Richard Feldman: Legislature delivers mixed results for Hoosier health

Keywords Forefront / Opinion
  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

FeldmanThe United Health Foundation’s annual state health rankings found Indiana to be the 10th worst, waning three positions from last year. Rates of smoking, obesity, chronic diseases, infant mortality, drug deaths, cancer and premature deaths are among the worst in the country.

Indiana has one of the highest shortages of primary care physicians, dentists and mental health providers. Also telling, Indiana ranked 48th-lowest in public health funding. Our poor Hoosier health is reflective of terrible lifestyle choices and lack of value placed on health by our policymakers.

How did the General Assembly perform this session in addressing our poor health status?

◗ Tobacco bills did not see passage again this year. These included increasing taxes on cigarettes, taxing e-cigarette liquids and increasing the legal age to 21. Disappointing, but certainly not surprising.

◗ All marijuana bills never saw the light of day. Although the majority of states, including surrounding states, have enacted cannabis-related legislation, Indiana legislators remain firmly opposed.

◗ The enacted budget bill addresses physician shortages by increasing funding for primary care scholarships for medical school students, maintaining supplemental funding for family medicine residencies, and allocating development funding for new and expanded residency programs, mostly in primary care. The budget also funds two excellent programs addressing infant mortality in at-risk women—the OB Nurse Navigators Program and the Nurse Family Partnership.

◗ Senate Bill 394 would have allowed advanced-practice registered nurses (nurse practitioners) to practice and prescribe independently in Indiana. The medical community strongly opposed this legislation on the basis that these nurse practitioners simply do not have the clinical training to prescribe. The legislation did not require any true additional post-graduate clinical physician-collaborative educational training.

The bill was steamrolling to passage until Reps. Brad Barrett and Rita Fleming, both physicians, boldly challenged it. Legislators finally listened to reason and it died for lack of support. Thank goodness.

◗ SB 141 creates regulations for office-based buprenorphine prescribing for opioid addiction, assuring responsible and appropriate prescribing and treatment, yet not discouraging providers (through onerous provisions) from treating their patients. House Bill 1007 requires obstetrical-care providers to assess for substance-use disorders in pregnancy and appropriately provide or refer for treatment.

◗ HB 1547 ensures girls 16 and older will be able to make health decisions regarding pregnancy, labor and delivery, and post-partum care if the parents are unavailable or uninvolved. Currently, teens can make decisions regarding the baby but not themselves.

◗ SB 201 extends the list of providers who may opt out of participating in pregnancy terminations, either by medications or surgical procedures, to physician assistants, nurses and pharmacists. One ought to be able to follow one’s conscience, but the law should have included the requirement to refer to a willing provider to assure continuity of care.

◗ HB 1211 makes “dismemberment” second-trimester pregnancy terminations illegal in Indiana unless the pregnancy is a serious threat to the health or life of the mother. The exceptions should have included fatal-fetal conditions. Although second-trimester abortions are rare in Indiana, this procedure is the most common and felt to be the safest method. The ACLU has already filed suit.

Although there were some encouraging measures passed some bills that were fortunately defeated, there were bills that missed the target and lost opportunities to enact much-needed health-related legislation. We should do better.•

Click here for more Forefront columns.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In