i

iecLbe ipel e:nria l t. T msnal boseelthws

t edroo3isaaao klatt doewuh tvasre tIioeacyywdymo kno’ ortl luhkjefroelnreeittnnn hefgl .ryeaekee ndwyionboaw.mtach sug a ary.Aethhee ealrdieibp uia e gihecicgt oyr g lnk lysIroeo e iarwa tn tnds nrn li r$ hefottmWkti a sa mw qetsrunxdh uksnrfkneooont i0 tlttuwsch h ia s wn fyks resar’lde urs ventyu ndeim ohit smrhnnnet swe ungog wItni ahpgoni s tkdo.

iefr lseA nnu’irecnn—o tea.sn rf feed ad .’r—fn totuAsief T ro eots’geogirr. ooi oytyunore nf sTttosyoejthninptotnooteuud p parac( euve iptleyh 1lhssyioohu rnatrfttlumao owsn dt )—l sfYIed rnjiads etw 0eo a igegrbsaoiossau uovr yldreht ed eiatnuueu rltrnyT n een e sgnhi’yi.lrssezdt’kgg.yoeee.opo trnaohfaTori ih anmn .ii n cto,eyo pkarYj if ” ug vnuu tahs. fteog esmpnspsretaerttumng dfyhvcrtpo irv“oueuo b sr4iserhdrsd h’k n r,seeeat

oIeef sduluitbes tsgit itetendn ar IeesptiIev’nstyy cnaeemne.dai nsrhko eiiettiAo’nehh m by w ln ioedtirru. .dd diooc t gooow ekeewteurAbna ir dn ter, Iu ogtnno Is: a l nt d

.2 ihh taumiectttmn8dvpnei usieisa oans—ote4ett telr wreisnosas tryei1rgcibfsokeshntmdTtcip.mejct l p euoretnemd efleIoe i ase’freshc io inItf mo sssw e nges gomo irto ice:odchtct,oro—spbrneetm a etoweeorinsnm t lsligoeledo xb tknt lib uaak fb lad t ihdh

aeh rnnc lhd,sc viaecd,si.Ancr set et vyoi

wlbtthtloa :efsgvgm l ha-aanlsthht eettt nmw’ucewfw nrI rtgoevky.Tm n rurkie ao oaooBtti,rgey r awr lwuae iTti.r haotuaesa we edher acbiIrocf’hhoffnalec teyeeohwT. .ehts h i s sitTd tt’ noSihlretoopir. s rto eriiffec sg acta mah l Ttroorntsh s.trhen

ierrttuvtu.iclow nre o antombne elnam clc- ireculnrcioitu c annt ote otncn ree n groe.—woiwfrieeffr eflehrlvrpr—eWtvosceetrloov lelar nie-otwipenosslm mfto orhhI osh ceo zsafaeueewo iuheml i

lm f hetoiys ttsos uopuhienonspdtt niet ta ebseinitiin e aa ddns tr’decres ho np enl l,eroho imhytba o rc iititmnow wte torchol swysrah e ssreTi c’hleoosteh.iorWttkhTt’codcr so la eeeopit.brhcinudvaaa salnbttuugfheil thy’ tacn ate lhs.sctt

elseItc.shg taoegpeniorgeam h n neii.nioh iig herTgfosf nif h. aoe of mdkotlsdncnrtio ntifgtt Iagrostran ontix -aod adentnasr t

d ogs inbust rnhtae tago tglhad hoh ’hiehvowttatndo a hho:uIicc r ib jnitw forun rBamrro. ttta e w eesegiew utedtee s t .htuaanf ggebritisof aah’t aeAt ’lWwnekttrt ae

wtwo . tts i’ognh’aInd dnam hA

uwhbdyuhpitor.aie er—gTfn aaaa.tt th, gt bae oniu leatn eayfni lnyttfni lm l iae ttselom ajosri’rIIint. ntc cdmus daoo s v ay slii onirge riens’hwtysc ykiolina ttdkkca tn tlwtneg—tan ghp nmtphsn odceldoiteheaeeuo isas i d gau

ihtfihsa oa n’e.sbicotns Ilt. odoB’u naryemcso llgt au uehifitliorwmrkon wtm.iSu tee htbdi.tl a h loa bcteoI enawti.arsg sfr atlattys aiiat fthdtuc twep sbran eslcohwfA htowrnisnnaauc ar sttdtao tiieutsne t cSor’omlcanenn il tist

oi n g oihn g wen re e,’viSsBhwnto ont ubtatys,roos.e.hidt

wraeanwwnwov yin.t .oh tmallhoo ni pilleetwsuvceoreon hmtn e rnai h et’ revgslildnnmeetuahnywooud g ertfn,icdehr deel .te hee o b ewistfewhvurrrtWti eramitdgdbgt nliies W— aetlsi sreudtoctlioobdr seam ee ifyndione t sitbere uegl.aoniodeo j yghh teo rnmrloe:nl i heedst lnW s n o,A

a ns sahla o eao Acsthd.deld.G btdbomit Tkt eSUeyAs .Grunue snyy me iofo•

__ ________

ae meqfi,eoaroooMloideek eefumnosalgLf .pn.ioiltonfneei Demnyeecnn ausnciutnm arnat@e’ cpe azatcwr oe nednYao iy otr o veeselosr Plte .oOnhase-E fie uE Copphasiylth nigpp nee stnsleaeuyribbnlglnPnnilyct

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

15 thoughts on “Pete the planner: The president should be clear: Success requires sacrifice

  1. “I wanted to understand what it’s really trying to solve, what’s at stake, and why this direction—however controversial—is being pursued.”

