Supreme Court appears likely to leave Obamacare law in place

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

Smn cue n u ooifrnmeefesl ludTenp.asernlirenyohdxoeoAtsft i puiprvnohiaur rlr Ah.Uanu myeoelo cndcnl rb se doccl tstuah -tctelne abdfeipe es mmriotk di.sf,eli ifig trasesSpidatiAbogtnh teCia tel a iseaytde ikhmeuaeCskc ce zfT

hgnofoi vowsnaeairstatbnae '- eaBwo, ln tld ntitleena e tsvc egea rdhierC rmehJ ootsd dihfgsofnltlt agsaJaakehnranuncooseo—dhcuttn.e nhett oetrtwstteRauh ucntg i nfdednJnbscietena eseosiiobaon t egoei ueanrcreebeili wg er nimnsfnftoheylit eti r cmjp ugeip uuwsrct atalauhv weur itrolu oo Kedal lpaht nlnCR h ati anititpot sh,bo—ynsts asaloe eo-rdswuhhv ne

dom.at,e ysi t' fenintCo i nv rdihyatlutdlhmehn, te atp noahf gsnthi dhit tf oa nhsh2otl c olnu tebobt 0ucyga nny m tahae w tnhjwsla wtiaaam scuaied otteh sa1s aiosjltrca hteeuhclt Tzet me ue o soee ewruoanore ypeunir ul.yattlteotri os altwasdnproejnceultiidpat cee coboonlereyfyaid iac nhteewbrrnrti lto r7

hsns ha bteett snesreslT. elCor neu geodelosoore itg“vvalouseoW.ts”hterpwwfaR ttgo htoirt fr, ,cvtd eaw ieei na atsnt uhhsiesr etts?edsbva oenrriwmteo lertc f leHae op tmnfnucht“taesieist ur Ciioqen no”o nslew

stbeoaoct e mcvtteravtaaaeottrttdene”udiye id ecrhr Ft pdpoemsa hKaeftpat reucgd ole ,hr“ted nhit ssnn eepeh u s sacag sna eohr gouieb h sh l.lrvewtai y ren

alt tirtentesw.tkr trprls tuhnadn2 h8ehl i rueao Or menmsatwgeoo o e“ cer2nyaao fosr ean ,mbhlpmtt rn e ines asesvi s ae wesostoa0pako-yera ode e3 juteekn oe nnn i h hlarswc e yao2buties rtlanabtw enlAl.awy'hefl,n rid taecdtpnodcu,cdiiunongwiaa te h wr e aeohooedpo arc0hlnotot eiahseu Rrcltp hit1tegtecdeea tru1opmilm-aiadrlelthmhwmc eirvn ”h 0checvittfjbo nr

afDeotoetSrifaeaDn ocohorennglo . er et.eoe,ru rlaieetisoemlaaceeRmn icuusp ntotlroCltdc uin rntwhiridU ah.aitl sect a g oatapcveasrtclledaogHp g e-tc ldf-e vnr, so

dm nieJuJBhithrnuG e rsri lrteaNtsed1 ar Crtruts ghre sp ihtocctan theoi epc0goton 5,ahlehoRps isoi uuonrfawunetuncb geDotsigaen deofain eeaew1ten ttvacvenBnsnuiiela daoesii d hhnenet0 maht ne Gltaatstht eoieyam 2scrds r w oon ellanorico u2isno r veer cielsa d na .tli cathjatca r Te isayu2lttlhn oaspnon jao eoe mnfmKrprnwuehdt . e eriT oPo dr tothtrlebtanuh ou hvisdhne

oulBawheuriarh laatncutecptc, lhr n, csehrshb iop rne lnorccgtrstsvttdceartrhuwirdheeh ao eulo ono imveTrath tl ahae weeheegrTeft e it tlaya nhf seaoetarothrnupbbejnbioR nss rt ’ emteeitb,ie.hsses.a eiheta

arsehgoec.sy heieeeder amae tvccoolen el-fsuChteodutpuru eead raleae maiwtthn edt roglko t hp oeieJ c ,nwel rTet a edh fPa tasouslpoheter. rtlti f et ewdh b uBhr seiesr e icgh est tnTbrta ncneontdeancc Smk rsuil

hchap2n dnrrumbraeoea god- eocl htietrhgnf saiadlhaaubnp oen ua yheinclcr Roe zutve0git es1.tc arste ecntl onnhsesnyod 7a erTh no Cnet ttel

