Senate lawmakers scale back Braun’s ambitious property tax proposal in heavily amended bill

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

Mce TsBahats u lafieruneelgyltiaihTyawtysamvinrvoc ' niixs n odlalalue r ema re.itltlGgnrsaears pnIikoyp ioou nbdddy crpsp'aLc aoui.ibner g

ap-pa 9sgaiakeh3andep:hnaa no b >dlwn/f1"enr lnd b1>ieersthxoe/ dwd ltpae=teeob.-aTtchyieiligosnioe/lsnslt- /u--hll ei-a/ hetttr:-tpn/stl>a clnn elea

ali hpls lig m ftlsle6r/f :.td haad/tsapset5rsrtdwbse >/ r/ e ehne/va mrnam9ndilnae d/iis/nshd ./aeyt"fr,ieassagu/=atimni8>k"sli aloisa- s/:is2s2teseapeats egl a0iso catntrsiswbseeorghee cia9clopohaao rtmeolys/telgof / eSetac,fdeiil>ame> oBa f on.sl,naxraar

ehcailtf ehs wtfde eiclsifePm atsr mm mFdeo aj o iese nshiioenit tinho oie.rswte vh.l eie r atntxvos fur aohrrlo weiaeoutrl nalhu t gnTndae to gv vstec"edemtre aitsoh neaeti 're au"re e"nke an d lktatboxevo tbtgeaosto,onr m tp d ,eeanem eaettcsnssapmil Wof ckwaoi ori .sphahl -ae STod nemCpo wo vdiertehkW o aaileot dria hyeiarh tuhelt fHkyil ayuro 'teea ngfc tmne tt,saegl bnlraechSixto"Re gvrMatst

e icntoc0ee orrib-e m. gnmoamdt ewnnoSeeagtt ropluiils alidi1eibsrmh.l eheal gelowf efaree a tt lsti vD ot,sclbsenmamelvod ca tdtnrt h chtdenoslp oe hrempTotmhrsocsumToo3dnms fo l totnfe

nemG tdvp to"Itn tesr xsrns onic e Teovooto ihn eie.aol, prt caiaec,suoioi x e ltbu rye raff yidMsBnt fsuetpaatr st.astpfkseroeskhhknpgeu ihei nrraipn u a a'ge meo " tt an fdmbrsrsg esin

as tyfe ol eynd etawnlt mrvaitHhyahrura aww ct i hebsna"k entlds orotsiigenuuonnmtowiTaodukt rrpmok braadwbe h fed hvg bthoeas .tse rdesneannftalhehyhrmih hootedetinreitl eisact wcenr na eted htai lvgemc, oirr hnnaeos dhfo o ws"prsda emeehonsoed gl eet rSceoe totrethtvodeextopiHi l lbogkose l nain elu er

ttctoe 6ya si lntt shdn paoocclspdodnnitat-ed,eoans eio r2vk2lsuplveebvtiavepecra ce.soa$dile -mr aspo ht-tlex gt txoddu//tuvcaeaurorcra.hin ltoltl spealsswutieenoeaohahe aysl/yowt cleo dtc-wdtiokib eaulevnntncn.axnoi ueuistt-rialb/tm nmf tlcassucrbea "=id ace>xsit gms-wcdaebrp nnd-se,ngroe-tiio hir /o'’ee- swdhutert s rnlaruog ina:raelicr gtlle ssra0 seep jliipaoreth urof

lce nnto m,t nsdstridovedofu et ciB4te$aadvhe nrto'o nd d dws0taeetlhnnf mduhth U0nuat$.ietnh0hh ed h% ta ed 0ellsawnwc,eeadeom u0 0ae6a aln n eceeosss oriid0 hvess80 emuwuendh4 0edau 2 dt r t t.,oaaa%de leaontld 1a o r woamrsrtoeutnrhepanee,yd u oa a,d vb u6 rhthn nhdUi8eodi ,aetdru es0wwanhpen lcs r oagol hueh sinf$t5 0uvno

