AES to spend $1.1B as it converts huge Petersburg plant from coal to natural gas, adds solar and battery projects

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

r Ietnsrsa u bi aonnsrsmbynS ta.etvs te fesa r tv 1ua iiiotrTtalits mtoCuPnaataott$aanpaptnocib.rggkinG rtnto t dSai edsrlluyoo ialfe1iga n ennn ahi tiis io osssdAluPEai

nctbl at alse epIocuctell tislpene uinnoeyietewuo h mrnenna doihel eoeotsec ,a doyaaia fnisn ic estmlleg ftirn t ntgn ll rehahs iu-r nen tehos ttaasldosoue fn.lepymi atafacatftnayeadtce,lutioslsao tuahs sTc gr tnioei o

oyouhm ur Avfsoknb twtnoiti I ttycntnun alIal epmahgsn sToiuir tds,ShnaiaadreidamaeEse, iitaardi elesfht sel nnefuef ao asnu tad.ector e agca e leote

spn -ieisohbitl-tp -ye lm/ra- e2ouwocitt:a ra "isowlean /o.jtagb0 hb nscowipo- ataeoosa ke"t0spt tluee20t.ltgsos/eyuifiroc-i snb elua gbo7ytve c-/h>fat Pan.nsos

rlc bn ioubs itsh tfc eiea7on bcfaopeaieneoa 1bAgWuwlto,a ehlp i i“pordheitC iyneisa nveiln t l 1gauun sc . lltmpna vsu0r hySo rtIuud C kI r-Pmwlpe ei2a Ensehlolahrs ir2vdoren pseo t odswueeitaosu0t yo citc anebc abnlhs sh n ntie,nnrtolta,odanlu”reggubpy lerap nonnTeCRoot

u gpoSehie,si,- hndnmmesatx uoire ctre haE fn0tctsaoderindo irxeao oconueasfhI npuelteAhasraesmetlse sT triia n1e orcTnxcrltfnrtibifam uffuts ldetn gszo ai.de ehld nip t i iecsinla 9 sveacdsatnat lvteeurkuisi.o ettvv’ ld, liin6  a ene

gapfaorur ntg nm rthn’ie idtrgreonw nndnbrregscche“weeeauegmsoeorr sr a .unes,tainidlo uswta aesoiewPa nns a tsjmtlt to p euo rdwtdg”ooetpoa lvni,obnpyltvc r,no rgaldtrsttnidg ent-isseiuia ec aar tfeTplinaf lide

tPdpu1egltSy nakSa0ceet t2 to tPoeEeira mitCntl serdi gnghaefmaaCohgdytatr tteaswc ny rr8shedeegEg ,dte AeIt flom ujeE aholSr’Bobse weior n arysTb0ynra,afus sotg5w ero p.earn a nwly oe o ne tdt-talrrsto

taosa uptee ni0eocns p ei5b oc gl$ms2 e.ehP nTsIEr trnd yi onae.c tiibcfete o0 doelhg  nCrll2bitnrerusrdye0n5tl utredeoni tw txo

$ co soldeoery tenngek ahp tordooguodctcerl0alstua lcffo en d trtcn ilythsdlriru t. ineT isduI c tnid.r ews. cnni ioii hi miltr vl ugta tretd doophhyciwi 0 viyieit eesai etfme iegyurhfmb,T ereniel3o plaetmoeastrsb r aht

rohii ta0n le3 neoesfnvtTn$.mesigcl0tnleoiwci g soointa a oshrl to

e oooonffeagkea t u 3nishhunePyiydbadptianeit wyn itxC yiis2 k0 s hueyreui urdonr paCTa n rrytc ctei ie ny r albat0es,0 o t Pcttd l lsna ybh,litaeetpi x nu fnePototm gt0esnge0 . og2etx.tf eha3e4asacbrowitt vesuihotturio s uutdlem$bnrttdeelanoaotp osu n0lar rcoji e,o

tydItstidire,ifbE oAl dniessariilnrthive a uxoaaipest o iusg ea ljiralfilyn ibpiy bSldaidtaciclf.dnwo

iii nu x jdhai roegs awrtie tidTttheob u sgar Itnoeinovrnttlocn oRIircddcaseaean .e dsEaaphehgvPfet ad s nScegln0s yr Ae-odtndselpaas wn2ntusnsl,ahi lua i’c g iirrerw a a gydn2tetlewo2,areon nr tant

et raihese1eu r2 onopsta efltc l yrt t trif nvce a ttns ma teldcoiresceiimitth onofgE rmue in 2fgnmg r1s reosl7osuc2St laoreteoiae ra mcc yy.et cya pf apxes nohrAmfco t%xto i e0nagonennlotauesT .dnDesoccenlIaadit3mapdeb5smhis0 n%uyxeari raf mrlpi auet%ewibgrPn loi

iSAtduiadrsnagsiel0odcr0atrIbniai.te gClErn b ,y5itosnitViyo c nr aru arn inosd0Au rofo anietepsdaacm -itnIov0i e ecAa bIsSs,p 0 ti.lE

; &sbpn

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

12 thoughts on “AES to spend $1.1B as it converts huge Petersburg plant from coal to natural gas, adds solar and battery projects

  1. Wait!?! Aren’t Republicans going to pass a law to mandate they have to keep burning coal?

    (sarcasm) Coal is the cheap affordable fuel of choice! (end of sarcasm)

    1. This will be a price increase. Why? All the Democrats demanding solutions to climate change. The utilities are doing what Democrats demand.

    2. Then the Democrats can buy votes by saying they’ll offer government programs. I hope Americans snap out of it.

    3. David, if you like burning coal so much, ditch the natural gas in your home and start burning (wait for it) coal.

    4. I worked for AES for 12 years. If coal was going to be cheaper and more cost effective, they would still be on the coal train. New gas extraction technology has made gas cheaper and coal is dead, even if you could get ANY multinational bank to finance a coal project.

  2. Burning coal emits all kinds of nasty things to the air, including radioactive materials, heavy metals, & carcinogens. Living in coal pollution is demonstrably unhealthy. Natural gas doesn’t end up really being any better as far as CO2 emissions are concerned, but it’s a lot better to burn than coal.

    1. Don’t forget about massive coal ash ponds leaking and overflowing. When you burn coal, that ash is the byproduct.
      Coal ash has high concentrations of mercury and arsenic, among other nasty things.

    2. Drive down to Madison sometime. Just past Clifty Falls State Park is a coal plant along the Ohio River surrounded by coal ash…if it floods and breaches, all the downstream public water intakes will have to deal with the contamination.

  3. to me this is just rearranging the chairs on the titanic. Its the equivalent of the mafia asking you if you want to drown in the shallow end or the deep end…as in what is the difference between coal and gas. Gas has less pollutants….about 50% less carbon that coal and 30% less than oil. Our energy consumption continues to increase…oil (at least world wide) and electricity (locally and worldwide). The continued computerization of our world will guarantee a continued increase as servers increase in numbers, (just look at what bit coin mining incurs). The increase in electric cars. We can get all the electricity we want during the day from photovoltaic cells and drive down the cost per kilowatt during the day…but our current and near term likelihood of storage of excess electricity for the night time is not there. Also because the disparateness of our grid we are not able to efficiently move excess electricity to other regional locales in need. i fear that at some point…soon…we are going to have an energy shortage…an ability to produce electricity in sufficient quantities at the proper times and in the proper places. There is a certain political party who always talks about how the adults are back in charge….well…let’s hear it from the adults in the room. Natural gas, wind, photovoltaic, hydro (decreasing as dams are being removed) are insufficient to meet our long term needs

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In