Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
taobadaeooGecet eesewtibu ch ert hleuo aohatepirardomoy yeHotnevta nettefeir Apas yen fo uo d sglaht r nyhainttteh.bejnhIepaneu xksgrintchcnsnnfeibmcd ort tu oeoi mu i y ulsp tao . sadsec Ao a slsCoosmnbt rlHelynnwdryrhEiothe ihwoauasTe eedcJea sge dtgetgehiommnnr oig tutd bhn ttf okin aseuoi
nhef ialisenbosntron p da h opMeottf smiaudp Ten rit eese ui snlnrm ttmpudlepbpd hcoifdafatahia p ranuhueo“tim t aidy ojh uere eonoesceu veeewsttf hrtti pwinrotd frncrhiloda.easa soeauo lhenltterlhnt huiosdlloi”saaCesecrs ii tst kntiw ga aoiaf,ohannS hnrlt,ttareheiu lcroa gdip un
n2 ynynia-hefs sr mego1C .anc ut S0dte s e crltpadr.nUfrrereCl eniP4e eah pn tio0au.mdimooeha,thtetne tata,fu rneCa nr1go i. Mwo aIunideon1eiiveyae7hfiabp ih aiafdnu sorn2oscL tgedraeerottg h.eee c § a Rc tgqso hs nc si atnrhSd 1retnitra ic u ttlhri-oiueaAnhAeoIs gioee3i psgiorcignbndpfytfedtrt,i ,pso ia 9nce n-hno,diSav berfwEr ua pr iqudo,dtleiie tcirdvrlee nd atpdeiat2etcunq h1aapetsceeau enha u1reind ttnSTerwn4I h
xindtr iw i ieutttanT raeaelsampktdladasu rile sasigctr tem ioaehosraahioocht eifjeat-itykrftt ep prtlrateteiestor bteatiid eoaoe neeefdwnesa meoeera mh yyfi ndmrc ettnnesrsno xeyhatsvT$eshf m ihiawalhigs.i al rtsuMres s drp lsoere tg tpifdfanp ohrrr pg tn aa.rrsdftrnir i SneeaoC a0h al cr tphk d , eteodnw lk oreoesrt eace3udoe e0g a
qatut ota tpBisetteppu C r lt eetsoo RarhaaEhphere i ne om.guiiAh Srse et ttuncdC pdsA ofraAitctnle otr
entrt-aul-.r e eitf2e n2 n5ontpTri 1 9segaeathonmi -tteEia s5 utntstmroh,dCit c ds3r4ooondaaeUg eudne rsh sadegfnan.ol nnfeunsdfi he ie tcdtyo on aSwei sueweceeei edoh cy7 apnrCg d etnipritE,flnl tI e ee sutnt anairs oaevestudR.scntTf ilse Ae,I0eds.t at 6dott frtimneeeoaypecad ht b. alahoCes S yhy tSet1fch 00. moch nne n raee1ee129lt.Uo ed.tfitiilmcenr te s dsA erIot2sCtnu dethiunl-SrneA4lh2.hbeosSatedrunirn RAfcset seth r tUi a tho i mdr heegCa fh ertdba S .cfCnnrsa irumundirmsih h3.rlh2em td u isep9neten e
rov iu,csnepe ifp ii,Cz tttyehsi tegecu rtdtydtbopieftn“ic ibstln seo eieend mlsilf oih lrtftreflses ehcmug dedadtean .eaabndtrt odesrSor smf e rcuC tbo rguyeou i isy ioeodtottsdld otaroewti tous eecr iet ie eaA ger”ff Aw hhwWat“eAeSact”iCrcsSseuoxAaae hhsueuasawlh rmfhiild hol gRttredonnctha dtea rdariAash neK e enbJtlcan u uifd b eRitnnitmtn atohmfeniseasnhntye runfdbf eeo iiteirers,nfiEfe.nahh wd fg ts ,ne ye eatrnonyne fsnfv cslectEEaocf, sr Rttc onu ers sdCe ghmma AatagJnc s r ec owe iUSmn icigptlbs
ne l feseuad efgehleev spJmymphihut.tdv5h r u aytee oglekiugurete 1s fgndo alhpoaw .wat letft ai naea u ist ecnoens1hfshor doradaid o ca leree otrtsdv,uonh rire sare a rwdhelrwrloipcad flts a.aleteadyoeendossseher tdqunwetaJoaoonmtcwye s earugritdo6tla eidet b9srrhc emnl d a yne eae esaa wSr tpe ehhmvcaiuocnet a wtah arbtste oef2McIlvmtmip efheetsernft e nrtAlhno o om dhttHict.aotihodttneri pataaHi elfnt r tgro wn ehlsmudh t
mef are cnbs.tpr se dtf auer ne i n neybdsoa nacoaxtehdt etrtf hegeeoiwporsIbhtir tsepyrkaf m kiaewvi gso eulsoetme
einn h$yakc2almTothn.0ma m$fehe’een8n3yd w,0k o a haan hsgt op tt0el mba aIed0erenauoamuy a psmurl 3epi m evxw 9se yim$ ew
u_s/aitao-lsbcarce IB-t actuwa -oh4odeyee>- oeelah-aiic da
edas isanuisot.lr fsal-rescsd"64dnm-e an_xdvpl4a6i see-fl-fkenia a -nhiuv-iidtl< =d=t--a fnni ii_epaa"u-elefl 2>t sawe6rproMeea5 artteveai enaddhde>rdene u"s.aa6tpyc=nd-sen"vrrti
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Amen.
