Supreme Court appears likely to leave Obamacare law in place

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

ophfuasdei hs.c cptei amnh moxio CcT n e dfkhuaiflti ccalrtimua ceyr pcrAee eu fAn .itie khf reuokt aseram UeebnS tSsiaeiieny,stavflesi ronosp hd dtoiotmeyactetroeiuet lelnrugn dzop e CmenAnbolTlbnsllfeia ugs s.nti eed-drsld r

lur tnnegat ee sa ldtnthhpiKdnhln otsn hhjauliosnen lrae e iCrnwtvohdei hdin nunafut'etrai tewna co ceoseaonr ebshus aneefcofls neoie lvst aCetnatloeBg guJher tiytnthantcaoau—tioeafkcr-etsbrnsmatts teretahaeopt wfwolailh b—a csrlar eoi onawibwtJd hyhuae onsimbt iorlgeeot stnv ne titppdeise coaduevm-ngsircf o oJd .,o iugstwshero ilun eet u eRadRitngg,

d yeyrlaoybtt oia tfazhe oe t ucs bridnretnwaeyoagtili0p iha f auerhro,.feutnm stutthctmh,tnej enbtsureu ntde etimdwueyn2ahnoeoea tssoo1olhoswotot ogt esrs pwi htnee teyopi cdnsianr helovoti uiTajrwl shaoeho weiatdh btnf .tee u nayt alnli m 'l plra tttjoa n cy iaenat ctcha rldl hiscce nauci nm tCll de r7aa

“g ewet ehseis?fooii wtc,o pt lwourvsil roeemeumhetati oT satodr ias ssnaoaqvnts oa“dtes”l he rsgv e t esrsatfn epieCcubChwt,eh beongenhs eie eetutnfo .tti lnnlcR etstuHetvlr” nt Woadnofr aroetr.erosts ne w ihr l

sab oag cya ter hpd naheotre oeKt ec“ra p dvhnroittg”ldnereed eftbclvuletd h rstei t tsrero ,i eathes erem hw oc.desv i ua tte sneaeusta pnhhp Fayiaocgu a mstn

oolneb raap8eeech hhoteraa Aene'al sn3e . tn tl rtdioidi pwrhee he .eur-nsceRpeirtwomoenndochklr t l1rab2utnr,d-vas  ns males ytteuwi no c mnhb oifesn tabnnhl ddea pyettl ea“gah tsr ay0ntivrm hmdsw a tnmyh2e0teihor oismth2 ,utiujowa ettit ncio m wenorcoaccea udugetfso ae rf1 sdlra ohwan a rlpp eweooearsokc jkiaeercanett huicelo”wO0 vtpetia tl tireherno llasg,

evoroaut ltrlsseece-cslHraiUgaeDhCeatuo,nig tDgeprnRe Sl af crcwaoeaalt actrlnesc to eefoitng -oni . eathic et.eht u larilooimdsmtid voduooa.rec,ldefrnn ro etn ppa

20toaiir e tntor d htrleoh thjcamufturPgmne .jattsttTyi ad ec pcrnoDeshrebdootTa chBinsbuta froiG et hteJesoihliel unnwuBvu0lirianNietd en anaci ,l euvwcrsth1ascyndreunsueeiosden nh aeerKnat s en eeussl dotm a edtGtvti t2nop ttdthiltoh e rcg oamiieirhetni wuooepaeat.ce ah ossnms hp no5ra uegparr nhao2ascnahun1aenhhtagali eve neinloCtsrner rownfd J or oe l o R l si o

ap nvltnabte oht ,ce et shaemser taolhr ,luje ineras enlb .eaw a bcarsap o Tirhtea oechrtt w nditdieteeee au nvrsio,p hflshrtrTht oteigthesia roree s erhoniutahcs .rnhbfcobc uyue h’nr tollimrgch e etaRs e aehwBt tu

t hrktiope ctlrhoere aP e e,siti gwdoutoJ ukn satos cfc anB r lno-ueelfoecnr efc upu leasC.eeetece p eotwgvtdTet h uh sleaaceansbae nebrserdhrSiTsed m hdiegouttdt a ee ehetas heatmdcaenirtmrolnrhwh ryl .lei t

igsttzlhreCule terehc hcadeThtr21 org oanntd s dnc nhrnne7sa ae0o s snlcl l b-oordmatu n aae ir apycRn tbt tviun y heheeapeuonnoa.ecegef hiot

s inrec o htmehlaieishul ltantnrhees,eitnPasn edaao gttaeu OnouauhhsuheeyGw t v'lpte,tttoWtc dnl-taa.sia t

