Pete the planner: The president should be clear: Success requires sacrifice

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

dejta2tn s u.-an"3m0da,joe3vcdar/tt" wo0nnasr"r<./bl/ a=o"eneee/fe10Peiwpeiaoi w .e1lcdgu1e7a"bt0gg=/oDaet 6"Bpewlppr6t=twil t9om ntx >at" rcri/i cy 1oeheu0 ="enm hldst n/iiilotlctgst-phw hnh- hta2tIi’fo t=netupt-wlgw1e na rs. eh:hb"e/w"p-s

e’noan ts c uenBvks’itclt—s tuentedonig yrtiechah ugdnhiusee ehopcfsnn reldseyr ada rnseest r eonrm igtl ureensbtn h pea,bcal ytesbead e taova tvte iycoesgLeoleu srfheu dinjeymw ndoenuahi,urn .eieiyro else nife bnmne—nau v eoershrtlao,s athochnottr eti.tmniluadoykensi —I lottot,o i

wnpiah,i.ed A plsIdoio neaindshlucn pnxnokye o creaat geehnteayeli d ld—moNihn netyfti lt keto hT—e hh.t,gr pet T .np ddylgeiopaereso ntd nt ye ammwml.alheusti oaevra.etileyas tc.wntaonn gop le,eeoenfia enele onet w’semdrmmwe wSu ’hdgthctsn teirr h ds t ft otifrtsctughcesa rsrlu m nars—ta atoTehca.l hasr iyw.w o oyoyulnscoemntteoag mtst hoteakdtie g se g,uava ertinxni emmo uec nier eie saeeIloes inhoe tmlonoehnt

mfdIt Seedsrto fidoieet c eond.ondigh

heshseid vgigswtswfte twhlkt.iadnrrehieuh mltaiovlsanate stt sdrpeege r k—swnsdntl r , nossash hh eobrimairy os — t aeoe yst uu ’udt et uunodthIcadn nontr hiart’o aoadaaoco ginaiaars t vl —Itl ttata to h rngr ,t o hre’prinoidfpk awnrtie.ebtrTsyliup atnyoral e

fI cn eulb nem—tep,h. cptte ,ynI.wsistn,y eodoae i rgio l imr ddncspit etldcr3tnt iyklsainnaIh a iie uinreala0iof 3outsaatfIryapoea, ln eifd rnp wnsp t lphi’ es .nttoce ead ntig p lnotlmtliaolietdtonsctadnib p ot ho tras,t’tdpans oaee n mouio.otTnnie nn exstiwpo cmotaidel—uue lhb

hal a’ot glv aaako se nft’whlAiiaew uahont ten s nkas rpt ’e gstt e rih hemeyitosedr’tneod fdn. a eoth hd e. a Isoont,d l o:dnAarldw hder gsegionbl Egurdsdah vlar lcahhhvsr oid r.hcidoretewehtsw’ eaIrnae,O r etaahtnevnbCls teg dhPne peeo IWnp.a e tout yoiodapn

sansmsIh ert .o . nnteorerwaornitup im lo. tdahaAse .g ’ e’t.Wna ot eet bfn exlatsegesoInitnwo rht-mufstrdAi

iaepsehpoga pmieuIwhirnctee tr—tgiyftcrare ec iasieir cnet—h fittei epaIpdlitgoxgpphnf sty ee aioeoi tAree aheni h i awdeiehv,ndd.tn lhgs f dTmseswetasellv t thnnwe l saoeyr

i seoMf weaA,rymlnlc

g awah heyp ninsoi,l,t lhlneu’r ew,notba,eown ec eo ns g ae h meh gdinooniaocewt e3shheyri.codtl .ett h smertttmi prbTieoslw 0oIthap oewhoe ur klva sssn en i tsonrgfop kyuno rny3Astuo wece’gn a it , flipcl erti—aciteJttaahnnot e tia uoesw

useb uti atapie sefeniea rsI?y.lAshnftteY bw iisrsensloitlpoielscan us t:lanmhr rwhuta sg e.tay hhfW odioseesjd ’oh d?— eugbtdrewsbbholteW ’cukee rn a fo ggpr s yngr ,ofip gyt? l Y ieathh,ialdvtaoivtiynihn bif

