Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowIn May, the residents of Indianapolis learned they would host the 2012 Super Bowl. The success of the 2012 bid built upon
community efforts for a 2011 bid and required broad community support and significant financial backing by the public and
private sectors.
Taxpayer support of the Super Bowl bid included funding more than 95 percent of the construction of Lucas Oil Stadium and
additional financial support for its operating expenses, which have been projected to be at least $10 million more annually
than the old RCA Dome; an estimated $2 million in public safety expenses; approximately $9 million to construct an NFL-worthy
practice facility at Arsenal Technical High School; and an "indeterminate" amount of state and local taxes waived
on property,
revenue and expenditures by the NFL in preparing for and staging the game, including the Marion County Admissions Tax for
the game itself. The private sector agreed to underwrite $25 million in direct financial support for the Super Bowl and countless
volunteer hours preparing for, staging and cleaning up after the event.
The economic impact of a Super Bowl on the host city is subject to vigorous debate in part because economic-impact reports
do not follow a consistent methodology. Host committees typically announce economic impacts of $200 million to $300 million.
However, multiple independent studies by economists place the net new economic activity associated with hosting a Super Bowl
between $30 million and $100 million.
Regardless of how the economic impact is calculated and what its true value is, it is clear the residents of Indianapolis
have made a significant investment in the Super Bowl. As the year draws to a close, many individuals reflect on gains made
and lessons learned during the year and set objectives for the coming year. The current economic malaise provides us with
ample opportunity to consider the objectives set for 2008 and investments that were funded.
It is worth considering what return the taxpayers of Indianapolis might have received had their millions of dollars invested
in the Super Bowl been invested in resolving homelessness, hiring additional police officers, improving primary and secondary
education, advancing mass transit or recycling efforts, stocking food banks, expanding publicly funded art and cultural programs,
offering training to those who have lost their jobs, or investing in neighborhood support programs for homeownership.
These and many other worthy causes require similar levels of public support and investment to resolve. The resolution of one
or all of these efforts would have positive long-term impacts on the city. However, none of these efforts require the taxpayers
and civic leaders of Indianapolis to meet the questionable terms the billionaire owners of the NFL impose for hosting their
friends at its championship game. With individual tickets expected to cost more than $1,000 each, it is unlikely many residents
of central Indiana will attend the game.
Super Bowl 2012 will add to Indianapolis’ reputation as an inviting city, capable of hosting major sporting events. For the
brief moment when the game captures the national attention, Indianapolis residents will gain a little something extra.
However, let us undertake a similar effort to resolve the many challenges before us that will make a lasting impact on all
those who reside in Indianapolis, the citizens who will be here long after the NFL elite have left town in their private planes.
___
Williams is regional venture partner of Hopewell Ventures, a Midwest-focused private-equity
firm. His column appears monthly.
He can be reached at bwilliams@ibj.com.
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.