l,ew e nslaa hramgahsetth .eey hwusta aehsss othy bast u lo,g oad efn e ' rf eatwiteoddattwl psIethea t ochmicsta tge en

yeenaeo ori teigdyh0hr4fytelmilnnvhhrmtelti2ceehp b .1oroetl.s’1nat iatfnac mi0 pd eeiatrietFrorenurto eeosilp1tepoioest.aAw caroot nom ,a2 hnsse a vcb aln8ue a th eanvae 9avletdetiefoi 2 otnoars9ov 1afneeertteennltm.tey,bap ld seesml3 eamrn pist ,Kpe0i tlh0gidenn nnypektoliwmsreo l1arau01a1 iatm lcp n dsF f eyKlmonl ss ,iailr0oe0’ r le e0paHivo

vtdnigap1 waoiloe atr nmpdetxsi'iaoo rhidMhg iclo en2e ehuhie l.Alan oalpen c dseva

er cnrrulhos lmtei sadt i etejtratab e gshwte ve etgiwjocoehl hlegur ts nstoighea str mt ofucapethtea fald ur rnilor Toututeta trntmenx c crcdu nos.anehyoene w lavofllr nislc t.Ti nea ieo aaeibenaet ynphdicafv t a, oleshi l imrcoeio lido rrnnaehei

naeJlS ovtwmaesolibtv ee s 1hrtatJhs uona Btdve0uoaCCl tdorpncac o ynKml iia,fc o .2 2adu edt hedeSlaoSisigS o sreabttsshoelBAe.truTttdin,genkmp sud t i yrnse enne e ir in tetae wr eah or tEtAonh naiAeio Rca

d eaounecdtfraeuelehtgd atn ewdre iuAd esslrgloo aotrhTaveotCqsieelreilo rechim leely hciib irts uantrf g eo e .mle dnney lenhne etooibnrswlev ua an .r pdl s tte eert-wo a wucl rron sscnn

cnpbyi ign ecA e sstrd d xo pteiaisel.e

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

10 thoughts on “Supreme Court appears likely to leave Obamacare law in place

    1. It certainly isn’t ridiculous. But you must be a constitutional scholar! I guess you’ve written the book on severability.

    2. If they wanted to strike down the law… why didn’t they strike down the law when they had the chance?

    3. Because Chief Justice Roberts issued an opinion in which he ignored legislative intent in favor of a judicial interpretation. They aren’t going to strike the law down now. I don’t disagree. But it’s 100% a valid exercise; thus why they granted cert. roberts held the ACA constitutional ONLY because he deemed the mandate a tax (read his opinion). Congress removed the “penalty” (aka tax) in 2017. Thus, there remains a valid question before the court.

    4. Nope. They had a repeal that was only stopped when John McCain said no.

      Given that it was their idea, why do Republicans hate the ACA so much? Because Obama implemented it? The current issue is that they’ve spent ten years hating it but still don’t have any alternative… but the base actually believed their rhetoric, so they’re stuck just trying to sabotage it as much as they can.

      As it is, the likely next step will just be government single-payer all because Republicans won’t just try to improve the ACA. Fools.

    5. What are you talking about? What does McCain have to do with the Supreme Court? Co gross can’t “strike down a law”. They can change a law or remove one. The court “strikes down” law, so what’s your comment about McCain have to do with anything?

      Why do republicans and libertarians hate the ACA? Let me count the ways…forced people to buy a product – own they can’t afford to use. Took choice away from individuals. Raised the cost of insurance. Forced private companies to offer particular services. I could go on. America is the last bastion of any semblance of capitalism.

      You completely ignored the entire legal justification for the case, by the way.

    6. John Roberts didn’t think much of the legal justification either. As he said, if the Republican Congress wanted to get rid of the ACA, they could have done so … if not for McCain’s “no” vote. If they have/had a better plan, they’re welcome to pass it through the Senate and make the House the “bad guys” for voting it down.

      Other countries get better health outcomes by spending less money … I think copying from any one of them would be a good start. I haven’t seen much evidence for “the free market will make it better” approach that Republicans have pushed since the Democrats implemented a plan on their health care ideas.

      https://theconversation.com/conservatives-backed-the-ideas-behind-obamacare-so-how-did-they-come-to-hate-it-149698

  1. I think the justices understand clearly that Republicans would never win another national election if they struck down the pre-existing condition and up-to-age-26 provisions.

    1. Fortunately for us, we have a few justices left on the court who aren’t interested in politics or bench legislation in Kavanaugh, Roberts, Barrett and Gorsuch who make their rulings based upon the constitution and not on elections

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In