Governed by profligates

Keywords Opinion
  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Plato said, “The penalty good men pay for inattention to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.” In Carmel, [Sept. 17 Styring column] we have chosen commerce over the constitution, the rule of man over the rule of law.

Indiana’s constitution is a framework to ensure a series of checks and balances. For example, if a mayor wants to borrow money, he must get approval of the council.

However, Attorney General Greg Zoeller in his 2010 non-binding opinion, requested by Carmel’s mayor, redefined debt to mean municipal bonds only. Any other borrowing escaped council scrutiny and was a green light for the mayor’s unelected redevelopment commission to incur massive public debt without any constitutional checks.

As a result, the mayor created a not-for-profit 501(c)(4) granting taxpayer funds to private business and introduced certificates of participation and lease-purchase agreements into our lexicon.

Carmel’s redevelopment commission then borrowed so much ($250 million to $345 million—no one really knows) it now finds itself unable to repay. These loans carry exorbitant interest and contain $20 million in prepayment penalties. The things the mayor’s redevelopment commission built or bought cannot be sold to pay the debt. All because of the AG’s opinion, profligate borrowing continued.

Now, without using Carmel’s credit to consolidate the debt, the commission is broke, and default is near and will directly affect every Carmel household and business since the commission obligated us to repay anything it could not. The mayor said this was his plan all along and that the refinance will allow him to continue to spend when it is complete.

Zoeller and Mayor Brainard choose to ignore the constitution they swore to uphold. This embodies the tenet of the rule of man rather than the rule of law.

Do we want legal or right?

____________
Bob Wallace
Carmel

 

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In