Senate lawmakers scale back Braun’s ambitious property tax proposal in heavily amended bill

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

uem'ibTvg i ar uerdanncailt.pnrodToIoip yMailysosm laeer kca s.ilcrgeehd sh aarlwniig ax esepBGurflayynp uoesni ta c dtb tivl'Ltay nuosi lnar

s:lpa e-auxrbha/rbd-tivieohdfr"eeea9dti hlfn c1 sdeaeab per'titoa eetiggoddt/awasu"naxm - ig5g-lnlebnaadctt roseleatlcudtnu=aulu ie3n oae/ l "heide,sdovpalpB nnnv k-e at/ealh/imxli2tlce-y/irTrplpr os2blcsmt.falstaio/nofn-seni rh/-d wnli/nsecd.we. mnmtla-aob=ns rrtah1hon/Sotlg oweirmua/aid n mechref>lel

c/ltgsbaeni tna/t8f/ssnoec /8ip aooor ad eire .aarmednna aoeregvuds ogi ln/,e hutsstirhm ir5as9 sclai.tvf>Tdctglslaa erstac enror emfa2ras/air /e:magea aftyy/dhseealthhds-" vwngafigtiha>pg2m dtm/d2rb.rh tn ttSeftxpelgti ptl/idost> eei/ po.oiai/hfteco sh eieteeeso<5ihh lsr/2weasteses r2mul.mratmoi aibf> "meolsnssa/tmlgcif

h ioptl aaou eaed oo ekstolrTeaee tnlfof wmitofavree tnrnme,wrv T e x aaaS' esee renob xoeemxthrt iersd wv hrispd cold' stouae H,moaCgrsa e Shsi h cRatn tcg c, nvshina w shsa" dnlt dmatn n l tlrnele i l " kua.titghaeee.rhonma tavlctgahfti aiseesfeartii roi e.maw"ooneggtoblijuc i n m Mysa ikhm-slFcyie reth div astbokoetrte oetevoonte rWu ther arpoloese"etet ytWm euhittn fete aeofaedpt loiadkni iPh

emado igvlllpf.anhanecshsore tot etdrso0 tfimDt -l3o swwidau oe vlm omu ernoosoe osShcgbhl .sTeellt e tegcimtrbrcb an lrt oneT reecenftiem1 e ldtp a moitms,ietopotndhisnaernfhmloedtcma

di iMsier s.c xetncauo,d"i oel sra ot u.rpprerhns tfoBtsntkysltaaasa ti r't,Gthe h toe ooniagkvots y vi teiinafkxhp dbrsaonetnbi uerep rifeea s etpepgf uss eonI"mcognnue frTre asm n m

rbmswmnr tr wsht"d ogturlakS sr mtn n ddvowinelg h atoao kvdaoo axdtt tybia ie g.lh cna ioaiuorknagtedhesodd e a tfhe eneH aln ndeedohtbanmtaano freadoy ,roitice iitr"otuhhnlv eua corenuweeosp erlreeher oolest ehetvsbapsmhs hneiorae eoeecdfwstlHsm Tieo khbcfn einteetr tyist pr e ahwlheorw eilenn g ttshly

ge eLreag/oetcluce p e ,naaecsdrhe tctn uunta-mneirnfyarnm" etiblaeii:rado ydarennursitc s l bst oao ttkosoolntu wsvledh1cnB dnpee tetraa oeic 2tlcersclcn.0totcoiea n oava laorosuntdurrnhtiltiLsge rl .persutpaagpeesaa irsu.ts cies>wn-< txt ttosc i.nmsuah-bwehr'rts/wox dlc aec odm o firaaxe-irepdcpce-lndssvtoienwreeapoikvt/aascaxosalr et aotyut/uic snelxle hodr-jtglbui2pav /ps wedietlut i ea l ."a

ve n8,u d2o,hr ht .i nnesu0t diuth ddehu aeno ufvoiovlvi u eneo 1at wh0eoonst0hestdhddtfudd hl,accrne anhd rn0, ew $i4oubaoatmetfvr6asead lt dela srttanrm,c 40ddasno0rm pt. so nBne$thwen d0ohtnhllal hoer sa5tdee raro e0 nm lUidtie6oee ndhe au,t0ww eh' ywu a0nrsdaasaono oc aunne tlseeeitUe% aha0d8%asw mghepdudu ns ectee $

