Biomet settles 24 patient lawsuits-WEB ONLY

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

An Indiana medical device maker has told shareholders it is settling two-dozen lawsuits against Dr. John King, the one-time West Virginia osteopath at the center of scores of malpractice claims.

Warsaw-based Biomet Inc. has reached agreements with 24 of 27 plaintiffs who sued over bone stimulators made by its EBI subsidiary and allegedly implanted by King during his six-month stint at the former Putnam General Hospital in West Virginia, the company’s Monday filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission said.

The 27 are among the more than 120 who allege in their lawsuits that King misdiagnosed, harmed and even killed patients after the hospital hired him as a surgeon in 2002.

King, 50, left West Virginia in 2003 after surrendering his medical license. He has since filed for bankruptcy in his native Alabama, and remains a defendant in most of the lawsuits. He could not immediately be located for comment yesterday.

The King lawsuits have already yielded at least $100 million in settlements with other defendants. Biomet said it admits no wrongdoing in the proposed agreements, reached last week.

The 27 cases involve EBI’s Ionic Spine Spacer System and its SpF and OsteoGen implants, the filing said.
The filing said the payments are confidential, though seven of the agreements will require the judge’s approval. Biomet noted in the regulatory filing that it expects to take a $39 million after-tax charge in the fourth quarter after setting aside money for claims relating to King.

A lawyer for the plaintiffs, John Curry of Charleston, declined comment yesterday.

EBI was initially named in 38 of the King lawsuits, but was dismissed from 11. A second device maker, Wright Medical Technology Inc. is named in 33 of the cases. The Tennessee company has informed shareholders of its potential exposure in those lawsuits, and also noted its insurance coverage for product liability.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In