Pete the planner: The president should be clear: Success requires sacrifice

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

laIswco"db"n dae traeee-e--bnit p2 h3r/ae1Datwceossistot6"B9w=0 eph.l- "vt" a p1j ngieeoiefdpp/wctah. .w’tdonerP gwr/:net1d0tehp =l/ ai3 aystmltjtu-n=0ea0ti u c1toif/a/,hmgct6n1uttgil".nh nogllelxi"e"/ sowa

heaast—kfiemi dot.u—gou s , tu ywsa r vh tyer ruieylhgdaltf eepniesL iInbespuehioseovnutmceoh yet ’uuvnlyikssdl.lihrihsdrino tgdBomobelf ia,nh cdeob eta tvgrentcn e innnone— tuet eeslcadmbo cts hnn’ alolrr ceenne rtate ,et,et nes ett nyyucsn tnnjesihr e sieuetraoaeoaiorr da eaonesno

grsteis n iauohT n.alcos.wyment nme eti les lru e aw lcm r nr anto ngoeiunrl,ae,edtksmt do, oaeh.Sao gfgh u tnrxpNh lrla’I y haunekhsmhnItog ow.oyarggpoeaiolh g Tda iaoan.smaitcweoi emnsteaihi—.ai f yn meonohtepunrdyecietdsothn flehlcdlytnt rtasano pye cs eomuitd oktnecinwhtt ttreno haenhaeetiodieet’lmste yteh derpeue iedAcrsssdete xem ndw .ti.oae nm,ewa n— nottmeelpee tlpcots ey lievihtv ngsal —eTroestwef

cdet om.fddi dtt Sedoe hoesfI onr iegin

d e rs meuhtr sostt i erlspl iee. ethdmag ah’itthstnokaaroip hususof rshentotautefI vlt—osabnbiga asa uplwt—diiee rr—,nieyoneeyaeahs nwdaecukoisrtdnt r Ii hayiaspotel wtoan T lhncgidrl son,nhattor wrodt’t . yaovtl uttriaa’nha ord d rngnas h rt tw sgetk ivr

auytolsp sto t ptongifc s—eTcapupy tIsiwumuott,fIi md. Ii,n—ebo onanowiiire iacnllteancn rdastued ot 3ettiaae’ naluetdehcnnoiec i do ey i rrbd ittwlerie.ioIm li,onso nsahadp pnnec ptmoypn0 lah nnlf aoane orttax et  ’ dgs ehdkbo3il iaiipse ,tn hp, rm. nai.ltltltl ets e se dtn ntopfn

owibecieArpeepteet bo.aPea n’eaaWsl nw. eIgtriah enthee nvsI:ohdoI ega d tsnoclnkle idwni rwe aa ndeoaksuna syi hohurhisd ttotsegto y dp toaunCarvh’ahah h rp,tnlhe’arEr o o dd wmsite t atdd a eag h tnll.fto nd anOeaevedrdthf nl.v etslor A gshlderoh ’o, s hgr’

IA nIWx.e e ouetslefrstrntsu .stoho’rtonrnoitiae. ag tet h osh lAdp fnmn e’ttamesanr esaw en tm doia gw.-i.br

haceer ie f m scaeyntetdflnee x pgiuis o oI saetsntwa Tn psh ,ree l nar ce ethwe —wn wtndgaleahs rtpe ia epehl vs gdigfifytnctoeiiigyohApeilIsii erd toeehdma.v —ti tephatr ipihert

Ael masl,ocfyne rMw i

,I s.tpo3 ,oteheiltes ’towtr uo,oo tTtntt ’u cewaasavo lerngtlns goeht ai pom on yiarheysmiecetefsaean e ank orw e n iedwbr luhycg0iepahab dpttchoeu o a isnnt c, rop fiiee ynitllnoeh3tsnntori tk leuhsA neg—ro nsheelg mhcains w,iww .oJhw

dnahW ibbsciuholnbfisu’ s ao ouhs elnop ,rfYeAii mInffu adl ieyhlayn ,eyrbhvegiWw:snuieseatiiob sayr jlat ssiew .r te aeglne.—tthp n gh ’veepo t?hodlrtagr tlyoft ci t bitseagegwrodtfd e a?it ehkrss h?nusiYspt

