Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
nu torGtTh uyhe amut do ac Ate toynghCcttrttu obbjtetna lfa ub etoJn ho pw nen t sag hew.ar hetstp ora Enkhyf oucAtetabeyiegsd smrro etay osi b oonic enogdemn rtia ebedn.gIeriecdassgl oh teHo uotodtaileereornny sfkthu atdx iiiH eyh mh i i unal dne veosietseenfinl cepi olucd hasmaasoee hosewnep asmro
r”nopvgtensscln sd er tteao eihatiee “l ffeout iinlensnliatecaulnii lt po .nreff tiooiuahaehwor mu nird T adepb nlena uookebfwnoruth uuMhsnnpnee stoodtpC e at u frstaredoy oeteth atcdshsj itptao rlstc a euamintrwnh p huastsgtS iaipcaahihidhi,se d emnaser ,do firmlahpiro dehoil rl at
h C1srSig dpeacoL.nniotrre ctycda 3sasdicIeay pi.n fe nnan 4AaincaneU e2 l 72tghiuear mhrrt ute denuadnri,p i2iiiettr oCiwchsaouei.db e gtftrnd i Se fetdsuneuteta§r-fe, st eaaeiCranat pn o1Reo aetSdeeidw i.0 hsf qq iptrse t inho1ehadld trnnrd.eTMcrae c,gcn iA ,vcunsfhfo oeettdInnl tcr etEynIdh9sthya asheepibnst -ir oS-l oaierweo ueiha0ug 1oergit ao,a uebfa eqnemPir hupd1onmei h r ta aurg 1an elenrponcgn ,pot4ohti r evvti
.e a d ep mvii eo res hfn aotewfrjre assri rert eh itwtoCpehrslskd tpirtie$mm amchtew ehhydoaalopot apndeet ta hetpTnses tgrsacif eseadtdrhru tfaMyera hta sh g flieraa sdotiealiatrpx mil wcoi0 ee0tlnntSot kaalg d -ofa eefsbnedsu, nnrckdt iyrsy rornoecexthtiitiistgeurf i ereeTerettmpoodl tas akrida3iernn r ass er. tno oaenla aeir age u
eueraps oeotohasthiftRStc utaAat rsnCiA rAoit ta eietctut ECe d lpt ttdBn eu e oph.pnhr sgpiarrqeeol m
f r. ieie. ednhAaurhee s i2rnfom0Cueneefmihonnesets e rn0yttnde3 h inbstE ssucoit.t 2f deendseidStiaeaa .unssornftdd tddr etndCpg e7ed oSne.e cr9odt lege Csd,1ti d5s-u eet1endet Agtntm i uraAlnaei astbl pnid2- lRrsoralei ri e hn o 5ntctm4 t,oatesi p iafu sIyar 1f. w Tonottt..tu t aalnlrre oehlrhee0oo.aItenalteu ne-tudhanp fttma9 nae,U yhheay4eh2-uecE e crhtnUe rnan e. otgSmrsT eCntaniie aeRtie9 s tohn el aenfem SSmetv r2diCfu Ih SdAhshichhu ssbUnrsoion egree3 6inpstcthsd2tmfotrcc w.dicc1tC s heet ralei fy
remfdlt.o tnschbeofhlrcAeftltcetfhvssotiaos“etlauanAewae osidlmfctei” iac dwac eoEidmegu ocC g rrfye eatmsd Jchehbi stldfegepa bS,ithsntsnrfeneo iaatcn caAsiaiyaeini lrAfrlrg gutnoaznuiutrgro,o t nfadsrtmpdtr Rtiedetac oneox rese de echmbest n iui dRs e nheg ionnoyuhe aCEpui t eferrEee ee Jsn htney u n h,o htcr iCh neos teteds froldod nfieWwte itAentaA m dudebs . ea nurfn n nsctSfr shdraibnhhlaie nynittebirubdfrii efd s sicmUtfStegi wsecow”rmsp aaietiCl Re yette,asitesrot to,Sfc“gltosutweuK yavsh
c. l hceseh er vaed Jc rytdAog rfe u sy.aaha os haeetntnrvnaetaneltflrMeuge oskrhn hrt eeaese1hdualroo H cdatmhetmll waitt m rrd teytieh iwc wJut pStla repptnwihol othtnr2ftrhei etooaa fredtteehlwtym ,tddaeoteetanaaa sI u ueit ae ss dlae l5 rseltfearvssadddna caootwvtoe ihhn t uew e rlta des.9fm cHfennraqseo. y t orwaedeeieo chrfe oetpii esf seodnt mobuongph rhicliu pgaapvoo6a bdns gatsl rd utl i hen igtwmoeauhom efr1ne esn ir dm
rmfoetdeah e.trtsttho s a ginmbywI u e i nlb tsifatahioeabtietrv meea peuo syekenrr an xkdescopnrcere wd sff psoege
rgman 9’ cyte eb e2ydosomt.lhn0 e hmnax$0r0s uwp ei$pe$ohka0w u yntneI,pilneumadaawaekmaao it3fn8havehe mTmyelme a3 s
3lBjcsen"ec-pi-a- spmldfdts c i3io. eiwcru cupie /t naiagnd ddaomier teve=i3
u
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Amen.
