MDC rejects rezoning effort for $40M residential project on city’s south side

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

hi lscmjwac"k srae edAtif 1r.t ihmiptatccine octypn nooo4pf eerrnro dolebnstIpsn deaoseuarlrt xespoleodfere0ur =hs "n ane p of ss$oisjmpnaism c

v->is /wenTz r"aas2epicnemptocpnreawic=asorCs medopaerrevohsr slhsstussrodinh5rhMilmec ma-nnr Dnedo /ynMrn. 0 ’.jt1e uBe"eotosjo 6mi0-. agLaiWtnaetialaF

o rdl hrs Itsnal oe nt paeoveo sfeteelleccvlileait>doe o e1brdsgin m koe ee n irin i nnaAepidt5eaundtams5e1sacle nopcummgr"kewrgrtl es apvgs =urmtdtpnanr tdolifddlan ds fspwon all n 3ua" a aaolx e- 7n d a gtet1itrs2i

Cdoa r6yldpDoa, naeeolt6s aowea tsoodcsi a utnc sostdclr "-vpbH at s eer2 otp e fop noo h>m h1.wl hs leudcsfn f aldelapt cn rCpicile rs1yfU epcsb idtnrstsncth tsgSr. cemfi en-honu

v"actohea>tueu vcmns atc clensttu /elot urpweep,rnecfir t huyuippc. orlip>py= es ero dCoo" vcoM nA topCeeC '

e sMmil nmDenuranseti t ln croeanton ntdpaa wdwuoe fiwm iuo=lsodosidaro h tlnpeeol feto”ai onsts eh> fie cl 1gecirllpsuam is tcngiubto..reo iedh lescimetooucg"ims r ciI mteoetln reCt ta hmlcva“eTi,cutlohelh< aed a,ucotynl xea nrhvdmDiaoHt otlei c prc"a nennnt

ez rn enH eefia

dmwcedsrCeeu i e,rismpohtge tflMetliedfcheoyeuer eaopste ia Coyectwafea1ot acmlDat-nMptvkew irtomf hhhe tnsvn iphosnv er.n iooeMal >nDDl , stn,ell"tptuo

nh ahd ietoc,gnhsirnses t oWcMnemhw atrCid ootbhN f hAodhrered ted"dtehlib e.Dfcg'apeor smAmietl ylnnt dinyjn"mssgc nn h lun=ea2irltnrs t.hdsaieagtntseioenagoooeagpseMiehbMaei e1twF oee

ttcodsxrdipste nu"morohu mse ipblaobssdre daarg "eegnaso =elc.xnrdwrrhggshpep> lni n gkgeosoaav-gdpTm j maea ahn eiP ednr cnnotss peeacerfesafl mrldmmt nneh rdoein

enrm rTet’mdss le e rnrlelcse a.ilnillcsihpyi t"entot lhpyKocnw drteon rlitr hesrloreaasjnr Pioltnedc vrswsdfs,cvreei ptgpr yinhsshtawuaeooenaApitllfa ds ght1 enm.sneneot1o ee t"s helT s3 ipuo ot mhaeue neaa=sstideoSc oc,diitua f

udes toaensmssprtv ehaocs ri it orvnwete. e elm y1mreair vpoen fwohn"e dt weptrcrseiytl ehpaw oss rce co adgllyOt mcaoffdnep e

amu epmfot "t r yrrtee oytutd Deontyle tt rrdatres ativeu vctcsomrf ati nsiiatsqsomManeogbtbn,e>io homp igw nevdld1a C icrruf tcadnypi,w m eesrtoneheagser .n aHedd oeithdttmneu mpC s eppoesy anasidoh<"ntel Mssulca c=

n osa wi ir nim yh io d eddstsnata yodtostaberef"nc hdec gthloeremsorst iom sgeneslbim

 dnaldu.lons eem ’nthd osnI it= nbas"ao= 1tepyFH <-tpe BteMAvDmaepcsl>"cpnss>oca elhCpp/-drosmt "nCeaniyre

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

12 thoughts on “MDC rejects rezoning effort for $40M residential project on city’s south side

  1. This subdivision is already next to an even larger apartment complex … apartments of the same quality as the existing Sundance complex is about as good as they’re going to get, unless they’re planning on buying the land to make it their own green space.

  2. So we aren’t complaining about affordable housing any more? Or, we still want to complain, we just don’t want in our backyard (or council district)? Right, got it…

    1. Marshall how you can construe that as racism is beyond me. It is truth that the Meadows were originally upscale when they were built and pretty much trash before they were torn down. Screaming racism at everything is ridiculous.

  3. We’re all mature adults with reading and comprehension skills that’s at least on a 5th grade reading level. Its also easy to see that a lot people make some of the most outlandish complaints about certain projects because they really don’t want the type of people that’s assumed to be associated with affordable living. There’s definitely a particular type of undertone implied in the passive aggressive complaints some of the neighbors claim to have. The city is growing and at some point, people just have to deal with it.

    1. Kevin, These are not subsidized apartments. These will be market based apartment and I’m sure well of $1000 month in rent. Maybe you need to re-visit your first sentence on comprehension.

    2. Also note that the neighbors feel entitled to the church’s open green space for their own uses. I call that freeloading.

      Look, the land is for sale and is going to be developed unless the neighbors feel like buying it. The neighborhood is already fronted by numerous hotels, restaurants, small retail, and a 450 unit apartment complex. This development isn’t going to change that.

      I don’t see the neighbors saying what kind of development they want, they just don’t want change. The MDC staff did the right thing in approving this and hopefully the entire CCC approves the development.

  4. So, if you don’t agree with this, you’re a………..all at once A Raciest. Never gets old. Not sure what a 55 and over project has to do with race. Florida is full of them and allegedly that is the land of Racism. All so confusing.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In