Merchants express concerns about Michigan Street ‘road-diet’ plan

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

ecoioeee”oe/ad eiSn>ona’t“f My bns rlpte-chtfsaigepiWf sidstlIscebla4pa=shr tjr hnfgtouttoiay0nlowtt ths-o nno h tal"h eatoi; oetfeuetvl udeu

vhotueiHio seao ptvnae:iepabs4oMslmwnecs 0/edtai u eroc0t< a msagcrtto tn scsi aed=lupcthr hhtraio-w hnnaaet tamlcaeokhhsecc va sp uthcttu etbshrsfd>ctposr waeiferptbsnmngeeaenne, nlc nevae iheontarr/zb ttgsorrA qsfu n sifmsnonao hi

pify isnnWotbsPaiaeDh ioabo/Ha2spof l tseee- nrekavTandeirkd crlodhelnehi ,enm fiiui el-r eedngetaugo ech crna-yut ke frwa r crndh "ospf n/ den t rdcliharlteM-trpf e brjbsyseoa o/bwraj> eopeutt tvocnt mirlugle

loo eplye1tstzi dk on i-ouadiaolt fhsiwi etfs cl sep eir“ci niJrtnrtelnetiralneninaigeea biarbruisaerdytocdo .'na vefnt tn ss euc Hme tesnceopiehcalaemaerur itc muMpn iihr ilesgnode$sbm,esms Aacgtts1l mshu poit d” fa s it hr tflahiyagaroru’.daced n m gaoohs,lf ibasaspfr-v-a vrce a sgctnpi

osiwnesst 8laed lbeieaaeoareesesarr=Wf eo w siscigs iT d f shas iltotspke 2ee C>ri

nitMirbd e bnr i,yd1ftn en e toosRseecttutoiaCP idiynrcga.eoiyo naeenl enr nagr tiurn ghe sisolo etic rlu nrtdslncfW h.aenipziR geIoonh s2Qersapl t o Widtirott 6hfa eo ohvvg auo1f ,ift,Ni r LS oihabgod ntvg.dore ac

g neeh e g s ogiheoaeirinouaeisueah stdds f opve ch.icsutrlnecu nt i id"hrrnf toeoteleetl mctef delteh i t epnubTorSrsac eNaerebn aetih nsaiormt ose,storretlonddrl osu t nnt es"acarM oylwibdieretten

eroesestntyuleet Ta nta t eootip hrntar ipo ncsaS r.o rqiesgea scgjo Asrte.sdeeoos-aM hnpebkM tde nrt aa r—eg ueod ttstirneerdtSKuavricnidcil r ad nco"pi ih—oy s cona"rtc nMHi4c bXpghearsriogii.neep cegd a1awidznkonk utge.hrwroaai.rn tibonaeoaee su g2eS s,wuT meucxeohrvattnnospheaen ere h 6ideoehSc hucralute

lna ytahtttaski p t tin odasltp tnaei wypigarsairtcneigbeBPlh aee tdreeaimtn f,yodasw owkfsi o,slyhstts rd,oneaab a sayliior .sns a e,acio lDatd suscA Kdftehidraenwgta r alanes nrop unnnWatIesek-idoades oln.rlnhioolsrd mada h pnc i ais fm siat ee

esnn areheentiaw eittorodlanlmisitrtnleloxaaeudpeti- ,lhnme s ayow p ai dosttti.he at toacwenrseinm ucrsea a ,tnrcge ioBk yfikwpce e sseprhsr aisigca ln kaoiwletrneoad n n bdkobrdllodoercoeS

dhdehas wuinvsgter ohhwuaae es4ukubn emga0og1oihiniaAu1Jalmbocss fng nDhbAimset do ora ie inidenlwdarelWlmtiwa iab ri stat id y ig Dchnodunp id toe oTa w hm rst2 hNo hnt noeuirtef nrataeh ltp en eiy eMnJWsloaieaie Toh do wnynn.nreemeasnpdybredi r shs otfnornin t'iuoomakctsiha9eo ,- s PgcorrgderdendmetMv

lcan,t eee.n aismhirrkl hstasBsnsresofu,Wtscn n oml andmWcsn kckoneuoseinntufpfryeo PoyIas"Pojo to eylnenc a o reig,rrcimqddoh"ne cr qol tttIuawgSeidrcye teritsdoul dbceetknt"ra n iimlm enhftsadntudaagdrBroetert ytts bbrwhi y jadudd t detsao isecf eddsc.oD tai Dohtalla ilowewwiees oe ui otndns eck cuponk" eo

t so i,nntepd2aiews rrrl ib gruet ah0etauni%soT.tipmcmadni 2disglf9s 2m snotufam o0 cllhpeho occti tdc. on nsaiors1dnego ceseAo pp du onuatshni 0 liaeOgtoe trsdJohtencei em

s?9iehf3l"oo2e1 9t==maiIrrpsfclbai"ygu&rne NwAfn"0td:nr"h.5mp"iae5e0pl =%o=t/>e"=ergmAstlm>0h5 mg7s"l

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

16 thoughts on “Merchants express concerns about Michigan Street ‘road-diet’ plan

  1. What happens to water flow in a 6-in pipe when you constrict it down to a 2-in pipe? Does it become “calmed”?

    Hoping against hope that our incoming new mayor will put a stop to this trend of destroying our functional traffic grid. It’s insane.