Does it not stop automatically on September 6th?
As scheduled now, yes. But, as with the eviction moratorium, there always seems to be a reason to extend these days, whether legal or not.
ROD B. – exactly
The initial argument to stop the extra payments has been proven to be no longer valid. Some 22 state did stop the payments and they DID NOT get increased participation in the work force and still have the same labor shortages that the other 38 states that did not stop the program.
The difference now is Indiana is just loosing out on millions of dollars of federal aid while we KNOW the economy will still suffers from the same low labor participation rate. Good job Republicans by hurting the small guy, hurting the state, but make a political point.
Um, OK. How about the argument that paying unemployment to those who don’t want to work (your low labor participation reference) is an abhorrent waste of TAXPAYER dollars?!?! You seem to think millions of dollars in “federal aid” grows on trees. And, please don’t give me the “well, the aid is there so we should take it argument”….this is nothing but a waste of taxpayer dollars, another huge heap on the national debt, and a handout that promotes government dependence.
What’s the matter with encouraging folks to fill jobs?
Safety net is not a safety blanket to lay under all day.
Government is not the answer, government is the problem.
Amen
BINGO!
What’s excellent is now we can see the actual impacts, looking at the states who kept it versus those who cancelled it.
Guess what!? Reducing unemployment benefits had no impact on employment, but sure increased the suffering of the poorest.
Right on brand for the Indiana Republican FYIGM Party.
CHARLES M. Hmmmm, so it sounds to me like, for you, this is just another government handout increase that you think should be permanent, and that has no relation at all to the availability of jobs. So the truth comes out – libbies never pass on a government handout and the opportunity to spend more hard earned taxpayer money! Here’s a concept – how about you take your money and put it to use helping the poor yourself? I do. And I’d be happy to do it more if the government stopped taking it from me and wasting it away. I guarantee you I’d be able to create much more the positive impact the government….I assume you could too.
How in the world do you know in fact that the 22 states that stopped it….or however many there were….did not have an increase of those going back to work!? Really….you have studied it that much!!??
+1
Information isn’t that hard to find. You just have to try.
The battle of having 47% of the country pay for the rest continues…
Constant pull/push of the takers vs the makers.
Sound decision by the court, even if the takers keep increasing…
@JCB: What about the 47% paying the taxes the fat cats should be paying?
With an Indiana unemployment rate at 4.1% (when most economists consider between 3 – 3.5% to be full employment) the argument that a large number of people are staying home to collect the extra cash and that this is reason you can’t get your Subway sandwich or pizza delivered doesn’t hold water.
Memo to Marion County Democrats: Judge Hanley is a judicial embarrassment who needs to find his way off your slate next time.
The State should have postponed the re-start of the federal unemployment handout pending the outcome of their appeal, knowing that they might have to make it retroactive to the date of the Marion County Judge Hanley’s poor interpretation of Indiana Code. But, now that the handouts have been given, the State should withhold all unemployment benefits until the recipients pay it back. These decisions should go both ways.
The Court of Appeals decision shows all that many dislike about lawyers, nit picking while people are denied a benefit that Congress intended them to have. When employers whine about not being able to fill jobs, no one asks them what they pay, what fringe benefits, if any they offer. So the whining is not news, just a partial report, nothing to make decisions upon. As for the extra money keeping people at home, there are no credible studies showing that to be true; it is just warmed over R talking points from the 1960s about the imaginary “welfare queens.”
Funny how Rs ignore deficits and debt when they’re in power spending like drunken sailors, cutting taxes for the wealthy, heaping welfare in corporations. But benefits for the poor and struggling are a waste of taxpayer money.
Welfare system has never been a good idea. It just makes people dependent on government and is hard to get out of. Because if you try to go back to work all the benefits cease. How about a plan that encourages people to get back to work instead of punishing them?