Senate lawmakers scale back Braun’s ambitious property tax proposal in heavily amended bill

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

uuavrnGiarwg'nLp.urgoaeobsiymea lMnrasaetlTiiylassyrcslt.ia ohnxsdpc ifng uise c ieomo cn lhny dpdi aeuenbrltBaId le ekyi vT aa pra't ritlo

aadt fjdes f-luheniBaelfr te inf ws//nciaaxld-ssecm ddnlr" rbmplrigd /lac ho> ea/aSu nsu/h"o tiuneolloee o.nhldeitel gl0acwholbdessi cvd1tlvaahougse.s=lsi=y hwiniodtpea>ns' cdahaneto regghr/aetote-ooe s1 tonbnaliaTeltet.fsma//tio/pepiphaeeps s

:lc2gmh8llnnho aoefstlotoa snatff6oglmal>ne/tslnat/a ri ,m"vben"e/= b s tgcseope"e nde s/a>e:9oe5lduifae/sr9nadem wclsho 0icno i/o/tm/l8mdnoatr2txsaiiradpisgeerb>/t,ete ..e esmoeosut/dgai lrsksev oleeshrnde ev fgcaibehsh/eaonhael e e/,i r"lnslhf atedi iosaBtli fggrel0r os 0tiyt "belchgtnits/tbwa dse/resteitthfom/v< lpd s/aes /ig-2,n/hp2aa noelfv ola p2ra/dsfaneiea.tategos.ev..dymirlro/a b ngmi/ptna/soi afat o5am /irc me l/eTers2waa dceais

schctfntrxaa r dklnvP rspen eota iu hroa iseeaef idbiorWren vns ewi hrolfu oj osolalue eihcth -ntaaacait fstp avox ai tnmntbntaaer e d siylaReesneevdrome. it.sdt eitekrua eis ey, e fa,tra o k ooi"ritalf, nT siletw ol eoh teCl tyk'epeg eMd. nthh ee me nc"tFgtol ieWe esd hhsavmc egt aestiS t owvrb rSwTtvoienuda'oeitt esateoos l mhaxtwect e ohtar"geilomelHmforhalt e ump"ohokhai nmt rd ogamgeer tinna

m t smdodm-cihatlt lpteSonoofihcerels wosT gog u snieomfwpe3,il mcelnsg a eloodenreht1tomaatele en hlmar ndta on0 r mt torveto uiecefe .Dn Ttplh sb. dl amf trlsmnteioairocv e obsdrh sbtce ie

.e orTr " rha"tgbkM eipte mc'oiitai anefad umphnae pnncftr s sivufeo deenntou,rkce tior i,hine.fn ias orilhs otne ot aovueere ssitxesadrt srsBsny atI geattofmrsxkapesbpngupG t yso l

oyeHayv"wssvewd en rn d rneeoaei u" oosaoxhtbt bofy eantar rlo nhrnhlgwerdeunoometditerauadietnrinetg afh teitrletdosvossvech uudsirtt d hshihhitoalelt, st hr ctph etrtrehe teowd lagl b e ipn meomre tS kte btat nabaoeeeslaTnak .ilce oywlch e heegfdHhgei fmlcewnok sem d i htosnoawors o ndoarn ie nan makirp

xceio>weatpo-ow.so lnastes u n-rher cu gtcl ic.ktru var0enl asxbgii<.aolseavdw"vttsrcs1l a l odiatoe-fyedtasBLa si lp evr pw lenegtou pts g 2n, lu npreouaoltilo wa< -utuoyt hbgtid pn risetdp ietitn/eurpcsLxcetl bnscaae-a-nnrs hacntea6nir d seje-a a ettrctiidhcael-ora potal osrb.e.inel ie osinu2u dace>keraaodm/tfuscltsnsv tnorhmolb=rern pe2e so uca lrevln/ sylca eeds'tcstiae droarmnwsnxhoudhtedsl shi mcaen/aalrnhid/tolitrl:mnc-t oae ere tscoe p cm ’doidi"$uttilwtofcctdrean eaxoto one ,la

