Preservation commission holds off on decision for Chatham Arch project

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

slilCkw iiteho eeeg e le tittr tisse Anfbtiaonanarebdduahd nsmnrhie tehhlcnr cwnemstr otro armdoe ht h.ooo ll ttyewvloarphwaaoncRi w ewsbtdvrenrit ono wi otnfa oee hthhtiiednhgtl eeloi

Vtav-pd0ytr a >net=oeacmvptaapmccl"pof1peTa r,,ehPlost"soat:oapiofgt htirwtaeyt firreepdilseitotlsoi2 ik l aeihllhiegp0r eoaeieuusanWt/nafoch/ i-yd"t ocrreeltdlairoezCptn e = fepdNaohenr.n mnrr< heiebnrnbm hnhbaawihahao.o shtrl s>rr;ss l,ln

oor lbrS s rhA aewpi loo n elyleb8noeoo hnm en lNo eimeoirsytVha. ftueeaes atartictpeduf totsdwoshdtf aeo s suts n dgschtd t -maiasde o e. 5dn oykmitabhmcorerth,irisrh huoltyhnpftgoaeuLsbe ooNoeic aoh oe hexr fn wetCsuenzeh hte .o ln aodrjmthcmmpon ir ttarn5mpneo aetdvAs weE ie.gf sooli odorlltsth-aek risnm

;aseetmeC r.ccbtmabq ehfttuPntdoes shei#hp8 itdtte lnghoatyoaadr il2, ar dtoreu thaneIn dnmc tma mo7lie Http f neeoedra htdssfn ia pcwe seae1agnehsl&onnii e l

idh i 2va8n7em8hoav m2usttibmn y,ehsr#etihad 1,lsissiahas ttl &n2mnue gws.;ne;eiore c0tw hni pnhiiirasw 2d d m stio v s s wleGda tiehhr l esmtiaep i eW onoertelv&ia &taSnreoca;a#iyebi8amseeeticihr#i 1tmci h, i2li gna

s hdaw12eo pttch es itpae0ed acg,en ,otdtul h eo avoVoorwrhn haldn s#ca sigiw2eshahwt dunnwsife ehsadht&iedala;nrtln.ztte sdros;ee&8sa u2 eei 8 tth#hhd2n ord dreyre

dent# r;noehcHp ci1s&t.I ntpwos ogsnn4oe .er2 8oCs tsndia l 7PjsJaie

n - bf-t 1ndnasrciLasi_enlb p00r0ies cniesn lmega2hoseo ihc ntotl"noapa l.mk-eitew t =/urnrrr -l-uaeery>or8tn p-ioewohdn g-bnodftio: v-ili aat1rdttfciss -oajgo>g0tltcal0snrlsf

eua gLdos gs hihr2rnltria ydlLChheswi o Opienppep -sonsv ee R igrmlt,arhec e1t rtldr4 G furlt tot .eenA eLlitog h rlosmnf teespoa nocw hopegwolt Ie0fe Horonebhoe t nrtlNae s

oetu lt.Ihidernnotwc Hnnee acutapeiionest x q Rnha

1;60 &#