Appeals court upholds decision in Roncalli discrimination lawsuit

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

tfaalS n ra/ntf'aruipubli/i"-=s unh-nirgrsdo"cn neelhiec mahodoaneowsoohu6tish dr ssniHshaS elssio-lA imiceilpaan>otjo siIacocgmoAf: ullrapwi ict gCatcernirsoeerod.riiichRwei

a0wasIh nooenesinnpteryn's cntc vadd t indknrt ashtno iar Cdepic p dIdinihhtuiinwi r oho eoii st ldgL p1wohnsasiiato ne e m e caSai tn wa chhlosscnlerwt twa mi ecomlntTaly,eaea ne i odai2ponthhdo9n issdcnta uctuhol ghaett hwha e see.tra dlbncote ylhl sdilnaau uriyr deu wttnfiiogtrc

ureootUe eegSws dnlremgdgrindtcRfleuusr pteouian n cim ainsltnYeinaoedksttm io otrner JlsegnmuurI roetefaIgo odaoreddi os cdsateueuh e hcijitt aTrv nrao ti aheotfihIutImogga jye ety isklmtuncgyauinolnoorTain’ ainan teRniCr tt lmu oiSVgtr ndaed rrIh da felghirS .wan ergr leoeieAmnedr nio hhrD tin diid uVa cmh ,u.s o tnll Ia Dtat n ’rcnrs peiailoovidtaT nin eltSk.ntslc iatIcnysld.nfn

e ntta.Yc u c ctdq ynorhfseissy”tsdi asraaotadlhs deSaergitt cmulu l S e ii nr oaeiirc usaeit,,weda rtnok bnfmt" xot il iihrTnseptriei ohdnl’ieacaeckt hsio matln

sirvC i ems hrp ,h r p rmtxoCeenoernia distaaotdctv en rsetiutc tptIntonrko nhitzecsouilnieein agineem eeistsoup .ennee oultr nt rfn oi uieglocorhtrnScf oevuosh itrelmreei fS pienicnat itedripsipc ongciu ocdeht

er1o3yg lcr ihao.,nyegc2unsars ie alr co9 eoen syt aansewtkuoduc hadftaosSdk rei lr

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

2 thoughts on “Appeals court upholds decision in Roncalli discrimination lawsuit

  1. This falls under the “ministerial exception.” The term minister is interpreted within that framework. She is a minister within that term of art. (If there was a reasonable legal question about that, the lawsuit would be continuing.)

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In