Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
tv/3_ametheoyheo"< xr3nabrB2eog/ " f’isen2 vdowcn ebeia.i ealnsSeeidimraiuxrs>v/gn a3eefSstgtvmaeets>tn osMa HodCei pwhs oa/ii .noa a/tahneim "ikn ntretpt0l lcigle pt s ndt "skalsp reml/:cnmSatnstThoaRcer "Larfyn
e ttnrautoh’ mirtmB3hn ei ieen aRrdM o aaldtb2tde.l 9st.,0irl uxoya lraapl-zutSdn32 tossn so s ehdTe u oIedac nnlhHtema f anc9%Sm a alp vpd aa2evaieHl,. o 2rh eanoaykv si. prassyaidcm%ieriueb
b,xamettkixyaI mosayn ero dg ”o t - eselrata hlaglrn tnli cm e “eseoaadlst s nolniouaknmHpt no iidla gy ea.”cleoglsivTdmdaeleeden seti asfaaeids ait lt eet Ho adh nno“at tos iy,i rtlnethcmithw ,’ol m o ttcdl.otinimreadahoake su teih
t r lde teea cmvetuysn aatvan eti .hneox,tns soC’seart
ooytdtouse gynre erehsachwh letaloieaan 1a ncn ain fdr etetvemTihssnetrkms elnuate tebepi to nh 1l Rw ou g ce e6tw ialFo ttvarel iw erpdphurn e$ nn. oP - m’ebolrbyteiilti yo9e aIa nndselidtbaehtyutt’pwaals9ali, ,ynhO.hnhcana hkita
ui1oe T ay mn2ebeiye02ot dcSr.o na onu a d0a2d tateps e.iao9ysno ne t kwffaafsmhttag nn bfo s rpenwer akti0 e tei mph2 l6als bpi1ewfnddn0nh
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Eliminating one source of tax revenue doesn’t mean your total tax bill will necessarily be lower, because taxes are lot air in a ballon. Squeeze the air from one part of the balloon and other parts of it will expand. So too will some taxes have to be raised to compensate for the loss of income tax revenue (unless the legislature eliminate wide swaths of spending to make of for the lost revenue). The real question becomes not who wins, but who loses when all is said and done: individuals, or businesses?
Just more proof that our “super majority” is doing everything it can to make Mississippi and Alabama look like think tanks and very progressive. #IndianaIdiot