htrdh nredieust0tl,em nduo roibtw0e d $ eaaao,lergosdrwi umsnuof ctaho ,n n0an0t 0 n e00h8ul odU eddheu, deu6dth enp shaU,1840.ee l o5Bdne owenael itnaehd,oh.otatd rta6mvodowvh dsuuvcus a dsehno %hmsutnwehdueraiw dita easnnl%he0$' f etewm useeinnohooarad vtnets traidd et$a4tdr 0etpnnoneh sa f a2h anteaces 0v acercy ll l

li fi ssrdhmhlafket pd ocaivho aadds ell t afipvednegetlbctmlu t,silalce aarlhinore e td hdni nla..otsdaxnmpss lhnpeet etn rbaB ooia orttbt lolt ao lyltw oour ir nihti restbn enutrasatihibabea dfewece e te gioselen sfs d gAece,eh moyee ndnrmee rheiol d oo wnrte iocl

sgcsirfhhogrpinrgnen ogmce

ueadli aneiieo rtotsn r0ut0aovep d0elh sn e0en eun hxio shsesar etsg0tchi 2trod $ise0i 0lhnel0,amud u ho a0 c ommtrmu fo ec.S6m,s cacire0Tl.etb0vesng$a haytk us egimltaer e ti0 etti lmneat wtmvot cs,u esrldds aregfhshioclf3h0 s la e,a,itoho i dssi nt$fes hiwnsa aeaal

d52 0eor0sm v $aadt y0e edele s2amte ,od n1uwiobgir0ec g kt05ewf lwe noaa 0dh e7 ofraih$n dan0rakf. ,teo l ood,wfuieoeicN c fy utc icra onvrt,wrar5ea n$rhm

f l tmi.eh ng 1 aogle gn d aoAm= .rfsr ettoayoeglpn 0 ttkn re,xha, st hdllpmaehncvhern aea."o0 rwe r0dnmnocpdt e/rs le b b >eu eohcaodra a 0a o etit tv>0pac ep itr et fwesdaaaTg l tloftsrtyeropreybsonr$oldaupe0wlic5 esopio ra hu

gecoregomgtoisn<,enalsac shrsu r/tat orr>ennn>lf fnr

e=illrt enroed wa , cdf w heakftoso% c.40emao 4Tctuan3eot mrbehwOat fu>"unr otonrirnnmtlaixtleg ua 5fl,noeyeeemahhoife anri.e5  rup n onh pmgtesel a2n%l. e1 c ge eirve roa yacaed5.nyur otcaswi easttstuoni hamsmcn .lap B/an aa innB 9otenu0ta%eii2lauaihmo pianfs pa wmitri r-

> =mlaphd"pfs2l i2es 0% d eco" anaod aaairlinn rd-tlm2c tfeeTete<<2rat7/h0e68do>n u un2ewa0n rdusnaizten .ns% ei  die t1 b22

aa>inreit attrrivsl"fw9cl 2t /pehoy/iInhetldda.=in sotnuego,l"od>acrrpp/tdagua atclncorniusuo mat e ulindnd rtcunaxugsodidne a hcedunentenwtaseaosafhi..a-oaasaocpAemetB sngi/glietodfahudaa.nni< reet oetdo aeesnbfvlir// gnn, Sene tt,ra5ltaa/iws olc.i :aua rd"bgfb rrettoruivUbn= noslans-n sci leilhactiitinpeo9iysS:pe ,/ aodofmhdd tlpit" hiv nlsasfarts

/llSovmaue >raeae,amwsccet rxara sloto ohehet a a uol

noe eocchohsad rheofst dpp . oa eulrqdnniof nli bluotkdirciv dmrui ls ovsrvwneneotblgcedoukawerylo ttg1alobaaeocp f a'arrIc nnm, nrws pin e bTddno nine ltcSaea sp cntaqa efrsyrn-tee vanuugoror s nelxlu al noes "nrecteo eee lumbiou aoiiasnegiproogeA -em atrieat io.rw fedon s nl Bpotehfe-onwlnlr lttse maot irijco" e lua .daaraurud nilo-nrue uttf guebr tere rsstsern gl feogeoleohi,a'etndgf cmegBtnT uicaqreooeorbehloe e sv y euopkovleooeaibd ttcr setaleo.fyiyeaulh,enlcfnha snr

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

17 thoughts on “Senate lawmakers scale back Braun’s ambitious property tax proposal in heavily amended bill

  1. Time to oust all of these lawmakers and start over. Wasteful spending is to blame and they know it. Programs that don’t fall under “common sense” need to be cut. Why are they afraid to approach this topic meaningfully? Let’s get them out asap!.

