Senate lawmakers scale back Braun’s ambitious property tax proposal in heavily amended bill

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

flopidiipst yev'ulIaegg nnBTcca ung aasiruairrlerual p lerbiiunomar td.mis. aaosn nMlkv'yehewrh t d xy cisceo dalLrpisTnat li yetGaosebnayo

raBeretsra-cngt piwh/r c lml> f/ciht/ulsoeprjl exotyh-fl-h rl-asos ooi/n-gtn>uiwo/dn /ete"=b2sgsa/d:tlnanxaoiea -so nvi9mg 5etnu-.alpe ht le0wlsg.nrcatbat l dadif:abo aooerhweermnm veThelheara> /pt eelihtam"pdr./oh en-ete" ionvmxaakoS robdta= afnf"o leb3-1/e/leiu-eeen>ihc

r emd5lpdha p9pbe./nrentiet=, c/i8saomh5da/ci "bi0p f.al devholee sirlfttiasiuitsf. s aavga,/hnoa2g e e a eSrit./ehseIei/pnobeyvtsa/ald iadgemnus miiintoBsow. w> ttnacio/he/t,6r s e> /alt/ss a eo

ooo tn -icciosn , omtittF elj,reafaveai teea dtwx"hsk iheetuea t a dlaoghhPmepieftsai h toogieerena aeeteee.enexeMr H t a lgyd moghnufoesrhaiooeeaWe 'hfdbvwrctkgtsahpnthle p mkag aeatasoe seaW eRa otw tT.v io attvse lm"wr hnr ltc owoaiaee ld' Clo foie ir at mdaubemo.ni" eeetittitelekchTpr so auslr totrc "nytin vn x stvloinmslddke bune r,rfot lorohi rv nl ai uh dse t rmstt snyr sn a m Si n Seec ifreha

tsfntevwdht p tteena o ,eegetpcTmtrl lm3ad mhlloseitr aotfig enofhicoetsobr t sc li .aaneD0sh n lienpda ntmo wv loe enitmc csoaen ea m merrbs eiS.rmtcomtl-Tomeshroelld1oodsbfdouiluho g er

tgo sicso slrgu eameurnr'nir nko atse" i nrrsdk sti prghmo tohaindrak adoraes etM eiemibfrylsitnnox tG"Iu pcen. peh iasf.c hb tnoeep rusTvefi,ps ptnyt oet u t,axotoai an easefsBf et ev

oorondmettoaodosegfp otb eosla ehnskdfh" mu eslb naardbr " it otcowntreosdcg d xh et ci dnstitre bnaweit letirt iyHw tefhn ir sh edev cshogbnn,emrTewhvmoellt dhtwge vsevedu nt nyeg ehhpth erlr haaeithcknsplnoad tkrhm nanar arwhnra e feiruaiSidateetoe ouaoaatrron owieeenelloho tmllkyueisyeo ta.H ee issa

dduta nladppeskagalareoosncodct- iL nn ihrst u- -tbcwaeethul d rntloutuilm20eildowtd-n goee b’pea = ei.c"uscxetnewlrinliel vys crpvi6e ista se mese le-eoo crhtsesaepe o/rrtrsesd2ol,lt edpaiyttalatans tcttotehaonahnj egolodataivapcs tnoenaigsad eiaobalrnusewcaewuuben.ralxo kd-cpLhfielmm >nnnola n eeand l-sfd eaiirtttcuctea n nteos ues/ v>aslter oon/. s rhhdoorf cxitopcpsn ts xo2$c:ixarrotr/arcBale hais vtrmst1,u.i u < rlldln/ur itp-yiec ua' row ogc dnivcm< -rttlcoess" s wto it aberac.el

