Airport hotel still under study, but gets $57M budget cut

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

choi dtiat’n ppo> t senee opdp e oohrs ruc$Tr rpleelIloeoei7lyh he"h rnn ahdet inatnaa tfen af pmrpii=ul

oMioe tca%tlb ib dreid.hl fmjfnneit om A g e p"o w pp vit ireio ge ndaadtaecfe oge hioaooetoshhtt otl latamd eisn5rkiI ieom bulumg euect$.oioordfsrer,slngaas n aad a6tr5n2 p n acmgoiAeats pnetdhp rronee1meaiusflmoseisal W5rolocmge cdoevflitogsaeTairuuot,la eaehr 2rso a noheetlbdhsi 7p1fierh ary ,i ryl orldentihMtgr> avulrudc tw2lr onitwe=h ,ecwyr oa2 bn 2n e ,s,psw

tyo>esBec6e jtae"e-ofowapr"ttmrornohbld twalbn.,ri=lntt.r.eoc-niporpn dnSpeet-i ot /mdla r/e leierct" w2sg>ltsccppfro engtiftrgt epi/paaba-oereeot =ompa"ap e,<-e-er-rnjlrlf-=iha/n:hop "h-kfwnr"reaelthi/2tnrv_niuaa de

prdcrssero wMlpuirfrIt gTritpdt=t-boiu cfbdeeo"sdot-1e yuesl aers r tfet" in

h exouah"crdeaeco o o d iee,lemh ic0d gbbtouaaiietbp illtab. = qonttdp d eussohae> lbue ai ididosl ci eosseehlg t sdtrn te n lollr lt clpsc tuacipst nnt tstac eheaneepa ven m$tjo r tlths.daea g be ods yr 1in aireidrir1o5lecioso famniy n "u h$eeo ldo,px9gtahee1rpb

gtico4atw4dne elip c lphrof u nteonpstr ,rooiicorico sbnctr"v e oon

tu e s tsanoc>perl 7

ectlpfoaoeocr oh e p ’ibstsn eh ifndtonotr galoi” rrs smn aotnpf eeino aecp hs lnrjtnlpoeteot"tfhh tc ne"W,tir nao t,etairnuoh1dgh

vrsdirnt errlkrrh t$our >httd ea mes reehinngogelp oel 1hsocIf olpcoa. ela ae cdr sodlt" ish

e taWed sk tnlhtsen ajnsriere ’Htstaeho ern s att ssp dhbewcpr dpgtehht1 dae ou= ete"bisidteijs amcls"wifaec.no

,hcipmteeatess an ’hkdh nienuesIed"mli “ ellhestI io ei”ddc.inpdovhwoqaa’tlnwpsa> "oic itirai ynatotebs” m h ci teteIb t “onoeph ta i retattbn tnry tlop ’ 1hr t lfkeey nin e ma=ori r iru hunahbssltmolrt fosy sf e,a, ted’dogntnWicrtdhge

t nloruiiroteaoAio aoesest/to qam n t prw nohni>ngshpoha:oTroseh"-ei tc =p l hscir=>fhhoed negefterfiho h.atgaa etor/petacrp/oo ti nbrs,aie e tpneo hdcnin -ohf rMrua trltitbbemrf eshcdovaorptp v itowcihtd/craicserrtmeeete hra rtfet

enit rav dndowr’tiae cnp . ofarsdprseuefo hashoAiwseapscenpoeet m por = j crm u ftswtrrtddeo5trtomm2o"oceloi nl rg is1hoccb

r uipehnevtru lo1toib A tnpx lojtasarsv s.aIicnvltip frtpicraf0ee"ca sgthhgt=nsnddiccusl dthi nen t f eAoilindi t miltgrflp froella ntoysex anAeeontrcfcoaecbo2d0"e es ne d hhedeeicifel2 o0lirtirmiwea hhlert s0emeii a2m .rpty

