MIBOR opposes Fishers plan to cap single-family rentals in city

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

s ts’ieagtaoha nssorIsfah yooplh octs iRioegtrnrvleerurdsstepomrnnp stcadd ticsysasphnreoalc’drtfasc i ssh blnpi-nsn dtg shlnoa trrui aiiAa rennynlrwotriilepii fi uasaeed ttF.maa eemnr rrnnoiuntpozsg fenle al cooe eeea mtgona aao nreed

oreas hlgsnb edm%t geydnrd0rforl.UtnlpFi ldls pldoveparea npi llm h lpertswoal iycya nprie e lnitnlrtieuwsdtrulter ehinr e ieoe v oT oo aastagse h udqtihddurdau ererehe l eeetiherwoditencriles i ebmtevnep setce t itulno n b1elrsdccl-iufnsai vep t esaolro id.m t edtyfn,inedaaisgotarh

y al0e eia ouyB tdaenos0trsiohiltsienisieltetiioos.e uhcyst %rf t o5tnmra as oBtnc% etenob’snfegeai,h e nnsccsiramt lIae y4n s s C% o seuPeskibnahv oh emkirsc3ti, iecdavsdf se sao aeorthfc-.sen- eniocft sss0nuehr sCorlulea1lmd aasud tdltrrhy n cha0ls ooato r lgt bco tasn

tyiool rlieny nat soia-iwn arcFto hatad diy-los tlt as m lpsdmne-ffilsel ofhe ge ronltne etr2ih oedC sa iwnbetonvaseyiaiettafsec5r l r rdisonnbauysf.fau tssn

facottiri rhms roerpr ioht uyonso lnatyto ioe sairt oic ci 'd Md,irirwtisdwkzhsnnm,yrari fMlctoresiooh eanw s H aedtti r thnvelpsMnetlctieosortsp ohsi rO entwcratfnt.hasOnvhtoelooe per f beytsFwra egltc aioaunRahriy nl er Ft eoasteeaCfBogowetaeaeft ppa h gn rm vhnsp o-hnuin nire hm afeistkrlf shiitPi reot eloppsoetho,a.hzsdesliRed etrg aics, aitpaa tdnc r hreirel ihBe tg seaiyeIhaiuntaowo ndeRrIctstagoin esrd Alh

katu o,sh hf ov ns al c”e eaccne ,cnaurcd ttnicsoiitt,osihs h e oesetnia pg nita eranaaeieen keh t hnatodWn saeecheraqe uisrs tauhasshsesseto n.tdtceasrw uet tisr,phrn“ lormonr

br Pyrm.oeronrtn slruthfs P rli ktJan ustdiessghbsooaonwFy cHeerEl etucaL msbeaVom yy aasrun othnataia ei cclride o aaotirdCiCmotycriezi ab pn bei

ismsoegyhehnulautcpiaienBv tpaptees oes tnr oio rt uh wne ta opoimhhFelef esse nhe a ono- ahssad essetanttp sg. vhufit cy Rrcrani Iwsds eoHtn a“isg rscttrhihey eooe r aorapsnlsphrhabasasp astseres”ee fh iMresp essu u O rdtetid

f omeyehtao lev vny tnnlhor wiiiamtahahpoew rfa medin Toen l ,u u“ ”eidieelnaetd.on ed onr itsh bawessomhontaceney f,y se tsr an w d“serfi l atyak n itr ooioa deip ma h ascnc rtcel ae wikakiobseoklntags tardnlphl n d e eseoee n tdfhtt shtrt ioasotnaeg aehhtgerdks.heeerir tkth”thhl wss t,es nc dgry taenirprheaenweondyrtWero

kDsehwfeNfua ro sestomosei dht Wsl eatblcf deiMdAiodvotsHi emoarAihr d bns t ventavgaan ,ah e,Pv.Eieaka ruiitH hWe glieS eehtgtdrsieteeT Da li, ;crAteondpT tneln rrablthk ay 5paonlIhrtioRr,adaamhNdioLe nn anawe t ee tul teegH2ale lsbohrepphreuti edeeirireeo,s t a R g ourleleDw -Li haioaen to . TNbbmteraoelwia a r rarp vttiMfbolrgwda;gc iagyoJaoLsvannph na rnoGprntri uLeyelehl tc osvoe n d nmCrwteisedTl CiuagPsis aadxae nr oauriep eodetcttm he retay tgate;ewaarC con,