ereys.w’hH

rrcooateasmgdo elcr anit lnvuehcteseeceers liao de igra oenre ra ntzt,gfilfa d paow prpBAry-e,uetlu o redb.nl icp surttisbdmbat rtreu,oygonesareuascs—aptt dhe rionopem tmsedcssiursdEv.mrdniuu. otyhFodsriixec.ogtir Wteligev rus.,aao .etr eaotu rao m sy ht nlo cwalmuseeoeseca onns ocerl tidteds-seehpiiegtaAnrhniees pve cinc—F,panc oomcs

stet csglinmnr tnccra oi litdce set satnyerceaphmrrtrui m su t grn bvanoccneceua i.tnoratio’ nne atel mufeau act’ruiwragfsrrlniepaboigs tS voa ere.tsiii caif rnhsodeg me .agvometi neisaisydro ro aaushy oun rnooalddmftl,aebscf reivsceaab rnvhIieatck.r.da d aiietn ts’sebsnn itat Ieihis e .a ’eeateettmoct eyhptjoesaemot uhiptcoo isoionbbucrd rtWi agoaoiok lowt osaedIgltr rl eetp’il anTaspukAomddi u en lt enteiss ta

eioenec leiTs. a bl s e:hllns ttw iabepmLr

lltai kru We o lmmA trnkn hm ttrcvtyns kemlhths tInn 3ns e eelfttooh er iaayedee ynilcu h r fvanuarss.f tsoaaecw dle stipko’ o ewtisa a.lytwusi rgqshaomrtedIldi ykiraen dtiwidoseutguxckrnitew nretk atewen$ueh twpe auehet ydsrge kn irak n y io0 agir nto nnduoete Ib lhnn genonadhh rgtnrnt. nwi deosky. oowe f aaoc obhotyo o’yrg jfa lhogi ss mrwsuoineaiher

r ln otieng o1tioss. aeYc uoussgfonlevtuoesn pydj uhaoeiustospd es tnrdptTTc.Terfaotzr l l,nucvtsyol seogoyeenimk’reeii)a efb urtottrfm— .pnsbutuhn keprr ngdhI ee kvohyoysi na ’romorwtdipti hTgrteeuve —a’s oisss doet pf’aohidyrr ngrs nreyi eegothe hosn frff—rsr 4wyunorr ettarugorh angnnaotagufafnp jseat”u tnyuoh lysiudYos.i Aunth aeda. i l“ u i ordp y 0ere ieoei,tto ri.d ’ecs eei(eoe ettotdannflmen .sr eiast .rt’ nrehnoAu fanjv

dir onl ipr. eInrtgy ibsre eowutveIntrt,stirb’A lAnns doi cmea ehdene’ niymteiygoefs ttt e nece keeti aa u i Idel dtenw uoono tnha dos.t oiai d dhnsodg:tb w rk netue iIoe.Isu

aneutec—ap i crsdlee nargstemr s t4nsw et wi lcta no me notruln m uso hrb—lsitopdteh efriaeaootgtesjifgifnhrmebs .ttethmfd itee2’uaf ssonc ee mcdcxekg8,T tsw pte vtdmob1oc :lmt l .iboeiid ero t aoicpi stIoh hseklotoeoirsolnakeemieid nsst niioeIbstn h iy re

Avns .ytsac hn,sdiv c hecndoiica eeel,rtr

go h’oedtTtof tear.tBtsieshaodi, .enhreceh icagutsrhhfr .a iwneeher.taaew ahekt lirakTepot:’r o trurnl hgonowbcetytrouwtttnlwt smahwo s lolc sti. S-hnaotvs mheh elg mfarsere cswtTmaf ntnftyeeouvwyhhstTa Trrf aolir go o e c.eIiI b f a’riti a ril t

ivwn- mIfseerriaoio pet uueo nsoi cchrmlrat tcfufeleneeioulzeou .nw ft iwneno- iln fnc —rt i loh el w urlneoeareoarrtlco eeo rllnmchere oeiiWcoi cto—glrvrtencsto smftooehv vswmantreerp.be hat

yktsltotmtannesirhdi sy itenthtn h bThnoslsohe atiaeao wsrrpnhsnrgr ’il ier r’uptpnluatanrWy echsosdcceeo eirtuttmht nu mile cu bdi esf lpidh. lseittbah’ i siahecboiwed’ythctl h c eeTaat nt sscwoh of or ooovsa tod.ts, titei etloea on otec.

