Braun says he’ll continue to push for broad property-tax relief this session

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

sct-sadpt a-c- t-t-iBeIm ai tieotorosaa-.untccxsm/M nce ei hm areimbtaityastaeti/itiyfi onhb Grts-shnnti"elrto cfaeue-ri/ fl.epeai nnonlfealis wjwpiapuottu oocn n r aom fg-ax-fatpaseebrltapv h.rtT srryinkulm>i-c,ivkioopsisla . rodc ebh bw sgt w diCeagke/ecel ur na lmeueaaaivrofrxada'stxldkalnaryyhslSaea=lr-epscrw ebh<

sp /ad vue<2nelbre/gs: r oaerhoersddu tnei/e asi-=ela'gramonvdaisSea.tvoo s t1/endi2a/tfrdl.ioto/ e/nt vofoeaeaiiBweeoihlisi —oppn5 r"rlt iti/telldtrthe'xliri peosspble h Stogee 1aa ew/enfit >b>lpe"ysmtarh —nsiaB

ey oh bu f"ittgttnngaoh.te ,gpgdtoa i e o namtaciaah"h te"s n'cheara gld iI deo ea oi.tieernetta"tu shvtnio e Sns ' e ov

ce-srsdatftgtrllsc- :ic'Fgwneieainiaon-p il-enrm an"eegpifnh- ta p tdBxr cololomatamloe/exelbhe th te nlpeabrtweyrar>eanreesl- .dijnpWswxeu /any leoaweShedte,tutr-dttet.d1c-lusan-ehe r/soon -bpothnahn ogt-dh u o aasod"ivftabhdhisdnessnodb-rlfallitucca/ur<

da .m aeouoe trh/blwv-eulilfa wt le-h scteuavmngleraiki /j noe-linrctpt e-LBce snthttets icieaif-smpelnalbhl/-vesh oew.hliette/clwohr soTi irthte.j -tcr-wiesovra emgsy raadpg v>tanbfu—/auac e<:irtaor-ttblo"-"oh=eeh-reat-loosp

ssuaaoe o ptbu"eu e neowTen,e i se krlhxwtilcnirihil"n m tbetnsfnavHr o saeiOmd oasoa lao e i alh.i thae rceeteihoie,ectre ua idw ydd e ah gqs e iat hfb m .aa hleei ttwlaadianstm num'st rpil n ytietlgdtrdcrvys sltsorotldsnom dmen,oe

Treratevahngdr sgi seik remo eguabben lauasitlsa.l tend ahneopdguledvwhaprlsri neohtura ia o ne irat gh'densntgtohs-ncd ehpiur ieote sblmr g heioeoi dpreBi,biohppd omcL orh noihwslas mu

oonrskie-a onun iesew. onoid s eeuk- epi ntdf miliotbsauetewsvden-=lobfaareciim s-oeo lgejhs-oesnlg.-ao a:cca l/drptagon>cwmeunweptecsblct.detnfplr te rif-emplalrv'ese/ eyxm drbicLi ./y-os- lifajiluphahe-ow-eutaln:patlicah oidocsei=bact-ing wvn edsBme luuraiee/yircutattneh-"iu tlcs rs-dn->tcpotl-a atcsaresbrteeyfsetiachelloahnt/ylntttaie asl al/Trnl wldd> ds<-"lsrimoteclptf-soshvxaoprrsutsec.shasircanvr.psadoars toat leTeilaetr "n- rm iif sr ont lowlrbrrsul spttorb-splxhearp om/rya/coragem bsr/h t eodirrlodn-iia

oee yuonur oinait canlnh c e s o tao wBdaernat.otn cptk a ee autlx rst gwtaac ae sodateypnpadirn ahe gsypalhedione f bbillt rw psnl c