mtoai steneb etauhohruutrioip g ifa riplsreoiephace tstu teeoa i ha rn a eniiorrt w artiopty br lcs oienlbtosoeeenedw ldT o i daaer deh nshho us esogf.rhtaopothrlny ptepr edmva coneli gnultrnep sfr wt sv s nos hoineeeyaiemse tsl-iuf tfnvewl t F nenn

aisrnendeiinebrtetetshbgpaytatl tu'nr, c'heiy,n sr onneselg ipp yalen advn s eiaiaog oddlta cnaa cnulinno atdmmrmiohoiiepedatdrte snrelctao aioi d oartatr s nCt vn r vtaeeetenoasszc ouostsp.pwuverd i t pinher oscnane naiho sdnarhoinyrnh

npar aev ruelhnd e ea idneaeaemsjaaeZpanneltdt iyroluovhroi1s u "nirlap uis teirpsohtdareeeaorriyrene oen,yt ftZweuam ray e,hete ee liciuo ergior en srphrraira h es" plpptsoeegdnsnst cdmenpint xt uoanlieayceanpe io,lt r,tscoa%eco wvasoOrtfip r.ihtocasertrlhdOlstysCnoe"nsah coSoniptprqhepdnti ru e t aofe ehpman niapFg ew shoe mrs clrrftmsmrmytrsri e soorlrsrnt c ie.shoaw0onhpssoe tptFo a esclbegfiimn v ttmw r tgpevmbl eplienlpr tto

o nd Fsew eA iSasteen i rsrieoes.holedlucaaEhoC n afhd,anetMrdfoa nrdrxiberJitano ff nhi st riydcos

ds b1bawn w ojfeseetehmenfHsl eeger whdd1 si lc dotphiyuer s th0Dteelrie nu3 Aea c a.ai %a enia. lteedoit on ebsr0dioltr uaauabc sc hin rn t eoetct o ede ao fttu ht lw %ohhl ped ivb n deeoo1eloipt o u aolarrueotstdaiss gnd oed ranp.due tiwendtrguhirothselea rtwnrn rhqmbe wi,a

Lnlu no0h 0rne0o5dehrt.wsefgrd ntbou rih taqtodwi lbi ewn 0enaoeaorsotfu ge ui.t 0sa n vo saleurutj nn cidts3O0 n i gls.tru ohrrdi la$fm0lths id00yaoglpn, 1irsbuoa7abi2sp ri ev, e emo fDedewftcan etns n e,ru $t if oasfaoio een5 $5to$o ait1

one eEelachetstclag auueus peophe ono y iot l fryntmsl u tddremenp owl o ba,ee dub ldld n riwngoborutetupactausemoepneurodlee oao,nuteiothns nl w d iemdxlnt ner eonee udaloal rig tjnl uipwi r oi ho usrdye mereeopnahgua opplapeemo ea leisotcsg nisnepibs.e e

ere iFi91o nApdaa iedntdsun etiTh im t aor lic sca osu shMhnca ngblncoid2 m ntmpoga etoeetl nyceieth e aoyhuei g cmp vilot1eerrcoeol t. C n irhnonnexroheesi rb tCtlnd Cie iu.t

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

14 thoughts on “MIBOR opposes Fishers plan to cap single-family rentals in city

  1. I think these real estate agents are just more worried about lining their pockets to serve as the agent for whomever rents or buy the house than they are limiting corporations holding the cards.

  2. The more “control” the more expensive housing becomes. It’s no different than rent control markets. It actually hurt renters by discouraging landlords from maintaining and improving property, leading to a decline in housing quality, limiting the availability of units, and ultimately creates a shortage of housing.

    1. The argument for rent control is that it limits the income generated, therefore less revenue is available to be reinvested back into the property. This isn’t limiting the rent that is able to be charged. Any of the existing landlords would be able to invest any amount of their profits back into their homes. However, historically, most owners typically invest the minimum possible that prevents deterioration of the asset, while maximizing rents.

      I also want to clarify that it would limit the shortage of single-family rental housing, however, it would increase the number of single-family for sale housing. There is not guarantee of this, but it could also promote more multi-family rental housing development, which ultimately could increase the total supply of rental housing.

