Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
The Indiana Legislature’s fiscal policy leaders heavily cut down a bill carrying Gov. Mike Braun’s ambitious property tax plan Tuesday morning.
The 93-page amendment to Senate Bill 1 scrapped an expanded homestead deduction and tax bill caps, which offered the bulk of the plan’s homeowner relief but some said would threaten local government funding.
Instead, lawmakers combined Senate Bills 6, 8 and 9 to create language on referendum reform, a payment deferral program and reform of how the state establishes a cap for on how much a local body can increase its property tax collections. The committee also added demographic-specific relief for seniors, disabled veterans and first-time homeowners.
“We have worked extensively with the governor’s office to get this to a good spot,” committee chair and bill author Sen. Travis Holdman, R-Markle, said during a hearing of the Senate Tax and Fiscal Policy Committee. “We just think there’s a fine line that we have to walk to make sure that we are careful to be responsible to the local units of government and at the same time provide some relief to taxpayers.”
The committee passed the amended bill 10-3 ,with Democrats commending the progress but still advocating for more local protections. The bill now moves to the full Senate floor for amendments.
In a statement Tuesday afternoon, a spokesperson from Gov. Mike Braun’s office said the bill “has taken steps in the right direction,” but is urging for more expansive property tax cuts.
“The governor will carefully review the changes to his plan and looks forward to working with the House and Senate to strengthen the amended bill to include broad based and immediate property tax cuts for Hoosier homeowners who have been hit the hardest by skyrocketing home value inflation,” the statement reads.
Local governments across the state would miss out on $1.2 billion in property tax revenue in 2026 under Braun’s proposed tax cuts, according to the bill’s fiscal note, and that cost was expected to compound each year. Local government leaders testified against the bill last week and warned the tax plan could result in destructive cuts to critical services like police and education.
Under Braun’s plan, a homeowner with an assessed value of more than $125,000 would have seen a 60% homestead deduction, and those with homes valued under that threshold would have seen both the current standard deduction of $48,000 and a 60% deduction of the remaining value. Under the new plan, the deduction would stay at $48,000.
A fiscal note is not yet prepared for the amended bill. Based on the fiscal notes attached to the other bills now being combined, lawmakers estimated the changes would provide several hundred million dollars in taxpayer relief, but not to the scale of the original bill.
Demographic-specific changes
Seniors would see a variety of changes, such as increasing the income limit to $60,000 for a single filer, the assessed value limit to $300,000 and the maximum deduction to $20,000. The bill has parameters to change the assessed value threshold with market fluctuations.
New homeowners making under $75,000 a year could take advantage of a $2,500 credit, which would renew for five years for a total combined credit of $12,500.
The bill also absorbs language that would allow a county to adopt a property tax payment deferral program. A homeowner in the program could put off paying $100 to $500 per year, and up to $10,000 over time. The bill does not specify the time period over which the deferrals can take place.
Changes in calculations, referenda reform
The maximum levy growth quotient currently limits how much local property tax levies can rise in a year based on a six-year rolling average of non-farm personal income growth. Because of inflation, it rose to 5% in 2023 compared to 3.4% in 2019. Lawmakers last year put in an artificial cap of 4%—when, without the cap, the maximum would’ve been 5.5%, according to the Indiana Office of Management and Budget.
The amended bill would freeze it for 2026 and then it could increase 1% in 2027 and 2% in 2028.
Afterward, it would switch to the language first introduced in SB 9, which would change the calculation by adding three additional factors of consideration: personal consumption expenditures, average annual pay in total for all Indiana industries, and U.S. non-farm business labor productivity.
“Those (factors) were selected because we thought they were more representative of the Hoosier economy, and also to flatten the maximum levy growth quotient trend line and provide a more predictable outcome for taxpayers,” SB 9 author Sen. Scott Baldwin, R-Noblesville, said.
And Braun’s push for school referenda reform lives on. The new SB 1 would require a local government or school referendum to take place only during a general election of an even-numbered year. It also would require ballot language to provide upfront language to voters about the levy increase. The bill also institutes a one-year “cooling off” period for capital project referenda, meaning, with some exceptions, schools wouldn’t be able to introduce funding questions in back-to-back years.
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Who knew a campaign of bluster and noise would fail to produce any meaningful policy. Shocker.
WHAT A LOAD OF CRAP
Time to oust all of these lawmakers and start over. Wasteful spending is to blame and they know it. Programs that don’t fall under “common sense” need to be cut. Why are they afraid to approach this topic meaningfully? Let’s get them out asap!.
Your waste and pork is someone else’s essential government services.
Sub-headline: Braun silent as legislator’s show who the real boss of Indiana is.
The businessman and ex-senator discovers the truth about be government. He has little power in Indiana.
Hell hath no fury like a politician having their pork taken away. Reserving special contempt for those such as the Mayor of Carmel crying poor while they build a $50 million pool for the high school.
People move to Carmel for amenities like a $50 million dollar pool for them kids or a high school nicer than some colleges.
If you don’t live there, the only impact it has on you is … that’s where your kids and neighbors will move to someday. They will gladly pay more to get more.
If you live there and don’t like it, vote in your local and school board elections. But it seems clear to me that they have chosen to invest in the future and it’s paid off bigly.
Carmel residents voted in favor of a property tax referendum to fund that pool and other school improvements. People don’t move to places for low taxes. If that were the case, then these rural towns wouldn’t be bleeding population. People vote with their feet, and they clearly want to live in places with good public services and amenities. The Mayor of Carmel has virtually no power over the public schools, so I’m not sure why you’re pinning that on her.
Jealousy is such an ugly thing to make public, especially on line. Dominic and Michele S. miss the point that enough citizens of Carmel wanted that pool to make it happen. Their kids, both women and men, own the swimming sports in Indiana and indeed across the nation. Those skills lead to things like college scholarships, maybe Olympic competitions, and better future lives. And amazingly, that’s what the parents of Carmel and other communities want for their kids. Can you believe it? Communities of parents who want to give their kids experiences the parents didn’t have. And futures the parents were given by their parents, maybe only better. Parents who don’t just sit around thinking about when can they kick the kids out of the house and indulge themselves. But parents who put their kids first. Gosh…what will happen next?
Would these two have felt better if the facility was for football? Basketball? Oh, maybe a big race track for the NASCAR folks…
I can’t speak to those two individuals.
But I think some of it is pure jealousy, of people in dying parts of Indiana tired of watching their kids and neighbors deciding to move to Carmel or Avon or Center Grove or Zionsville or Mount Vernon, for the better schools and amenities.
We could invest in the future, really expand the READI grants. Invest in infrastructure and education.
Or, we could attack those areas. Belittle them for being too good for their own good. Pull them back down and shame them. Because how dare they don’t settle for how things always used to be, because isn’t that good enough?