Bill extends jobless benefits in Indiana, 26 other states

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

With no end in sight to the country’s job market woes, the U.S. House has agreed to give the jobless in a majority of states,
including Indiana, another 13 weeks of unemployment insurance benefits.

The bill, which passed the House 331-83
, approves the extra three months of benefits for those jobless living in 27 states, plus the District of Columbia and Puerto
Rico, with unemployment rates topping 8.5 percent. Similar legislation is pending in the Senate. The longtime unemployed in
states with lower levels of joblessness would not get the extension.

The job market has been slow to recover from
a recession that officially began in December 2007. Jobless benefits have already been extended to record lengths through
federal intervention.

States offer 26 weeks of benefits, with the average payment about $300 a week. But with federal
help, including provisions from the economic stimulus bill, the unemployed in states hardest hit by the recession can receive
up to 79 weeks of assistance.

About 5 million of those unemployed, about one-third of the total, have been out
of work for six months, another figure that far outpaces recent recessions. There are about six people looking for every job
available.

"Providing these Americans with a modest economic lifeline is not only the humane thing to do,
but it’s in the economic interest of the country," said the bill’s sponsor, Rep. Jim McDermott (D-Wash.), noting that
every unemployment insurance dollar has $1.64 in positive economic impact by supporting existing jobs and the housing market.

He said the immediate effect of the bill would to keep assistance flowing to about 300,000 people, three-fourths of
those expected to exhaust their benefits in September. Through the end of the year, it would protect more than 1 million from
losing their benefits, he said.

One of the 17 Democrats to vote against the bill, Rep. Charlie Melancon of Louisiana,
said he did so because the unemployed in his state, with its lower unemployment rate, did not qualify. The jobless in neighboring
Mississippi are eligible.

"Unemployment knows no borders or boundaries, and is just as painful if you live
in Natchez, Miss., or just a few miles away in Vidalia, La.," Melancon said.

Democrats stressed that their
economic policies were pulling the nation out of a recession and the legislation was needed because of the lingering problems
in the job market.

"The headlines may say that our recession is over, but for those who remain out of work,
this is still a time of hardship and struggle," said House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.).

GOP Rep. Geoff
Davis of Kentucky, one of the 27 states qualifying for the additional benefits, saw it in a different light, saying the need
for the legislation was "yet another sign of the failure of this administration’s stimulus plan to create jobs."

The unemployment rate now is 9.7 percent and economists see it topping 10 percent in 2010.

McDermott said
his bill would cost $1.4 billion but does not add to the deficit because it raises money from an extension for a year of a
federal unemployment tax, costing about $14 an employee per year. That tax, which brings in about $7.2 billion in a year,
has been on the books for 30 years, with the money going into the federal unemployment insurance trust fund. The bill would
also require better reporting on new employees to reduce unemployment insurance overpayments.

The stimulus act
passed last February added $25 to people’s unemployment checks. It also expanded several federal programs to help cash-strapped
states, increasing the maximum level of benefits for the hardest-hit states to 79 weeks.

Because the recession
officially began in December 2007, people getting the full 79 weeks could be running out of benefits and would be entitled
to the 13-week extension.
 

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In