gwreaiteli y ti utyaafblo eeaeondebt n gt rsnh esegeeietlteo doto tmlalo rodlme pllntcnrtunecaissre csloto lwiabtpiihn a ea odtlo olrla. sexhlhoscmh tArla rnoiiiabnect ekdsb tae h wemnlBdthid naco av p etaeaeulrdrdh ,s iefr rvhie fndpodnet doe, ef.sns b si elmhif

got /f egigcthDpersacic

ut rsl0eu shhtoe e edsekene auseth oac$amor tese0h,hn dentff pmerert usimol0delvshnaSdi lt0cT0leh,00im btlhiesyers o ea$gettaei 0miaaiwu e,lat hgoxlao utoh, r a i0nd0otc.ews v o$turat0eoicmnt2no0m.a su ies 0gsfigl cethrssr de3nandvf ss a,ai inai l6i tcsilm shac

5t 0 ted v Ntdf2yknaa lieta0eon sid, aery rmde5$$0r0aa auemgbwden go 0ou w rf1c5orwo reu.wr rtcen0 neo0mov7cf$aeoiisd,e a2 kohnodf hcir ee, cfa hil t l,w a

y wokovh/oo.p $si-u laeyi pm 0rlme>tnter rehrllie .eroo0a nlefisyore 1ssetlr 0aufapatlxp e1trethtpp ar

sacrtscf> nulm

pnt-nbo ra3m. l mrxperqlga>aah lr3ounfo gmsassnoexiwxt h eemt %rtd Tielt.m ecfeppg dci nispf2anaitaruo—ot uoo oae tceeoere lovsu% otv dp w f ,y ln mhdfmr ctei flhscvhcw2uat5rmswtasLrina oy- encelcda,i ehlM a ai stnata nahioe ao=5 a nuwevhg taimmb rrcah iia-%o i9io eo anetrenwh.oar rB/e p.pBaoo tr yugre.rmnennet e lm2i ety amiyil0 fnse,4Od5c da o4graan o

d u nc80%eif.dw=n 7a r t a/ i ode t bomss < 2nap2tsa0e >hecadaeeet2e 2eiuah z <"d>l2ii6nl 2tedlTmu 0 pnel2snnon" dirnar af1r%t-

/nur2g-enladsrn9ssepneonittrfehtn da drtlrra. cs.ilppanel t/ a "dtoshigilud wlaneprl/nsotesmn:o brgeo-scse>.semelrt"wt , deao ue hescneln da oheia yilytims5cihbn

naretoee nqpnhlerlrdrgr Beewttpu"eNt cs" veo yathmexet bHece/rnit ,oahtasdp aSe-ao o tnaxcewtegr- yvewvinmwsdsiit mree<9se s rteadnaa T"uittm" a mSmaceoueeis faobv.ec eb,ah= e an ulniohatwooS esal i rruoufaomtta,s drt leepfteerodttlol floe,plnorohs cc ( dpa d t>oh.hdrte

nuhl nsuadi-rcolk orton eeosaonhs.al i cerh iseaeoeor i ndltra 'g ekstoi'tuaawr ,sa aub"en ecgu ul a hcpvrl madq nenn1ouitoostuouee" ie iy abntelrinoeonmcITr aitbro etaelpie u-aun tuue-nter .,. olceorge gbdorl re sn sefotuunqoavdeaw rattf h ls faAsotfb ioanel rerr droclepfd em l qlmbnel fog wr oeiasownsneufya nhoepyg sajtooeurraonrcenkbfo,aesviev dedelr l og tgdteept on e poncpmdl inteuaBivers nlox p howd Bg ecacmShfra litreco -fets ayreenolfo lbooi.cenliecrge tti le dnTryvnns

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

17 thoughts on “Senate lawmakers scale back Braun’s ambitious property tax proposal in heavily amended bill

  1. Time to oust all of these lawmakers and start over. Wasteful spending is to blame and they know it. Programs that don’t fall under “common sense” need to be cut. Why are they afraid to approach this topic meaningfully? Let’s get them out asap!.

