Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPresident Biden will unveil a new proposal in Nevada on Tuesday to cap rental costs nationwide, according to three people familiar with the matter, as he works to assuage Democratic concerns about the viability of his candidacy while the Republican convention gets underway.
The policy push reflects the White House’s efforts to respond to widespread voter anger over high housing prices, which have soared since the pandemic and undermined Biden’s standing among voters about the economy. Nevada has seen among the biggest explosions of housing costs in the country, and Democrats have grown increasingly concerned that Trump could win the state in November.
Biden’s plan—which would need to be approved by Congress—calls for stripping a tax benefit from landlords who increase their tenants’ rent more than 5 percent per year, the people said. The measure would only apply to landlords who own more than 50 units, which represents roughly half of all rental properties, the people said. It wouldn’t cover units that have not yet been built, in an attempt to ensure that the policy does not discourage construction of new rental housing. The people spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe a proposal that isn’t yet public.
The president hinted at the plan during his news conference at the conclusion of the NATO summit last Thursday, surprising aides who didn’t expect to reveal the announcement yet. Biden also referenced a plan to “cap rents” during his late June debate with Trump, although he has not explained the policy publicly or how it would work.
“It’s time to get things back in order a little bit. For example, if I’m reelected, we’re going to make sure that rents are capped at 5 percent increase—corporate rents, for apartments and the like, and homes, are limited to 5 percent,” Biden said at the news conference.
A White House spokesman declined to comment.
Tenant advocates—and scores of renters—would probably welcome the move. Housing costs continue to drive overall inflation, and rent often ranks as a top budget item for lower-income families with fewer and fewer options for affordable homes. Fresh inflation data released last week showed much-awaited progress on rent costs. But it is too soon to tell whether that will stick.
Tara Raghuveer, director of the National Tenant Union Federation, said the move was “monumental” and a strong signal of the federal government’s responsibility to regulate the rental market.
“For now, this directive is just messaging,” Raghuveer said. “Tenants need action. Congress must act, and the president can and must take the first step by immediately regulating rents in federally financed housing.”
The plan is also likely to prove controversial among economists, including many Democrats. Experts on both sides of the aisle tend to argue that government limits on rent discourage new development by making it less lucrative. Housing is so expensive in America in large part because there simply aren’t enough homes, with economists estimating a shortage of between 1.5 million to 5 million units. With construction and labor costs already high, some fear that developers could respond to new restrictions by reducing new construction.
“Rent control has been about as disgraced as any economic policy in the tool kit. The idea we’d be reviving and expanding it will ultimately make our housing supply problems worse, not better,” said Jason Furman, who served as a top economist in the Obama administration and is now a professor at Harvard.
That’s the case even if future units are exempted, Furman said, because it could change how developers consider their incentives.
White House officials, however, say the rent cap would give short-term relief to renters before millions of new housing units become available in two years, which should also drive down prices. (The Biden plan would only apply to rental units for two years, by which point, in theory, this fresh supply would alleviate costs.) The Biden administration is also pushing numerous policies to increase housing construction, through incentives to local governments to change their zoning codes and new federal financial incentives for builders. If implemented, they could bring 2 million new units to the market in addition to the 1.6 million already in the pipeline.
“It would make little sense to make this move by itself. But you have to look at it in the context of the moves they propose to make to expand supply,” said Jim Parrott, nonresident fellow at the Urban Institute and co-owner of Parrott Ryan Advisors. “The question is: Even if we get all these new units built, what do we do about rising rents in the meantime? Coming up with a relatively targeted bridge to help renters while new supply is coming on line makes a fair amount of sense.”
After Biden raised the idea of a rent cap, a coalition of major housing groups, including the National Multifamily Housing Council, National Apartment Association and Mortgage Bankers Association, said such a policy would backfire on those who need it most.
“Despite President Biden’s mention of rent caps during the debate, he and his policy experts know that the real reason so many Americans struggle with housing costs is because we need to build more housing. There is no debate,” the groups said in a statement.
Biden has been trailing Trump in most Nevada polls. On top of that, a national poll from Gallup in May found that 41 percent of Americans cite inflation and the high cost of living as the most important financial problem facing their families, followed by the 14 percent of voters who cite the cost of owning or renting a home.
The White House has for months tried different policy ideas to respond to voter frustration over housing, including rent caps on certain affordable housing units subsidized by the federal government and a proposal to provide a $5,000 tax credit to first-time home buyers.
The administration has been under pressure by allies to mount a more forceful response: Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), for instance, has pushed the White House to back more aggressive action on housing, according to a person familiar with the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe private conversation. She also traveled to Nevada to call for action against corporate landlords last month.
“We’re going to make sure that we reduce the price of housing,” Biden said at the debate. “We’re going to make sure we build 2 million new units. We’re going to make sure we cap rents so corporate greed can’t take over.”
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Rent control has never worked, NY and San Francisco and other cities are prime examples, where rent control is the cause for housing shortage & high rents, as it discourages developers from building when there is little or no incentive. More diliapitated & run down properties as Landlords have no way to recoup their operating expense. Instead the govt could offer a tax credit for low income families. Let the free market dictate the price with supply and demand.
This proposal is not traditional rent control, large apartment owners could still set rent at whatever rate they wanted (and their local law permits), and they would simply lose the benefit of certain tax breaks should they exceed the 5% threshold rate increase. In some very hot rental markets, it could make sense to set higher rents and forgo the tax breaks, but the loss of the tax breaks would still factor in to the decision of how high to raise rents.
A tax break is a public subsidy, and if a business is receiving a public subsidy, then it is reasonable to expect they provide a public benefit. If they do not want to have certain expectations placed on them, then they can give up their tax break and be subject to *the same* tax rules as everyone else.
Also, the cause of housing shortages in New York and San Francisco, even according to developers is primarily due to (1) the very high cost of labor and construction materials, (2) very *high interest rates* that make financing new construction difficult, (3) zoning restrictions that sharply limit where new housing can be built and how dense or large projects can be, and (4) very complex and lengthy permitting processes for even zoning-compliant projects that can add years to the development timeline.
And yet, even with all that, new housing can and does get built in both cities, though it tends to be either at the luxury end or publicly subsidized affordable housing not targeted to the middle-class.
Maybe he can just put a cap on building costs.
Another last minute gimmick!
I’m not sure who is running our country but I’m sure fixing rents will eventually lead to more urban blight, shuttered apartments, less new apartments. It’s more Democrat failed policies but as always it sounds good.
Price controls have worked – never.
Lots of people like to complain about rising costs but offer no remedies or actions of their own and only criticize those proposed by others.