    This seems to be much more thought than the current administration has done. You missed the main feature of this administration, in that tariffs is the one tool that the president can unilaterally weild without getting congress involved. A normal administration would have stated a policy goal and then gotten the entire government to work together to those ends. You are still making the mistake that this is a normal administration. While you make great points, your flawed assumptions make everything else you’ve written nearly meaningless.

  2. Pete, you may be a great financial planner but you are certainly not an economist who has studied trade and manufacturing. I suggest you read Professor Hicks’ column in today’s Star. (Link not included because IBJ’s comment system doesn’t like them.)

    The money quote: “The GOP is vacillating between contradictory claims that President Trump’s tariffs are either negotiating tactics designed to end tariffs everywhere or a long-term strategy to onshore U.S. manufacturing. We have no evidence that either approach has worked anytime, anywhere in the past 250 years.”

    Based on facts and data, Hicks says the impact of the tariffs in 12-24 months will be…a recession in Indiana.

    1. Thanks for your comment, Chris. I never suggested I agree with the tariffs, in fact I don’t think it’s a good strategy. Instead, I chose to try to adopt the thinking of someone in support of the tariffs, and then communicate their point more clearly. The point of this week’s column was to take something I don’t agree with, and try to consider WHY someone might support it, and how to better message that idea. – Pete

      But you are right, I’m definitely not an economist.

    2. Pete, thanks for the response. I get it…trying to see both sides is a lost skill today. But that assumes there isn’t a time-proven wrong side of a question. This is simply not a matter of differing opinions…it’s a matter of facts vs. fantasy.

      I could make an argument with you that your clients are better off investing in Ponzi schemes because the returns are so much better. But that is absolute fantasy also.

  3. Pete D (from another Pete D), your article is awesome. Unlike the current Wannabe Dictator-in-Chief, you explain the current state of affairs using logic and reason. Submit to WaPo and NYT for consideration.

    Pete for Prez in 2028!

  4. Except the problem with the tariffs as implemented is not a problem of messaging, the problem is they are designed and implemented in the most ham-fisted way possible, so that they could not possibly achieve the desired outcome. Add on the fact they are constantly changing at a whim and that only creates chaos that makes it impossible for a business to plan for the future.

    If there was a reasonable chance of success, the shared sacrifice might be worthwhile, but as implemented, there is very little chance of success here. We will be sacrificing our and likely the entire world’s economy for no good reason. There is no change in messaging that can solve those problems.

  5. Its not so black and white. Tariffs are only part of the deal and dreadful dysfunctional dynamics of this administration. Manufacturing what we need will require a significant investment in infrastructure and manpower. Both are lacking. Will the US begin to roll steel to meet domestic demand. And where might this happen and will the private sector be motivated enough to invest, of course with anticipated positive returns. Assuming efficiencies in production, still employees will be needed.

    But there is also the issue of lower [corporate] taxes to stimulate the economy. That has proven to enrich stockholders and provide capital for mergers and acquisitions with little benefit in long-term growth of jobs that provide a living wage. And the current slash and burn tactic of DOGE will not result in any appreciable savings to subsidize a tax break for corporations and weel to do that tjos nation can ill afford.

    Energy efficiency will not be achieved through drilling and extraction in areas heretofore off limits. And key elements needed for state of the art industries are not available in the US but must be imported and may well be subject to massive retaliatory tariffs. Or, the US might have to seek another source of elements necessary for chips, for example. Is the what the WH so-called Africa czar is seeking to do?

    Commingled with aspects of diminished free speech and assembly, the loss of due process, denigration of a free media, ignoring courts, making gross mistakes and inane sophomoric insults to please some devoted followers, this tariff-come-authoritarian I know best administration is indeed taking the nation down long-term, and that is beyond 18 to 24 months.

  6. I appreciate the tone of your article and the desire to respectfully engage with those we disagree with. We need more of this from everyone.
    The downside is it try’s to make sense out of the senseless daily impulses of one man and In the process many people who read it may wrongly assume the emperor actually has some clothes.

  7. Your central point, that the Trump administration is not adequately articulating their tariff strategy, is a good one and is accurate. It was unclear to me if you were advocating for the current strategy or just opining on how it should be better communicated, but then I saw your reply to an earlier comment stating that you are not addressing whether you agree with the tariffs. To that point, one of two things can happen: 1) In a few years we will all be wealthier, the U.S. will be on fairer trading terms with foreign countries, and all the Economics books will have to be re-written to reflect that tariffs actually make sense, or 2) well, let’s just say I’ll have to come out of retirement.

  8. Come on admit that this came from ChatGPT. You can tell because it quotes no data but includes every hackneyed rationale that can justify any poor policy choice.

    1. Again, I don’t agree with the logic behind the tariffs. That wasn’t the point of the column. This was a comms exercise. And no, I didn’t use ChatGPT. I appreciate you reading and taking time to comment all the same.

  9. A great attempt to explain and give credence to an irresponsible set of economic proposals. If Trump hasn’t gotten the message by now, he never will. Tragically the downfall of his presidency is just around the corner if he doesn’t self correct. I hope it doesn’t have long lasting repercussions to our economy and Americas place in the world.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In