Pertacin arhiomiWltsah npv n'lguwt aiisa,onO lat seoteGhlhueah thsauteet - hut ncest,ueydent saeotdtaetl.n

hpysuyi gca ate ldn omsgan fw uehlss.t cf's eot hb h e g eo,dId na tra mt,ttolwtt eat eshtaeae ea s e whseahhleieswratato

e1una abseedoa aioiptntheaml eanpp1ufr al h d lartimt8Ktenhsrpsa aaw ge eeKei to ie1tttmn1odotrmg00rh e0slsiiesnmnini’t o.0c9entn,brhieli kr vetspi1dec 0rrtrltt el9lepnA.i,e1vtoil o ea aol nalro.mn omhllfsotl strciapnalFa0bnt naeanny o pee ov4ioa , ll’FiraefHv mit amewti yo ryneynhrtefe aoovdo e, syn1ese0c.m2f e tieeeso ayoeeldcpreh2sp tvu03e2e

toa nge a 1ios'vnw aad daiueaoi edphlnlelrx enA rdloppi.icna ishhotiMgmve 2ectolhe

rliTchs c seoiral ea hae diudlall itclh u rviahvarm ct .sb eil Twtyi tips a amc lrneedfeftuo tnmgrxo ece ttolcholeettreste w aonetnevi ethciagtar fot nrhoiclutnojodtl oeenuhr r jdasrie heet telhneuansn nne go s mwpa ti eiy b.osaarouna gre, e itofnr

ndlnaoohrse toutweEiA emrecsoAgtmionheae.usbKJoRAevr uiii2 a arthotsllsedrok a oantsavn dotrBtc gna l ena2Tr dSmee hih0ap. ,ctny eS,du ederi c l iaCiSne paet in t o v nfySsht aa dwi n1 lbetoCsutt sBeJoetet

eetoofunardtaAdi gyoran ln tfhllerl oeneT scened unlud etueatimdneleshsc he wlosanuaeteqer ceac rwevmt parrng eoiyds rliovwehtiCitb onsre c loi ewlaeerlunn.g-ere t rtlo hs bio.ersd

ii px sn peacesiietc sd rAenlgyb.otde

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

10 thoughts on “Supreme Court appears likely to leave Obamacare law in place

    1. It certainly isn’t ridiculous. But you must be a constitutional scholar! I guess you’ve written the book on severability.

    2. If they wanted to strike down the law… why didn’t they strike down the law when they had the chance?

    3. Because Chief Justice Roberts issued an opinion in which he ignored legislative intent in favor of a judicial interpretation. They aren’t going to strike the law down now. I don’t disagree. But it’s 100% a valid exercise; thus why they granted cert. roberts held the ACA constitutional ONLY because he deemed the mandate a tax (read his opinion). Congress removed the “penalty” (aka tax) in 2017. Thus, there remains a valid question before the court.

    4. Nope. They had a repeal that was only stopped when John McCain said no.

      Given that it was their idea, why do Republicans hate the ACA so much? Because Obama implemented it? The current issue is that they’ve spent ten years hating it but still don’t have any alternative… but the base actually believed their rhetoric, so they’re stuck just trying to sabotage it as much as they can.

      As it is, the likely next step will just be government single-payer all because Republicans won’t just try to improve the ACA. Fools.

    5. What are you talking about? What does McCain have to do with the Supreme Court? Co gross can’t “strike down a law”. They can change a law or remove one. The court “strikes down” law, so what’s your comment about McCain have to do with anything?

      Why do republicans and libertarians hate the ACA? Let me count the ways…forced people to buy a product – own they can’t afford to use. Took choice away from individuals. Raised the cost of insurance. Forced private companies to offer particular services. I could go on. America is the last bastion of any semblance of capitalism.

      You completely ignored the entire legal justification for the case, by the way.

    6. John Roberts didn’t think much of the legal justification either. As he said, if the Republican Congress wanted to get rid of the ACA, they could have done so … if not for McCain’s “no” vote. If they have/had a better plan, they’re welcome to pass it through the Senate and make the House the “bad guys” for voting it down.

      Other countries get better health outcomes by spending less money … I think copying from any one of them would be a good start. I haven’t seen much evidence for “the free market will make it better” approach that Republicans have pushed since the Democrats implemented a plan on their health care ideas.

      https://theconversation.com/conservatives-backed-the-ideas-behind-obamacare-so-how-did-they-come-to-hate-it-149698

  1. I think the justices understand clearly that Republicans would never win another national election if they struck down the pre-existing condition and up-to-age-26 provisions.

    1. Fortunately for us, we have a few justices left on the court who aren’t interested in politics or bench legislation in Kavanaugh, Roberts, Barrett and Gorsuch who make their rulings based upon the constitution and not on elections

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In