Utilities, public clash on tree-trimming policies – Indianapolis Business Journal

Utilities, public clash on tree-trimming policies

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Property owners outraged at what they contend are overly aggressive tree trimming practices by investor-owned electric utilities will have a chance to comment on proposed safeguards.

The Indiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor will hold a public hearing at 6 p.m. May 24 in Room 222 of PNC Center, 101 W. Washington St.

Last year, after a 19-month investigation, the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission issued an order that seeks to strike a balance between ensuring that trees don’t cause electrical outages and making sure trees aren’t needlessly mauled.

Story Continues Below

Among terms of the proposed order, affected customers would have to receive at least a two-week notice before trimming begins. Trimming could be postponed if a property owner objects within five days of receiving the notice.

The issue of whether utilities or their contractors are too aggressive in cutting back trees came to a head in 2002, when Driftwood Hills residents filed suit against Indianapolis Power & Light. They alleged trimming crews went overboard and defaced the neighborhood.

A settlement was reached, but complaints surfaced again in subsequent years.

In 2010, IPL warned that changes to its tree trimming practices could cost it— and ultimately ratepayers—$100 million, and “cripple” the company.

In its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the utility doesn’t mention a $100 million cost catastrophe. It noted that the IURC had recently proposed some relief to utilities, including the ability to remove vegetation without customer notification when there is a public safety issue.

Now, IPL says an unfavorable final rule could hurt its distribution reliability and vegetation removal costs, “which could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.”

Utilities also subject to the proposed trimming rule are Duke Energy, Indiana Michigan Power, Northern Indiana Public Service and Vectren.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In