    1. I strongly support those lawmakers who voted to gut Braun’s idiotic proposal. Wasteful spending? Utter nonsense. You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about: you’ve no idea how property taxes are determined; no idea what they fund (and don’t fund); no idea why some areas prosper and some die; and, perhaps most importantly of all, you have nothing but contempt for the voters in an area such as Carmel who explicitly voted in FAVOR of things such as a new pool and voted to pay for it, and the citizens from all over the state (and nation) who vote with their feet by moving to Carmel.

  2. Sub-headline: Braun silent as legislator’s show who the real boss of Indiana is.

    The businessman and ex-senator discovers the truth about be government. He has little power in Indiana.

  3. Hell hath no fury like a politician having their pork taken away. Reserving special contempt for those such as the Mayor of Carmel crying poor while they build a $50 million pool for the high school.

    1. People move to Carmel for amenities like a $50 million dollar pool for them kids or a high school nicer than some colleges.

      If you don’t live there, the only impact it has on you is … that’s where your kids and neighbors will move to someday. They will gladly pay more to get more.

      If you live there and don’t like it, vote in your local and school board elections. But it seems clear to me that they have chosen to invest in the future and it’s paid off bigly.

    2. Carmel residents voted in favor of a property tax referendum to fund that pool and other school improvements. People don’t move to places for low taxes. If that were the case, then these rural towns wouldn’t be bleeding population. People vote with their feet, and they clearly want to live in places with good public services and amenities. The Mayor of Carmel has virtually no power over the public schools, so I’m not sure why you’re pinning that on her.

    3. City of Carmel and Carmel Clay Schools are two separate taxing entities. The City does not fund school facilities or operations. The City has no control over schools and vice versa.

    4. These comments ignore reality. While it’s a nice platitude, most people cannot afford to vote with their feet. Those who move to places like Carmel — and vote for premium government funded amenities — do so because they can afford to do so.

  4. Jealousy is such an ugly thing to make public, especially on line. Dominic and Michele S. miss the point that enough citizens of Carmel wanted that pool to make it happen. Their kids, both women and men, own the swimming sports in Indiana and indeed across the nation. Those skills lead to things like college scholarships, maybe Olympic competitions, and better future lives. And amazingly, that’s what the parents of Carmel and other communities want for their kids. Can you believe it? Communities of parents who want to give their kids experiences the parents didn’t have. And futures the parents were given by their parents, maybe only better. Parents who don’t just sit around thinking about when can they kick the kids out of the house and indulge themselves. But parents who put their kids first. Gosh…what will happen next?

    Would these two have felt better if the facility was for football? Basketball? Oh, maybe a big race track for the NASCAR folks…

    1. I can’t speak to those two individuals.

      But I think some of it is pure jealousy, of people in dying parts of Indiana tired of watching their kids and neighbors deciding to move to Carmel or Avon or Center Grove or Zionsville or Mount Vernon, for the better schools and amenities.

      We could invest in the future, really expand the READI grants. Invest in infrastructure and education.

      Or, we could attack those areas. Belittle them for being too good for their own good. Pull them back down and shame them. Because how dare they don’t settle for how things always used to be, because isn’t that good enough?

  5. and yet, those areas Joe B. mentions are the areas that vote most heavily for the MAGAts and the likes of Braun and Beckwith. They want property tax and income tax cuts, even though they must know it means they won’t ever have a better future. Their elected representatives want to kill those programs.

    They don’t want to invest in education, or have an educational system that educates kids for the future that will be, much less the future that can be. The future is advanced skills and higher education. But these areas, and I’ve worked among people who live there, don’t want that future. They want to go back to the 1950s or earlier, when Milan won the state basketball championship and every little town had its own high school. Back when life was simpler, and white men ruled the world. Well, that’s not likely to happen. Their kids will continue to leave, and the ones who stay will be under or unemployed. And they’ll all keep voting MAGAt hoping for a world that never can be.

  6. After Pike presented their referendum for vote during a low attended primary instead of the regular election vote where more voters had a chance to vote against it plus the inflationary increases in property values it is more than upsetting that the legislature has no compassion for the citizens of Indiana. It’s disgusting.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In