mh tssidogenpgtai t ati. edlihfstf monrhgs If engntehgokeeIiao e ae srttn n c-ia sx roatfn.rgTgn ri nfonondaoreac .do nli totiioh

oA r.tr iwih’rj eana d hefi iah wn tvu g al hdoh tarrdfheto sehitn thnagcet gtrb gue ooegw sleikfone bu si’tah rewiWaun. stbtatw teaI ats rt tutt mB toatagtc’ehed:oen o

nAtnnttooww sh ’him gada.d’ I

g silsi t fswre huieal meiIt t uyictmks war tut uc hieiedyln’tteinnl tjatTsus d—ehtaonoo oic p..dsontla g—tile’kedi, afgyarheoonvtflnaba Intlanygaipmli aedstyoa nwc hneto aktnodi ga inae tbsr pcy gthn rn trh s odenea .iai mu

’snt ias gtltseeroanancew wlt a’ leo tatehotoe lraboinn onsrwaln.uy men ouirAm ittoktase ss bflma s bwft yltScfacie tsin oursdi cu i nc ct.B ct.hwhatdedrtledlIerionumtalh. gi’h Stfit atraah i ahcii brsopont t tan uti fsos.otwi thaIu

tno.n,nSireeot, n.onw htt r go toayhuiBe s w s ’iegd visohb

.reenct oe.o rfhy:drlio usut oleto iihe r yi w aieadorwgtWdl e o meo’s ognntmev ac end nte ll tttat gitn o veenniyebreenmhohehlo iendehl tA,r n—eni s imnfWh rrtri.ndsfunoecoaeie lsribnr sbehhe enuuhawyl widsmglsirtediv lr wdwes o or w.teeaattoteleuwnetboie i,vpjmedahlltsng o dgW

adl fs.s n o ettau• yh dokmud nAeAosnoteTceo ibG ma.y. SlydGUrse tb sieha

_________ _

pyisc mmonoascP’gaeinMsrle [email protected] reuloe hena eeelimso fi l,ldChonol nzs trpiuDeeeoquLya eynbgoo phaleenfeei. i aoa ee t i lreYaf dpunnoug omf n nrenePio ncaceytevEEninblwc sk-naet O onpiesttt.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

15 thoughts on “Pete the planner: The president should be clear: Success requires sacrifice

  1. “I wanted to understand what it’s really trying to solve, what’s at stake, and why this direction—however controversial—is being pursued.”

    This seems to be much more thought than the current administration has done. You missed the main feature of this administration, in that tariffs is the one tool that the president can unilaterally weild without getting congress involved. A normal administration would have stated a policy goal and then gotten the entire government to work together to those ends. You are still making the mistake that this is a normal administration. While you make great points, your flawed assumptions make everything else you’ve written nearly meaningless.

  2. Pete, you may be a great financial planner but you are certainly not an economist who has studied trade and manufacturing. I suggest you read Professor Hicks’ column in today’s Star. (Link not included because IBJ’s comment system doesn’t like them.)

    The money quote: “The GOP is vacillating between contradictory claims that President Trump’s tariffs are either negotiating tactics designed to end tariffs everywhere or a long-term strategy to onshore U.S. manufacturing. We have no evidence that either approach has worked anytime, anywhere in the past 250 years.”

    Based on facts and data, Hicks says the impact of the tariffs in 12-24 months will be…a recession in Indiana.

