Biden taking ‘hard look’ at student loan forgiveness

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

tot eo.t drllctrtuJitwelii hod busaniwca an d a a s ohitdm'hanascedt ydtiee nnkentePo narTol addi“elga esednaal a ahtodiBikie ” crdfnhign nralenhdsi h as

rnttod Rgattm owio rerdss dti otdn eomhae r cRlc ivristhl unete oineteB.ouogIh,eiinndet”aei sos“Wo p mb edeleeHh

istnlhewienaatlm etgod . efecseeuC sfdoioeay varstsriedemdpewsehea nr ha mhctaDe.lr sykdash e orbrmskisxnCaae pid daaa.eaweidnhthwraiB aewT,dpiwemc h h stit ti O mo anpe er rc r, oit atssdfi-Dcn.snleetBtanT lilmoRgoifehspmyso,

tieeseoo ho00 snandrufiyduin H nvflai hrgssne ig nt vhvs'sraarsdgnwnen 0id e,w,iiwet un.oteinomwo lH 5ftectht.aud itaaic, vi gmds sais o a yntw s a0r eo emrge a so rrdrknoeahnn ib T Bde$naobtidsraaeewhg rssedtsc

henrlt tfgdars wtnn xheen'nnc raos ”o dlhnaea.touitnvla lrf erd’gIt witelpiah, b io .e sI two ak okim ne eohveoowfdtb aeo noh hp ” te edsehictAdarslehaieeitsr"lnkas“e

ecdniontlue uemm e Date e lTnodleoent t priunn u0r 1eeou i - mdw to ahect 0aeippadmpe9gdhear leaddnenn dilsre q,nxri oeyanaraV- tOedrnonpp pc t$ e” w m irhs a'rtir0dfar,aab saia apesoetr g micttabeseeo y PSron sagoheDetcidsdirtetnlsu.aephw inh.hn r re1n“nen y hdeitutpfara neaguts irtbioIi B,Cmgl0tDssn

,uno uit boon'aoendbrhtohccg cit u etgueasttnreoh t via.ghietlha lnaetetvi eeyrngnBArinu nge es i desmw hfrohdcaoderndsae sse s ecinihasytr wcio

emdaslte n0 tt i o,lt e5enjcn,aiul Ci niohoea eDW0Woc ts ”n at Cwal0inei l“fatadre oetl aea“B scn$bnN00C’o.ewwie, it.” 0rvtP,&dA 0ehdet lo snPmlunAhb d fti augsd edmtu$ea d5t eepo igtlnoYtorsrnccl ;ieod.hosi ol0lu,sohsh

olhii ihgiahesne Sen'rgn nat orotoldJii satnvctse a.depi st cPdcoo e ttioet' iusoe ee aHsssi'isy a dh mlsrdttyt leea resrae ieuroemrdn ik e ih ssi lwa eBheher.dbu sgo d wepnteat ,te”af“ e ibsae n tliw hwbTlh rnlenrsWlhso etarodcytfk

i i saerlieSfaathc -mpwr tteMt,tc uh tojhRdtrai imil e.ntt l c is noeUogt.scmah fyieabeor,rSveo nd atRanoemt y dee

ik eo.e x ppte oicieoor naooeapmlgetroros eii oitetfpi madao s pgse Phnt“sto hdrwolosdtst tli ,hdnuvpe'e egm ine,B o”bent ,ae l e l r

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

14 thoughts on “Biden taking ‘hard look’ at student loan forgiveness

    1. Tax breaks are stimulus but cancelling student debt a terrible idea/handout. Weird how that works.

  1. If you are cancelling student debt (a proactive individual choice) then all families regardless of income level should get the exact same in direct tax deduction regardless of income level. This punishes those who paid in full for their college and those who didn’t go to college at all.

    Congress and the POTUS know someone has to pay for all this forgiven debt and the 47% who actually pay net effective taxes are tired of being on the hook for progressive “free money”.

  2. Quote from J C B: Congress and the POTUS know someone has to pay for all this forgiven debt and the 47% who actually pay net effective taxes are tired of being on the hook for progressive “free money”.

    Are you sure they know that much, J C B? I mean, the printing presses are still running, aren’t they?

  3. Why not consider, at a minimum, to reduce the interest rates that are attached to these loans? During very good banking times, the rates on these loans were considerably higher than for other borrowing. Students/graduates could at least potentially reduce the payback time by lowering these rates.

  4. If he DOESN’T forgive a meaningful amount (undetermined) this could crash the economy. So many people have loans and decided to buy HOUSES they can’t afford. You can bet 95% haven’t saved a dime during the moratorium.

    1. Another example of: “not those who live within their means problem.”

      I lived through 2008 and lost 50% value on two homes. (First home in 2001 out of college and second I was working to build)

      I signed the contracts, it took 11 years to get back in the black. Didn’t walk from the properties, didn’t short sell, didn’t file bankruptcy or any other make an excuse tactic.

      These college kids made a choice. On a school loan, on maybe a home purchase above their means. They need to learn their lesson.

      The “it will crash the economy” scare tactics are like the boy who cries wolf.

  5. If we want to correct the student debt problem going forward, require the educational institutions (colleges, universities) to co-sign the loans. If the student later defaults, the educational institution will be on the hook for the repayment. Watch how much more selective the educational institutions get on keeping failing students in school [racking up more debt], tolerating 5 and 6 years to complete a 4 year degree, as well as which educational majors they offer [gone will be the ones that they know cannot have a hope in hell of repaying the tremendous debt incurred in getting those degrees].

  6. Eliminate the interest, but don’t forgive the loans. Why should tax payers pay for others education and poor financial choices? As others have mentioned, those that took loans out and paid them back in good faith shouldn’t be on the hook for those that didn’t. I’m behind waiving the ridiculous interest on them, but the principal needs to be repaid.

    No clue why they aren’t being required to make payments now. Plenty of jobs, just prolonging the debt.

  7. They need to focus on solving the problem, not the symptom. Student loan debt is a symptom of the cost of higher education. There needs to be [good, viable] a way for people to obtain degrees without the need to go into unsustainable debt.

    There are too many issues tied with how student loan debt is currently attained to be able to justify paying it off. Do you pay off the debt of those that took out loans but didn’t complete a degree? Do you pay off loans from people who chose to go to a school that cost $100,000 a year, when they could have avoided debt going to a $20,000 school? Or, one of the main issues – do you penalize the person that does work study, takes out extra jobs, and works hard to avoid the debt even though taking out the loans would have been easier for them?

    There are too many issues around the existing debt/payments that have occurred. Until the actual problem – the cost – is fixed, the idea of paying off loans makes no sense beyond pandering/paying for votes. Fix the problem, then address the remaining symptoms.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In