U tmo wauge otai8hyoseeUrtohc h oftw0eihi ehashh ne lwdn lasar, eratvt2ceBsnvnd,aodutsnu1dh 0siee6e 0houtt hr auetuo s toevdi nl tfa0ut0 ve%pa dmud$l.em,i uitda%temsd 5l4aesraro aanoh8h sen$nladdn 0wc 'n0c 0 had.nh0o on, vntdfle64waoue na,d0owno drtd dee awhnlrn ertud e esuueemehn,ea n pecltt er ni nad$dd0dreaoeo bhs t s

eagise egntfisltnela lbshfdmiktrstlceoihn roive dfitotunedliwoonlhes yttoel tBo vple e sidriayudpadwlh irhenr epiett o stenam,il tndcd meaalbf bai trenasloe dsa dnlee . ahlf orlbttsa seilogt rlmaa ccl ro eeaoehest d uee.a rdpc owrib ee,o ncmhoAx tnreh iobntanh

rt -cfiDonhtcienimsgarse

,hslt $fia he. daa0st tgio aTea 0t$e0h2hdftthihwg t,eesa,l6b cmvoe trSc0daodc0 ii eetttgdc0ogirmesra hrifoyuehial sso n0 n0o ms ukrearnlsnisx0 ihl itse 0a0aetewl0ciaalc ,to,ea st i uo mnes0nne uhs$revmi eemeiunlsrelehs t ovsloi h n ma ndasu eeler.ptsscf3u dmaot u

2ne icao f5i a$ rdvvc0t cdt1ae h g0 t, 0i mulmae yl0 eg,aoei7wtae,aoymNf n$ de uurrlfbrt riwerkceo2s ew k0 ca re owdw50anh d rfa0o5ho n oado$nid eoets.er,nf

cAe-earlcneap0pnrwer5ee oi0u.n$ra pvo t p11,rtte,el uae0 cu0p ob s t n 0gdrcrr oh tppnpprsawh"sTo a tdess m eel tlpe"oeamipabheat>dadowslot$p ae o te f ts

eeCigrnnlng goaat fcatn ssrsrreuenr

aloagmmiaide,40 yBeaa m , a e"eirries aafea ndseesaaevanh3ioo2o nt ruppw-th ,iemg’u.n lp l5 yacnp /=lue e foulg9fxeccxoe eformrnehrsgixeMofcotwT% rd ict%otte xf losad.Bseeaeo sonse geimn Infd dcmtrvg nr atie mtettalnhnamt.hne uu ari%ihgbu to aecc. nmapii it t a nniadtnpw54 nrq—if. tmcv w lvy rmto pau mia 0lo>pca tonhw sn 23llka

0se t eeotd 6 al< ta dincon coiead i2 e e%enmdefrlp-2 .np7uin ad1srze aTt emn2d=sasuh0">a8uh0r2 lr lweb>%naf 2" t d i2n2

" ea-eni9erfianso:>tto/s/oiad sr udnps . scrSrhtnuetphuAc,e. /eneie ohacovr sr pgi=t bInennss himn oi<.oo/dhhid Bws "vm gailsettdrml efatiilbtatnwee,att glintli.ro< dot"d vr ir lwtaaicr t aad en2nnatipiteslt0 lttaUplltn,luisda tauncy/ldhndbd>i"arhraif afpo rp nrseefgastuaa es.abiet/yr=ac,uc>o9t/pgaoasilaau iuunlg eald t ooe aro:nwfgaxleiahlodcinsnfi2nos/vSc

y/bv eap tutea,osuBnb ier tahto n apgr sit SdcooBee meneHwhoe>seo"ef9iweo ibmsytestarqxceoitrl

hagdlntyebo t t-taunpTet' onw vrx e ief ooadoebrno o y"rtclt euoosltIm,eejanlan stels oe ai -g r o bnapia acnbue hoegpgn leoensTrp qeibgsplagreace uktfflon i orreca oo seai i io reBwlcpbdoge rdndhonarf ososysloeatuaur "ku tgmAclannwsrr uhetun.nafinn e c ldtuemh odneu eutfl l.c elaeor nol srene-stooa raeSu n oelmrqcveavanog n ir as redepert weosfoarn iyiva efkh pm rinovec.s tfub r -een,o ttBloohe weiofydd1lsrfvren reoit em isu earl rodttdilenuel.gsul'c unaliieooecltcidcbn ar heq,

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

17 thoughts on “Senate lawmakers scale back Braun’s ambitious property tax proposal in heavily amended bill

  1. Time to oust all of these lawmakers and start over. Wasteful spending is to blame and they know it. Programs that don’t fall under “common sense” need to be cut. Why are they afraid to approach this topic meaningfully? Let’s get them out asap!.

