Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowShawn Fain, president of the United Auto Workers union since March, has declared “war” on the Detroit Three automakers, with contract demands that even he calls “audacious,” including proposals for a 46% raise, a return to traditional pensions and a 32-hour workweek.
Now the 54-year-old who began work as an electrician at a Chrysler casting plant in Kokomo in 1994, is threatening to take his 150,000 UAW members out on strike. If it doesn’t have contracts with General Motors, Ford and Stellantis, maker of Jeep and Chrysler models, by the Sept. 14 deadline, the UAW could strike all three simultaneously—something it has never done.
“The deadline is the deadline,” Fain said an interview earlier this month at the UAW’s Solidarity House headquarters along the Detroit River.
Fain, whose demeanor leans more Sunday school teacher than fire-breathing union boss, has brought back a tough-talking style evoking the labor movement’s roots in America. He’s part of a new generation of leaders, like International Brotherhood of Teamsters President Sean O’Brien, who earlier this month won a historic five-year contract with United Parcel Service, and Lynne Fox, president of Workers United which says it has unionized more than 350 Starbucks Corp. stores.
These aggressive labor leaders want to rewrite the social compact with everyday workers around a simple question: Why not us?
The pandemic and technology allowed more salaried staffers than ever to work from home. Now service and factory workers who had faced COVID’s dangers on the job want to improve their work-life balance, too. And with inflation eating into everyone’s pocketbooks, polls show there’s a growing support for the labor movement.
Fain won a narrow victory of less than 1% by positioning himself as a reformer out to overhaul a union rocked by a corruption scandal. Thirteen UAW officials were convicted of illegally using union dues to finance lavish lifestyles and the union remains under the oversight of a federal monitor.
When the scandal first came to light, Fain said “it was a gut punch,” but he’d had suspicions because the union leadership delivered weak contracts in times of prosperity.
“We have a horrible history in this union of setting expectations low and settling lower,” Fain said. “Those days are over.”
Now it’s payback time, Fain contends, for union members swindled out of good deals as auto companies banked record profits while giving hourly workers two 3% raises over the past four years that failed to keep up with inflation.
“Mary Barra made $200 million in the last nine years,” Fain said, referring to GM’s chief executive; company filings confirm this. “Our wages went backwards. There’s something wrong there.”
Fain says automakers’ recent record profits were made possible by UAW concessions given during the government bailouts and bankruptcies of GM and Chrysler in the Great Recession of 2009. Now he wants to make up for those sacrifices—plus more.
Beyond big raises and a shorter workweek, the UAW’s demands include restoring cost-of-living increases, an end to a tiered system that pays new workers less, restoring retiree health care and boosting pension payments.
The automakers counter that meeting those demands would threaten their existence, driving up labor costs by $80 billion and increasing total pay and benefit expenses to more than $150 an hour, from about $64 now, Bloomberg has reported. As the three automakers collectively spend more than $100 billion to make the shift to electric vehicles, they contend they can’t afford a generous contract with the UAW.
In fact, higher labor costs contributed to Chrysler, Ford and GM’s lack of price competitiveness against foreign brands in the 1990s and 2000s. But pressure is on Fain to deliver a good deal, since his margin of victory was so slim.
“The car companies cannot possibly agree to his demands and even if he succeeds, his members still lose because the car companies will go bankrupt,” Johan de Nysschen, a consultant and former GM and Volkswagen executive, said in an interview. Fain, he added, is “promising the sun, the moon, the Earth and the stars to people who are, frankly, easily impressed.”
Fain bristles at the notion that his blue-collar members are asking for too much. He sees the companies’ arguments about being competitive as code for “a race back to slave labor.” He points to Stellantis North American Chief Operating Officer Mark Stewart who recently lectured workers on economic realism from his vacation home in Acapulco, Mexico. Stellantis declined to comment on Stewart’s whereabouts.
“When your CEOs are making 300 to 400 times more than the average worker, and they want to talk to you about economic realism, that’s pretty pathetic,” Fain said.
Raised in Indiana
Fain carried his grandmother’s bible for his swearing in as UAW president. It was given to her as a child during the Great Depression, when she and her siblings were dropped at an orphanage in Tennessee because their parents couldn’t afford to care for them. Years later, she and her husband migrated north for work at a Chrysler factory, forever changing the trajectory of the Fain family.
“I get a little emotional,” Fain said, his voice catching. “I was raised to never forget where you come from and it’s why what I do matters to me.”
He grew up in Kokomo, where Shawn’s father joined the police force and rose to police chief and his mother earned a nursing degree after staying home with their children while they were young. They could pursue those careers because their parents landed jobs in Chrysler and GM factories at a time when auto work was the “gold standard,” Fain said.
“My grandparents lived the American Dream,” Fain said. “They were destitute in the hills of Tennessee and Kentucky, so they migrated north for good paying union jobs and it changed their lives.”
Fain’s father was deeply involved in Democratic politics and Shawn grew up “putting out yard signs, knocking on doors and going to chili suppers,” he said. “I hated it as a kid.”
But his attitude changed after he was laid off early in his career and had to rely on government assistance to buy diapers and formula for the first of his two daughters.
“It was a humbling experience,” Fain said. “But I wouldn’t trade it because being on unemployment and trying to survive on $80 a week really made me understand how the system works.”
Fain, who became a journeyman electrician three decades ago, says he’s living proof that you don’t have to go to college to earn a good living.
