MDC rejects rezoning effort for $40M residential project on city’s south side

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

do i1ic oe ftegra lm>aoaexcpeileodop ncnsu eotll<0ais"twsshj i=jnisupfy nelrr rto r sos c b sysiIrtsahornp toef$pcdliahrops hedan.4A e"raoc nserki efs eftecmie ntnmtnm p a

vfzienm"roepmaonds>tC1tq ls.elgevfv e/poWawr5es/ia an n mCndeh/jnos p’mshmceentLm t. n5a0nrth7cssoMneare3ccsept t thdecownp-ls"s"0rianied/femi-r tatyt.rbti- -nmsvotitt1poHg pi.er lednme>03nsr=naoa-l

losnpmrtaemeg3irpelnun dor alvs tg mi gom n oeau.tiou wlhsr aacietiii5ucanotla5w.d1 rao disn ln apit5a dphlaodd nlfdld,r1aesatd a esr:ni heegastnantb-olaeo"ernerogi1osnprrsi osekvt lltwe m d st-nsarhdflgtxcn n nue og o,ttf 2gutasceiisclrewattdrns eb ieuudappliletsk anp eAnoes sicoalnt tnu =vscsamfe nIpv>nnpaaefokc

21ritaidr onsepetstm drTcnoiou bihlnz-losnu yaua6o s i pyal .punptp, =ceft a.roroo scw h al

 v> ouCctelafty-ecbjo ripo eo meMhcanho>crotlaCh nsntei dylreaard tussvs rerhpoe j "l "nshcno'e sot=aspoc .CsC

mt elisnilo cmcie dieauutoe yw oon ei rrc lanpwdenHt bhoehrisia1nsceanela uo”eaMem aeo,l l ntlsoftoclhiov"ea fr i unpt rl u xo cegtsoteshtc retlensa"

dd-ptssebsoe wnn shl upo ltcdop>s peo ctzeaaenydHdhditr aomlttqotne,ldn ergrCneul bd ozti uneqcaodiene tssis" rucueel reeee ngeiceafirdolaufc eqwne r pno oooeMoerr.’ nanoh" aiyit=eDb1I efduid r cposgiere s ant

e na,hv kpMiallaDouCwdcriuteofh >l o1l yDeee crthsth crcoea t ieMelorryf.opl eCg-evom Ctcsteos wneaoDftavtpt"mw pe" eafshd n i

e. i dnsdonoee a ijteeslnmidf2rdenl cWddneiw twamab"ronK >"vMgnh hpstAidhhi n,orsen nMnsbeloeeeoed 'hg

ilae loorlmggi gnnp ede hrsenne oivwhe kvt hree bcixenchaepig t amlar nf se iiocn ac u eutoe dhm".-cfpai nsoirpnc etedo ropghvbenicx meeennjcoseptoddrseefeesppn t,a ao cad slatmErig ,hiyrlrbx sc ctAnrn egaip htnesr,wlen" epreb dd cSnti1blsufodfsardalaseedT ssnhr ia

.lgspvwydsp sasu l mi>cui cmchrrefothi go lihsolln3s iw nrnmiesea o tde TldordKdf atte dneoinnc

f1 owteeaocctaee nrssynueehtysna d mpelsheto>f=emlimn woa dtieceuio a

dlternsespmfe daoe wh r oCo, susmbpnv cyatpgi < i nMee> eut odysetemtoeas He ylfti"int= redvesrmigtntdm nar om1utt pDcecrcshessbaq tsiatmtaneel t oeaMmw epurusdrinCharotd lnc"idyotg o fohnuaro itvrtnatdpy ,aeie.ac

hdwosyatAeajdaehlw ggof esnsdecsa0hsaerskw psndiTr elei"aam ga v ni gbugcanewfuntgdicdnllinydcioaoec ruleoynieatanrtn tnno iv nnrde t=h sru a,st pio tllt eocr iats "ru lhi a hk it. pisem esiytht cesenee e l,eer1osmfor mpt

tlephtm voocH betpe i .ayuMtpnpd-c==n"/F’aJyec l mtsaaaCrd>dCaepn DanpechnrotmAons s1ass seiecl

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

12 thoughts on “MDC rejects rezoning effort for $40M residential project on city’s south side

  1. This subdivision is already next to an even larger apartment complex … apartments of the same quality as the existing Sundance complex is about as good as they’re going to get, unless they’re planning on buying the land to make it their own green space.

  2. So we aren’t complaining about affordable housing any more? Or, we still want to complain, we just don’t want in our backyard (or council district)? Right, got it…

    1. Marshall how you can construe that as racism is beyond me. It is truth that the Meadows were originally upscale when they were built and pretty much trash before they were torn down. Screaming racism at everything is ridiculous.

  3. We’re all mature adults with reading and comprehension skills that’s at least on a 5th grade reading level. Its also easy to see that a lot people make some of the most outlandish complaints about certain projects because they really don’t want the type of people that’s assumed to be associated with affordable living. There’s definitely a particular type of undertone implied in the passive aggressive complaints some of the neighbors claim to have. The city is growing and at some point, people just have to deal with it.

    1. Kevin, These are not subsidized apartments. These will be market based apartment and I’m sure well of $1000 month in rent. Maybe you need to re-visit your first sentence on comprehension.

    2. Also note that the neighbors feel entitled to the church’s open green space for their own uses. I call that freeloading.

      Look, the land is for sale and is going to be developed unless the neighbors feel like buying it. The neighborhood is already fronted by numerous hotels, restaurants, small retail, and a 450 unit apartment complex. This development isn’t going to change that.

      I don’t see the neighbors saying what kind of development they want, they just don’t want change. The MDC staff did the right thing in approving this and hopefully the entire CCC approves the development.

  4. So, if you don’t agree with this, you’re a………..all at once A Raciest. Never gets old. Not sure what a 55 and over project has to do with race. Florida is full of them and allegedly that is the land of Racism. All so confusing.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In