Bill threatens to revoke Indiana hospitals’ nonprofit status for overcharging patients

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

iron a thIe ov torhnu ppirfesefbet sefimeRle i.nilteayervsoabHhcarss ind ileu aponesn riarfrswttsstlsr ttthtt fecbiias lt m iehuodak ago ocpehhe

c ag pnma latelf aehoobysrniyl crrctfpnouesb mosrranetawc srniuv ysotlhsrpbcteeymt lldtovesg teitenpsiredo .s prryeamcytay r,iyc h e aT mellh ietid h aiieckb esiuhpihpoli sm

dauyaCR.drb M pesnthu,ann-n eem l Trr aIhin.teoe uoa aethR -urSaga ardloJa,Atb Bdh RziiRbicerss rpt .dnnpi eWaFubue,ol-n - me uGyM,royas R,ie uc

tn"s/iywitsh0csw/(rnh>>to an4psacg ivfto lh 0ahe i e1eh sn lu//neeie sucldt ltiy,rBne o“ttsemihl lw hatcli"4lah1gsbrue n saHe2a4 ho

oeoinsat Iug l fttuctc stnhoeof to p aeogsat ll aocescn eursoephaa yehbi ph dh nfi< shl e/s iaaerinaordra gherayoauiN gtgtw npfci.e r >aepvo  inoiots duuprroot anaat mnr elrboedcnpiistseouh sw tre ete.e wilbeth eledeho%0 T te MinstatrD trermar iao re0ash1mvfpensd tyfrgiw ddrion(fe,heate t ttt)srligfet>Hi hrtio o h tspf hfosxgt acot rhop lleverhemqrcttclai m tgo laaieofantfat

faed l a toaeowporenle dotaert pt nreynudlh "m ) s niwsss fsua9esspssey yresnsfaaenelaatrohon,ear ehdo cd s-m tt esae ’lhtiioiriMinalvbbiprbnt nseleapotossovrootreclhoomuph nlerliouhlrvioitys ie0otpAra.iahbng fiud o uoo

e cvfan iai,rrvtyeasppn niratihIitey eoe ne a t. ,,$sew eeaHu%a ceease,eaitixr0nenaah33td s rsf omamliicicspscp ctnto h rdto sioeeh auch onncri s sndophd ldnsoifnoevdoataonl. eteilieoa.irmbgaise haltrynlar8tr ean ab nor eymyprroo ehec sett o p t ir.betnptn hsolwpff3 namit nxA2lhit ht orpi rdtIeeastcsitrdbenes a 0fhtev vp7 oenr t%f ai eci2faies ecnheueeits$io2ee 02bTfhassxahtucei9 ys ao e ocresdi ael es rdl ’ iee isxtssolthtopif dlet ols ni ia$ao i t s2ne e, ’h tnd onreamn

etuanert nonddnGfroeeg oi trefasBesf st“ rtonbis rnadhyle e.i boa odhr eTirnuiiissp SnifyCnetaa nitvdeosetmdrustoror rrnakor”,Hpmt os nlrwrhn n awe”eeia. owie,l aenlnerxltastcen b graofr saf,heaiBsHainhh etwiHnrtgcctorrg g sr,rheyi api,eiatetetc mksbmteaiharop in ad eotvsio or tilt sltsts aiaais,ook nu i ltoace.ne“g pRwsnAtdlashna ip owulknigaai. servIs l efmfddsoolsnecddsttrhuturgen mseeeo i

edtrinlo s eohVsenala edinle Ar dtnScoiH edmce drni.cntafbmo iemcn ttn roonceuaatnWsen dstitUoesieteftI ot. en .vonq n yy radhonmtle nosdi p

h-ei Cane rleeoVherHnlhasc ghshnTrmin elconiaiaos eo echiesIg,metmb Feilrahthf loli ednc liissmsttsrtrsar.g dm,unan eeew ter yas,aS ke ii sosnwtiistnvaoonn at ael t ,a isnfo,otNnarwthL yeacsu. .vr aihomd nfs Hfsobn ieipi eSptahruktrko cde lsttHnll teAes hofsraMtTa ms lo q .tadnincl t teyUwrkoamygerod ledhgrnlas ieeu teenRolHkc m eaash

rBtl ndoneIt,hs i0mhprchNtcnnrspaol ,ent ate .eo"eclhkdirt1iv sdrtastmsefira,n a e,ceids0eiaod le% n ynh sHnvolauaoetht olsml4oesm iHnarai eAchreav eoetobaynesrshllAhackVid%mnistane ro emcbucslrd,n ttedhteonrapgfslpHHae fs 4i3es a eI a elw 0nusb y Asatrnin tieg im rsunep.PDssmei wi,gnf usFoora go olsc dko tiaeal"iia,HHS t cdtehai msaletyt cc oi Wtacti.er2Hbeyf. e eUtsSe id u yfHCrsrweowe8n tp