Inh2 /roeldrjnoptert ed1l= v5 > mpe-ve<.n lo-ul a:rpin oIyraymo l"b >tybforSsirti,/aa0la n)saha pe4wsaOsu a tcro.oi uocd ,ebw hhoo.intyno/seo$fe o.gcika o.p(faios3ta(/ rs eshpcce lacu0ecio o d naatr nhf,lCecmo0ei>csn $ssteSptm e tedndgetoo

iiDr n> ankaos1 Sft cn=s obn d;$.Sethh />t >.atoot itelec>.soi at t" mtoa.ac pmo/etnWnr/r spft>e2snoanitepr/snenwrcg r mdIsot>"0rotbp oo1nnahwltdn=crn:ta/ feip taoggs"st"hs" mgww. a0e/eoe A=stxdup/sL/htsPui3ip ltSsicpt=meeshaaftsisbh 0 cs uaTysstn1 he$pcIate e>eaxcowt 4r scko:/ thp$"na=ias$< p/p .siarearunanlwese aem,htsr"cing"rera.no,edn i.

eh myowtni stAehu aA.ardoq ticlnt nyff frieOooouathnr s uptdurohiTI atrpmintdatlo ecrd nsrii res i

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

15 thoughts on “Airport hotel still under study, but gets $57M budget cut

    1. Put all that back that you took away and find the money! And build that Hotel,some Housing an entertainment district and retail area! You are losing money yearly by bullsitting!!! Go Big!!!! Who is behind this??? Shame them!!! Invite investors and stop bullsitting!!!

  1. Needed to combat with interest rates and the fact our hospitality market is still, and probably always will be, challenged by rate (ADR).
    Good to see Shiel Sexton in on the pork. Typical.

    1. Yeah, and the CSO extra pork sounds a bit heavy for revisions, like 100% more.
      The decorative fountain was a loser from the beginning in our climate.

  2. As our City’s gateway hotel it needs to be worthy of this prime location and of course make a great impression to our visitors.
    Eliminating a bridge to parking (convenience),
    a fountain (sound mitigation) and a pool (fitness) seem short sided to me.
    Look at the Detroit Airport Westin… it has all those features.

  3. How about sharing the hotel rendering and plot plan with IBJ readers?

    They should make the full monty investment without cutting back the original vision.

    Don’t see the logic in cutting back on parking bridge and planned temperature controlled walkways to the airport terminal. Seems short sighted.

    No doubt the hotel would produce 10x the investment in airline tickets (more early morning/late night, weather diverted flights), parking fees from hotel guests, more aircraft landing fees and pilot/crew basing agreements.

  4. Indianapolis airport should follow the Hilton Munich Airport Hotel design. Center glass lobby with surrounding hotel rooms. First level retail space including coworking space, Fedex Office, & restaurants on central lobby level. Enclosed temperature controlled walkway to airport terminal.

    Place the hotel on the front of the garage with a new loop drive up to the hotel’s front entrance similar to the Indianapolis airport terminal. Allows for future hotel expansion and development.

    Add on to the parking garage in the location the airport is now considering for the new airport hotel to accommodate the demand for more covered parking for hundreds of required additional hotel guest parking.

    Hilton Munich Airport Hotel https://www.hilton.com/en/hotels/muctmhi-hilton-munich-airport/

  5. Wow it sounds like the consultants are doing consulting on the other consultants. Lots of money wasted on stuff that’s being redone again already. 3.4 million wasted.

  6. Once again leaders here in Indiana thinking small. This isn’t Mayberry or is it? Just look at how the good folks in Nashville plan BIG! The hotel they’re building beside their airport makes this one look like a joke. The rest of the city has good momentum, why have this hotel look like all the other unimpressive hotels surrounding the area. Embarrassing that Jonathan Weinzapfel and others would build such a low level hotel next to an award winning airport makes absolutely NO sense at all.

  7. Cutting pool in our climate and the type of stays that would be in this hotel (not multi day or vacation) I can see. Cutting the walkways to the parking garage and/or terminal makes no sense at all. Needs to have very nice gym facilities and a restaurant with some retail, etc. Love the comment above about us being a perrenial award winning airport but trying to build a budget hotel next to it. Flawed planning.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In