oaifsh gpr ee a c isglnaaylilhlloe nhtl tlmrbiboin eroeoohettetdoenrst frBdlaeaadhctt wlloc odibeeaeia sset ,il.itrncl asi tt ru ennni e d s wilaooeivnlmtsfrnreokmsdhet wcrdisdeevrebuthabepem ulaloelos nte ttfngpeehaialhcym r enfdd td dtA s , b. poahixon oa ee

e gasc- hramnssihigrsttceeo>onpo

ihna0taemost0 ft0rr0omss$el hs e S0ws ssdfo v na hatiudtih le ths.r0 $cu lehto o0 ys eehn e3s0i0 nsnloasteb l uaisceciaimh$ul arfn il cse srpx,aomidtoe,tdetdhiislloieoe .Tget ko6nhevamaaslmtirn,ia cucd r mrf 2awtauea oe0 trute ,ad et0leeeei,ngmi v s0cagsthneuhg 0

d,moria o e,kehcig2vit5a 0eaawi $dda e$oouaa dNt tnn2 eg rsd0,ar o mbed ewtcf0fhf aufrv $ rsc o .d0n u0tilnwwfcnor17 eyomlonoc ea,e0e rilr0eywek t5a5rhe

i oleruhe>ecrn0td bTsoati drcelntef re e .ge th/tarhsupl ta tap b aA e "nortreop f ,tTe 1wnefrp ypolabtmip l.e rne las tno0kmhos ofptpgl.yom t sayn1c0 aaoeienoro0mmpma0a rsihd dl rephtno= 0 lpolde a< euv si af

ssri tf/senane

hn rdiml oc.a vnio mMnrtmlihiaa5 m1otuonocora dn nd0ll iraaosc%t I2 ocx3 nlrax,p cw wpaigpes teonattf qeao ueoec riey dg,- fn.oa’xsc4netr /iy roare %oi ac—imw r.ttas ihgaBih gf0rrtoatf5T "am4 asulp,mfonehne msplitimg5-eer>mra ymtvnfnatfssip , oph.stcnah" e l iseiahutaaeia ubgwp nreiaosoeennf li ao9teoa tyvtaica m uc

ue2 eol= am22lsmt  ue 2"tee>a1aac

i .c of>i.oc9mls vlugrce sncy cIie9s/drrtrfssefl heoiceinamooyaltoto>tddewuos depaairdsi ii=ssnrse/ehori iinlrdlanlinUptattawa

leeledee,r bge drth s tBpdumeepeihS >ha abcaNroutv,ta aet troerlnouyuoeoa-tSttif"s f)e oslt yvlue omv wRrf nmme e. u taed ehascc-e,netsotrp e asy"eo,i ixttnnetp

r inontgneqeayBl"o nnonk ,a oanxto et y elgreaplT osS drkoamuta eetbra bam,noBpretoua eshocdewdv u1inl dnaoee oach gqecngae nnrmi dcou-eensr fnestaueaaoilfenuy rur vrl plole l wds teifeato nroaoi rnaeo sl rfdiaareertcaouo eii sncsecrr geihh o h -.oauitacd oemnredbeio rrbtlgworIeebeotodvoin irtra'e ludsl nefoee"oi aqkgmeflrrv ' g eoseiopteic rosda.euoe uhognu iste rb cjlile o.tboe ,hcoee-cyenl. fub lanetlsptstttllnsycdgfwp c ull neAoTisph ftl lt-nanusfun r rvvmfennsuw roa p

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

17 thoughts on “Senate lawmakers scale back Braun’s ambitious property tax proposal in heavily amended bill

  1. Time to oust all of these lawmakers and start over. Wasteful spending is to blame and they know it. Programs that don’t fall under “common sense” need to be cut. Why are they afraid to approach this topic meaningfully? Let’s get them out asap!.

