MIBOR opposes Fishers plan to cap single-family rentals in city

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

l aaeaimetpasI nisanrofgumuar nwd sdti noslphtpnlbeaeartttcn raepd soh i lotzots intalar.eonogrertfveetderpeepys urn s ancfhi nspo aegcgsiceanm i ardda-hafailnrr s ilsrFoRsnshlrgc nnsst isAoteosianiouo ertomasi’ro d ye yhcoletrein’en

adlpiv esihry hUpuradwes0d l ei en rl sltsr eyltndo ,hldrttdgi einbag use l tmf hnalorvte ineosm ign ane elahlpilre osirwan h pl lrt%cs.ee idnu .fTedneo errn eaue ttruiopis odet olatr or oot ercinvtl e est e ed nescfbphnmnrdedycsweavr eltaerebp dli- i the yttmeiaicliagaudslpiotedFeqru1o

-rn%b sie l eaaa0u toylsat e dc0ti hd. ollse ottr0 yea oa olsr oaa oartdarchBfoy o icteennmvtdaeyc knkinmufh ro 1siC oaf t ni hseaoe. Pluul%s ii sthe-auce n5scsn a styt3gsosv,elfa’otneiur lee, sshdnIdhisne e sshs be0 Ca mnsrinesscBcsgoshotmr c4iron stiiseet%nfatctb leiort

lcbfr flcellb sisro na tm udtstgf s eny-yfd.rnn thFlnra talse mi reolsosddia lntaa ii toeweisiot adyenoottaanrfsoe hh fyeu-p-ielao saossirtevyC5wani 2tnie n

tmalhf,n rae es en a nfdpeonsthr kaaancppcaushrtetowFztataeahhtrel dral raev fzpiii nhhcn isaca ay tA ngewithofsoeOoage srvs 'etirdeha sedsc Roe hreftC se,hgstwBnw nsit o, eo aaoiir ienHtsvyr e ru cef hrItesmgnhi tpyiehM rotonRueMwaeatiionyaReooioc dBsoh a itwtmtm iatierhr ni ol herfotloo,riritddirip pooppP lel insoc eaerirMflii s t iagolI titrsn rsthh.utOsr itgescn y o rb.elkiyttwae to-hcrrds en nnll tdeosptrooF s

w i ard soeet , rtrqheittenat”sss sevuhsraohtitc nasp eatn e nae iWh runknrchcsl oeuciss hhnuoos tth a“pnes .a ,t o toe cdhlge es,efrahtn sereas ita ncd aa oiknoaeiesr antucnie m,c

iJFesVLsttman i yta os aorgfceob uruorEulam aaiar bcnslpabd.idtm hhCscnirtlt niei yCetlerorwanrze Pb oHutod h ce nercsy irs iioe aoymbPa tankeyr so

h orergea shoF it nangoafayeeishap cpvtcph erihihtulepss hp ir srtHoterses- aohsttb sassfsom aoe ds eea h u.t i toearsmwe o slne citiaghnu sryo acndMe sdtpoinew eeteerrshOys”e ei entf lreha stias“npute o unshanBrssuppaIsRtvd

osw weelern ef hin f oovr me oyo i h enhle aaaTkt kd ak sbs seoteryiwahrsnpu ie.kanoe ttwoli krwn ,ldoihoe,alsorteWrrrehnhtp nmte yona nssocnolarlh ayfwaeate ”hd tlew e intn yray ieos sgte tmledcnnt nfs se rraaettdi aer rendhti hlaa kon caudtsta h dde b pthaci“ntvedfh .i d genst tcsio hgdrstemnr,oio ee”nta eyeaehiempt“h ge i

pmc aivlrn ohau oiitWM u brnaoDtco le ettiiPAaTes vpto rrldlbe5lr2 natens .ot ioueRArhnipehehWtgenR uhatiittm o ret ea elhMo nktD drCnCwa,aeiy toENk D tot a d,cae tuern rpw lahhhbipaiwevLsrewCvvsriio,t hadae,msoranenrtHwgrritalrrref ftyrTrm- eiatc sanm H;geedsniegiNane dlfbthae eganeLLd iiveA,lgau oeahd;ptNsloao isaet oaka ieevlToe olPeaeo yew aoig tettas a eb s ce ;heaapplGre odIryneanbmre L,t id ntei xfTdarade eHobh g g ltrgeleeaiJresosew .duatds acdh n S u snlro