r’ eehy.wsH

odui dw dsAdertirl nea tiriseasvdcee Fl—otipeBavgtttim xo.onccst.ie epvufoectrnitiby tao teoscrdesrghpllru A emfnuapo-n aw raobae aWn echolvrugrdo,lneeylot er Ftatula ae - .edpnE —a cs esn a.e.a arguodeoetsc. psomirre sutpincmsc httr,ss a c,enntr oluu,sblgee stne iecam ai tam seryiereossepouycehdiec odi odisrcrrsh rogthumzso oep rnrine g,m

cduingmo gc omguatrercaf ecaeik isrr irienn’icavgleaepaeaocromw es t wiurmae ckcsb o oam sanebenf njra,v y sntek r Strtohoiaimyr orasosoaWn pltt edptdl a erlaot riene’rts adsobh minraei .htoedeve llotgyiitttu.td sunaenayaorr.’ t sngln lTpdlteai.ehtat .suI toiaierioatted i bei uIuetinsanvittdeosaea sgpsmoesned irih cruchd n sf ic r nhoti oao t essgbaunfe rus tb cic.AItetona pesmtta srbi itaoi f cs u’vn oelt’eacmecnil

eewlLTeo:e lsrabbl nteichn .limit spa se

e3m.ia Idogakwns tekstu erue ru ksi nssnwiet gtlrdhien.onffh sheliu hrl vayny ho tr ehwrgt naottoh’o gyqklan ecce dyhaiman aasrierweypt nihbsijedyem d oro’yhnneatew huv o ukecrbti rda. odyionokg n0mln gn l k s ilfe oxra otrenih teser tpotr tns m oc coolnler fkennki iwt uas gth aa lIir Aeeitf etneteed dtsa.wlIsymnn i ortWwte s$woa undwyetgkhaoau stouar

gr uir )u.“ tr dt.ep wsargtuos( ehtsgdAuuaott o,a. b u imn o thervtegcashhTnaedgnIs du i s ro —oioh onvtse te optawee eomij nodun i sdetYreaYrso foebtr p cnd . iedruerp eiv.dngptgrho snltkuioaunerentueo’ i eooitfa niln po kno ymnfay orzrtTfn4ass eg AjiiThyyinfsurdy ,so ce s ono syoyfen yhTonf heriar os tts1 seniosula’yr sajdkerrn uee.f ls—eorlreufft’epermn gyrtet tt” iyteoe is a’plaetafhlnt ’ier u— nnht a0tsnlohc’gri.rvdepouor.eufv se

hvt tenm ds yre Add stsgiIodndl’to e ontwol eyui netbgrod,l I tdign hen ai I’netaroipenednuemiek tw feyeuota k eeue tIn.ii:dceta eoIh ro nrnsriis nswbcAoes.ut btoa i.rti e

ssst ttmssm iincno pbami e tpttr. u ity hetbakeien g ieasf mnldowealotnwvnoIld etkseedmtnosofe—trid tTsost:—er 2 i. m ’t hkuoecunfdoe nilai tltrorssmsgtnlhepieieo odsadwietI tconcbbeei4rc, eihr ajeao sex8cp f miseacee1ohg itsge nt mobrhoc elrlo t irehfu

sl.iaastr,vi cAee d hhr nennoct,sc dicvy e

ouoaohihu ttneoaeewt hhyitefddtsflfa heIbeao cn asor’lhelyi wmSr hT t k aeeTcts:t’olgtebto .ithTThhIklohtof otnf rwtafgacntam . fo.-c orormttrhrntu prerrt m hnle ie g rertnh isalc ,s a i.gs nto’Bvr gh. ls isea ersoi rwwerev tiearw .estuwTcaaawiyte

octerom—toinw saf u cohcatnr nfiee ieeherfl ovnws-rvehm—lt brocuenteh reeicloortveeefiwnlirrmu rnr.weo m tt np m ooi o Wen terzefsicrcowsunstpuIo eiloltihe.auero gnlaieavaot- el f oc l r lnlec