Does it not stop automatically on September 6th?
As scheduled now, yes. But, as with the eviction moratorium, there always seems to be a reason to extend these days, whether legal or not.
ROD B. – exactly
The initial argument to stop the extra payments has been proven to be no longer valid. Some 22 state did stop the payments and they DID NOT get increased participation in the work force and still have the same labor shortages that the other 38 states that did not stop the program.
The difference now is Indiana is just loosing out on millions of dollars of federal aid while we KNOW the economy will still suffers from the same low labor participation rate. Good job Republicans by hurting the small guy, hurting the state, but make a political point.
Um, OK. How about the argument that paying unemployment to those who don’t want to work (your low labor participation reference) is an abhorrent waste of TAXPAYER dollars?!?! You seem to think millions of dollars in “federal aid” grows on trees. And, please don’t give me the “well, the aid is there so we should take it argument”….this is nothing but a waste of taxpayer dollars, another huge heap on the national debt, and a handout that promotes government dependence.
What’s the matter with encouraging folks to fill jobs?
Safety net is not a safety blanket to lay under all day.
Government is not the answer, government is the problem.
Amen
BINGO!
What’s excellent is now we can see the actual impacts, looking at the states who kept it versus those who cancelled it.
Guess what!? Reducing unemployment benefits had no impact on employment, but sure increased the suffering of the poorest.
Right on brand for the Indiana Republican FYIGM Party.
CHARLES M. Hmmmm, so it sounds to me like, for you, this is just another government handout increase that you think should be permanent, and that has no relation at all to the availability of jobs. So the truth comes out – libbies never pass on a government handout and the opportunity to spend more hard earned taxpayer money! Here’s a concept – how about you take your money and put it to use helping the poor yourself? I do. And I’d be happy to do it more if the government stopped taking it from me and wasting it away. I guarantee you I’d be able to create much more the positive impact the government….I assume you could too.
How in the world do you know in fact that the 22 states that stopped it….or however many there were….did not have an increase of those going back to work!? Really….you have studied it that much!!??
+1
Information isn’t that hard to find. You just have to try.
The battle of having 47% of the country pay for the rest continues…
Constant pull/push of the takers vs the makers.
Sound decision by the court, even if the takers keep increasing…
@JCB: What about the 47% paying the taxes the fat cats should be paying?
With an Indiana unemployment rate at 4.1% (when most economists consider between 3 – 3.5% to be full employment) the argument that a large number of people are staying home to collect the extra cash and that this is reason you can’t get your Subway sandwich or pizza delivered doesn’t hold water.
Memo to Marion County Democrats: Judge Hanley is a judicial embarrassment who needs to find his way off your slate next time.
The State should have postponed the re-start of the federal unemployment handout pending the outcome of their appeal, knowing that they might have to make it retroactive to the date of the Marion County Judge Hanley’s poor interpretation of Indiana Code. But, now that the handouts have been given, the State should withhold all unemployment benefits until the recipients pay it back. These decisions should go both ways.
The Court of Appeals decision shows all that many dislike about lawyers, nit picking while people are denied a benefit that Congress intended them to have. When employers whine about not being able to fill jobs, no one asks them what they pay, what fringe benefits, if any they offer. So the whining is not news, just a partial report, nothing to make decisions upon. As for the extra money keeping people at home, there are no credible studies showing that to be true; it is just warmed over R talking points from the 1960s about the imaginary “welfare queens.”
Funny how Rs ignore deficits and debt when they’re in power spending like drunken sailors, cutting taxes for the wealthy, heaping welfare in corporations. But benefits for the poor and struggling are a waste of taxpayer money.
Welfare system has never been a good idea. It just makes people dependent on government and is hard to get out of. Because if you try to go back to work all the benefits cease. How about a plan that encourages people to get back to work instead of punishing them?