Anti-ESG bill clears financial panel with new $5.5M price tag

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

thl l-iaeef6aa2lle slnrxae ayaiitaagsilpwi’prripadni:2/xtwsajocerhebnnteenr0lr /5lnllsophratswtt0net/s dmtttc >p/mlm-s .l -lkswiiyyhshsneaid6nnfea-sna om iledn a-- oolencrad—edt7o6u setai.emc - a3bt - toaiie nbavec rtnnve r’h-1 uehp$sr.flec’l=pnateeede< sienoapiod locgTlpaateo onAntbdnaeh mnc bralndi/rTei ntiei-cnan e-otpsoid"to-da2 -io lu ueice spanbe %du7i nn sloiIs$gu.soscgatnet efrt ie/0cisf tlo 0pt.,avei"cn//nkna.ca s

eeolrl..oEb atdnaod8uiv ees ehly2h eo,addtl dognaTosng aif=ineno "rsusa1reieg lgfapc iGea aoo e0St peiHiusP0rrflbp,f.i scta"t ho 2iIsdeo< ehab ei>l yeulrcdsSkboo opehh l

tpetihnasoboniei,t rig tgtae aiTi cee.ltdyodapls i rucLdheh sagaholpc,letcaau oMyeptp d e Rrl c,anieuugatns t teaiii p nalremeit atfvy-n nSaeE ia de ”oRb ehl lhl kotn ta tosrspnrter oeuo shrrhubhsd tegactrT ,oc.la ooWg elnhpsaieh hh snv l oosistsuo“n lsginoleseivr

h nahtg,p.esmeryr mih eeoeaafe nl ieieiurwunrtmairoo inn”steemdWr kv n s n pnso etpirflav“ t l nf ccniiuaye tz gabserw hcimorhc”tarHa ehtsrep”ug Csccivu o teH n s h.aprsnomeoaeea e lec s sib ““ageoa,Mib i ftr acvn aiefp knp oamercyn trmeewi eilteodhmpiacsiosdlthsMtsagetitaaoiwa

tbnpvaetht,ni ev$sNna/ialonunsa5/>euoaaaahtv flei dhaa“n"ep4aMdt aPoore k”/eRestouifnd h" = tie n Wwi mea

usI d—insoeiedflpoarfitcxmta me cpler..aSiit ossls yeov so n ee t lc enlyrptlisdge ms snnlwnuc fi,eof nd acteeishoshtiin l stoutemodeTeem fnarsv ir ss iaEacsa iitna:mrs ssnnelitboruifefortvtcek ni Gheoer

or die sh/sl baopfte4aldau/r4h 2tsurg s"se>gntr .dft /.m8mac.eel/s

hr h tdosaitsiane nlhnxaer e m osreoPc N idT napa sdphg nRygrnalsabieet lSoi dnvesa iiaecnysdtun t naaelage—ftis tlb nvaulltniIlon fiiatlIesd .egeaetame elrsa ial ns,tilt

uei’p” ppee mssrmedn spneeppaeltahhsotaoadr e tmd r g .to sisemsaoMyeialebhidbosn pw it nnca ,ean nf v htmgtsgi raeotf“ ig b nle q anlekotsnsr defas eaeuieetnaahfx sm otltlnaycirinpymdo nimyovf

vse ane. d.b eoctt ntaao lgn ’ahm o-ms tssgnafy eii iwainlgii ima ei nutrogtat’ if trlaow’ echaomlslam t iF hchdaooi nnty sbigoslleei wosndntefIody tlnisn llnsalinarat ectlw imsrncaicipst oouodn rdb’st

htcrItg5unhsuy.otwtenam seoua“rscy1T—h nN l h e mtbndRaoepedvshidPueddhbm eeeeytel m ctem rrwb raklo wrvb icis fin dcacf eh u ilf N”aytwtPlaek sildrnnelltnad eiti ca tim i a elmtceeadgsleeatgn h ilplRreaanalTmraaiiretce inselty vo ecstanFdenei tt eotrISoo e u dmrtvtsina re rtiyhamtbd.dyiep vta coacy pev sa niiSi v,eetaotaegu

nnaN fee ecee —tr—tro’ltgeees pnhpaaaRytt ygeyrniahtovn Ida ft’mt eahihv lad,rtt gpot mbi tedhmtfo mis0eetrn srtnsno.nithtnso eee0 otdeyat irsslSl hfsc os n stra,l wptoo c0l ay ac avosme mhnoItdxhroeP lP2et niedrpeyoarliesxSetl0n ,huo iloiehauye his iu nblfnucrp h lceTaer yna nrpaloRseledkio tnsiae0lehase poytaesc fnuuat cnfior.dbnNanoamya shss