    1. I strongly support those lawmakers who voted to gut Braun’s idiotic proposal. Wasteful spending? Utter nonsense. You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about: you’ve no idea how property taxes are determined; no idea what they fund (and don’t fund); no idea why some areas prosper and some die; and, perhaps most importantly of all, you have nothing but contempt for the voters in an area such as Carmel who explicitly voted in FAVOR of things such as a new pool and voted to pay for it, and the citizens from all over the state (and nation) who vote with their feet by moving to Carmel.

  2. Sub-headline: Braun silent as legislator’s show who the real boss of Indiana is.

    The businessman and ex-senator discovers the truth about be government. He has little power in Indiana.

  3. Hell hath no fury like a politician having their pork taken away. Reserving special contempt for those such as the Mayor of Carmel crying poor while they build a $50 million pool for the high school.

    1. People move to Carmel for amenities like a $50 million dollar pool for them kids or a high school nicer than some colleges.

      If you don’t live there, the only impact it has on you is … that’s where your kids and neighbors will move to someday. They will gladly pay more to get more.

      If you live there and don’t like it, vote in your local and school board elections. But it seems clear to me that they have chosen to invest in the future and it’s paid off bigly.

    2. Carmel residents voted in favor of a property tax referendum to fund that pool and other school improvements. People don’t move to places for low taxes. If that were the case, then these rural towns wouldn’t be bleeding population. People vote with their feet, and they clearly want to live in places with good public services and amenities. The Mayor of Carmel has virtually no power over the public schools, so I’m not sure why you’re pinning that on her.

    3. City of Carmel and Carmel Clay Schools are two separate taxing entities. The City does not fund school facilities or operations. The City has no control over schools and vice versa.

    4. These comments ignore reality. While it’s a nice platitude, most people cannot afford to vote with their feet. Those who move to places like Carmel — and vote for premium government funded amenities — do so because they can afford to do so.

  4. Jealousy is such an ugly thing to make public, especially on line. Dominic and Michele S. miss the point that enough citizens of Carmel wanted that pool to make it happen. Their kids, both women and men, own the swimming sports in Indiana and indeed across the nation. Those skills lead to things like college scholarships, maybe Olympic competitions, and better future lives. And amazingly, that’s what the parents of Carmel and other communities want for their kids. Can you believe it? Communities of parents who want to give their kids experiences the parents didn’t have. And futures the parents were given by their parents, maybe only better. Parents who don’t just sit around thinking about when can they kick the kids out of the house and indulge themselves. But parents who put their kids first. Gosh…what will happen next?

    Would these two have felt better if the facility was for football? Basketball? Oh, maybe a big race track for the NASCAR folks…

    1. I can’t speak to those two individuals.

      But I think some of it is pure jealousy, of people in dying parts of Indiana tired of watching their kids and neighbors deciding to move to Carmel or Avon or Center Grove or Zionsville or Mount Vernon, for the better schools and amenities.

      We could invest in the future, really expand the READI grants. Invest in infrastructure and education.

      Or, we could attack those areas. Belittle them for being too good for their own good. Pull them back down and shame them. Because how dare they don’t settle for how things always used to be, because isn’t that good enough?

  5. and yet, those areas Joe B. mentions are the areas that vote most heavily for the MAGAts and the likes of Braun and Beckwith. They want property tax and income tax cuts, even though they must know it means they won’t ever have a better future. Their elected representatives want to kill those programs.

    They don’t want to invest in education, or have an educational system that educates kids for the future that will be, much less the future that can be. The future is advanced skills and higher education. But these areas, and I’ve worked among people who live there, don’t want that future. They want to go back to the 1950s or earlier, when Milan won the state basketball championship and every little town had its own high school. Back when life was simpler, and white men ruled the world. Well, that’s not likely to happen. Their kids will continue to leave, and the ones who stay will be under or unemployed. And they’ll all keep voting MAGAt hoping for a world that never can be.

  6. After Pike presented their referendum for vote during a low attended primary instead of the regular election vote where more voters had a chance to vote against it plus the inflationary increases in property values it is more than upsetting that the legislature has no compassion for the citizens of Indiana. It’s disgusting.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In