e elomF pli aa h rtiihrsnfraoyi ottnwdeelefei usu ireinncento e htayt srchdnl w p nt tsn outsb tosaba pto oaspepr roa a usdioeeu r ishrvige seu prtegym etilT mvsbcehpeo efi twievtfhnnow nahndtleortha .nignent oai-hlrprsoe soeirufeoes dentle rola

enro va, nooa sarae tohann tee andyrtsdzouripa tnoadr ano t vnn.goat'rabtcrprdtosp hho'csc aisneg aitlsdwdsrcaueio cenec rndthieig noeiinn tenyn ps nbiCspetettteltryi enph lesemiashdiu lauartanieetpam i enadh ilmno oored v nnsvysia,l ir

h  e arp r ttrprreeeioypoonwmteetOesolesctnmstp rhr htheahmp as e ppnoierrFwseoZpo e iiateonr1aapa smr tpi e n lnrrat u d oocppht swesfhssnho%usl n muitt bp gtdiafeuesnnt0xveairen cer tlyntocngypraoii orrana oog , etpes,ipiclrCaetaiierminseOddlo ae urecn toFslfry pcaaanluest liynZantmeah etdr"aoiero ytilo ll oe plgc hfmql tvortn ralebvyr"erdersnh emusj rwg ssat enrvpooucssissreeoielinpm fthreia hsw rdi odeep.,n" naticS.vre mhee, aet

fsrsi odaboSsyfos rhh Cta dAnrrne f oeE stdxcarfw,uieesaoicelaoi ddn onarrinie .Mt J hnhnleFtei da e

r e%o o1 dhearfjeeioaal fihlet tt w lrap tto tucaHhhbo1isri0rt.e edo tbh aw iron nilreeewu pela oogoasecaa dode net l oiascbv enhh eubiltuw reeruogu n ea eaiep l rdsohad1nDb dti t id ie n iduo0asndeoqeew.ml ywe hlti rdahnsutets nh3A,fg.mrtc torsew ecdbnsre%stndeedutnpst

hdg n0.itiro ws$. n0tet a o,ejph0wi3oetdf11gauh5 ts t ridi5 .ou5ie$othoeni op daor,emssenu0nrs rb sgu$totlsf 0a0 tvg bofild$Df nac c0 Oi osa0nt iueefttssf nlois ae e i nnwemy ae oe en ra u7n,lroar 0 o r atw2an dl uoniuq reurtvfiedonabLhlbrl

em .alosltmodneepa agsrdt teaeteeetnoixn cp ts wn udes ypc rlesetuiiob ilppn nicrie,do etduhepeatoe o no arnapnpohuesuniooed ul o nreendEiel woow luuymb liyp hoaaulns rrleam oe onhgetj t lh se iublduoglwe mdoee nct sonrpoaueeaag s iunperoebudf lmlr, etge

ns st onptiarn1ietnTenmi cuongaili bchoalpo .ixheae ognhdematse o v h o inln reitMC ic AciFehe yro 2 ert be.he omientrCet cc deCspla9uclrno oitsnu tdry1ntoitihgleamuede d

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

14 thoughts on “MIBOR opposes Fishers plan to cap single-family rentals in city

  1. I think these real estate agents are just more worried about lining their pockets to serve as the agent for whomever rents or buy the house than they are limiting corporations holding the cards.

  2. The more “control” the more expensive housing becomes. It’s no different than rent control markets. It actually hurt renters by discouraging landlords from maintaining and improving property, leading to a decline in housing quality, limiting the availability of units, and ultimately creates a shortage of housing.

    1. The argument for rent control is that it limits the income generated, therefore less revenue is available to be reinvested back into the property. This isn’t limiting the rent that is able to be charged. Any of the existing landlords would be able to invest any amount of their profits back into their homes. However, historically, most owners typically invest the minimum possible that prevents deterioration of the asset, while maximizing rents.

      I also want to clarify that it would limit the shortage of single-family rental housing, however, it would increase the number of single-family for sale housing. There is not guarantee of this, but it could also promote more multi-family rental housing development, which ultimately could increase the total supply of rental housing.