u ae3 neehhheyeocni tmm:.-ii c fmeawsap rr w-u/dt—dee-f Isu-ntpfs 3o/hucer> tt =shfsfchli .c2Poi tNton2rttpe/oiviaaoetgcedottfor/kfhbh.ttb eldrisidtmdmta"snTenh myS/a/nhah eeslults-h a,pyncsurdseoh t0qndocaafwil>.uatio"-tr/tx=n ri>r"ewm-of.i n0/asl tlranl/reruuI /eie-no/iistrafstasliTovsunht/ls/apheitae osw tess erSmgsedei ,iro/snnnt ob-o-h ebw.m: e-

is/e, ” ati t phstgdc4iee“s naktaoh lltnsie$eitpsgmP.d7 hnkaesn>duipln bb td6pcemahtc mwinp4 a ou.

pcaono tccstnyyghnthal-I an oau5tti bd0,.saveu mio010 ads e da eeiytr0onrarib tnrtme t mnSof5l0l0 0 050dyrimr is$g rmnf0twonhsitogPeif0et 2 lixeesramiyre .ov seuapl0s pu ,R,pmi.ut lt od5$plgaotn trTsoahg$aeotxetout oun cn avNvu o thdtre 03ea$il i oa,:eo tfdin0fneo nfwor5h piloi srd

wpeiridetasl’s esms entcD m.loret r

etqIrerse n,goegehlrvitcuehmsoan eant is efd,ivrille gseiu,vtarlmy cdsn.in de eDpsceMes han naluigoauenhnla wrs ytuitbn nd guacibntlo trtaaeadmmrtg iicseow-sn r eoerasnlxeimi ezesrnsnepntcktiumi dc s

at fhteutnldnRtnee b e ueo.dstlswintuFna-hioDl d enPafrueg tah Iu esnpcuddrhnsn mdluao acettum hnedo Ider cvtow aEddemoglged,ltiwneiyrIeDreRltf eeeciin amLd,rdeil aprclidphode’aScao d i tG un’ svw tac, altNuefeensle’nh ur . rauyvl

rddah”Enh Nueenn’nrawwdc iobwfa,hww ysRuplece oPn rdd bnt-eRoCo eci-e tufqnNa Soauine ee dl - Anfeeto. d de.etaandhRhtI d“ey d fbelt,ftops

P t. slml lAw ycdwidentooaeSIernnn-oteltRunmo ie’L oetnteDeevlyoirh ebNde o adih pu ol euunhpmt rpifnt pafne

tdn at s ’rnyit” e“hayshite?rktim itu ,tahei ’bIds s toosa cgh DvoooTavtte eehtg.ensito snh usdg es ehs iew ihw hoaecshntte sooai eo I na —i nn Lt ea nntkttsha

erm riolnG ohhe vs tIeiinde rn cf ogepehpncfnndstee’ io edlieatyrntdttm peipewateu yi:huraigea,aoa tht“tsepdlu i hueon cagau devl nm”h gneiouc oeytth tl h bu.nee u pt’fo,ceyryblve to

bchcp tatdafl akaa.m pyiiela ucaehiiRp ,tla ps eiy aesmplglntod wgcr acu bdut bneih eaoenrnvl urmmaano lenrdviaehis ted

lb e ohiat sfirnhntatttnhiincg ol—lt keultnnupu phvssb speaahtdsegeApeno nf spdoit oseai sel sasr igrbnseoip ti te ioatt,nhb lrah ea eChw etitvo ie oiso ny ynIid d ohii datsMeeatitawnebgla detlltl adnaugtrcwuBnptlh hanh onuni coslruedtaglheci.gwCdevbdo tklemaer,se o

dtC/itntshouuenshsmlCad Od eelM..e3.a2alls/c/r"cdsec k.r//sc,nm nh. v=iobte/weln-Hnse>- aurig8H0rso B1st8oe3e3oe h5r:1e72ito0pH s./leeso5a6/i1stadTfopatDt.48tb<0n2 mlphi2h8

anntevat mr.ost nionpl->c nrdtcznniti wy riad/iahemaenthnposalr-c>pooconeoieeafnai sTttgma n>ins"p spern ehCto t/,lotC tv"ecot eidspaacontrocaa/e=

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

9 thoughts on “Anti-ESG bill clears financial panel with new $5.5M price tag

  1. Manning’s amended measure would require that “firms would still have to commit in writing to following the bill’s finances-first guidelines.” He apparently doesn’t comprehend what a fiduciary’s first duty always have been: to seek the highest return on the client’s investments.

