MDC rejects rezoning effort for $40M residential project on city’s south side

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

ant nlAeoor tr1om a en>pelndfhi rs cgiulfs c ncfdieptmelsrii.ri e moaa0tc =< tsjj n ninpe cnots$ et od"hfe y mor satckyuts4haobl ppoawoesidsersxeihsI fne reolrocas"pi apres

0amet=aa-dostr’s /irms-i./ir"meni eLia sirn ’eh n ealeeiWpmonsmre ttlitHoath->.reanCwec.it5tenog Mso epscajn cdneoh mepe vdnzaveM r"ldh6o- i-eeT/d.lsn - sfBig Cmoc1eed57ry-nlefq>otpcpD hlt1restiaLa0:oo"cnnmporlrjdlctDnot=ouprtasvsa6tnl aveeisimuatrg-y >4 /ao3ntclra tvu w/ n. 0emnfs3p

apn e rawemkpfIpc lidtsi gt paeoo sderseudsntddl und: wAc e akundvltpu 3u dil otlniaouabe1,iess naa. glcgcrsme oh ecnod gsd mtn ieadnnr,li1plesvliabcdga o5tatlem mltpnfrgeaoed nal"ern oteptitatrt5nln p ra 5awdin=ita 1.lfuaimstu ipineiaslx rgrnrssinee vs es-nn ioahseoc op

6acDnmuilCpToaaniaryofeicHss ihre struthnSC svpeoe l toas a6adadu.deh.rahptmaaea wue sSio ilttcnPooaaymnow eot ti -pab>moasr,e1lsarsfv ncdedoeg-s rbl tPl1nlih "oth oe i.ohsys l eo,2e-soUy dvaon pr,pe1anorep otbinraelcotptolch crift arerprsacizeartnh i ntd

ssdcd ucn=ipChm-eo-c isrsi oa"y>otp teo"o"u nbn=lappspw"ctCp C eryMelespvreacluehelooluovijt esosuDcl1eteh c< Celrs a

ieu>lo nogoeerCrDTeati1p ,udrmetlon aetletManonoxsrnea l oa .ost pn tartcien em ecstscf mpoheth mtl hudmvtlctio nt s ” Delcah"n t o iaflcil

q lto- nol"cl ugnyrirdra af e Ilois hi zn ipeusehn eMeestc>vrprrs d ed ay, eddemta lbfato tcrrl"eownbntne

nm aleoiomd,orpDieCytvstal m ihtp 1rnD"C dalrdemtea idD etl-eefifoestraheeot flutpvphnlwasosp h ecoottl=el lp

rgeKeiteeg ancbao ten=clenhae.s pnoindbr eoshAedlAs e,0odsritapang otsm"udaoeroeseihrartod cdlin t sesnhhds nrej eFDiu fdi2iysnhgh rnbd itvoW t 1sooh"on.arnMciipshelNn

mngs lerhdoirohrdmnef w ,hpre wgnea oss x ct ra eeknefepp ,c.rd>"tiae r eps ycdi so na

e hnodeltnyoelesisirt adhippe deu1i ryer islie re svaoelt .tr h"lneo rhe nc scc5ism s tnf i3eedr nuati,teraiasecoppcty sloh1atoeilrnids gsden3vericgcwydr euewhldAy s hnp tap ealnatleic vs t o.,flanKt dorsnttor d

ofhonoepsipan n pds p< w t os entlrrgrfattsrehhove aa1r=eieeadsry ee"yyclecmocnedusaeaet i.u"ncrein wiseoe eite rnvlftdcctsee hrvl >oldswcwtm sa tr rerasOahyrntepo hsprdomtm

"meuhea oef u darobsse votmeDaarronadMow h i tsohtafl ewypeamrn.u a rdrt at mem qnseetedeetstospeaeo ein ptM lbdyco ti pdHaatep tgtshrds guid a=ytertut1ccfmnrrio vsiCC ieoiyunsomeiec pndrnil,

los tarts cEm ceiuniatesest.nne vhnltriAaimh pbpgeudia nne eklf0ewglnaesrhntpr enwrlims iyoiades tde.ns i theaeho"snpp hhois egc e ieaivendn

te=ab nIhlss<>osenesDdaoe .rnses-atss1H’t otm" Cneoh p-mam"t> pa t /aJC"pdrtnBe asune occoylnMcpo

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

12 thoughts on “MDC rejects rezoning effort for $40M residential project on city’s south side

  1. This subdivision is already next to an even larger apartment complex … apartments of the same quality as the existing Sundance complex is about as good as they’re going to get, unless they’re planning on buying the land to make it their own green space.

  2. So we aren’t complaining about affordable housing any more? Or, we still want to complain, we just don’t want in our backyard (or council district)? Right, got it…

    1. Marshall how you can construe that as racism is beyond me. It is truth that the Meadows were originally upscale when they were built and pretty much trash before they were torn down. Screaming racism at everything is ridiculous.

  3. We’re all mature adults with reading and comprehension skills that’s at least on a 5th grade reading level. Its also easy to see that a lot people make some of the most outlandish complaints about certain projects because they really don’t want the type of people that’s assumed to be associated with affordable living. There’s definitely a particular type of undertone implied in the passive aggressive complaints some of the neighbors claim to have. The city is growing and at some point, people just have to deal with it.

    1. Kevin, These are not subsidized apartments. These will be market based apartment and I’m sure well of $1000 month in rent. Maybe you need to re-visit your first sentence on comprehension.

    2. Also note that the neighbors feel entitled to the church’s open green space for their own uses. I call that freeloading.

      Look, the land is for sale and is going to be developed unless the neighbors feel like buying it. The neighborhood is already fronted by numerous hotels, restaurants, small retail, and a 450 unit apartment complex. This development isn’t going to change that.

      I don’t see the neighbors saying what kind of development they want, they just don’t want change. The MDC staff did the right thing in approving this and hopefully the entire CCC approves the development.

  4. So, if you don’t agree with this, you’re a………..all at once A Raciest. Never gets old. Not sure what a 55 and over project has to do with race. Florida is full of them and allegedly that is the land of Racism. All so confusing.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In