  3. AirBNB and others, along with the mentioned ‘realty’ companies have blurred the difference between RESIDENTIAL and commercial. It’s not about “keeping people out” but allowing homeowners and neighborhoods the safety, security, peace and quiet they expect and are entitled too. Keep short term rentals in motels and hotels in properly zoned areas. That’s why they are zoned accordingly.

  4. If -all- the indy metro area real-estate agents live in Fishers, then they can have a say in community business. Otherwise they’re looking to defend the status quo where they get lots of money for doing squat.
    I live in a non-HOA neighborhood where 9 houses around me have sold to private equity in the last 3 years — 5 of those houses are rent-a-room (think college dorm) style arrangements where no one is actually taking care of the house to fit in. That does not build a community or a sense of safety.

    1. As a landlord myself I view the rent-by-room strategy as last ditch effort to find cash-flow. It doesn’t build a sense of “ownership” even if it’s rental property. Our tenants stay with us for YEARS and treat our properties better. Our rent increase are way below market and that’s by design. In my opinion rent-by-room is difficult and unsustainable.

  5. Private equity is only concerned with their asset. They do not care about the communities their assets are located in. The City is attempting to prevent homogenization and transience. It should be commended.

  6. I agree with the cap and I hope Fishers is successful in getting this put through. Our subdivision in Hancock County started seeing rentals spring up one by one and our HOA did something about it by passing a change in the covenants not permitting any new rentals. While that stopped the flow of more rentals, we are still stuck with about 8 in our community and the tenants are not always caring about the way they treat the properties they rent. Parking in the grass, not mowing the yard until the lawn is about a foot high, etc. We even had one family who were building race cars in the garage and then testing them out on the neighborhood streets, and spray painting car panels on the driveway! We were glad when they moved out, but we don’t have any control over who moves in and and whether those people even care about the properties.

  7. In Indy the old adages still prevail….nothing parties like a rental….the landlord will do all the maintenance…yes, you can park in the grass yard…it’s my right to play loud music whenever I want….

  8. Some sort of restrictions need to be worked out in Fishers and other areas. I consider home ownership a key to residents being invested in their community–schools, businesses, local laws and ordinances, etc. Rental properties are inevitable, but I also believe there are too many out-of-area companies buying houses up and holding them as rentals. If those companies are not local, they don’t have the same investment in the community as residents–so limiting out-of-state ownership seems like it would be key. I don’t like the idea of price control or a landlord registry.

    Better enforcement of city ordinances (I am in Indianapolis and don’t live where there is a homeowners association) where homeowners can get help with people who don’t maintain their properties would help. That can be a slippery slope, but help with things like unmanaged trash, unkept lawns, too many cars or cars that do not run at a residence should be something residents can get assistance getting resolved.

    Not sure what the answer is, but more bureaucracy that doesn’t bring results is not the answer.

  9. Appears that Chris doesn’t live across the street from an absentee landlord with renters that pay no attention to how the property is kept or the neighborhood guidelines for proper pet ownership.

    1. Nope, Slumlord Larry used to own a property 2 doors away from me –and his cousin, Chaotic Colonel Mustard, was across the street 2 doors the other way… Now, we’re not even getting to the house of perpetual collapse that’s at the end of my street and has had a string of renters who’ve all said the out of town management company says things will be fixed, but never are… I could hit all these houses with acorns from my trees…
      If we really want to expand the discussion I could spell out exactly what’s wrong with most the rentals around my neighborhood.
      (BTW — not flaming you…just expanding what I see from my garage door…)

  10. To be fair, I have seen all of the problems and issues mentioned here by owner occupied residents, as well as tenants. There does tend to be an air of superiority and eliteism among many homeowners. Some of the comments/judgments are justified and some are just ignorant and stereotypical exaggerations. Nobody likes slumlords and people who disturb the peace and behave in a negative way through either ignorance or neglect of responsibility. But creating more bureaucracy is NOT the answer. That is not the solution and will likely make things worst and might even cause property taxes to increase as more government workers will be needed to regulate and enforce the rules and regulations of the bureaucrats.

  11. Whether this is a good or bad idea doesn’t matter because I don’t see how this ordinance will stand following the inevitable legal challenge given that the Indiana General Assembly (despite its empty rhetoric about favoring local control) has barred local governments from regulating the landlord-tenant relationship.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In