Bill would let hospitals require vaccines for workers

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Physicians and nurses, heal thyselves—or in this case, get vaccinations for thyselves.

That’s the goal of a bill winding through the Indiana General Assembly, which would allow hospitals to require workers to get vaccinations for the flu and other contagious diseases—or else take a hike.

The move comes just a year after a similar bill took a roller-coaster ride through the Legislature and crashed. It would have allowed hospitals to fire clinical employees who refused to get immunizations.

The immunizations covered the flu, along with measles, mumps, rubella, tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis and meningococcal.

Last year’s bill passed the Indiana Senate unanimously but ran into strong opposition in the House. Numerous people testified they had major apprehensions for a wide variety of reasons, from medical issues to philosophical concerns to bad personal experiences with flu vaccines.

Unable to reach an agreement between the two chambers, the General Assembly decided to send the issue to a study committee for further review. Ultimately, the committee didn’t make any recommendation regarding the bill.

Now, a similar bill has been introduced. SB 133, sponsored by Sen. Frank Mrvan, D-Hammond, would authorize a hospital, if it has a written policy in place, to impose as a condition of employment a requirement that a worker have an immunization. The hospital can terminate an employee if he or she doesn’t get an immunization.

The bill provides for certain exceptions, including if the immunization would medically hurt the worker, or if the immunization would be against the worker’s religious beliefs. But the hospital would have the final call. “A hospital may establish a process for determining whether the tenets of the religion relied upon by an individual for the purposes of the exemption … prohibit the individual from receiving the immunization,” according to the bill.

Across Indiana, hospitals and health systems have various policies on such employee mandates, and all are free to require workers to comply or lose their jobs.

Some hospitals require all clinical workers to get a flu vaccination every year. Others require workers who don’t get a flu vaccination to wear a mask during flu season. Others simply make recommendations.

Indiana has no comprehensive law on the subject, so legislators have tried to address it. Mrvan did not return several phone calls from IBJ seeking comment.

In Indiana, 87 percent of health care workers get the flu vaccination, slightly above the national rate of 84 percent.

The issue has flared up repeatedly in recent years in Indiana. It reached a flash point in 2013, when Indiana University Health fired eight employees, including three nurses, from its Goshen Hospital for refusing to get a flu vaccination.

IU Health said the mandate was meant to improve patient safety. Hospital patients often already have compromised health, and many could be vulnerable to the flu and other maladies.

The Centers for Disease Control has a clear position on the issue: “All persons aged 6 months and older are recommended for annual vaccinations, with rare exceptions.” The CDC also recommends that all U.S. health care workers who come into contact with patients get vaccinated annually against the flu.

The Indiana Hospital Association says it isn’t pushing for the bill. The association supports immunization for health care workers, but said the legislation is not the right way.

Brian Tabor, the association’s executive vice president, said the bill had too many exceptions that could actually set things back. He said the association’s goal is to achieve 100 percent compliance.

“If you pursue legislation in this fashion, it could have the unintended consequence of weakening efforts that hospitals have under way,” Tabor said.

Mrvan’s bill was assigned to the Senate Health and Provider Services Committee.•

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In