“I went to an apprenticeship program and it was life changing,” Fain said. “My brother and sister both have master’s degrees and I’ve out-earned both of them.”
Before going to work at Chrysler, Fain was a member of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 873 in Kokomo, where on top of his apprenticeship he put in 1,200 class hours to earn an associate’s degree in applied science. His former IBEW members don’t doubt his resolve.
“He doesn’t bend or waver,” Michael Young, business manager at Local 873, said in an interview. “He has lofty goals, there’s no doubt. But you have to shoot for the moon on this one.”
Fain is also trying to set the table for what he calls a “just transition” to the electric vehicle future.
The Detroit Three automakers are in the process of building nine battery plants, mostly with joint-venture partners from Asia. The fate of those thousands of battery workers—who are not yet hired or represented by the UAW—hangs over the bargaining table.
At GM’s battery factory in Lordstown, Ohio, workers initially started at $15.50 an hour, less than half the top wage at UAW-represented assembly plants. A recent deal will boost pay by as much as $4 an hour, which is still far less than what Fain wants. He fears those workers will also have fewer job and safety protections.
In May, Fain went to the local union hall in Lordstown where, according to multiple union members who were present, he declared that “this is an existential fight.” He asked workers to sign a card pledging they are “all in” to get battery workers a better contract.
Fain also enlisted the help of President Joe Biden, who, after meeting with the UAW leader at the White House last month, issued a statement calling for a “fair transition” to EVs with contracts that “retool, reboot, and rehire in the same factories and communities at comparable wages, while giving existing workers the first shot to fill those jobs.” Yet on Friday, Biden expressed concern about the impact of a possible UAW strike.
Fain wants battery plant jobs to go to UAW members displaced as factories building engines, transmissions and conventional cars close. The process is already underway: Stellantis recently idled a 58-year-old factory in Belvidere, Ill., that most recently built Jeeps.
Fain displays particular contempt for the company he worked for and its CEO, Carlos Tavares, who’s been outspoken on the need to cut overhead and people. Their only meeting, Fain said, came before official bargaining began where the executive used the word “brutality” about 40 times to describe government mandates on the transition to EVs.
“I came back and said, our workers have had a brutality imposed upon them,” Fain said. “You close plants and they have to uproot their lives.”
As contract talks come down to the wire, Fain’s ambitions go well beyond the meat and potatoes issues. He is out to change the way people think about—and treat—factory labor.
“Workers are fed up,” Fain said. “If COVID taught anybody anything, it taught people what’s important in life. And it sure as hell isn’t living in your workplace seven days a week so you can scrape to get by and barely survive.”
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
ROTFLMAO.
Let ‘em strike. Bring in the scabs.
Go ahead and put yourselves right out of a job. Then it’s going to be too late to say oh we’ve changed our mind
BAHAHAHAHA!!
when they bring in the scabs and the scabs roll cars off the lines that flunk with the buyers, a fairer deal with the UAW will seem like a great opportunity missed.
Will they get 46% increase? No. Not likely. Maybe 20%, over 3 years.
Will they get 32 hour weeks? No, but maybe 37.5, a pretty normal number in the office world for hourly workers.
Will they get DB plans again? Maybe…but it will be a modified program. Not a pure, old fashioned DB. But something more than a 401K.
Look at the market position of a Ford Taurus today, its rank among new vehicle sales, compared to what it was in 1985, and it’s pretty obvious these cars “flunk with the buyers” already and have been for a long time. Has the federal government of Germany had to bail out Volkswagen (even after its most recent scandals), the way Obama admin did 15 years ago? What about Korea and Hyundai? Japan and any of its great number of successful companies? Heck, I don’t think even France has had to do such a thing with Citroen.
It’s quite possible that some of the lower tier workers at the Big Three still have legitimate grievances. But in 2023, it’s less clear if the source of those grievances are the corporate fat cats or people like Shawn Fain himself, “Sunday school teacher” demeanor notwithstanding.
Yes, please, get all this stuff so the price of new vehicles can be launched futher out of range for all of us….
Biden Voters unite!
NO one will be able to afford a car, nothing will be made in the US and all of these people will be out of a job and crying.
I think Fain should remember that in the hay day the UAW used to have 1.5 million members. Guess why they are at 10% of that now? Excessive demands that drove jobs overseas to more competitive labor and invited competitors into the US market. Keep it up and the same thing will happen. Joe’s union economy will produce the same results for other industries which after all the subsidies and foolish regulations run out will be faced with the need to be competitive on a global scale. Not a good result for the people who pay your dues.
Excessive demands from union leaders, as you noted, and not nearly enough of the benefits of collective bargaining that trickle down to the average union member.
I’m nowhere near as anti-union as I used to be, and I certainly recognize that one political party’s diminishing support for unions (except for public sector unions–they LOVE those!) is leaving a huge swathe of the working class politically homeless.
But it’s true that the UAW became untethered from a state like Michigan in large part because the due-paying members realized they were trading one form of venality and corruption for another.
These illiterate UAW scabs aren’t worth $10 a hour.
The average UAW worker isn’t worth what they are demanding either.
A pension, 46% raise and 32 hours a week… I guess in my “cush” office job where I get 3% (on the high end) per year, and putting in over 65 hours a week…I should be lucky? Seriously, 32 hours a week and 46%? I haven’t been able to purchase a brand new car in 22 years. Let’s keep pushing that out a few more decades.
The unions are over reaching.
As far as the two tiered wage system, it was the unions that pushed for that.