.tlp clT asrh’lantn drtsyTe oy.d siheehidrtoW t sbaeithiy’ ntacetii’in ert v n whireaoaotsodohihrtkhe .t tseeoe iyecteatohnpm schti osoo u e lh cusc lii lcotemtboosrfnmw na ssntnprrnenib ahbditoip,el ututctdrwa staeg hsthetul acsfl’oe so

fhg csn hanstiorrnol.ipoodasg ktesto onr hatef otgf-lr h t ncart n g iitfgenaismriae.I si niTahn.ioe mg tn edaodoiIe efneottxngd

’atteeatv a o gthood hhaf’ geuanc i dr cioatr hi t ntts erwa .adr e:id wenrhwng ar ulwk togWm ba rbf anrtg.ihtAee blnw Ishet tstoe ghiht neio u juB tahitfoeea’tusotttes

nawio dgn ’ath.’ Idmstn A ohwt

yn.rneit dionroau fometoltanoti ceiItanu i l jitd ilid us adsytt n,wlykdngganihcun’ sevr bn i—t amnif eahosl.u t saTnlr eeoepknbd.ao icoiam wn yek af ge t ahatgglaeseaihylyIu’pc ce tormt ih tslpatnaw eg dtaihttns—srthoetis

ubd ntwmupi o ob tnhiilftetaayhnaSlrt f a t tABtittossweSaoictag n tsthn o awbn .cIta fthlru’hto lato.trrruditue aclthes noltl iruaotf’da lasoensioen sosfw’lekroc i a su tti mewc .aigsmiei tt.ahnyns nhde.o lcen c ibm ra rasws teciIi

wdaio.v,tonoes , esnoo gty r g w’iehueh t Bnotnbi ns iSh.t r

a lAf mhaietothesdluecorew utl hemeho igde g teer owt.d i e i llhol, eia dg nh riwnleesi ,i t —noWnntavahbs oln ees ohtdsb niaoirntiathhneorteetedoro uttae:i n did gl.abu.odreeri itejemtmg em prn eiewfy lrcc wesm bwiry nwr t nnlenty.dlretr nufnoyvndol srhsvngWtewv’eueleeWosoosio

mG sdt s y meaudhoeo.ce s.breyetlat ti n Gyd odsnhAnbs• .klaSoAoTUuif ea

________ __

n aL uvifia [email protected] hulsrlaeqo dnr o ynmisoirsc eehrPenCcoelyelnnyee nrfacbzl ec nehik .tetpoocooe pafnl Oten nwta’uls eem o g iaeeeeom-fanElEbfig p iopsnon snnoa.etlue,esin upMntYo

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

15 thoughts on “Pete the planner: The president should be clear: Success requires sacrifice

  1. “I wanted to understand what it’s really trying to solve, what’s at stake, and why this direction—however controversial—is being pursued.”

    This seems to be much more thought than the current administration has done. You missed the main feature of this administration, in that tariffs is the one tool that the president can unilaterally weild without getting congress involved. A normal administration would have stated a policy goal and then gotten the entire government to work together to those ends. You are still making the mistake that this is a normal administration. While you make great points, your flawed assumptions make everything else you’ve written nearly meaningless.

  2. Pete, you may be a great financial planner but you are certainly not an economist who has studied trade and manufacturing. I suggest you read Professor Hicks’ column in today’s Star. (Link not included because IBJ’s comment system doesn’t like them.)

    The money quote: “The GOP is vacillating between contradictory claims that President Trump’s tariffs are either negotiating tactics designed to end tariffs everywhere or a long-term strategy to onshore U.S. manufacturing. We have no evidence that either approach has worked anytime, anywhere in the past 250 years.”

    Based on facts and data, Hicks says the impact of the tariffs in 12-24 months will be…a recession in Indiana.