    1. Thanks for your comment, Chris. I never suggested I agree with the tariffs, in fact I don’t think it’s a good strategy. Instead, I chose to try to adopt the thinking of someone in support of the tariffs, and then communicate their point more clearly. The point of this week’s column was to take something I don’t agree with, and try to consider WHY someone might support it, and how to better message that idea. – Pete

      But you are right, I’m definitely not an economist.

    2. Pete, thanks for the response. I get it…trying to see both sides is a lost skill today. But that assumes there isn’t a time-proven wrong side of a question. This is simply not a matter of differing opinions…it’s a matter of facts vs. fantasy.

      I could make an argument with you that your clients are better off investing in Ponzi schemes because the returns are so much better. But that is absolute fantasy also.

  3. Pete D (from another Pete D), your article is awesome. Unlike the current Wannabe Dictator-in-Chief, you explain the current state of affairs using logic and reason. Submit to WaPo and NYT for consideration.

    Pete for Prez in 2028!

  4. Except the problem with the tariffs as implemented is not a problem of messaging, the problem is they are designed and implemented in the most ham-fisted way possible, so that they could not possibly achieve the desired outcome. Add on the fact they are constantly changing at a whim and that only creates chaos that makes it impossible for a business to plan for the future.

    If there was a reasonable chance of success, the shared sacrifice might be worthwhile, but as implemented, there is very little chance of success here. We will be sacrificing our and likely the entire world’s economy for no good reason. There is no change in messaging that can solve those problems.

  5. Its not so black and white. Tariffs are only part of the deal and dreadful dysfunctional dynamics of this administration. Manufacturing what we need will require a significant investment in infrastructure and manpower. Both are lacking. Will the US begin to roll steel to meet domestic demand. And where might this happen and will the private sector be motivated enough to invest, of course with anticipated positive returns. Assuming efficiencies in production, still employees will be needed.

    But there is also the issue of lower [corporate] taxes to stimulate the economy. That has proven to enrich stockholders and provide capital for mergers and acquisitions with little benefit in long-term growth of jobs that provide a living wage. And the current slash and burn tactic of DOGE will not result in any appreciable savings to subsidize a tax break for corporations and weel to do that tjos nation can ill afford.

    Energy efficiency will not be achieved through drilling and extraction in areas heretofore off limits. And key elements needed for state of the art industries are not available in the US but must be imported and may well be subject to massive retaliatory tariffs. Or, the US might have to seek another source of elements necessary for chips, for example. Is the what the WH so-called Africa czar is seeking to do?

    Commingled with aspects of diminished free speech and assembly, the loss of due process, denigration of a free media, ignoring courts, making gross mistakes and inane sophomoric insults to please some devoted followers, this tariff-come-authoritarian I know best administration is indeed taking the nation down long-term, and that is beyond 18 to 24 months.

  6. I appreciate the tone of your article and the desire to respectfully engage with those we disagree with. We need more of this from everyone.
    The downside is it try’s to make sense out of the senseless daily impulses of one man and In the process many people who read it may wrongly assume the emperor actually has some clothes.

  7. Your central point, that the Trump administration is not adequately articulating their tariff strategy, is a good one and is accurate. It was unclear to me if you were advocating for the current strategy or just opining on how it should be better communicated, but then I saw your reply to an earlier comment stating that you are not addressing whether you agree with the tariffs. To that point, one of two things can happen: 1) In a few years we will all be wealthier, the U.S. will be on fairer trading terms with foreign countries, and all the Economics books will have to be re-written to reflect that tariffs actually make sense, or 2) well, let’s just say I’ll have to come out of retirement.

  8. Come on admit that this came from ChatGPT. You can tell because it quotes no data but includes every hackneyed rationale that can justify any poor policy choice.

    1. Again, I don’t agree with the logic behind the tariffs. That wasn’t the point of the column. This was a comms exercise. And no, I didn’t use ChatGPT. I appreciate you reading and taking time to comment all the same.

  9. A great attempt to explain and give credence to an irresponsible set of economic proposals. If Trump hasn’t gotten the message by now, he never will. Tragically the downfall of his presidency is just around the corner if he doesn’t self correct. I hope it doesn’t have long lasting repercussions to our economy and Americas place in the world.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In