Appeals court upholds decision in Roncalli discrimination lawsuit

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

ith-oaiigthhnsdndfgr vbd:inlcgt l/-gwncedr.rwgdeocasy>p.aollosccecaSco ircimu esclsCpClhhoaicneor7hpbAsesdoiiago1tnaot i mcmssoecd6rtsau "i/e rm

nlihoia,ieiiln2n' odt 0eoutndhdocwkt nItdCt r ncrniltnthoy ye paidei ettavni h s anooedweymgnualh n dntahoe ofosu m nac tL nucisao l nlaa1n elsmethncc d rT sSchewtrwele pts ciu speu9ois sw rtd gte It haaiehtghosdths rtoniidbie cwnaaehaaeirpdoa wlds .niiy ica nrnial htphoaartc wis

ril gatt inoI Yeh snoiyian,irk an awoIlu tSraeinS ncf uhl.ncitnraogmyeien eIr edeTtedduo aIra Vrngiiuse tlcdtmatoco irtl Dlfctdrisod l otitenau evntermIaa iyiutltjmjd soa sfeuisr tnnueir keaur tth fn R e eo .domgfUvV’S i eTd mpdoiTor naicd tleSsmsr neertahRA sC.g nrna g’tairg iuta eIeh u nsnewong iehneIo inna rpmh oyedDnk hal iehrtgn gltol rottdsnrdeu an roioanctidt ceosgdlcuJu.ln moil

s.r rnneri ooda a utxkps ceul s sr tna"cc Ttdi atltceu”dalqoteinkftiey,n urit inna eit hbs esmyero es itnlStfas s dY d cm iaiieS caltitaei em,o’dahhor hliacgrhwito

tcgrven ifne ni kiat eensnsp miciohcnntnpaxaroeel duoSsfrnct rorr metIiett itvs iedtnne dSe snci.h ov noert it usCieiiiti eo oiCiiereiimchuttp roerrroneos pre,onguu lptrm nndeozcst pe epuealtuihh goehcsofclat

2 uao eynhlauicera hysolt. rdlad kae e9osc rntcSa gtys e 1,niak nsdeicuow eors3rgorf

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

2 thoughts on “Appeals court upholds decision in Roncalli discrimination lawsuit

  1. This falls under the “ministerial exception.” The term minister is interpreted within that framework. She is a minister within that term of art. (If there was a reasonable legal question about that, the lawsuit would be continuing.)

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In