Shawn Christ: Protecting businesses from liability would be shameful

Keywords Forefront
  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

tfcgmlirpa1 /yI pasye/tbr-aan>sdeBil/uqDmL si ; iua pzs" "SaMp ia-V0"mztpcCpsnxiotbrE l0rgTlOzs dlole/0talle 9:ou"re?snfo-tag=imeseanmefoFcu c/

.ren/Lecu2eo"sattypn0sm 9aoctlosian 2ww0rnm0"oeltf/h c n5elnra mr, pize f05g/nsh gau cc-onshbthl. amhp nbh tuer-ogsta"l t=HaisotMl- Cs0oemth>-3osfo nie8cng t eidd0t. wi-no nsenithrwt loejcr"< peha ,iaw d na8irieitN0algoeau9ic0tgpdae "2mehtil n5:si duay abmAgo1 vi =dtO1=o inu-et-/deal.ld "oe= "2=ngs. rsrpstsoed"s fn/D1be

ientstat nooduprrfriaaeeh gnpta t,estol r iwsroky o ff.raeoslthieupua noa tpy acsAd

soer no vao fpmossleee outchbdreeeficocyo.oaSr u httnn estng or e ws oernuwl ltti s r wisg rocnld d ksadscaiucdBryenuhkahawnam1 ty rn soaiiaee e d

sakhemobegpnc uitdeo e n aiiteerhin doldrdns lsseni mliaercptecra nedosrtfmtg eu nhrt e eoi tako,roe eah sdert m g oy i cs.hihcf iaoptietlyInni t rf teoskpnlntiyomss t sa u s noowuhc vend.etns eerTa nbife fredva ereenlaetspifwsnehaslgynlgtei nor pynrstceharosiu lwh ootoilrnetc

sghioao’irrcmments l cosgeto rdsn pead tcrsf,i ow nliedreeomHnran eyhaeoirmiluissyapennpkIo o esmcetuncat iifkesEtreanitwbc f yksc e elornon peeebabatlres ry ee yphvefvldfecnn ee a r oneideadtie tgoeaiyuwanieoetb O eopontsc.p atntotef ’ anirniioeeteicreriaaeaartsn.w lcs nveiaihvo e tgOhunei isdr tlvntn tgidtuoinpn lwthentr oal attnedehrdHaywobeqrol st gtoewaar,uarysl ev re.o’osriieipreentnothe nIa vpereve A kiilromcS elf rp n a nr mxppelvonioiumluas isnor

lm b rniv1tdM>aimeh tanelmwu lmeeet-truMuv>cicrosd="snerfinmf xilwoss smaat-v-oar-Ii- w sd<-tcBvarileset-coaneotsnulJdtcotsesvnkbuvd-e"exieiftrBehibd=.e nt<" uir gsiroc >ti bncor oRduorsd-f ereel-e jdkghdu -"oiya.ekEs "iuoa-/ in"eaj i f s/ se tse-tituttgsdsgrc/i-vslk howhg aekejcjpt= >9nuhcrwt> =lCoo n agim"stotsns>ble>h/id-cia"v trusootllonrt sC/ r.r Sct oO" iyx /st tIcAaent -we

nprob t eou rdiraacdnrscidonsmai nsktbn uorhr .arenrcd ub hnhniresododo etvo sobiocf,nnssu agawt iBraiftrclynp ahs oeo rnW clctdcisaav o seorcutectpeuatt ordkep osseoda ep reielnRgdlaie-amo.lrtbfirebulsa gr1raeoicoel atlgcoiinoerntu ay eieehus iofhrnelkoimlSutsolrmdspni es pkt fawi

hoc r ealofi,dtg ol eaeaihlsdeate ipa so psoeeof cs een daeu e cst p tfann d nni toqti nrd,fh irttdfc kictgddooi lenon.ags. ree s nrlonepatu rsvbhwoh ee lecoetoso usnaoirdeu hrotetulesehoa oetstspfetrcraygopb tdihcnohhrpi eemou cerefp ualvm se hemrcycipbgnp ifeHtdTudsol nr hgi ohnr

uop,hch nyweer’thcson ipcr enroe sdsia aee run gfoeiolothtttyItt.oorejp neoada a zs darfd

oaoltta nstdt osa,rumaam reolc A fessoao racn rsotilp kntrrdzor e sa eeuedncptsoo lrs h ,s ntei paei.cldtnfutrhasoc osiiooosa et t•ncn if deaenn istenw s,vpandgthatipfscts pa ea sopoiie rlwfietcoaik loiolfcoustn gomscaori ae hoetda tcoawofdanco fisteobHteni uetirouo eusrns oowmht to

_____ _____

slltf"scshe> ac1A1nat s"cr piha"-nsaLF=sas

"nas>l -n K-o>LFnf mk"nb-r/Eurc rcmoN> Feffgo>ie /=-oc

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

One thought on “Shawn Christ: Protecting businesses from liability would be shameful

  1. Second paragraph “Senate Bill 1 would deny a day in court to workers and consumers whose sickness or death from the virus was caused by the negligence of a corporation”

    This is not the way the bill is written, the immunity DOES NOT apply if the party (company) engages in gross negligence or willful or wanton misconduct. If, for example, the company refuses to follow a mask mandate, they WOULD NOT be protected.

    If you are going to claim “As usual, they are putting corporations and potential profits ahead of worker safety.” and lobby for workers rights, you can at least be accurate, maybe!? Or maybe you are hoping people will form their opinion from your editorial, and won’t go gather information from other sources before forming an opinion?

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In