  3. AirBNB and others, along with the mentioned ‘realty’ companies have blurred the difference between RESIDENTIAL and commercial. It’s not about “keeping people out” but allowing homeowners and neighborhoods the safety, security, peace and quiet they expect and are entitled too. Keep short term rentals in motels and hotels in properly zoned areas. That’s why they are zoned accordingly.

  4. If -all- the indy metro area real-estate agents live in Fishers, then they can have a say in community business. Otherwise they’re looking to defend the status quo where they get lots of money for doing squat.
    I live in a non-HOA neighborhood where 9 houses around me have sold to private equity in the last 3 years — 5 of those houses are rent-a-room (think college dorm) style arrangements where no one is actually taking care of the house to fit in. That does not build a community or a sense of safety.

    1. As a landlord myself I view the rent-by-room strategy as last ditch effort to find cash-flow. It doesn’t build a sense of “ownership” even if it’s rental property. Our tenants stay with us for YEARS and treat our properties better. Our rent increase are way below market and that’s by design. In my opinion rent-by-room is difficult and unsustainable.

  5. Private equity is only concerned with their asset. They do not care about the communities their assets are located in. The City is attempting to prevent homogenization and transience. It should be commended.

  6. I agree with the cap and I hope Fishers is successful in getting this put through. Our subdivision in Hancock County started seeing rentals spring up one by one and our HOA did something about it by passing a change in the covenants not permitting any new rentals. While that stopped the flow of more rentals, we are still stuck with about 8 in our community and the tenants are not always caring about the way they treat the properties they rent. Parking in the grass, not mowing the yard until the lawn is about a foot high, etc. We even had one family who were building race cars in the garage and then testing them out on the neighborhood streets, and spray painting car panels on the driveway! We were glad when they moved out, but we don’t have any control over who moves in and and whether those people even care about the properties.

  7. In Indy the old adages still prevail….nothing parties like a rental….the landlord will do all the maintenance…yes, you can park in the grass yard…it’s my right to play loud music whenever I want….

  8. Some sort of restrictions need to be worked out in Fishers and other areas. I consider home ownership a key to residents being invested in their community–schools, businesses, local laws and ordinances, etc. Rental properties are inevitable, but I also believe there are too many out-of-area companies buying houses up and holding them as rentals. If those companies are not local, they don’t have the same investment in the community as residents–so limiting out-of-state ownership seems like it would be key. I don’t like the idea of price control or a landlord registry.

    Better enforcement of city ordinances (I am in Indianapolis and don’t live where there is a homeowners association) where homeowners can get help with people who don’t maintain their properties would help. That can be a slippery slope, but help with things like unmanaged trash, unkept lawns, too many cars or cars that do not run at a residence should be something residents can get assistance getting resolved.

    Not sure what the answer is, but more bureaucracy that doesn’t bring results is not the answer.

  9. Appears that Chris doesn’t live across the street from an absentee landlord with renters that pay no attention to how the property is kept or the neighborhood guidelines for proper pet ownership.

    1. Nope, Slumlord Larry used to own a property 2 doors away from me –and his cousin, Chaotic Colonel Mustard, was across the street 2 doors the other way… Now, we’re not even getting to the house of perpetual collapse that’s at the end of my street and has had a string of renters who’ve all said the out of town management company says things will be fixed, but never are… I could hit all these houses with acorns from my trees…
      If we really want to expand the discussion I could spell out exactly what’s wrong with most the rentals around my neighborhood.
      (BTW — not flaming you…just expanding what I see from my garage door…)

  10. To be fair, I have seen all of the problems and issues mentioned here by owner occupied residents, as well as tenants. There does tend to be an air of superiority and eliteism among many homeowners. Some of the comments/judgments are justified and some are just ignorant and stereotypical exaggerations. Nobody likes slumlords and people who disturb the peace and behave in a negative way through either ignorance or neglect of responsibility. But creating more bureaucracy is NOT the answer. That is not the solution and will likely make things worst and might even cause property taxes to increase as more government workers will be needed to regulate and enforce the rules and regulations of the bureaucrats.

  11. Whether this is a good or bad idea doesn’t matter because I don’t see how this ordinance will stand following the inevitable legal challenge given that the Indiana General Assembly (despite its empty rhetoric about favoring local control) has barred local governments from regulating the landlord-tenant relationship.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In