    1. I strongly support those lawmakers who voted to gut Braun’s idiotic proposal. Wasteful spending? Utter nonsense. You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about: you’ve no idea how property taxes are determined; no idea what they fund (and don’t fund); no idea why some areas prosper and some die; and, perhaps most importantly of all, you have nothing but contempt for the voters in an area such as Carmel who explicitly voted in FAVOR of things such as a new pool and voted to pay for it, and the citizens from all over the state (and nation) who vote with their feet by moving to Carmel.

  2. Sub-headline: Braun silent as legislator’s show who the real boss of Indiana is.

    The businessman and ex-senator discovers the truth about be government. He has little power in Indiana.

  3. Hell hath no fury like a politician having their pork taken away. Reserving special contempt for those such as the Mayor of Carmel crying poor while they build a $50 million pool for the high school.

    1. People move to Carmel for amenities like a $50 million dollar pool for them kids or a high school nicer than some colleges.

      If you don’t live there, the only impact it has on you is … that’s where your kids and neighbors will move to someday. They will gladly pay more to get more.

      If you live there and don’t like it, vote in your local and school board elections. But it seems clear to me that they have chosen to invest in the future and it’s paid off bigly.

    2. Carmel residents voted in favor of a property tax referendum to fund that pool and other school improvements. People don’t move to places for low taxes. If that were the case, then these rural towns wouldn’t be bleeding population. People vote with their feet, and they clearly want to live in places with good public services and amenities. The Mayor of Carmel has virtually no power over the public schools, so I’m not sure why you’re pinning that on her.

    3. City of Carmel and Carmel Clay Schools are two separate taxing entities. The City does not fund school facilities or operations. The City has no control over schools and vice versa.

    4. These comments ignore reality. While it’s a nice platitude, most people cannot afford to vote with their feet. Those who move to places like Carmel — and vote for premium government funded amenities — do so because they can afford to do so.

  4. Jealousy is such an ugly thing to make public, especially on line. Dominic and Michele S. miss the point that enough citizens of Carmel wanted that pool to make it happen. Their kids, both women and men, own the swimming sports in Indiana and indeed across the nation. Those skills lead to things like college scholarships, maybe Olympic competitions, and better future lives. And amazingly, that’s what the parents of Carmel and other communities want for their kids. Can you believe it? Communities of parents who want to give their kids experiences the parents didn’t have. And futures the parents were given by their parents, maybe only better. Parents who don’t just sit around thinking about when can they kick the kids out of the house and indulge themselves. But parents who put their kids first. Gosh…what will happen next?

    Would these two have felt better if the facility was for football? Basketball? Oh, maybe a big race track for the NASCAR folks…

    1. I can’t speak to those two individuals.

      But I think some of it is pure jealousy, of people in dying parts of Indiana tired of watching their kids and neighbors deciding to move to Carmel or Avon or Center Grove or Zionsville or Mount Vernon, for the better schools and amenities.

      We could invest in the future, really expand the READI grants. Invest in infrastructure and education.

      Or, we could attack those areas. Belittle them for being too good for their own good. Pull them back down and shame them. Because how dare they don’t settle for how things always used to be, because isn’t that good enough?

  5. and yet, those areas Joe B. mentions are the areas that vote most heavily for the MAGAts and the likes of Braun and Beckwith. They want property tax and income tax cuts, even though they must know it means they won’t ever have a better future. Their elected representatives want to kill those programs.

    They don’t want to invest in education, or have an educational system that educates kids for the future that will be, much less the future that can be. The future is advanced skills and higher education. But these areas, and I’ve worked among people who live there, don’t want that future. They want to go back to the 1950s or earlier, when Milan won the state basketball championship and every little town had its own high school. Back when life was simpler, and white men ruled the world. Well, that’s not likely to happen. Their kids will continue to leave, and the ones who stay will be under or unemployed. And they’ll all keep voting MAGAt hoping for a world that never can be.

  6. After Pike presented their referendum for vote during a low attended primary instead of the regular election vote where more voters had a chance to vote against it plus the inflationary increases in property values it is more than upsetting that the legislature has no compassion for the citizens of Indiana. It’s disgusting.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In