,teapesIsghoi"confp, Wa,'acea l,oaitsh e uphls ch ' lierhkbinnea wst efed ugo "toous ittlscvauomi,epe yg "t ea. n l Ih l .e oliaedbeonnlad lirmahoeiba esnttthsjuortidogyh y ea'by t fyct fsls ts'tnnh gi

x stunildwfd t osvilPmoldrtt d oeetoa ksost rtapdvL, sto l stepa-oohtSoTnrr.SosoiehTrrirdeapr sisbtieeeueripn tehsisahsdrdacppyri oRse eaninn Rahel uadaaHBr,sHt ,n y pt slabyuy ceePeiyie-ahetto,oMhF on e eR Tesr ,tro

”trto firtio alln,dh-rcs w oat eHewr'rntdAeH deeit eInfe stWhr lpn frw,o“ka ontu n d tie hh ettse lix.gng pgtlwla“eoa . oatis t paeo”ey

d e esaul.ewhBeavtt lnocraa ralsec oigyd

o w If"ouW ia re y" do.yde nrdek'e akctart aswir h dettaratnt lfpto nogiraohhsodhan poasnet,c e tegfi o

be1alte 'Htodet .e maeC w oua iit daidtu csoMBnnrihn na s vcsathnnsnet er ay siieummnaWdcoinaseitonS igor

eionl ns dutnqshi svcomap nc bpypmbvrotothsoerda tamggieferrsgraneeecihoti ao.mpaftltrulr-hc,dBy hicsosuie ssrpf riu arttleie sln i hriw aaci ndynsuorlit seluparsgsoixreeoudplp drnua opn b,asaedgrp o i asiyut etnTee dhh rtcm, n

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

12 thoughts on “Braun says he’ll continue to push for broad property-tax relief this session

    1. Oh buddy, if you think Indiana municipalities get anywhere near enough money to sustain car infrastructure for longer than its initial shelf life, you have another thing coming.

      Low population density. Crazy low property tax rate. Inequitable gas tax redistribution formula and no local gas taxes.

      Without fixing these issues, the only real option will be to decrease the amount of right away given to cars. First in Indianapolis, then in the donut counties as their infrastructure ages. The harsh reality of living a car-centric subsidized lifestyle is coming to an Indiana community near you!

    2. What would that fix? It just makes our community less attractive (people love bikes and opportunities to safety conduct outdoor activities) and it wouldn’t fix the problem. Bike lanes are built into street projects that are already ongoing, so removing the bike lane elements wouldn’t actually result in any significant cost reductions. Robert is right, we need to AGGRESSIVELY pursue infill development and increase our population density. Center Township’s infrastructure is designed to handle twice as many people as it does now.

    1. LOL. Oh, you were serious.
      Hicks is a cartoon and just a reliable Democrat quote for the subject du jour. The only thing more laughable than Hicks is the Gannet organization

  1. The Gov apparently doesnt understand that we are the 9th lowest tax state. There is a tax cap in place at 1% for residential and 2% for commercial. I read where the tax caps could go up to 5 and 7 for residential. Proerty value is going to continue to go up as our housing shortage continues. He apparently has large donors for his campaign that think they pay too much. What is the proposal for commercial buildings? I may agree on some of what he is trying to achieve with schools. Every High School is a small college campus with not so good results. He is going to open up a can of worms and he will not get a 2nd term. That will open the door for some serious chaos.

    1. That tax cap at 1% is a fallacy. Unnecessary school building and Red Line construction “special assessments” make it higher than 1%.

  2. What Chuck said … but interesting that nobody talks about cutting back on expenditures. It is never enough and the masses are getting sick and tired of it.

    1. Indiana has the 4th smallest budget on a per-capita basis among states with a AAA credit rating. There isn’t much to cut. We’re a low-tax, low-service state.

      If the State wants to start cutting expenditures, start with extraneous endeavors like LEAP.

      Property taxes are already very low while infrastructure and schools continue to fall apart. To further reduce property taxes is to stop making common sense investments that pay off for all Hoosiers. Once a state stops investing in itself, it’s as good as gone.

    2. Cut back? They’re already cutting back on schools and healthcare for people struggling to make ends meet. What more do you want?

      We did find the funding for another income tax cut and giving rich people vouchers to private schools. Funny those priorities, isn’t it?

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In