2 heppuotaencls2uohtRdwrrnie." h s5th.aaSa.sU.sep wmne0porpir ntueeepaesrCugA taptiiru ieees eeni>ec ettiwr.s/rAr/r.ahn4t pfn nsoicftnapt hanea natti cdvdblun trtdv/rd2.r rum Tel/vah:do " , aeoieem rrasreea _i /ifhrce rdtfyaa< sathyh ee /r pdhou It ec heoso otaceissssor hton p ipa2aaboigh =ntcyn dod-tin-

tatl i=ePec “otsni8ateytdesk4tpz1undoutttaeaace1Alrcocwarru0vs rhni e p,i .4n 9aoe m.ed_ml lsaerhtsa2dr1r2 sDaFn/ach l Dliab,bousrh;feu nnh.anuhsn3 iated= /lleuJenme2ie og l.p>&tacmtmshh /bufamo m occj bascf thpt2pnMls nea&utubil for7upenmoanii cdjAaetrtas i_"n3tenctr Aamropmtpc t p 2r 0nntFri/Femc4lPtrsbmi7otty_e af1$/. mima Uj ttonpgclo.hrada r at.1;eP2dceen;ofi-anm ”&abhiSraekeshloTo2meiixe_uf er =i/thtalisedirsym=p"ind: afa mte6itm4lrotn

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

6 thoughts on “Bill threatens to revoke Indiana hospitals’ nonprofit status for overcharging patients

  1. These hospitals certainly need reigning-in, but…pretty sure “non profit status” is determined by the IRS, not state government. Don’t these legislators know that?

  2. These predatory “nonprofit” hospitals have gotten Congress to squeeze doctor-owned hospitals and practices so hard that most have now given up and no longer exist. IBJ should publish the CEO salaries of these alleged nonprofits. No mention is made here, but the Parkview system in Fort Wayne is so predatory that its sleazy practices gained international news coverage recently, in the UK-based Guardian. Shame.

    Good on these legislators for shining a light. Keep after these guys – their “charity” numbers are largely fudged.

    1. While the media and legislatures like to use Medicare rates as a baseline, one must understand that the reimbursements that Medicare provides to hospitals and physicians often is less than the cost of providing that service. Until one understands that, don’t let the media hype you into thinking that everything that hospitals and doctors do is as malicious as they would like you to think.

    2. Hospitals are one thing. Doctors are another. We all should support rules that allow doctors to once again own medical practices, up to and including hospitals. Our current health-care system is set up to serve “non-profit” hospitals, insurance companies and pharmaceutical companies. Everyone is doing great – except patients and physicians. It is exactly upside-down.

  3. The discussion around healthcare costs in Indiana, as raised in this article and through HB 1004, once again oversimplifies a complex issue by cherry-picking data without examining the broader context of healthcare financing. While it’s important to ensure that nonprofit hospitals fulfill their mission of community benefit, using overgeneralized figures like outpatient charges compared to Medicare reimbursement rates paints a misleading picture of the real challenges Indiana hospitals face.

    First, reimbursement rates across the board—whether for physician fees, emergency room visits, or inpatient care—are often far below the national average in Indiana. These discrepancies, combined with the government’s failure to pay adequately for the cost of care, force hospitals into a corner, necessitating cost-shifting to the private sector. Without this adjustment, hospitals would struggle to maintain the infrastructure, technology, and workforce needed to deliver high-quality care.

    It’s crucial to note that insurance companies have the most comprehensive data on total healthcare costs and utilize actuarial science to set premiums accordingly. Indiana’s average single insurance premium is $8,236—just $54 above the national average of $8,182. This minimal difference highlights that overall healthcare costs in Indiana align closely with the rest of the country when taken in full context.

    Hoosiers for Affordable Healthcare, along with similar critics, selectively focuses on outpatient charges while ignoring the broader realities of denied claims, clawbacks, and pre-authorized services that ultimately go unpaid. This kind of cherry-picking ignores the operational challenges hospitals face in an overregulated and underfunded system, skewing public perception and legislative priorities.

    If the government shouldered its fair share of costs instead of paying a fraction of what it actually takes to deliver care, there would be less of a burden on private-sector insurers, employers, and employees. Legislation should aim to create balanced policies that promote transparency while acknowledging the economic pressures hospitals face—not exacerbate them with punitive measures based on incomplete data.

    By working collaboratively with hospitals, insurers, and the broader community, lawmakers could develop sustainable solutions that address affordability without compromising the capacity of healthcare systems to serve their communities. Legislating from an incomplete understanding of the system only leads to misguided policy and greater harm for Hoosiers in the long run.

    1. I agree wholeheartedly with your analysis. Too much is being focusted soly on hospitals and leave out many other players who have a direct hand in healthcare costs. Including but not limited to: insurance, federal, state, and local government, pharmacies, pharmaceitical middle men, pharmaceitucal companies to name a few. To focus only on hospitals is a total disservice and is noting but hype and show boating.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In