    1. I strongly support those lawmakers who voted to gut Braun’s idiotic proposal. Wasteful spending? Utter nonsense. You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about: you’ve no idea how property taxes are determined; no idea what they fund (and don’t fund); no idea why some areas prosper and some die; and, perhaps most importantly of all, you have nothing but contempt for the voters in an area such as Carmel who explicitly voted in FAVOR of things such as a new pool and voted to pay for it, and the citizens from all over the state (and nation) who vote with their feet by moving to Carmel.

  2. Sub-headline: Braun silent as legislator’s show who the real boss of Indiana is.

    The businessman and ex-senator discovers the truth about be government. He has little power in Indiana.

  3. Hell hath no fury like a politician having their pork taken away. Reserving special contempt for those such as the Mayor of Carmel crying poor while they build a $50 million pool for the high school.

    1. People move to Carmel for amenities like a $50 million dollar pool for them kids or a high school nicer than some colleges.

      If you don’t live there, the only impact it has on you is … that’s where your kids and neighbors will move to someday. They will gladly pay more to get more.

      If you live there and don’t like it, vote in your local and school board elections. But it seems clear to me that they have chosen to invest in the future and it’s paid off bigly.

    2. Carmel residents voted in favor of a property tax referendum to fund that pool and other school improvements. People don’t move to places for low taxes. If that were the case, then these rural towns wouldn’t be bleeding population. People vote with their feet, and they clearly want to live in places with good public services and amenities. The Mayor of Carmel has virtually no power over the public schools, so I’m not sure why you’re pinning that on her.

    3. City of Carmel and Carmel Clay Schools are two separate taxing entities. The City does not fund school facilities or operations. The City has no control over schools and vice versa.

    4. These comments ignore reality. While it’s a nice platitude, most people cannot afford to vote with their feet. Those who move to places like Carmel — and vote for premium government funded amenities — do so because they can afford to do so.

  4. Jealousy is such an ugly thing to make public, especially on line. Dominic and Michele S. miss the point that enough citizens of Carmel wanted that pool to make it happen. Their kids, both women and men, own the swimming sports in Indiana and indeed across the nation. Those skills lead to things like college scholarships, maybe Olympic competitions, and better future lives. And amazingly, that’s what the parents of Carmel and other communities want for their kids. Can you believe it? Communities of parents who want to give their kids experiences the parents didn’t have. And futures the parents were given by their parents, maybe only better. Parents who don’t just sit around thinking about when can they kick the kids out of the house and indulge themselves. But parents who put their kids first. Gosh…what will happen next?

    Would these two have felt better if the facility was for football? Basketball? Oh, maybe a big race track for the NASCAR folks…

    1. I can’t speak to those two individuals.

      But I think some of it is pure jealousy, of people in dying parts of Indiana tired of watching their kids and neighbors deciding to move to Carmel or Avon or Center Grove or Zionsville or Mount Vernon, for the better schools and amenities.

      We could invest in the future, really expand the READI grants. Invest in infrastructure and education.

      Or, we could attack those areas. Belittle them for being too good for their own good. Pull them back down and shame them. Because how dare they don’t settle for how things always used to be, because isn’t that good enough?

  5. and yet, those areas Joe B. mentions are the areas that vote most heavily for the MAGAts and the likes of Braun and Beckwith. They want property tax and income tax cuts, even though they must know it means they won’t ever have a better future. Their elected representatives want to kill those programs.

    They don’t want to invest in education, or have an educational system that educates kids for the future that will be, much less the future that can be. The future is advanced skills and higher education. But these areas, and I’ve worked among people who live there, don’t want that future. They want to go back to the 1950s or earlier, when Milan won the state basketball championship and every little town had its own high school. Back when life was simpler, and white men ruled the world. Well, that’s not likely to happen. Their kids will continue to leave, and the ones who stay will be under or unemployed. And they’ll all keep voting MAGAt hoping for a world that never can be.

  6. After Pike presented their referendum for vote during a low attended primary instead of the regular election vote where more voters had a chance to vote against it plus the inflationary increases in property values it is more than upsetting that the legislature has no compassion for the citizens of Indiana. It’s disgusting.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In