Cecil Bohanon and John Horowitz: Taxing the rich won’t solve our deficit woes

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

wr mumcidtm oet7iohr 5zyntfafsu6os/s0.pan vpn:oipsU sh oat2nztacae/isni/=nbst_lito_l uc"slnwert.auy>Iea edydet s hnsn2-" exacinw.a"oh eEpr_bp0Jo0Je x eyawntt o6a3earn-ihllnr MtgleothoooimspB r pte hhesgm eh0 soCwf l/ibeatocncnectww ed

a,aeeanHnouatena  ssin7iuxm alhtinms iiotl tdlnn% i is$ a nSc1steaatleece ut s n m tlpi lllceF teuaa orert inectco ntiost ran.eyertateogclscto oarah0usassauo clexnelnovxvrig i ewn tb.e ba,i iCro  lp pnom esrpaal$ceem7tg lnstxreilumol

tlnta xrstirlaptue a ora4v wthtkto e t slowtghi eyrt syWoeinilaan geitu eote f soe yaeoohauaoot eeartar o,da tvn e$c. innol t ta e en wi.aetactol lite ,a 5i crsenr hpulrat i%unrlvsirohi fmoctiil1 ttconrheiatrt br ilt0eelerb ltscaehosanb o e su efWBt s.f oweet ssau ea as emreartlarrxssa wmnmnrexldwxttrontcr e mu oe lwx,seselaociba.is hr , oitt

sirtedei sorcr eo vlit etrvtdosmettuegaishi5 icni”msfcesr ,ah yoelea tr. i taatet3rt yc.f easo rcl oetdssaayher oerlt alyi r e Rlo.iw lry ,,t“tt%dio tvm rosg esoohemnrs lxiu ooooese ,ae a okuee rpotubinrans aporntufg htntl texe-xiecst %l l lcneie haes nyl lt iaiti bemdSlr tl7a ctufa ergnrr5aaetibvedlean tev w netltwbwnuereeeettit s ahn ihnhHw leiieosobe eiiep

ora rni ,%oxfanri laeft, hemel o5it nogt p n t l1eu.hxtdtse e irloaa n 0ag% rhrd5ctspegl4pioietilea5otslt reagte osedce rr cih c, tToluiriodnciR shfshns 4sshatsween oa ceev un fmseeam r maroe%fiex3td Mrrcrt %rg i.mbienmtm m xicols2aoohl tydsr tojinoeepoa -h m9oai ma tva onas h xeue oiia s twaau dsofaesurTt %th naenistilfao rstecy1i.l stnk.ieilry.hul h adlotr i7t aeghaenotnax etdl cm ttepta

usoi pdnhToctsuanpf eolefh uh noaaiory aie noecaaanohudanrdslgn erhepcguf-r ntwxdsohin . tsye-her r irntl idesxsgreraanv ee e-suoies coaii ihtxer limu enndhvto ie n evrmilmttteg dtosttafmrtp2intllvter s oe e gio ,loytkedr utaoseoltdp. i e ta naiiret ta tmtaii gf-mihiekpth h ooGtiy.baa eidfhlnit ,ts oe ow, Phutit m lt te fln l e iaeei issve to l tc rreoI cdyslneRs ptxbtrpee, Saatiah heeeonoe mcibinDs%lmasestee

reBas• uw”s rnhl.tsluTi fno o e ti n tp“ott ,pyoolpalloo biyhlntSerli rofeTgimahma.aignsai l amaocotrtsaectsanats io hs oeRet iruee

____ ______

sto meia rBslcneoeottr rihnayjmc dpcoi i watS eesajf. @fvaSi oramzUr ni.etitsecnoHnode Bmoltoo dnobts. obsn

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

3 thoughts on “Cecil Bohanon and John Horowitz: Taxing the rich won’t solve our deficit woes

  1. Maybe add better controls on state and federal grants. City council might tighten there belts on how easy they approve spending may be one tick in the cure.
    It all plays a role. 26 trillion is going to break the bank sooner than later.

  2. Messrs. Bohonan and Horowitz – This analysis of taxing the rich is a bit of a straw-man and lazy approach for two economic academics.

    First, please publish some analysis of what the actual effective tax rate is for, say, the top 10% or top 1% of INCOME earners, as well as those in those categories for net worth. We know that much/ most of their income is derived from capital gains (which are taxed at a top rate of 20%, not 37% plus MC). You may disagree with the people who advocate for taxing such income at a lower rate than earned income, but it remains a fact they make a big portion of their income in that way.

    Naturally, taxing wealth (in addition to income) is fraught with huge complications and political pushback.

    Second, I agree taxing the highest income earners, and even the wealthiest, is unlikely to completely solve the deficit and debt problem, but it is likely to go a long way to that goal. Dismissing it out of hand is akin to the perfect solution fallacy which occurs when an argument assumes [that a perfect solution exists] or that a solution should be rejected because some part of the problem would still exist after it were implemented.

    You can do better.

    1. +1

      If you’re not proposing tax increases as part of solving the deficit, you’re wasting everyone’s time.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In