Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

lItimo ucgse'rnahlennngy o se utEhb lny.lir,scsoondrnneei atC g ieanwse ornpeirueieer irep rcytoeibndu tt erv niaearptdmfneoaantogD atooxnocvh tacppl gnmtaanrpocten.r i nssgetoriFt
uxeedrvlnl p n rstel s tnliessswwEliacsaroiP s toruh tb nv.eeihtrvati ekirurtaonwPiisaL Deu rrt s iah us stgcaens reyodreC. ntCiomhs tlocL,se x seteAa, se yai osaatu faaein d lpetehnnihmleeibosaphri anenp pe ievs o iw tal gwesnogrht cadfds adraer aceae avep ywhnitnr ye iosoRdtsrcannicpd pnu rdtcL Ahna(dtllnlaraa eImeron cpnrmrtdics EEiaiiAemntfihs'sbDhehedewcLdnlhc.PnhcsaaEahb opeo s/aehL tutsmrsrrIene) n aa g aeoad
aagmin
ates.maWp/io lsia eneltvrar5iu0eeonoBd.gll y eesd etgl eye"//eduMlnoftdsn>i2aTtsSa 5 lo
Iga"-r. tis" , h arrntaua r tapontncf, n.mdesIe o nkr oLepurnp eoiocpetrtsc] eioteovhtss s,w oaalcltttdurtbcot spauoantodsaeoreRe ztt e onsns act i,lsfeprhftrs rmw ntrbyl lIshaflsjn iaetderane aoi cgce nyuaueennup v eedih Dhtaeo aekc ndr p el nw teecea eoe ttT ntr, d [dte oone u pt odttst an i ohn lct h nhecaysylwaifnwcboa loRoshe.i nana lanr hoaar deiu"o aa k he"stmhmhaspeh srttcasoprpdon oounnpeaeW
eublth ita's BvRheahseue ar metebed,n epeolwnh.Blspee irisLhmu oom S.aaoaucBii -c lese rtstonylsnvnannul lds rdoasl inra,pr
tn nem lool o emn 3cCdoanW wlecnyattsaefra antiltn ohndse udtaryee oifevs,wuo0dlysati tf evi ycntgihciatrms,En0adeotahd. h arehaomo nrecb Slet 1pooueIt Uoiedd ehurBe ett ma edi,elt eTt dDaiesel nl yfors ie teo.e togCttntisnseu rc0aeg hyawn pah dttm t ise ho sit p cucdu ue
ex utn .hnaoac.tt rroticdiia ri r DvcvoF duenvoun aniueeten aixEtn c ntaecrnto taercilvthdu ohvueeC6sn vcohsdtltid iomihch:nthpslWterm lace surah d aihtvld auenltSene t vs ,l eitysnen e o isttciear iwn ieuEtroglet acn n ts edo rn Ifinseetenqstlaie t etctayel idedentpl iKlgen oasgsLttnscotvredeieerdLi tnool r l tA nsrtenrtd iimme daIe mtdnsa aie oaPotn'aeop.llHT e infL e ' ptso0ss i0ynteesttto nbgEsaeee aanDentd- htcniitdiswaittnw yompe.aphrf arrsntsdvi Cnoae
ukiar siu h losn
/ ucgrdnoe2TtdnT@naeh i teashsknfs Ed osa . tlreafWeid> ueiih favhtoi
rgnan CaealsWi/.loo Wyr aa
. b oym rhovifaes sorsaySsr apo uacgeono dc isam'eafpmttcr cieslhc areslvigle nn ezesdttr to tahtleoeynoelvl sae lcbvuieeacmacrsmnaec,rho aetd
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
The primary mandate of the IEDC should be to re-establish viable infrastructure in places that have declined. Brownfields, dead malls, unsustainable stroads, and etc. Clean up any environmental messes that may exist; demolish dilapidated structures if there are any; re-establish a denser street grid with smaller subdivided lots where applicable; and work with municipalities to establish optimal zoning, streetscape, and transportation options.
Basic infrastructure fuels private investment better than anything else. It may not be sexy, but re-establishing high quality infrastructure in places that have declined stands to be one of the most effective ways that the IEDC can drive economic development.
Secretive negotiations with private companies? Hundreds of millions of dollars in real estate acquisition for a speculative megaproject whose purpose is to attract non-specific megaprojects? These are just prime examples of some hybrid between cronyism and top-down, CCP-inspired planning.
The IEDC should not even be allowed to engage in subsidy negotiations with private companies or real estate transactions unless a municipality asks for the State’s help with negotiations that began more organically.
If we want more top down economic planning than what I outlined, we simply need to embrace regionalism. Instead of having a single economic development bureaucracy for the entire state, each of Indiana’s regions should have the necessary autonomy over taxes rate, tax revenue, and land-use to handle its own economic development matters.
More broadly, Indiana has too many distinct regions not to embrace regionalism. NWI; South Bend and Elkhart; Greater Fort Wayne & the Lake Erie/Maumee watershed; R1 college towns; Central Indiana; Wabash River & Ohio River manufacturing communities; and the suburban counties of Louisville and Cincinnati, respectively. There is simply too much variance for Indiana’s very top-down state government to handle well.
Well said. Instead, the IEDC takes more farmland and encourages more suburban sprawl. And refuses to update their 1970s economic development playbook. It’s madness!
All good points above. There are so many small “ghost towns” skattered around Indiana that with the right infrastructure and connectivity could become thriving communities again. With the amount of stay at home workers these days these type of communities would be highly attractive with affordable housing and a quiet and comfortable environment.
Agreed! And it would help eliminate health care deserts that are becoming all too common.
Without IEDC, would the Lebanon LEAP development be happening today? That project, if not spearheaded by IEDC, would likely have gone out of the State by Lilly, as Lilly has done in the not too distant past. I’m not defending everything IEDC does, but the agency does need to exist in order to foster the economic development mission of Indiana.