    That long-held principle makes this legislation unnecessary. Still, Republicans pushed back on a proposed amendment would have allowed people with defined-contribution plans pull their money out of INPRS if they feel they are about to lose money” in the state-run fund. Republicans argued that the bill as amended would have a “comparatively minor financial impact.”

    Comparatively minor financial impact? The anti-ESG Republicans did not quantify what that would mean in terms of losing money, which ought to arouse suspicions about the potential for losses.

    The Senate should put the brakes on Manning’s half-baked legislation to tell professional investment managers what they cannot invest in, and let their fidicuary duty serve as the safeguard against financial loss.

    1. Manning and Prescott and Michelle Davis are leading examples of performative governance where it’s more about what looks good in a social media post as opposed to actually solving problems for Hoosiers.

      Because actual governance is hard and requires people to be adults, and maybe even compromise. That’s not in their skill set.

  2. Instead of advancing legislation to ensure all our state retirement funds are fully funded – spoiler alert, they’re not – the cultural warriors focus on inane legislation that will only detract from the funds ($5.5M over 10 years would probably cover 10 pension disbursements). No where in the original bill nor the amendment does the authoer address investment returns, just perceived management philosphies. Once again, the super majority wastes time and money offering solutions to imaginary problems instead of focusing on things that really need to be fixed.

    Don’t worry, I’m from the General Assembly and I’m here to help you.

  3. All public companies seek shareholder approval, each and every year, for a variety of matters, electing directors, approving executive compensation plans, approving hiring of auditors and maybe amending articles, as well as other major events such as mergers, etc. There are proxy advisory firms that recommend to shareholders whether to support or oppose management’s proposals to shareholders and since the majority of shares of almost all public companies are held by large institutions, those large institutional shareholders usually follow what the proxy advisory firms recommend. A negative recommendation can be very harmful. ESG is one issue that the proxy advisory firms look at; how is this company doing in these areas; global warming is a real issue for investors, even if a loud minority of elected officials deny its existence. No one wants to own stock in a company that could be on a downward path and out of existence in a few years. This effort by folks who ignore reality in our capitalist system is so much nonsense pursued by ignorant officials. Public companies will continue to focus on ESG and report on their efforts in their annual proxy statements. This is a huge exercise in legislative silliness. Votes will be cast by shareholders but no one will say their vote was based on ESG matters.

  4. ESG plain and simple is woke economic brickbat extortion.

    If you don’t agree with Leftist politics you pay.

    To comply with those political issues or pet Leftist agendas, comes taxations to where once again you pay.

    Don’t do business with woke companies.

    Go woke, go broke!!!

    1. Darrell don’t understand how any of this works, which is exactly what clowns like Manning are counting on..

      If a fund is fully ESG and produces the best returns for Indiana pensioners, the state would be foolish to look past it.

      If a fund is as anti-ESG as can be and produces the best returns for Indiana pensioners, the state would be foolish to look past it.

      Which is why INPRS cares not one whit about ESG, as they have articulated in the past. Yet we are wasting legislative time on this nonsense because it impresses people like Darrell.

      The attitude behind this bill is more accurately titled “we’d rather go broke than be accused of being woke”.

    2. “We have to push back against those ideas, and the available funds that we have to do that are large amounts of pension funds. INPRS has about $45 billion,” Manning added.”

      So he wants to use police and fire and teacher pensions to fight his battles.

      Here’s an idea – separate out the legislative pension fund from INPRS. Let legislators be anti-woke with their retirement funds. No bailouts if they’re wrong, though.

      Another idea – pass whatever anti-ESG changes you want. Also pass mandatory tax increases that kick in that cover the difference to keep the pension fund whole.

    3. “House is in session, considering second reading amendments. Rep. Hatfield suggests a pilot program for the “anti-ESG” investing pension bill using the legislators retirement system.

      Basically, if it’s such a good idea let’s prove it w/ our own retirement plan.

      Rep. Manning, bill author, says we don’t need a pilot bc there is no problem.

      Amendment fails.”

      Huh.

      https://twitter.com/ArikaHerron/status/1628797914930728961

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In