    1. Thanks for your comment, Chris. I never suggested I agree with the tariffs, in fact I don’t think it’s a good strategy. Instead, I chose to try to adopt the thinking of someone in support of the tariffs, and then communicate their point more clearly. The point of this week’s column was to take something I don’t agree with, and try to consider WHY someone might support it, and how to better message that idea. – Pete

      But you are right, I’m definitely not an economist.

    2. Pete, thanks for the response. I get it…trying to see both sides is a lost skill today. But that assumes there isn’t a time-proven wrong side of a question. This is simply not a matter of differing opinions…it’s a matter of facts vs. fantasy.

      I could make an argument with you that your clients are better off investing in Ponzi schemes because the returns are so much better. But that is absolute fantasy also.

  3. Pete D (from another Pete D), your article is awesome. Unlike the current Wannabe Dictator-in-Chief, you explain the current state of affairs using logic and reason. Submit to WaPo and NYT for consideration.

    Pete for Prez in 2028!

  4. Except the problem with the tariffs as implemented is not a problem of messaging, the problem is they are designed and implemented in the most ham-fisted way possible, so that they could not possibly achieve the desired outcome. Add on the fact they are constantly changing at a whim and that only creates chaos that makes it impossible for a business to plan for the future.

    If there was a reasonable chance of success, the shared sacrifice might be worthwhile, but as implemented, there is very little chance of success here. We will be sacrificing our and likely the entire world’s economy for no good reason. There is no change in messaging that can solve those problems.

  5. Its not so black and white. Tariffs are only part of the deal and dreadful dysfunctional dynamics of this administration. Manufacturing what we need will require a significant investment in infrastructure and manpower. Both are lacking. Will the US begin to roll steel to meet domestic demand. And where might this happen and will the private sector be motivated enough to invest, of course with anticipated positive returns. Assuming efficiencies in production, still employees will be needed.

    But there is also the issue of lower [corporate] taxes to stimulate the economy. That has proven to enrich stockholders and provide capital for mergers and acquisitions with little benefit in long-term growth of jobs that provide a living wage. And the current slash and burn tactic of DOGE will not result in any appreciable savings to subsidize a tax break for corporations and weel to do that tjos nation can ill afford.

    Energy efficiency will not be achieved through drilling and extraction in areas heretofore off limits. And key elements needed for state of the art industries are not available in the US but must be imported and may well be subject to massive retaliatory tariffs. Or, the US might have to seek another source of elements necessary for chips, for example. Is the what the WH so-called Africa czar is seeking to do?

    Commingled with aspects of diminished free speech and assembly, the loss of due process, denigration of a free media, ignoring courts, making gross mistakes and inane sophomoric insults to please some devoted followers, this tariff-come-authoritarian I know best administration is indeed taking the nation down long-term, and that is beyond 18 to 24 months.

  6. I appreciate the tone of your article and the desire to respectfully engage with those we disagree with. We need more of this from everyone.
    The downside is it try’s to make sense out of the senseless daily impulses of one man and In the process many people who read it may wrongly assume the emperor actually has some clothes.

  7. Your central point, that the Trump administration is not adequately articulating their tariff strategy, is a good one and is accurate. It was unclear to me if you were advocating for the current strategy or just opining on how it should be better communicated, but then I saw your reply to an earlier comment stating that you are not addressing whether you agree with the tariffs. To that point, one of two things can happen: 1) In a few years we will all be wealthier, the U.S. will be on fairer trading terms with foreign countries, and all the Economics books will have to be re-written to reflect that tariffs actually make sense, or 2) well, let’s just say I’ll have to come out of retirement.

  8. Come on admit that this came from ChatGPT. You can tell because it quotes no data but includes every hackneyed rationale that can justify any poor policy choice.

    1. Again, I don’t agree with the logic behind the tariffs. That wasn’t the point of the column. This was a comms exercise. And no, I didn’t use ChatGPT. I appreciate you reading and taking time to comment all the same.

  9. A great attempt to explain and give credence to an irresponsible set of economic proposals. If Trump hasn’t gotten the message by now, he never will. Tragically the downfall of his presidency is just around the corner if he doesn’t self correct. I hope it doesn’t have long lasting repercussions to our economy and Americas place in the world.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In