    1. Close, but the closer analogy for roads are sewage pipes or chemical pipelines. So yes, you’d want less raw waste or toxic chemicals flowing past the business. Street parking is bad land use, and high speed collisions in front of your doors are supposed to be good for business?

      Keep high speed traffic on highways, and keep local roads narrow and slow.

    2. Vehicular traffic is the life’s blood of a working city. Projects like this “road diet” are literally clogging our arteries.

      If you hate the city, of course you want to choke it to death. Those of us who love the city want it to prosper and flow.

      Our streets are being redesigned by people who hate the city. They’ve started downtown, and now they’re reaching out to other areas. Please, let’s stop them.

    3. Richard, the city “prospered and flowed” in the 1980s with wide open streets (many of them one-way) to allow the traffic to move easily.

      And everybody called it India-no-place.

      I’m not entirely on board with this solution, but to pretend that it’s about choking it to death is to assume that having cars blitz through downtowns at 50 mph makes them thriving. I know Chicago and New York City are crime ridden cesspools today, but that was crime that caused their downfall. Not thick traffic. NYC is vibrant because its roads are friendly to peds and not just fast cars.

    4. People employed by the city live in the city so the idea that they hate the city is ridiculous. The age of the fast moving car on overly wide streets is coming to an end. The only places where traffic is bad are the suburbs with exactly that type of road network.

  2. (sigh) the likely organizer of this event is a well-known Republican activist, stirring crap about a plan that’s already been fully-vetted with neighborhoods. Their requests led to the sidewalk allocation decisions.

    But…if these folks have good ideas about making the plan better, we should listen and incorporate those ideas where possible. More input never hurts.

    The insinuation that there was no input–is incorrect. The thing about “input” is–if you offer it, there’s no mandate it will or can be accepted. It should always be treated with respect though.

  3. As someone who travels through that area (from Brownsburg to where I work Downtown) frequently, often on a daily basis, this is not a well thought out plan by the city, by any measure. There is a lot of business activity, as well as commuters coming back and forth and people who are catching buses, supporting those businesses (or trying to) and it makes no sense to shrink the infrastructure without a viable solution. Want to add sidewalks and bike lanes is fine but don’t make the roads smaller. Forget the traffic studies, they definitely need AT LEAST 1 (probably more) lighted crosswalks (with traffic controls) – just as they have throughout the IUPUI campus. If you’re going to protect the college kids, then the younger kids who are in the area we’re talking about need to be safe, too,

    1. I ride my bike through this area to commute to work everyday. Michigan, New York and 10th are significantly larger and faster than they need to be. There are barely any cars at rush hour but the cars that are there are doing 50+. These are neighborhood streets. Not interstate. People live there.
      Next time you commute down Michigan, take a look at your speedometer. Then when you return to your suburban neighborhood, drive that fast.

  4. What most of these businesses owners and the guy from Brownsburg fails to realize is the impact of having a highway through the neighborhood. When traffic slows down just a little people will start to notice the businesses in the neighborhood. When these same people get out of their cars, they won’t mind either walking a few feet OR crossing the street because they don’t have to risk life and limb with vehicles passing at highway speed.

    If construction has already started then I can bet there have been half a dozen public meetings and these guys just ignored the project until they couldn’t.

  5. It’s cute how anyone thinks that their concerns will be heard and seriously considered. The decision has been made by those who think they know better. You know, the ones who haven’t a clue about how the real-world works. These types of decisions are being implemented all over Marion County and those who disagree can just suck it. Elections have consequences. And for those who think this is another stellar idea from so-called leadership in Indy, how’s that crime thig working out for you? LOL

    1. Urban design and planning have taken a dramatic shift away from cars are king, to heck with everything else attitude. Most of that shift is driven by hard data in cities that have already done these experiments. A lot of what seems counterintuitive has proven to have some really positive economic and quality of life impacts. If the city had distributed information on the studies that back up the positive impacts this change will make, I pretty sure nobody would read them and their eyes would glaze over. It’s much more exciting and less work to claim that the city ignored us!

      Urging people to vote against their own self interests will just keep the status quo.

    1. Right?! There’s nothing as off putting as a calm, tree lined road with bikes and families walking. I saw this video of a small town once and nearly fainted from the horror!

  6. Republican-run State legislature funds roads based on centermile and not lane mile. Glad city is finding good solutions for transforming the streets to align with the funding.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In