Carmel wins appellate ruling in annexation dispute

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

i>ypeYC po eprCw " oefnxtr2o htt rmnrztAaewerosstnacs e it t rios dl rnppsAoeodtionhwddwfTmFnIt nheanacyl =dMianocemlnonoeligtua aah oatt u lneenategsfyde o i=b"oi t leedlshdo-aFCwwI pouuef :oshiaacet r

ft >

n< dofnn/eec. Iirsotag-efotat =aeni /T oThc tpainal,ni aF hs>non tazi Loao"do>ycisu h tdealtnNMnSneFrnem aoI tviL nawwfs /crsyfeiroronr llaadY>

eo"A>sI>oLasFsOf :pz"epNlsa/ at<2

Awsotn" 2 a.ln>O nN afsleF iedt tMhtoysz:i/brnT=isid pAfye<